[01:14] <rbasak> bdmurray: sorry, I was called away on something urgent earlier. I am back this week and next week. Rick had asked me to look at helping with the SRU queue, so I was doing some very early on Wednesday that I figured wouldn't clash with anyone.
[01:15] <rbasak> I need to pick up gnome-control-center again still. Nothing else outstanding.
[01:15] <rbasak> (ie. nothing else I've looked at at not yet finished)
[03:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-azure-storage-common [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-4] (no packageset)
[04:15] <kyrofa> cjwatson, the only change between this build and the last is a dep specific to armhf and armel, so nothing should have changed for ppc
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: re2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201101+dfsg-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: re2 [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201101+dfsg-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: re2 [i386] (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201101+dfsg-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: re2 [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201101+dfsg-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: re2 [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201101+dfsg-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[05:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: re2 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201101+dfsg-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[05:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: re2 [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201101+dfsg-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[06:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-198.230]
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-127.130] (core, kernel)
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-32.34] (core, kernel)
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-127.130] (core, kernel)
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-32.34] (core, kernel)
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-32.34] (core, kernel)
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-32.34] (core, kernel)
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qiime [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2020.11.0-1]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted re2 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [20201101+dfsg-2]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted re2 [i386] (hirsute-proposed) [20201101+dfsg-2]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted re2 [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [20201101+dfsg-2]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-azure-storage-common [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.0.1-4]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted re2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [20201101+dfsg-2]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted re2 [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [20201101+dfsg-2]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted re2 [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [20201101+dfsg-2]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted re2 [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [20201101+dfsg-2]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-32.34]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-32.34]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-32.34]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-32.34]
[10:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-127.130]
[10:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-127.130]
[10:15] <cjwatson> kyrofa: I'd recommend diffing build logs as a starting point for looking for changes
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adduser (groovy-proposed/main) [3.118ubuntu2 => 3.118ubuntu3] (core)
[11:00] <Laney> looks like vorlon dropped some i386 hints that were still needed, restoring
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.4.0-1031.33] (no packageset)
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1031.33~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1033.34] (core, kernel)
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysdig (focal-proposed/universe) [0.26.4-1 => 0.26.4-1ubuntu0.2] (no packageset)
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1033.34]
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1031.33]
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1031.33~18.04.1]
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: signon (focal-proposed/universe) [8.59+17.10.20170606-0ubuntu2 => 8.59+17.10.20170606-0ubuntu2.20.04.1] (kubuntu)
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: signon (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.59+17.10.20170606-0ubuntu2 => 8.59+17.10.20170606-0ubuntu2.20.10.1] (kubuntu)
[13:29] <LocutusOfBorg> can any ubuntu-archive please NBS-cleanup? old binaries left on amd64: libqgis-3d3.10.11, libqgis-analysis3.10.11, libqgis-app3.10.11, libqgis-core3.10.11, libqgis-gui3.10.11, libqgis-native3.10.11, libqgis-server3.10.11, libqgisgrass7-3.10.11, libqgispython3.10.11 (from 3.10.11+dfsg-1ubuntu3)
[13:31] <doko> Processing triggers for tex-common (6.15) ...
[13:31] <doko> fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in
[13:31] <doko> /tmp/fmtutil.a8TypC2W
[13:31] <doko> Please include this file if you report a bug.
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1031.33~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1033.34~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-azure-storage-blob [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1031.33] (core, kernel)
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: q2-types [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2020.11.0-1] (no packageset)
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1029.30] (no packageset)
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1036.39] (no packageset)
[14:15] <cpaelzer> doko: since you asked for omnidb being blocked in hirsute https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/omnidb/+bug/1906517
[14:15] <cpaelzer> needs two odd binaries removed from -proposed
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1033.34~18.04.1]
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1031.33~18.04.1]
[14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1029.30]
[14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1031.33]
[14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1036.39]
[14:56] <rbalint> plusone anyone looking at postorius?
[15:30] <doko> rbalint: test is overridden now
[15:31] <sil2100> jibel: ping!
[15:34] <bdmurray> sil2100: could you review the SRU for bug 1901725?
[15:38] <jibel> sil2100, still in another meeting
[15:39] <jibel> sil2100, go ahead, I'll catch up with you later
[15:41] <doko> xnox: please provide MIRs when seeding packages (usrmerge, u-boot-menu opensbi)
[15:41] <doko> cpaelzer: .
[15:42] <cpaelzer> I guess I did something wrong if I only get a "." but could you elaborate?
[15:43] <Laney> it means 'done' in Debian speak :p
[15:43]  * cpaelzer needs lanuage trainer Me<->Debian
[15:43] <cpaelzer> thanks Laney for translating
[15:43] <cpaelzer> doko: also I just have found the fix for pgpointcloud that you asked for, likely uploaded to Debian today/tomorrow and then synced to fix the FTFBS
[15:43] <cpaelzer> leaving "just" the PG-12 test issues which I'll look into tomorrow
[15:44] <cpaelzer> and thanks doko for .ing it
[15:48] <doko> cpaelzer: let's override those please.
[15:48] <doko> sil2100: ^^^
[15:52] <cpaelzer> doko: unfortunately I can't override like "ignore result if triggered by postgresql-12" :-/
[15:52] <cpaelzer> or is there a way to do that in the meantime that I might have missed
[15:55] <doko> that's why I'm pointing to sil2100
[15:55] <cpaelzer> maybe I can fix some of them with custom triggers and we override the rest then
[15:55] <cpaelzer> oh, sil2100 knows magic way ... interesting :-)
[15:56] <doko> well, yes. hints are not documented ;p
[15:58] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: you discarded the delta from libkolabxml, force-syncing. now ftbfs
[16:01] <vorlon> Laney: note that the i386 hints that were dropped were dropped from the section of the file that's autogenerated, because these are no longer auto-detectable by that bit of script; I've moved the restored hints to another section so they don't get clobbered again
[16:02] <Laney> I see, cheers
[16:07] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: -proposed NBS cleanup done
[16:13] <vorlon> sil2100, Laney: do you know why bionic daily builds of ubuntu-base are disabled on ancientminister?  there's no comment given
[16:14] <Laney> no, I plead innocent
[16:14] <Laney> not guilty?
[16:14] <Laney> not me guv'nor
[16:14] <vorlon> :)
[16:23] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, I'm doing it! I usually try to sync
[16:23] <LocutusOfBorg> I was waiting for something else to fail
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openafs (focal-proposed/universe) [1.8.4~pre1-1ubuntu2 => 1.8.4~pre1-1ubuntu2.1] (no packageset)
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (focal-proposed/main) [3.192.30.1 => 3.192.30.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[16:36] <bdmurray> Laney: if all these oem-* packages on the sponsoring report have been sponsored can you unsubscribe ubuntu-sponsors?
[16:37] <Laney> oh sheesh
[16:40] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, is it possible to kick pyxs out from hirsute, and then promote python-pyxs to main? the source is the same, and the binaries have been taken over by the Debian package
[16:40] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I'll look shortly
[16:40] <vorlon> xnox, mwhudson: what's the status of nodejs on riscv64?
[16:40] <LocutusOfBorg> <3
[16:40] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks, I hate when an universe package provides binaries in main :)
[16:40] <vorlon> (asking in this instance because r-cran-arm -> hmisc)
[16:41] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure if such mismatches are caught
[16:42] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html
[16:43] <vorlon> working out the /solution/ to such mismatches is not automated :)
[16:46] <Laney> bdmurray: ok I did it
[16:46]  * Laney has API skills
[16:50] <vorlon> xnox: MIR for opensbi which is added to supported-cloud?
[16:51] <doko> vorlon: see scroll back
[16:52] <vorlon> kanashiro: can we get ~ubuntu-server subscribed to rubygems?  after which I would promote it since it has a previous completed MIR
[16:53] <doko> kanashiro is away this week. delayed to next week, I assume
[16:54] <vorlon> I'll talk to Rick then, thanks
[16:57] <rbalint> doko, vorlon plusone anyone looking at dulwich holding back python3-defaults
[16:57] <rbalint> ?
[16:57] <vorlon> I'm not
[16:57] <doko> no
[16:57]  * rbalint looking then
[16:58] <vorlon> doko: do you want a formal MIR for usrmerge?  It's a pretty trivial package
[16:58] <vorlon> maintainer scripts + conflicts
[16:59] <doko> I din't look at it yet. just noted the mismatch
[16:59] <vorlon> doko: are you ok with me subscribing + promoting without, then?
[16:59] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, looks like somebody has to subscribe foundation bugs to python-pyxs probably...
[16:59] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: already did
[16:59] <LocutusOfBorg> nice!
[16:59] <LocutusOfBorg> so we can now kick out pyxs, right?
[17:00] <vorlon> yes; is it removed from unstable?
[17:00] <LocutusOfBorg> it never appeared on sid
[17:00] <LocutusOfBorg> it was an ubuntu only package, that now exists in debian
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rtl8812au (focal-proposed/universe) [4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu12 => 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu13~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:02] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: aha ok
[17:02] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: removed
[17:02] <LocutusOfBorg> its part of my "hey lets find debian packages that superseeds ubuntu specific stuff and sync them"
[17:02] <LocutusOfBorg> :D
[17:03] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks a ton
[17:03] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm worried about ssreflect... I can't reproduce the failure on local machine... any idea?
[17:35] <sil2100> doko, cpaelzer: let me take a look at that in a moment
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: whoopsie (focal-proposed/main) [0.2.69ubuntu0.1 => 0.2.69ubuntu0.2] (desktop-core)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: whoopsie (bionic-proposed/main) [0.2.62ubuntu0.5 => 0.2.62ubuntu0.6] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[17:48] <sil2100> vorlon: hm hm! It might have been me but I really don't remember what it was about! I usually prefix my comments with "sil2100: " tho, but then again I might have forgotten
[17:49] <sil2100> I see the one that commented out left a comment "# bionic ubuntu-base tarball still building"
[17:49] <sil2100> Which doesn't seem to be the case, so I'll just uncomment it
[17:50] <sil2100> AH, no wait, nvm!
[17:50] <sil2100> That comment is unrelated, it's to why we're still building bionic -base even though rest of bionic not
[17:51] <sil2100> Anyway, no idea why it was disabled, I can't remember of any reason I'd disable it
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debmirror (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:2.27ubuntu1 => 1:2.27ubuntu2.20.10.1] (no packageset)
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debmirror (focal-proposed/universe) [1:2.27ubuntu1 => 1:2.27ubuntu2.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:32] <LocutusOfBorg> and now sslreflect looks regressed in release...
[18:32] <LocutusOfBorg> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/ssreflect/hirsute/amd64
[18:32] <LocutusOfBorg> time to hint please?
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1012.12] (core, kernel)
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1013.13] (core, kernel)
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.60 => 2.408.64] (desktop-core)
[19:32] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, nodejs is two hints waiting for migration... any reason to not do them? they are flaky and regressed in relase on arm64
[19:32] <LocutusOfBorg> same for ssreflect that makes ocaml migrate
[19:33] <LocutusOfBorg> regressed in release too
[19:53] <rbalint> plusone dulwich should be ok unblocking python3-defaults, looking at perl regressions (libdbd-pg-perl is presumably unblocked by all-proposed triggers which passes locally)
[20:09] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: did you raise an mp for these hints?
[20:09] <LocutusOfBorg> nope...
[20:09] <vorlon> ok
[20:09] <LocutusOfBorg> I can do if you want sure
[20:10] <vorlon> nah I'll take it from here
[20:10] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: where do you see that ssreflect regressed in release?
[20:11] <vorlon> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/s/ssreflect/20201130_211141_fe88e@/log.gz is a pass
[20:11] <LocutusOfBorg> 1.11.0-2build1	ssreflect/1.11.0-2 hello/2.10-2ubuntu2	2020-12-02 17:20:42 UTC	0h 03m 11s	
[20:11] <LocutusOfBorg> this one?
[20:11] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: which shows the actual tested version was 1.11.0-2build1
[20:11] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm how can I test that one then?
[20:12] <LocutusOfBorg> moreover I can't really see the failure locally :/
[20:12] <LocutusOfBorg> my suspect is that not all ocaml is coming from proposed
[20:46] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I don't know if this is enough to get the commit merged https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+git/hints-ubuntu
[20:53] <mwhudson> vorlon: nfi
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1013.13]
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1012.12]
[21:10] <vorlon> rbalint: what's the rationale for badtesting dulwich?  I only see autopkgtest failures with the version in -proposed.  Should we instead consider rolling back the new upstream version, and doing a no-change rebuild of the release version?
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1031.33~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:20] <rbalint> vorlon, hm, did i mention badtesting it?
[21:20] <rbalint> vorlon, i hoped i fixed the test
[21:20] <vorlon> rbalint: ah ok
[21:20] <vorlon> sorry, misunderstood
[21:20] <rbalint> vorlon, :-)
[21:21] <vorlon> (and update-excuses still doesn't show your upload
[21:21] <vorlon> )
[21:21] <rbalint> vorlon, well, i'm waiting for it to show up, too ;-)
[21:22] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: nodejs hints> already landed
[21:22] <rbalint> vorlon, btw badtesting it would be correct actually because i just unset the proxy which is an Ubuntu CI specific setting, the tests are passing it is not set
[21:22] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[21:22] <rbalint> vorlon, and that would python3-defaults in a few hours earlier
[21:24] <rbalint> vorlon, ahh, and now entangled with re2 and perl
[21:24] <vorlon> via?
[21:24] <rbalint> yaramod
[21:25] <vorlon> hmm
[21:26] <vorlon> I can roll that back
[21:26] <rbalint> vorlon, so i think forcing python3-defaults would be reasonable
[21:26] <vorlon> doko: ^^ did you check for yaramod being in -proposed already before kicking the no-change rebuild?
[21:27] <vorlon> yaramod rolled back, anywho
[21:28] <vorlon> in light of which, it doesn't look like a hint is needed for dulwich, because we can have autopkgtest results in the same run afaics
[21:28] <rbalint> dulwich tests are still not picked up, while the builds are published
[21:30] <vorlon> rbalint: but we can force that
[21:31] <vorlon> 'retry-autopkgtest-regressions --all-proposed --blocks dulwich | sed -e's/8-1/8-1ubuntu1/' | xargs -rn1 -P10 wget --load-cookies ~/.cache/autopkgtest.cookie -O-' done
[21:31] <rbalint> vorlon, hm, true
[22:09] <bryce> is there an archive admin available that can remove the apache2 sru from xenial-proposed?  Specifically apache2-bin=2.4.18-2ubuntu3.18 apache2-data=2.4.18-2ubuntu3.18 apache2=2.4.18-2ubuntu3.18.  This is for a proposed update regression for lp: #1832182
[22:10] <bryce> (if I'm asking for AA help in the wrong place, please redirect me...)
[22:12] <mwhudson> bryce: you should ping ubuntu-archive
[22:21] <bryce> ubuntu-archive: could someone remove the apache2 sru from xenial-proposed?  Specifically apache2-bin=2.4.18-2ubuntu3.18 apache2-data=2.4.18-2ubuntu3.18 apache2=2.4.18-2ubuntu3.18.  This is for a proposed update regression for lp: #1832182
[22:22] <RAOF> bryce: Sure.
[22:22] <bryce> thanks RAOF
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: q2cli [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2020.11.0-1] (no packageset)