[00:56] <Bashing-om> UWN: Gdoc caught up - minor edits completed and moved Laura Czajkowski's article up (summarized).
[22:53] <Bashing-om> UWN: Issue 660 up for review and final edits: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue660 :D
[23:06] <kryten> Bashing-om: You've got funky formatting on the very first summary.
[23:09] <Bashing-om> kryten: Lemme go look - that kinda day here.
[23:14] <Bashing-om> kryten: Fixed ^ silly little space :(
[23:14] <kryten> Bashing-om: And not sure Laura's runs two headers for her post, but "FOSDEM Community Devroom 2021 CFP" is the actual one (also note the scaled back all-caps).
[23:15] <Bashing-om> kryten: ack will exchange :)
[23:15] <kryten> "OpenStack" needs de-camelcasing.
[23:17] <kryten> "She provides key dates. suggested topics" - and while I rarely look at the actual summary texts, the period rather than comma I've noticed in this case.
[23:19] <kryten> And shouldn't "Ubuntu +1 Maintenance Reports" link to Dezember now?
[23:24] <Bashing-om> kryten: Edits caught up to 1 Maintenance - In December there is but one report from Robert Ancell. Last of November with several people reporting, Pick up December next issue ?
[23:26] <kryten> Ok, your call then - being 7th of Dec now, it just seemed more appropriate.. >_>
[23:28] <kryten> And don't forget to change Laura's post title in the issue summary too btw.
[23:29] <Bashing-om> kryten: Does not bother my sense of proper - to include both months for the "Ubuntu +1 Maintenance Report(s)"; Novemeber and Decemebr. What do you think ?
[23:30] <Bashing-om> kryten: I did recall to change the issue summary contents. do not recall now If I have saved where we currently are :(
[23:31] <kryten> Well yeah, could link to both months too I guess.
[23:31] <Bashing-om> kryten: Doiunds good to have both. Will do and "save".
[23:34] <Bashing-om> Doiunds/Sounds*
[23:38] <kryten> Eh, I thought you'd just put both links after one "Ubuntu +1 Maintenance Reports", and not add an extra item for it.
[23:39] <Bashing-om> good way too - I will make it so :D
[23:40] <kryten> "Desktop Team: Tue, December 8, 2:30pm – 3:30pm (per IRC topic advisory)" - and since we've been fiddling with the calendar as of late anyway, shouldn't we just change that event in it too?
[23:46] <Bashing-om> kryten: Well - As the Fridge still list the incorrect times - and yes I have tried to get someone from the channel to correct - Would it not be confusing to one reading the calendar and we have an inconsistent date ?
[23:47] <Bashing-om> Or rather the times  do not correspond :(
[23:48] <kryten> I mean yeah, if the two places differ, stating that is fine - was just thinking we could fix the other (calendar) by now instead..
[23:49] <Bashing-om> kryten: All I know to do to "Fix" is again ping on someone in the meeting to correct the Fridge listing.
[23:52] <kryten> Well, people on this channel (ping: jose, pleia2) of course have got access to the various calendars too - and since we've already get told so by someone previously, I think we could just change it ourselves now.
[23:55] <kryten> And speaking of which, unless there are actually two DMB meetings at the same time, we should also drop the one that doesn't have the meeting details.
[23:57] <Bashing-om> kryten: jose had passed on making that change himself :( - I do not know why the DMB notice is duplicated. That also has been brough up for attention and has not been addressed.