[07:03] Hi [07:03] is raharper on IRC ? to talk a min [07:07] He's rharper here [07:20] Hi, when flash becomes deprecated next month, will the package be forcefully removed from users due to security concerns (e.g. via a dummy package update)? [07:20] Do users that need flash need to keep a backup of this package and use apt-mark hold? [07:37] do users need flash? [07:42] I think the answer to that is the same as "Do users still need i386?" :3 [07:47] We have around 20 GB of educational software that is still in use [07:47] Palemoon promises to keep flash working after 2020, but I guess it'll need the adobe-flashplugin.deb [07:48] I hear similar situations in other countries [07:50] Unit193: no :) [07:50] besides i haven't seen any up to date linux running on i386 (maybe i486 still would work, considering it has enough ram) [07:51] (i'm aware you probably were just referring to any x86 hardware running in 32bit mode) [07:51] and i'm thankful for apple to have actively helped killing flash, and adobe gave it up finally! [07:54] hey alkisg o/ [07:54] thanks rbasak [07:54] tarzeau: i386 as Debian/Ubuntu define it, yes. [07:55] hey eoli3n [07:55] We have around 10.000 pentium 4's running 18.04/32bit here, but no complains there, it's fine [08:00] Unit193: where can i read more about their definition? (especiall with details about fpu)? [08:00] Unit193: linux itself also has some definition [08:01] alkisg: with what gui? (if at all) [08:01] alkisg: we used to run some ltsp clients 32bit but now that ltsp changed, we don't have ltsp anymore [08:01] tarzeau: with ubuntu mate 18.04.5 [08:01] They work fine as fat clients with 1 or 2 GB RAM [08:02] 1GB is enough for educational programs, while with 2GB they can do actual surfing [08:02] are you enabling zram? and nohang? [08:02] which web browser do you use? [08:02] Firefox [08:02] And chromium-browser [08:02] No zram, it wastes RAM [09:31] rharper https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1905731/comments/4 [09:31] Launchpad bug 1905731 in subiquity "feature request autoinstall: late_command scripts and chroot key" [Undecided,Incomplete] [09:32] can i mix this with non chrooted command ? [09:32] how to run "01_run_shellcmd: ['curtin', 'in-target', '--', 'sh', '-c', *shellcmd]" and others commands in late_commands [09:38] if i use that syntax, then i can't use a list anymore, right ? [09:38] i need to define a entry for each "group" of commands [11:48] alkisg: I believe the flash binary has a time bomb and will stop working on 2021-01-12: https://www.adobe.com/uk/products/flashplayer/end-of-life.html [11:49] alkisg: so if you're still using flash stuff, I'm afraid you're out of luck unless someone finds a workaround [11:49] but the package is the least of your issues [11:54] mdeslaur: setting the time back?? [11:59] maybe? I don't know how they implement the check, but perhaps that will work [11:59] they may check the date, or they may be doing an online check with an adobe server, I have no idea [12:21] https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1907107 [12:21] Launchpad bug 1907107 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "cloud-init runs too late at first startup after ubuntu autoinstall" [Undecided,Invalid] [12:51] Thank you mdeslaur, reading... [13:20] > As of mid-October 2020, users started being prompted by Adobe to uninstall Flash Player on their machines since Flash-based content will be blocked from running in Adobe Flash Player after the EOL Date. [13:21] Heh... I guess we'll have another use for the faketime package :D [13:28] Last version without a time bomb seems to be 32.0.0.363, https://community.adobe.com/t5/flash-player/flash-player-will-be-blocked-after-2021-time-bomb-proof-price-for-harman-packaged-browser/td-p/11312048?page=1 [13:28] /me tests with version of http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/ is lower than that... === ddstreet_away is now known as ddstreet === didrocks999 is now known as didrocks [17:05] waveform: have you seen https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-meta ? I just noticed this [17:06] Was wondering if we should move those to being installed in livecd-rootfs instead [17:06] or something ... [17:07] Laney: eh, darn, I mean, we did that via livecd-rootfs previously and now wanted to do it 'properly' by being pulled via the meta packages and seeds [17:08] don't see how that can work [17:08] it doesn't look particularly deliberate either, this just happens to be the first ubuntu-meta upload since we promoted last cycle [17:09] well [17:11] sil2100: I dunno, maybe we could remove restricted from update.cfg in the meta instead, perhaps that would work, not sure if it's a bad idea for some reason [17:23] (all that changes is dropping those two) === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch [18:49] vorlon, could you please take a look at the docker.io MP again? [19:24] kanashiro: acked [19:26] kanashiro: btw, what should we do about rails autopkgtest regressions? testsuite grew a dependency on chromium, so uninstallable on ppc64el + s390x, and fails on armhf due to containerization [19:27] vorlon, in Debian the maintainers were discussing an alternative today for chromium. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976291 [19:27] Debian bug 976291 in src:rails "rails: please drop Build-Depends on qunit-selenium" [Serious,Open] [19:27] \o/ [19:28] hopefully it will be dropped soon === dupondje1 is now known as dupondje === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson [22:50] Hi