/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/12/09/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: volk [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-3] (no packageset)00:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: volk [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-3] (no packageset)00:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bornagain [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.18.0-1]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libosmocore [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.4.1-3]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volk [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.4.0-3]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libosmocore [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.4.1-3]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volk [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [2.4.0-3]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libosmocore [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.4.1-3]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bpfcc [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.17.0-8]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bpfcc [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.17.0-8]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libosmocore [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.4.1-3]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volk [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [2.4.0-3]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volk [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [2.4.0-3]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bpfcc [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.17.0-8]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volk [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.4.0-3]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libosmocore [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.4.1-3]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted volk [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.4.0-3]01:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libosmocore [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.4.1-3]01:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flatpak (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.8.2-1 => 1.8.3-0ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) (sync)03:42
=== pieq_ is now known as pieq
kenvandinevorlon: according to my command history, i did not include binaries last time i did a copy-package on flatpak from that PPA.  I don't know why it looked like it did.  I just did it again, it definitely should not include binaries.  Hopefully it looks good now.03:50
kenvandineahayzen: ^^03:50
kenvandinecopy-package --from=~ahayzen/ubuntu/flatpak-manual-uploads-1-8-3-clean-1-groovy --from-suite=groovy --to=ubuntu --to-suite=groovy-proposed --sponsor ahayzen flatpak03:51
LaneyProblem is you can't tell that when reviewing the queue09:09
Laneyoh, no Ken09:09
LaneyI feel like there must be a Launchpad bug for that but I can't find it09:11
LaneyIn [6]: groovy.getPackageUploads(status='Unapproved', name='flatpak')[0].contains_build09:13
LaneyOut[6]: False09:13
LaneySomeoneā„¢ once told me that you can't rely on that09:13
Laneylike, maybe only one of contains_{build,copy,source} can be true at a time maybe?09:14
* Laney is guessing09:14
cjwatsonI don't think queue entries for copies have PackageUploadBuild rows linked to them09:15
cjwatsonOne of the several ways in which the interaction between copies and queues is a bit suboptimal09:16
cjwatsonThere's probably no good reason why PackageUpload.contains_build couldn't just have a quick look to see whether an associated PackageCopyJob has include_binaries set, though09:18
cjwatsonBut I don't believe there's a bug for it09:18
LaneyAlrighty then, I will file one09:22
Laneycontains_source is False too, feels like that should be True as well but less sure if that's useful for us09:23
cjwatsonMaybe.  Either of them would be a semantic change and we might want to think about whether we expose it in some other way09:41
cjwatsonSince tools might well assume that contains_source means there's an actual source package to download from the queue, and similarly contains_build for binaries09:41
LaneyI suppose so, since you're expected to dereference the archive the entry was copied from and then download from that one, rather than the files being directly exposed on the package_upload object09:47
dokoseb128: I see you did +1 yesterday, and today. test queues are busy, so maybe it would be good to look on synced transitions10:16
seb128doko, ack, I has a vac day yesterday but I'm going to do +1 today and tomorrow, I will check those10:33
dokoseb128: and autopilot, or maybe ping jibel ;)10:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib2.0 (focal-proposed/main) [2.64.3-1~ubuntu20.04.1 => 2.64.6-1~ubuntu20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist)11:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04.42]14:16
dokorbalint: would you support overriding the glibc x32 test failures triggered by binutils?14:48
rbalintdoko, it did not reproduce locally, i'm a bit nervous about a potential miscompilation14:52
rbalintdoko, i'm looking into it, so we can make the call today14:53
dokota, just want to use the binutils for the test rebuild next week14:53
rbasaksil2100: bug 1906627 has an adcli queue upload in bionic-proposed, which I think is wrong. I left a comment. Can I leave this one to you please?15:27
ubot5bug 1906627 in adcli (Ubuntu Bionic) "GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active Directory, causing recent adcli regression" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190662715:27
sil2100rbasak: hey! Yeah, I wanted to take a look at the whole adcli/sssd situation later today15:36
rbalintdoko, apparently the test runner(s?) are running on amd opteron: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/cpuinfo/hirsute/amd6415:52
rbalintdoko, could you please try reproducing the glibc vs binutils failure locally on ryzen?15:52
dokorbalint: ok, I'll do that15:57
dokodamn, I shouldn't have told you about that machine ;p15:57
rbalintdoko, :-P when mine arrives i'll tell you ;-)16:05
vorloncjwatson, Laney: so is it expected that for a sourceful sync, when I *fetch* it from the queue, I get binaries?16:10
LaneyDepends what you mean by expected16:11
LaneyI think yes given how LP works now, probably not yes in terms of what we would want to happen16:11
Laney:-)16:11
vorlonLaney: is it true that seeing binares when I download it from the queue doesn't tell us whether it was a binary or sourceful sync16:11
Laneyindeed16:11
vorlonhmm k16:11
Laneyhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/190742916:12
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1907429 in Launchpad itself "Can't tell if copies in distro upload queues contain binaries or not" [Undecided,New]16:12
Laneythat's the one I filed earlier16:12
rbalintdoko: LP: #1907472 , adding my observations16:14
ubot5Launchpad bug 1907472 in glibc (Ubuntu) "glibc x32 autopkgtest fails in hirsute with binutils and audit in -proposed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190747216:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.5 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.6] (ubuntu-server, virt)16:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (groovy-proposed/main) [6.6.0-1ubuntu3.1 => 6.6.0-1ubuntu3.2] (ubuntu-server, virt)16:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (bionic-proposed/main) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.17 => 4.0.0-1ubuntu8.18] (ubuntu-server, virt)16:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.41 => 1:18.04.42] (core)16:38
rbalintdoko, i've added the isa differences, the sse and avx2 differences seem interesting, i suspect sse issues with the latest binutils16:40
rbalintdoko, and if i'm right probably the test on ryzen will pass, because it has updated isa16:41
vorlonugh what's up with libtpms's libtool, it's suppressing compiler output /as if/ it were doing multiple passes and suppressing output for subsequent passes16:56
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libosmo-abis [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-2] (no packageset)18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgit2 [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg.1-2] (kubuntu)18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libosmo-abis [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-2] (no packageset)18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgit2 [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg.1-2] (kubuntu)18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: osmo-ggsn [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2] (no packageset)18:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: osmo-ggsn [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2] (no packageset)18:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: btfs [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.23-1] (no packageset)18:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: btfs [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.23-1] (no packageset)18:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgit2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg.1-2] (kubuntu)18:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libosmo-abis [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-2] (no packageset)18:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: btfs [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.23-1] (no packageset)18:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libosmo-abis [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-2] (no packageset)18:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: osmo-ggsn [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2] (no packageset)18:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: btfs [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.23-1] (no packageset)18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: osmo-ggsn [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2] (no packageset)18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-has-yarn [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libosmo-abis [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-2] (no packageset)18:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: octave [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [6.1.0-2] (no packageset)18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libosmo-abis [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-2] (no packageset)18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgit2 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg.1-2] (kubuntu)18:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgit2 [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg.1-2] (kubuntu)18:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: osmo-ggsn [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2] (no packageset)18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: osmo-ggsn [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2] (no packageset)18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgit2 [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg.1-2] (kubuntu)18:32
=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: btfs [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.23-1] (no packageset)18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: btfs [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.23-1] (no packageset)18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: octave [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [6.1.0-2] (no packageset)18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: octave [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [6.1.0-2] (no packageset)18:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgit2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg.1-2]19:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgit2 [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg.1-2]19:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgit2 [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg.1-2]19:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgit2 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg.1-2]19:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgit2 [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg.1-2]19:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgit2 [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg.1-2]19:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-has-yarn [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.1.0-1]19:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted btfs [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.23-1]19:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted btfs [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [2.23-1]19:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted btfs [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.23-1]19:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted btfs [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.23-1]19:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted btfs [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [2.23-1]19:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted btfs [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [2.23-1]19:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted osmo-ggsn [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6.0-2]19:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted osmo-ggsn [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6.0-2]19:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted osmo-ggsn [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6.0-2]19:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted osmo-ggsn [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6.0-2]19:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted osmo-ggsn [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6.0-2]19:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libosmo-abis [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.1-2]19:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libosmo-abis [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.1-2]19:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libosmo-abis [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.1-2]19:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted osmo-ggsn [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6.0-2]19:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libosmo-abis [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.1-2]19:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libosmo-abis [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.1-2]19:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libosmo-abis [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.1-2]19:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: octave [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [6.1.0-2] (no packageset)20:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: octave [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [6.1.0-2] (no packageset)21:24
ricotzhi :), are there plans to transition from mysql-8.0 to mariadb-10.5?21:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted octave [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [6.1.0-2]21:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted octave [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [6.1.0-2]21:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted octave [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [6.1.0-2]21:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted octave [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [6.1.0-2]21:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted octave [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [6.1.0-2]21:30
vorlonricotz: a better question for the server team than the release team; but I don't believe so21:49
vorlonthe server team has a relationship with mysql upstream and I haven't heard that there are any changes planned21:49
ricotzvorlon, I see, I am asking because debian seems to be doing something in this manner21:51
vorlonI understood that Debian had switched their default to mariadb quite a while ago; Ubuntu did not follow suit21:52
ricotzok, thanks for the info21:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (focal-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.6]22:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (groovy-proposed) [6.6.0-1ubuntu3.2]22:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.18]22:28
bryceubuntu-archive: I see that php8.0 has gotten sync'd into hirsute-proposed/universe, but we aren't planning on enabling php 8.0 this cycle.  Can you please remove it from 21.04?  LP: #190717722:34
ubot5Launchpad bug 1907177 in php8.0 (Ubuntu) "Please remove php8.0 from Ubuntu 21.04" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190717722:34
brycericotz, I can confirm there haven't been any discussions about that on the server team.22:35
brycenot recently anyway22:38
ricotzbryce, thanks for confirming22:38
RAOFbryce: You presumably want that removed and sync-blacklisted?22:52
bryceRAOF, yes indeed22:52
vorlonbryce: please subscribe ~ubuntu-archive to removal bugs23:08
vorlonbryce: to avoid future revisions of the package from being autosynced and migrating, do you want php8.0 added to the sync blacklist, or to keep an update-excuse bug open on it?23:12
vorlonhmm. something's gone seriously wrong with autosyncing, I've just found golang-github-keltia-archive that has been in unstable since Oct 2019 but hasn't gotten synced23:13
vorlonof course I've immediately clobbered the test case for this23:13
vorlonbryce: I mean block-proposed, not update-excuse23:15
RAOFvorlon: Shall I leave this to you, then?23:18
brycevorlon, thanks.  I'm not sure what the distinction is between the sync blacklist vs. a block-proposed bug tag, but essentially we just want to hold off on php8.0 until we're ready to undertake that transition23:18
vorlonRAOF: ah yes, sorry, somehow I missed your comments23:18
vorlonah; golang-github-keltia-archive was previously updated but then deleted due to autopkgtest regressions, so yay23:19
vorlonbryce: the difference is whether we block it in -proposed, or before -proposed23:19
vorlonpersonal taste as much as anything, I suppose23:19
bryceah, before -proposed would be preferred23:19
tumbleweedif you block it in proposed, it'll block everything else in proposed...23:19
vorlontumbleweed: it's not changing php-defaults, only php8.023:20
vorlonbryce: then that's a sync-blacklist23:20
bryceright, I notice there are some proposed-migration excuses where php packages are listing php8.0, which we don't want23:20
vorlonbut I'm on my way afk at the moment23:20
vorlonbryce: not that I see currently23:20
vorlon(no php8.0 references except php8.0 itself)23:20
brycewell, like I see it listed on https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/p/php-amqplib/hirsute/amd6423:21
bryceok, not proposed-migration excuses, but rather appearing in autopkgtest results.  But maybe that's just from php8.0 itself so no worry23:22

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!