[01:01] <callmepk> good  MORNING
[06:02] <jibel> Good morning 
[06:36] <seb128> good morning desktopes
[06:49] <ricotz> good morning
[06:50] <oSoMoN> good morning ricotz & desktoppers
[07:53] <callmepk> hi jibel seb128 ricotz oSoMoN 
[08:49] <seb128> hey ricotz, oSoMoN, callmepk , how are you?
[08:50] <oSoMoN> salut seb128! I didn't rest well this week-end, so a bit tired, but good otherwise. How are you?
[08:51] <seb128> oSoMoN, similar, weekend was nice but exhausting, my eyes are not happy with the screen this morning, I hope it goes better once I'm properly awake
[08:54] <ricotz> oSoMoN, seb128, hey
[08:55] <ricotz> I guess I might be in trouble for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1905422
[08:56] <ricotz> I overestimated its progress
[08:57] <oSoMoN> ricotz, the quickest fix is probably to revert and upload 1:7.0.4~rc2-0ubuntu2 to hirsute-proposed
[08:58] <ricotz> probably :(
[08:58] <seb128> ricotz, not in trouble, it's fine to keep that version in proposed until the MIR is sorted out if this agreement on doing that, but doing it for other series in a SRU is probably more controversial
[08:59] <ricotz> seb128, this is only for hirsute, otherwise the comment was PPA specific
[08:59] <oSoMoN> I'm not sure there's agreement on proceeding with the MIRs yet
[08:59] <ricotz> seb128, the problem is it will block boost
[09:03] <seb128> so probably best to revert yes, especially if there is no agreement and no MIR started, it will probably not clear off before eoy
[09:03] <Laney> moin
[09:03] <seb128> ricotz, ok, I though the ppa were preparing the SRU uploads
[09:03] <seb128> hey Laney, how are you?
[09:04] <ricotz> seb128, ok -- yes, the ppa is for SRU prepare that is why the groovy build doesn't carry this change
[09:04] <seb128> I see
[09:09] <Laney> hey seb128 
[09:09] <Laney> I'm alright, bit tired
[09:11] <seb128> one week to go and then some well deserved rest, right?
[09:12] <ricotz> oSoMoN, https://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/libreoffice/
[09:13] <marcustomlinson> morning callmepk jibel seb128 ricotz oSoMoN Laney
[09:14] <jibel> good morning marcustomlinson 
[09:16] <ricotz> oSoMoN, sorry faulty changelog
[09:16] <seb128> hey marcustomlinson, lut jibel, how are you?
[09:16] <oSoMoN> ricotz, I suppose you deleted the files and that's why the folder appears empty to me?
[09:16] <ricotz> oSoMoN, yes
[09:16] <oSoMoN> good morning Laney, marcustomlinson, salut jibel
[09:19] <ricotz> oSoMoN, uploaded again
[09:31] <jibel> salut oSoMoN seb128 
[09:31] <jibel> seb128, ça va, hâte d'être en vacances
[09:34] <oSoMoN> ricotz, sponsored
[09:36] <marcustomlinson> seb128: doing ok, about ready to say goodbye to 2020. You?
[09:37] <seb128> marcustomlinson, a bit tired but alright otherwise!
[09:42] <ricotz> oSoMoN, thank you
[09:43] <ricotz> Laney, jibel, marcustomlinson, hey :)
[09:43] <jibel> Hi ricotz 
[09:45] <Laney> hey marcustomlinson oSoMoN ricotz 
[11:16] <marcustomlinson> duflu: oh some of those bug expirations were from me :) 60 days after I’d set them incomplete
[13:35] <ricotz> oSoMoN, is thunderbird 78.6.0 build1 on your list?
[13:40] <oSoMoN> ricotz, yes it is
[13:42] <ricotz> oSoMoN, great :)
[13:42] <ricotz> oSoMoN, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/84.0+build3-0ubuntu1/+build/20408821
[13:44] <oSoMoN> ricotz, yes, it's been repeatedly failing to build on amd64 and I retried it a few times over the week-end (with +build2), hoping that it would pass at some point, but it looks like it won't, so I'll need to do something about it
[13:44] <ricotz> those gkrust failures has gotting worse lately with 85 -- so I am went with https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-trunk.head/revision/2371
[13:44] <ricotz> could be caused by rustc 1.47
[13:47] <oSoMoN> ricotz, yeah, most likely
[13:48] <oSoMoN> I'll borrow your updated patch, I think it makes sense to build with the same level of debuginfo on all architectures
[13:48] <ricotz> ack
[14:23] <oSoMoN> ricotz, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/1:78.6.0+build1-0ubuntu1
[14:39] <ricotz> oSoMoN, :)
[14:41] <seb128> you guys stop pushing updates before they are available :p
[14:41] <seb128> (still not on https://releases.mozilla.org/pub/thunderbird/releases/)
[14:43] <oSoMoN> seb128, I wouldn't do that for a stable release, but I think pushing RCs to the development series in the first half of the cycle is actually valuable
[14:47] <oSoMoN> ricotz, and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/84.0+build3-0ubuntu2, thanks for the updated patch!
[14:54] <seb128> oSoMoN, right, I'm mostly teasing because every time you do that I'm like 'oh, new version out, let's update the snap' to find out that I can't because the official builds aren't there yet ;-)
[14:59] <oSoMoN> seb128, ah, right :)
[16:38] <seb128> kenvandine, another fun snap core issue
[16:38] <seb128> https://github.com/seb128/core18/pull/1
[16:39] <seb128> https://github.com/snapcore/core18/pull/175 rather
[16:39] <seb128> the xdg-settings wrapper is outdated
[16:39] <seb128> it's probably also outdated for the protocols it includes in xdp-open compared to the ones added to snapd :-/
[16:52] <hellsworth> good morning desktopers
[16:54] <jibel> Good morning hellsworth 
[16:59] <hellsworth> hey there jibel 
[17:06] <oSoMoN> good morning hellsworth 
[17:07] <jibel> Laney, xnox I'm reviewing https://code.launchpad.net/~mfo/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+merge/390637 but I'm missing some history of Ubiquity. Do you have any idea why PageGtk is completely skipped in automatic mode? (there is a return true in __init__ if is_automatic is set to true) 
[17:07] <hellsworth> o/ oSoMoN 
[17:07] <jibel> it's a fix fix for bug 1895351
[17:07] <jibel> Laney, xnox but I think the fix is just to remove the test in PageGtk and PageKde
[17:10] <jibel> last change to this code is 7yo
[17:11] <jibel> 10yo actually
[17:23] <Laney> jibel: I'm not sure to be honest - there's some comment about how some frontends may never show anything in automatic mode, isn't that the intention? That you're supposed to (be able to) preseed everything..?
[17:25] <jibel> Laney, yeah but in this case simple-plugin is not executed even if use_nonfree is set because it exits too early. So you cannot install 3rd party drivers in automatic mode
[17:25] <jibel> I'm tempted to just remove this code and do more tests. It's the only plugin that works this way.
[17:28] <Laney> I guess when this code was written the plugin didn't do anything with side effects in the prepare function
[17:38] <oSoMoN> seb128, have you seen https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1904789 ?
[18:03] <xnox> jibel:  back in the day, prepare plugin was simply checkboxes " you are connected to internet, you have enough disk space, laptop power is plugged in" i think it didn't do anything in the past, or had any options.
[18:03] <xnox> jibel: and i think all options for it used to be preseedable, but maybe not anymore.
[18:03] <xnox> i.e. not sure if we have preseeded the secureboot enrollment pin right, for example.
[18:04] <xnox> but also i'd be worried to set that up, because secureboot mok key enrollment pin is not unattended.....
[18:07] <jibel> xnox, right, looking at the log history that's what I suspected. We're only interested in preseeding use_nonfree actually and maybe minimal install since as you said secure boot requires a manual enrollment and download updates has little value.
[18:08] <luna_> oSoMoN: Firefox 84 is out for Linux now
[18:09] <luna_> ah there is already a package in the PPA thanks
[18:11] <oSoMoN> luna_, yes, that and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/84.0+build3-0ubuntu2
[18:11] <xnox> jibel:  right, so the whole page should not be needed, just those keys getting preseeded. but i can't remember how much of the stuff is done in the common bits and how much is done by the page logic itself. it may need to run the page more fully now.
[18:13] <Laney> it'll need to at least run the simple-plugin prepare, that's what makes the ubuntu-drivers autoinstall file which ubiquity uses later
[18:13] <luna_> oSoMoN: updated now works well also Beta 0.5 is out now and Beta 3 will be out 18th December: http://fx-trains.herokuapp.com/release/?version=85
[18:13] <luna_> thanks
[19:21] <ricotz> looks like there is a gnome-builder rebuild needed for new glade
[20:14] <seb128> oSoMoN, I hadn't, I saw it now
[21:00] <seb128> ricotz, thanks, rebuild uploaded
[21:13] <ricotz> seb128, thanks, seems to be entangled with a missing rebuild of libgit2-glib against new libgit2?
[21:21] <ricotz> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/auto-libgit2.html doesn't show deps on libgit2-1.0 as bad
[21:21] <seb128> ricotz, I was just trying to see what's wrong here in a fresh env
[21:23] <ricotz> seb128, basically those need a second rebuild for libgit2-1.1 https://paste.debian.net/plain/1176922
[21:27] <seb128> ricotz, thanks
[21:31] <ricotz> seb128, yw
[21:40] <ricotz> seb128, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgit2-glib/0.99.0.1-1build1/+build/20411160