[10:36] <doko> seb128: please could you subscribe to gdk-pixbuf-xlib? it's just that the binaries are built from a different source
[10:51] <seb128> doko, subscribed
[10:52] <doko> seb128: also tiff got a new runtime dependency ... libdeflate. we probably should revert that while working on a MIR (security review would need some time)
[10:55] <seb128> doko, is it blocking anything else? if no it's probalby fine to keep it in proposed until the MIR is sorted out
[10:57] <doko> seb128: it causes uninstallability in -proposed, so no, it shouldn't wait
[10:57] <seb128> k
[10:57] <seb128> I will handle it in a bit
[10:57] <doko> libtiff5/amd64 in main cannot depend on libdeflate0 in universe
[11:14] <Laney> blackboxsw: hey, would you be able to verify update-notifier please and get it moved out to -updates? I've got another one to do and don't want to clobber you ideally.
[11:20] <Laney> (focal is the one I'm interested in)
[15:20] <teward> xnox: rbalint: cpaelzer: any of you three around?
[15:26] <rbalint> teward, in a meeting shortly
[15:27] <teward> rbalint: need you for -meeting atm if you can spare 2 minutes for an rbasak asked question
[15:29] <cpaelzer> teward: I'm here
[15:29] <teward> cpaelzer: #ubuntu-meeting, same thing
[15:29] <teward> look for your highlights
[15:29] <cpaelzer> omw
[16:27]  * ItzSwirlz gets bullied by the #fix_your_connection channel
[20:22] <The_LoudSpeaker> what was that command to check reverse deps of a package? someone remembers off the top of their head?
[20:23] <ItzSwirlz> The_LoudSpeaker: did you try apt-cache rdepends ?
[20:25] <The_LoudSpeaker> ItzSwirlz: worked. Thanks! I had completely forgotten about apt-cache. 😅
[20:25] <ItzSwirlz> dw
[20:25] <The_LoudSpeaker> Been long since I have been away from devel work
[20:26] <The_LoudSpeaker> ^ ow
[20:26] <The_LoudSpeaker> that statement didn't make any sense
[21:17] <The_LoudSpeaker> hey! everyone! I want to SRU micro to v 2.0.6-2 in focal. It is in version 2.0.1-1 right now. There are quite a few bugs in it which are worth of SRU. version 2.0.6-2 is present in groovy and it is well tested for regressions.
[21:18] <The_LoudSpeaker> Only catch is the golang-github-zyedidia-tcell-dev. Which is a build dependency of micro.
[21:19] <The_LoudSpeaker> We need v 1.4.8 for newer micro. But we have 1.4.4 in focal rn.
[21:21] <The_LoudSpeaker> I checked reverse deps of it and there's none. and between these two versions of golang-github-zyedidia-tcell-dev (golang-github-zyedidia-tcell-dev is the source ) there's not much change. Only minor version bumps. Should I go forward with SRU bug for golang-github-zyedidia-tcell ? Is there anything I should be careful about?
[21:21] <The_LoudSpeaker> ^ cc: teward tsimonq2 RikMills