[01:32] <bryce> ubuntu-archive: phpunit appears to be suffering from a circular build dependency on -proposed versions of php-codecoverage, php-timer, and new package php-phpspec-prophecy-phpunit; these three dependencies themselves appear to depend on the -proposed phpunit.
[01:32] <bryce> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#phpunit
[01:33] <bryce> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuArchitecture#Builds suggests this might need some manual bootstrapping by a build administrator?
[01:33] <vorlon> fossfreedom: geary: it appears update-seeds is not managing to update the ubuntu-budgie.hirsute checkout; I'm looking at it now
[01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hamlib [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [4.0-3] (no packageset)
[01:40] <vorlon> bryce: php-horde-ansel removed, now also checking to see why it got synced
[01:41] <vorlon> fossfreedom: found the problem with update-seeds, there had been a stale lock in an unrelated branch that broke the updating of any working directories appearing after it in the list
[01:41] <vorlon> fossfreedom: apparently it had been like that since November 19 :/
[01:43] <vorlon> bryce: sync-blacklist was similarly out of date due to a bzr lock
[01:47] <bryce> vorlon, aha, thanks
[02:44] <RAOF> Hm. If I remove lomiri-app-launch from hirsute & hirsute-proposed should I also sync blacklist it? It will just fail to satisfy its build-dependencies until it's updated for the new Mir.
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgit2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg.1-3] (kubuntu)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [7.2.23+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: miniupnpd [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: miniupnpd [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: miniupnpd [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: miniupnpd [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: miniupnpd [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: miniupnpd [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[06:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[09:14] <cpaelzer> hi, is anyone of ubuntu-archive aroudn to accept https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/20.11-1 from hirsute-new queue ?
[09:51] <LocutusOfBorg> also some haskell accept from new queue please
[09:58] <Laney> RAOF or bdmurray or someone else in ubuntu-sru - could you please look at releasing update-notifier/focal and then accepting the one which is hanging out in unapproved?
[10:05] <tjaalton> Laney: looks like bug 1881632 is not verified, don't know why it's not marked as verification-needed either but is listed on the pending sru's page
[10:07] <tjaalton> probably just some goof
[10:09] <tjaalton> Laney: I don't see an upload for focal on unapproved?
[10:09] <tjaalton> oh hehe, on the second page..
[10:11] <Laney> I see, I guess the second upload was done without -v?
[10:17] <Laney> or maybe the newer bug was supposed to take over from the first one
[11:03] <cpaelzer> pinging again for ubuntu-archive for DPDK in Hirsute new (and as mentioned by LocutusOfBorg also haskell in new)
[11:04] <Laney> cpaelzer: which? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hirsute/+queue
[11:05] <cpaelzer> the one that was accepted between now and when I last refreshed 30 minutes ago :-/ Sorry for the noise
[11:05] <cpaelzer> and thanks whoever processed the queue
[11:06] <Laney> I did run new-binary-debian-universe but there was no dpdk in there then either, that just cleared the haskell stuff
[11:06] <Laney> and /me eyes queuebot about that
[11:06] <cpaelzer> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/20.11-1 was in NEW this morning and isn't now
[11:06] <cpaelzer> let me check the publication history where I might have lost track
[11:07] <Laney> presumably someone else ran that this morning before me too
[11:07] <cpaelzer> must have been ~54 minutes ago
[11:07] <Laney> ones from Debian are cleared out fairly regularly / automatically
[11:07] <cpaelzer> but solved is solved, I won't complain :-)
[11:08] <Laney> well, not automatically, but by a script
[11:08] <Laney> anyway good, everyone enjoy their debs
[11:18] <Laney> blackboxsw: ^- heya, can you take care of that other bug for focal/update-notifier please? or clear up the situation
[12:59] <LocutusOfBorg> dh-python on armhf is sad due to python3.8 removed or something similar... possible to force-hint?
[13:51] <LocutusOfBorg> ubuntu-archive please move Package: matlab-jnifti (0.6-2) [contrib] -> multiverse
[13:51] <LocutusOfBorg> so it can migrate
[14:07] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, ^^ please matlab-jnifti move? also conserver from multiverse to universe? (license is now bsd-3)
[14:08] <LocutusOfBorg> I want some migration today, like ghc and to move octave forward
[14:33] <rbasak> kanashiro: I'm not doing the SRU queue today, but I noticed your docker.io Xenial upload has no bug reference
[15:56] <bdmurray> rbasak: so you rejected it?
[16:00] <bdmurray> Laney, tjaalton: bug 1881632 was untagged verification-needed-focal in comment #30 for reasons that seem unclear to me. blackboxsw can you double check this?
[16:01] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: definitely
[16:01] <rbasak> bdmurray: not yet, but I would. I thought I'd give kanashiro a chance to respond in case I was missing something
[16:03] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: that should need to be validated for focal as that commit was in 3.192.30.1 for focal
[16:03] <blackboxsw> I'll verify that for focal now
[16:03] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: great, thanks!
[16:03] <Laney> merci!
[17:02] <rbalint> Laney, i observe systemd/247.1-4ubuntu1 tests not showing up after test runs https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/systemd/hirsute/amd64
[17:03] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: I updated and performed the focal SRU verification on update-notifier now
[17:03] <blackboxsw> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/1881632
[17:03] <blackboxsw> and added the verification-done-focal tag back
[17:03] <rbalint> Laney, there are many people triggering those because 246.x regressed in release pocket with qemu migrating ahead of systemd 247
[17:04] <rbalint> Laney, bdmurray  please merge to not have to retry the failed systemd 246 tests: https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/395780
[17:12] <paride> I also have a hint mp pending review: https://code.launchpad.net/~paride/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/395790
[17:21] <bdmurray> I'm looking at these now.
[17:21] <bdmurray> these being hints ;-)
[17:22] <bdmurray> rbalint: Why is gnutls28 failing though?
[17:39] <RikMills> "<stgraber> updated queuebot looking quite solid, considering that port a success :)"
[17:39]  * RikMills is not so sure
[17:43] <rbalint> bdmurray, i guess new year or infra changes, but i think it does not matter since it clearly regressed and next version of sid fixes it
[17:44] <bdmurray> rbalint: You didn't mention that last bit in the bug...
[18:20] <rbalint> bdmurray, is this holding back the acceptance of hints?
[18:23] <bdmurray> wells its slowing me down
[18:28] <rbalint> bdmurray, i'v added this information as a comment
[18:29] <rbalint> bdmurray, could you please continue reviewing the hint PM and provide feedback when you are slowed down again?
[18:38] <bdmurray> rbalint: I'm new to ubuntu-release so maybe don't know what is good enough justification but "it passes in sid" doesn't seem like much of an explanation to me.
[18:38] <rbalint> bdmurray, imo if it id proven to have regressed in release it is good to accept
[18:39] <rbalint> s/id/is/
[18:40] <rbalint> bdmurray, requiring full triaging for tests failing in release does not make any sense because we would not get packages migrated then in a timely manner
[18:41] <bdmurray> rbalint: what is the path forward for fixing the gnutls tests though?
[18:41] <rbalint> merging next version
[18:42] <bdmurray> that won't help with the stable release tests though
[18:42] <rbalint> i just asked for hints for devel yet
[18:43] <bdmurray> anyway I feel better having found debian bug 977552
[18:44] <rbalint> fixing gnutls test in stable releases can be done later
[19:00] <bryce> is there an ubuntu-archive admin that can give advice on phpunit?  I think it may be stuck in a circular build dependency situation and am not sure how to unblock it.  Unfortunately phpunit is blocking other PHP stuff.
[19:28] <rbalint> bdmurray, merge this one as well https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/395806
[19:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (xenial-proposed/universe) [18.09.7-0ubuntu1~16.04.7 => 18.09.7-0ubuntu1~16.04.8] (no packageset)
[19:34] <coreycb> bdmurray: hello, if you have a chance we could use a review of openvswitch for https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906280.
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lsof [source] (groovy-proposed) [4.93.2+dfsg-1ubuntu0.20.10.1]
[19:37] <rbalint> bdmurray, (please)
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lsof [source] (focal-proposed) [4.93.2+dfsg-1ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (focal-proposed) [2.13.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.2]
[21:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.13.1-0ubuntu1.1]
[23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: catch2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.13.4-1] (no packageset)
[23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: catch2 [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.13.4-1] (no packageset)
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: catch2 [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.13.4-1] (no packageset)
[23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozc [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.26.4220.100+dfsg-1] (input-methods, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-guizero [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.1.1+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-uflash [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2.4+dfsg-5] (no packageset)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: catch2 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.13.4-1] (no packageset)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozc [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.26.4220.100+dfsg-1] (input-methods, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: catch2 [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.13.4-1] (no packageset)
[23:56] <RAOF> sil2100: Is LP: #1868703 on your radar? It looks to me like the regression found did not involve sssd, and so it should  be safe to release back to -updates (and -security), but I'd appreciate your input there.
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: socklog [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.1.0+repack-4] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: socklog [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.1.0+repack-4] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-advancedlogic-goose [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20200830.1225d53+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-appleboy-gofight [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-jamiealquiza-tachymeter [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-valyala-gozstd [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.9.0+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-antonmedv-expr [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.8.9-1] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-leodido-go-urn [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-gorilla-css [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-enescakir-emoji [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-logrusorgru-grokky [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20180829.47edf01-1] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: octave-iso2mesh [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.9.6+ds-2] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-go-playground-assert-v2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-mohae-deepcopy [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170929.c48cc78-1] (no packageset)