[01:32] ubuntu-archive: phpunit appears to be suffering from a circular build dependency on -proposed versions of php-codecoverage, php-timer, and new package php-phpspec-prophecy-phpunit; these three dependencies themselves appear to depend on the -proposed phpunit. [01:32] https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#phpunit [01:33] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuArchitecture#Builds suggests this might need some manual bootstrapping by a build administrator? [01:33] fossfreedom: geary: it appears update-seeds is not managing to update the ubuntu-budgie.hirsute checkout; I'm looking at it now [01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hamlib [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [4.0-3] (no packageset) [01:40] bryce: php-horde-ansel removed, now also checking to see why it got synced [01:41] fossfreedom: found the problem with update-seeds, there had been a stale lock in an unrelated branch that broke the updating of any working directories appearing after it in the list [01:41] fossfreedom: apparently it had been like that since November 19 :/ [01:43] bryce: sync-blacklist was similarly out of date due to a bzr lock [01:47] vorlon, aha, thanks [02:44] Hm. If I remove lomiri-app-launch from hirsute & hirsute-proposed should I also sync blacklist it? It will just fail to satisfy its build-dependencies until it's updated for the new Mir. [05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgit2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg.1-3] (kubuntu) [05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [7.2.23+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) [05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: miniupnpd [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-1] (no packageset) [05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: miniupnpd [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-1] (no packageset) [05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: miniupnpd [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-1] (no packageset) [05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: miniupnpd [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-1] (no packageset) [05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: miniupnpd [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-1] (no packageset) [05:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: miniupnpd [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-1] (no packageset) [05:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [06:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: limesuite [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.10.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [09:14] hi, is anyone of ubuntu-archive aroudn to accept https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/20.11-1 from hirsute-new queue ? === didrocks999 is now known as didrocks [09:51] also some haskell accept from new queue please [09:58] RAOF or bdmurray or someone else in ubuntu-sru - could you please look at releasing update-notifier/focal and then accepting the one which is hanging out in unapproved? [10:05] Laney: looks like bug 1881632 is not verified, don't know why it's not marked as verification-needed either but is listed on the pending sru's page [10:05] bug 1881632 in update-notifier (Ubuntu Focal) "esm security updates not reported by apt update-notifier" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1881632 [10:07] probably just some goof [10:09] Laney: I don't see an upload for focal on unapproved? [10:09] oh hehe, on the second page.. [10:11] I see, I guess the second upload was done without -v? [10:17] or maybe the newer bug was supposed to take over from the first one [11:03] pinging again for ubuntu-archive for DPDK in Hirsute new (and as mentioned by LocutusOfBorg also haskell in new) [11:04] cpaelzer: which? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hirsute/+queue [11:05] the one that was accepted between now and when I last refreshed 30 minutes ago :-/ Sorry for the noise [11:05] and thanks whoever processed the queue [11:06] I did run new-binary-debian-universe but there was no dpdk in there then either, that just cleared the haskell stuff [11:06] and /me eyes queuebot about that [11:06] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/20.11-1 was in NEW this morning and isn't now [11:06] let me check the publication history where I might have lost track [11:07] presumably someone else ran that this morning before me too [11:07] must have been ~54 minutes ago [11:07] ones from Debian are cleared out fairly regularly / automatically [11:07] but solved is solved, I won't complain :-) [11:08] well, not automatically, but by a script [11:08] anyway good, everyone enjoy their debs [11:18] blackboxsw: ^- heya, can you take care of that other bug for focal/update-notifier please? or clear up the situation === msalvatore_ is now known as msalvatore [12:59] dh-python on armhf is sad due to python3.8 removed or something similar... possible to force-hint? [13:51] ubuntu-archive please move Package: matlab-jnifti (0.6-2) [contrib] -> multiverse [13:51] so it can migrate [14:07] vorlon, ^^ please matlab-jnifti move? also conserver from multiverse to universe? (license is now bsd-3) [14:08] I want some migration today, like ghc and to move octave forward [14:33] kanashiro: I'm not doing the SRU queue today, but I noticed your docker.io Xenial upload has no bug reference [15:56] rbasak: so you rejected it? [16:00] Laney, tjaalton: bug 1881632 was untagged verification-needed-focal in comment #30 for reasons that seem unclear to me. blackboxsw can you double check this? [16:00] bug 1881632 in update-notifier (Ubuntu Focal) "esm security updates not reported by apt update-notifier" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1881632 [16:01] bdmurray: definitely [16:01] bdmurray: not yet, but I would. I thought I'd give kanashiro a chance to respond in case I was missing something [16:03] bdmurray: that should need to be validated for focal as that commit was in 3.192.30.1 for focal [16:03] I'll verify that for focal now [16:03] blackboxsw: great, thanks! [16:03] merci! [17:02] Laney, i observe systemd/247.1-4ubuntu1 tests not showing up after test runs https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/systemd/hirsute/amd64 [17:03] bdmurray: I updated and performed the focal SRU verification on update-notifier now [17:03] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/1881632 [17:03] Ubuntu bug 1881632 in update-notifier (Ubuntu Focal) "esm security updates not reported by apt update-notifier" [Undecided,Triaged] [17:03] and added the verification-done-focal tag back [17:03] Laney, there are many people triggering those because 246.x regressed in release pocket with qemu migrating ahead of systemd 247 [17:04] Laney, bdmurray please merge to not have to retry the failed systemd 246 tests: https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/395780 [17:12] I also have a hint mp pending review: https://code.launchpad.net/~paride/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/395790 [17:21] I'm looking at these now. [17:21] these being hints ;-) [17:22] rbalint: Why is gnutls28 failing though? [17:39] " updated queuebot looking quite solid, considering that port a success :)" [17:39] * RikMills is not so sure [17:43] bdmurray, i guess new year or infra changes, but i think it does not matter since it clearly regressed and next version of sid fixes it [17:44] rbalint: You didn't mention that last bit in the bug... === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch [18:20] bdmurray, is this holding back the acceptance of hints? [18:23] wells its slowing me down [18:28] bdmurray, i'v added this information as a comment [18:29] bdmurray, could you please continue reviewing the hint PM and provide feedback when you are slowed down again? [18:38] rbalint: I'm new to ubuntu-release so maybe don't know what is good enough justification but "it passes in sid" doesn't seem like much of an explanation to me. [18:38] bdmurray, imo if it id proven to have regressed in release it is good to accept [18:39] s/id/is/ [18:40] bdmurray, requiring full triaging for tests failing in release does not make any sense because we would not get packages migrated then in a timely manner [18:41] rbalint: what is the path forward for fixing the gnutls tests though? [18:41] merging next version [18:42] that won't help with the stable release tests though [18:42] i just asked for hints for devel yet [18:43] anyway I feel better having found debian bug 977552 [18:43] Debian bug 977552 in src:gnutls28 "gnutls28: Time bomb in testpkcs11.sh triggered" [Serious,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/977552 [18:44] fixing gnutls test in stable releases can be done later [19:00] is there an ubuntu-archive admin that can give advice on phpunit? I think it may be stuck in a circular build dependency situation and am not sure how to unblock it. Unfortunately phpunit is blocking other PHP stuff. [19:28] bdmurray, merge this one as well https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/395806 [19:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (xenial-proposed/universe) [18.09.7-0ubuntu1~16.04.7 => 18.09.7-0ubuntu1~16.04.8] (no packageset) [19:34] bdmurray: hello, if you have a chance we could use a review of openvswitch for https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906280. [19:34] Ubuntu bug 1906280 in charm-ovn-chassis "[SRU] Add support for disabling mlockall() calls in ovs-vswitchd" [Critical,In progress] [19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lsof [source] (groovy-proposed) [4.93.2+dfsg-1ubuntu0.20.10.1] [19:37] bdmurray, (please) [19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lsof [source] (focal-proposed) [4.93.2+dfsg-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson [21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (focal-proposed) [2.13.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] [21:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.13.1-0ubuntu1.1] [23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: catch2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.13.4-1] (no packageset) [23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: catch2 [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.13.4-1] (no packageset) [23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: catch2 [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.13.4-1] (no packageset) [23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozc [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.26.4220.100+dfsg-1] (input-methods, ubuntu-desktop) [23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-guizero [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.1.1+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) [23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-uflash [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2.4+dfsg-5] (no packageset) [23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: catch2 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.13.4-1] (no packageset) [23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozc [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.26.4220.100+dfsg-1] (input-methods, ubuntu-desktop) [23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: catch2 [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.13.4-1] (no packageset) [23:56] sil2100: Is LP: #1868703 on your radar? It looks to me like the regression found did not involve sssd, and so it should be safe to release back to -updates (and -security), but I'd appreciate your input there. [23:56] Launchpad bug 1868703 in sssd (Ubuntu Focal) "Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1868703 [23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: socklog [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.1.0+repack-4] (no packageset) [23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: socklog [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.1.0+repack-4] (no packageset) [23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-advancedlogic-goose [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20200830.1225d53+ds-1] (no packageset) [23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-appleboy-gofight [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.1.2-1] (no packageset) [23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-jamiealquiza-tachymeter [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) [23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-valyala-gozstd [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.9.0+ds-1] (no packageset) [23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-antonmedv-expr [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.8.9-1] (no packageset) [23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-leodido-go-urn [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-1] (no packageset) [23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-gorilla-css [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset) [23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-enescakir-emoji [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset) [23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-logrusorgru-grokky [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20180829.47edf01-1] (no packageset) [23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: octave-iso2mesh [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.9.6+ds-2] (no packageset) [23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-go-playground-assert-v2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-1] (no packageset) [23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-mohae-deepcopy [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170929.c48cc78-1] (no packageset)