[01:01] <callmepk> good morning
[01:02] <duflu> Morning callmepk 
[01:02] <callmepk> good morning duflu 
[01:09] <RAOF> seb128: Happy new year! If you'd like to get colord off the desktop-excuses list, 1.4.5-3 is available for sponsoring from salsa :)
[01:51] <duflu> RAOF: Anything exciting in that update?
[01:51] <duflu> Or just resolving excuses?
[01:51] <RAOF> Colord? It builds on s390x again :)
[01:51] <duflu> Meh
[01:52] <RAOF> I don't really expect anything particularly interesting to happen in colord releases from here out, with the exception, perhaps, of more colorimeter support.
[01:53] <RAOF> (Or the re-instatement of argyll support, bringing back a bunch of colorimeter support)
[01:53] <duflu> RAOF: BTW in case you're not subscribed already, bug 938751 is a popular issue, and not one I have had time to dive into
[01:53] <ubot5> bug 938751 in inkscape (Ubuntu) "Images are washed out or colors are skewed in some apps (particularly Image Viewer and Chrome)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/938751
[01:57] <duflu> I suspect we are applying the gamma curve twice in some apps
[01:58] <RAOF> That is possible, I guess?
[02:00] <JanC> like, in an application + in a library, or something like that?
[02:04] <duflu> More like in the shell + in the app/library
[02:07] <RAOF> I don't think it's the shell applying a monitor correction calibration and then the app doing the same, because it seems to apply to autogenerated profiles which cannot have correction data.
[02:08] <RAOF> It might be that the autogenerated profile has an incorrect gamut for the monitor, so the application is inapropriately restricting the colour space.
[02:09] <RAOF> It also might just be that the profile has a correct gamut, and the images people complain about have an sRGB profile embedded, so the when the monitor profile is applied colours are correctly muted.
[02:10] <duflu> I suspect the shell because the profile seems to affect shell elements as well as app windows
[02:26] <RAOF> If you have an example of such a profile, gcm-inspect (from the gnome-color-manager package) might provide interesting information.
[02:26] <RAOF> Or, you could send one such profile to me, and I could poke around.
[02:28] <duflu> RAOF: All profiles :(
[02:29] <duflu> Even the default one, which is curious because that should be a no-op right?
[02:30] <RAOF> The default one may not be a no-op - it definitely won't include the information necessary to do global colour-correction, but it could contain gamut information and such that would be usable.
[02:31] <duflu> RAOF: I haven't looked at it in years. Just suggested you subscribe to the bug :)
[02:32] <RAOF> But the “all profiles” bit suggests to me that maybe the problem is that you don't like the sRGB color space. :)
[02:33] <duflu> That's not impossible, but very curious it's been such an annoying issue across many different monitors/laptops/users
[02:36] <duflu> In the most extreme cases, white areas appear as green or pink. I think mpt and robert.ancell experienced that but haven't seen it myself
[02:36] <duflu> The fix was to disable all colour profiles
[06:21] <jibel> Good morning 
[06:34] <callmepk> morning jibel 
[06:53] <jibel> Hi callmepk 
[07:19] <duflu> Hi jibel 
[07:29] <seb128> goood morning desktopers
[07:30] <duflu> Morning seb128 
[07:30] <seb128> hey duflu, happy new year! do you feel better today?
[07:31] <duflu> seb128, happy new year. Yeah much better thanks. I had a killer headache, nausea and shivering despite it being summer. But I am good now. How are you?
[07:36] <seb128> I'm great thanks! Glad to read that you feel better today
[07:39] <didrocks> good morning
[07:39] <duflu> Morning didrocks 
[07:39] <didrocks> hey duflu!
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks
[08:00] <callmepk> morning seb128 diddledan 
[08:00] <callmepk> morning seb128 didrocks 
[08:00] <didrocks> hey callmepk :)
[08:00] <callmepk> oops
[08:09] <duflu> diddledan, getting all the love again
[08:43] <luna_> https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/84.0.2/
[08:43] <luna_> @ ricotz 
[08:48] <ricotz> luna_, thanks, osomon is likely on it soon
[08:49] <ricotz> I am looking after trunk, beta and esr
[08:49] <ricotz> gooooood morning desktopers! :)
[08:50] <duflu> Morning ricotz 
[08:51] <didrocks> hey hey ricotz 
[09:02] <callmepk> morning ricotz 
[09:02] <Laney> yooooooooooooooooooooooo
[09:03] <didrocks> hey Laney 
[09:04] <luna_> ricotz: heh there was a new ESR and Beta too
[09:07] <ricotz> hey duflu didrocks callmepk Laney 
[09:07] <ricotz> luna_, I known ;), already built or just uploaded :)
[09:10] <duflu> Hi Laney
[09:11] <Laney> moin didrocks ricotz & duflu 
[09:12] <didrocks> (/me is so tempted to say again hey Laney :p)
[09:24] <luna_> ricotz: oh alright nice
[09:25] <Laney> didrocks: oh god, we'll never break out
[09:51] <seb128> hey callmepk, didrocks, ricotz, luna_, Laney
[09:54] <didrocks> hey seb128 
[09:57] <Laney> wb seb128!
[09:57] <jibel> Salut seb128 
[10:03] <seb128> lut jibel 
[10:59] <luna_> hey seb128 
[11:38] <RikMills> Laney jibel : Hi. Id that ubiquity upload possible this week?
[11:38] <RikMills> *Is
[12:05] <Laney> yeah, thanks I forgot!
[12:11] <RikMills> ty :)
[15:32] <hellsworth> good morning desktopers
[15:48] <jibel> Good morning hellsworth 
[15:48] <didrocks> hey hellsworth 
[15:48] <hellsworth> hi there jibel didrocks !!
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch
[19:13] <tangarora> speaking of ubiquity... would anyone like to answer a Q or 2? :) hmmm...? 
=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson