[01:45] Bashing-om, read thru complete; looks great [01:46] guiverc: Usuns do do good work :P [01:48] :) [10:27] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::OMG!Ubuntu:: gThumb 3.11.2 Released with Minor Improvements @ https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2021/01/gthumb-3-11-2-released (by Joey Sneddon) [15:04] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::OMG!Ubuntu:: GNOME Devs Finally Fix the Truncated App Name Iss… @ https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2021/01/gnome-shell-show-full-application-name (by Joey Sneddon) [15:15] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Planet:: Alan Pope: Digital Hoarding: Gaming Edition @ https://popey.com/blog/2021/01/digital-hoarding-gaming-edition/ [19:45] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Planet:: Sebastian Schauenburg: Translators, please do not translate everything @ https://www.schauenburg.nl/posts/2021/01/11_translators_-_please_do_not_translate_everything.html [20:16] UWN: Pulling "WIP" - log checked and no further edits are known. Pushing out soonest. [20:36] UWN: ubuntu-news@lists is away - doing the Forum post next. [20:50] UWN: Forum post done with abridges to the update sections. Re-directs next. [21:06] UWN: Re-direct too done. Pending is release to the Social Medias and then the clean up. [21:45] Bashing-om, are we right to put #665 to the fridge? [21:50] guiverc: Yup :( Push to the fridge and others :) No issues known. [21:51] yeah I never mention 'others'... [21:53] https://fridge.ubuntu.com/2021/01/11/ubuntu-weekly-newsletter-issue-665/ [21:54] tweeted 665 [21:54] Fridge: Spot check - checks good :D [22:02] fb posted too [22:02] guiverc: Clear away the evidence now ? [22:03] yep. clear away [22:03] wipping :D [22:05] :wave [22:05] :wave: [22:06] just a quick update - we're calling for nominations for the Local Communities Research Committee, not the LoCo Council. Could we please edit it? [22:06] o/ jose [22:06] this should be the correct link: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/call-for-nomination-local-communities-research-committee/20271 [22:06] sorry I didn't see this before [22:09] jose, the intention for the first link was Walter's update.. the 20271 is in the 'evaluational links' (there was some discussion about how to do it.. this was decision). I gather you don't think highlighting of 20271 is significant enough? [22:09] jose: Ouch - Maybe I should have caught that - checking now ! [22:10] this should be an entirely new project, so it'd be nice if we could treat it as such [22:10] I can do a planet reminder this week and we can post that next Monday? how does that sound? [22:14] Bashing-om, you got this? (I'm going to walk pup outside; hopefully avoid another puddle inside) [22:15] jose: I have little heartburn to try and bring additional attention that issue for this week. Will take agrrement for the added edit - as we are all here should not be that big of a deal. We can summerize https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/call-for-nomination-local-communities-research-committee/20271 inder a new heading ( as we had discussed). [22:15] as you prefer [22:18] jose: We are all in this together - The way it is is the way I prefered due to time constraints at that time. I can now take the time for a do-over, Your call if it makes our presentation the better. [22:18] I'll leave it to you, I don't want to impose anything :) [22:22] jose: To insure better is never an imposition. I re-think and I do not see that summerizatiom of the 20271 article will add to the lead article. I can be persuaded otherwise :( [22:25] you're good [22:27] jose: Great - we make the nomimation for the Committeee lead next issue, as led from a Planet article :D [22:27] thank you! [22:32] jose: guiverc: Looks now that Gdoc is open for all to make suggestions for its content :) [22:35] Bashing-om, my concern over highlighting next issue; is the planet is from fridge; fridge is from Jun-8 ML post (ie. last week)... I'll write summary if we want to add to this week (20271). I have no issues with mentioning again (it's high priority community topic). [22:36] mentioning again (i was thinking next week; 2nd UWN) [22:36] I will make another Planet post about this regardless [22:38] guiverc: I do agree it is important - however - how does a separate summary from the lead article prompt our readers to read deeper ? [22:38] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Planet:: The Fridge: Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter Issue 665 @ https://fridge.ubuntu.com/2021/01/11/ubuntu-weekly-newsletter-issue-665/ [22:40] prompting readers to read further I see as imperative for 3rd party detail (bloggers etc), not a concern of mine with official Ubuntu details/notices.. [22:41] guiverc: Sure - as stated no big deal now to make the change, I go with your lead here :) [22:43] no ad/click revenue to be gained on official stuff.. anything that helps them to take interest in it I see as a plus (so lean maybe of benefit, may not be)... How about we work in gdoc [22:44] guiverc: Great - I log onto Gdoc and we do this right this time :) [23:01] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Fridge:: Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter Issue 665 @ https://fridge.ubuntu.com/2021/01/11/ubuntu-weekly-newsletter-issue-665/ (by guiverc) [23:17] krytarik: ^^ We have proceeded to make the WIKI adjustment. please see Gdoc for your concurrance. [23:19] I'll also just trust your judgement here! XD [23:20] krytarik: Thanks for that vote of confidence - we do eett :) [23:20] guiverc: ^ editing our WIKI at this time (ATT). [23:20] yep. thanks Bashing-om [23:31] jose: See now brown cow :P https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue665 . Good ? [23:43] UWN: Edits made to WIKI665 and to the Forum post - How did they take jose ? [23:45] guiverc: ^^ The fridge need to be re-addressed ? [23:47] going point, thanks Bashing-om ! [23:50] the script didn't show a change, i'll add the extra line manually [23:53] updated manually - https://fridge.ubuntu.com/2021/01/11/ubuntu-weekly-newsletter-issue-665/ [23:55] guiverc: Looks good - you do fine work :D [23:55] you too :)