[08:28] Seeing repeated timeout errors with OOPS last 5 minutes. (Error ID: OOPS-12be8b5060bbc1f92318e126ad954cb2) [08:28] https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-12be8b5060bbc1f92318e126ad954cb2 [08:45] cristiangsp: Seeing repeated timeout errors with OOPS last 5 minutes. (Error ID: OOPS-12be8b5060bbc1f92318e126ad954cb2) [08:45] https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-12be8b5060bbc1f92318e126ad954cb2 [08:45] cristiangsp: e.g. for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux [08:57] yep, I can reproduce it too, checking... [09:01] it seems that the overview section is fetching too much data which triggers the timeout. There is any specific are that you are interested on? [09:02] https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux seems loading fine for example [09:03] (just trying to find a better route for you as investigating and fixing a too big query can take a while [09:03] (just trying to find a better route for you as investigating and fixing a too big query can take a while) [09:04] we were trying to get to the publishing history [09:04] but it's not vital so don't worry about trying to find a route for us right now [09:05] got it, I would say that if you pick a small project probably you will be able to figure out the route for that one [09:06] like this: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+publishinghistory [09:06] got it via https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+publishinghistory [09:07] nice synchronization :P [09:09] but we wouldn't make the syncronised swimming team :) [09:09] XD [13:49] good day, anyone happen to know if lgw01 has been working with degraded storage over the last couple days? [13:53] context: I have a kernel build with minor patches that shouldn't affect the overall size at https://launchpad.net/~kisak/+archive/ubuntu/steamvr/+build/20807185 which failed twice with out of disk space at https://launchpad.net/~kisak/+archive/ubuntu/steamvr/+build/20807185 , then last night it failed after 11 hours with no log. [13:53] whoops, sorry about the double link [13:56] also, something restarted https://launchpad.net/~kisak/+archive/ubuntu/kisak-mesa/+build/20812889 , and this llvm build is at about 1/3 complete after 6 hours, so it's going to take 18 hours to complete when 4-6 hours is expected [13:57] a raid array being rebuilt would explain it [14:01] There are quite a lot of reasons why OpenStack nodes might be slow; storage is only one possibility [14:02] We'd have to bring this up with our sysadmins. There's nothing intentional from the Launchpad side of things, but we aren't the lowest layer of the stack here ... [14:02] yeah, the llvm build is just circumstantial, and I'm not trying to complain about it. [14:05] the practical part of my question is if I should give up on the kernel build after this, I don't want to be wasting resources if there's a blocker [14:14] I don't think so, but yours is the second report of lgw01 slowness recently so we'll need to dig [16:25] that kernel build hit another out of space on device failure [16:26] that's 3 out of space on device after ~2 hours and 1 unknown, log-less failure after 11 hours [16:27] all on lgw01 [16:27] failures without a log mean that either the builder crashed or there was a network interruption [16:27] out of space can't really be due to infrastructure though. are you sure your build-dependencies haven't changed [16:27] ? [16:27] each builder VM has had the same disk allocation for a couple of years at least [16:28] there are known bugs where launchpad-buildd doesn't always react well to ENOSPC, too [16:28] so could be all the same thing [16:28] I've not changed any build dependencies, it's inherited from https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel-test/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/mainline-crack/tag/?h=cod/mainline/v5.10.6 [16:28] you might not have changed any, but they might have been changed under you [16:28] for cases where you do get a build log, have you tried diffing it against a previous successful log to look for other changes? [16:29] I've not dug deeper yet. [16:31] I'd quite strongly advise doing a successful/failing build log diff to start with - it's a very useful approach in general [16:32] out of space is likely to be some kind of problem internal to the build, even if it's in something you're build-depending on rather than in your package directly [16:32] and diffing build logs might show you something you missed [18:18] so, it's failing while installing the files that go into linux-image-unsigned-5.10.6-steamvr-generic-dbgsym, I guess I have to disable debug symbols for the PPA, which I'm not thrilled about. There's no reason why a mainline build wouldn't hit the same issue. [18:24] Are you building an additional flavour, or perhaps something slightly larger in some way? [18:24] You might also consider removing intermediate output along the way once it's been processed [18:24] Since it sounds like your failure is pretty close to the end [18:30] no, there's about 72 KB of patches that gets applied to be base config from ubuntu. no additional packages or flavoring [18:32] it's about the middle of the build, since if it got further, it would finish with -generic- packages, delete it, and then do -lowlatency- [18:35] the previous kernel build for this PPA was back in November, and there's been ~15MB from normal package bumps in the container setup [18:42] happen to know if Icy has the same storage limit? [18:50] yeah, the dbgsym package grew another .1GB apparently https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages?field.name_filter=linux-oem&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=focal [18:58] Icy? Oh, you mean lcy01 [18:59] Yes, the VM flavours are identical, 60G disk [18:59] (they're airport codes for roughly where the relevant datacentres are physically located) [19:00] okay thanks ... uhh ... that's impossible to tell that's an 'l' instead of an 'I' on the webpage [19:01] it's stupid the build grows that large [20:02] has launchpad stopped including display names in email from: recently? [20:45] mwhudson: Not intentionally - what sort of email? [20:46] cjwatson: ones from uploads that go to -changes lists, for one [20:48] hmm [20:49] maybe it's gmail that's changed actually [20:49] which MUA are you using? [20:49] mwhudson: Just looked at my hirsute-changes mailbox and they seem to have display names in From: [20:49] yeah indeed [20:49] doko: gmail in browser [20:50] sorry for the noise [20:50] np [20:50] at least with groovy's Thunderbird I see -changes for my uploads as well