[07:04] morning [07:56] mvo: morning [07:56] good morning mborzecki [07:59] PR snapd#9835 closed: tests: apply workaround done for snap-advise-command to apt-hooks test [08:08] mvo: can you land https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9831 ? the failures are in apt-hooks and snap-advise-command again [08:08] PR #9831: interfaces/builtin: fix unit test expecting snap-device-helper at /usr/lib/snapd [08:17] mborzecki: sure thing [08:19] mvo: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9819#discussion_r556493129 /etc/dbus-1 is in centos-*, amzn2, 14.04, and must be in other other systems too [08:19] PR #9819: snap-confine: make host /etc/ssl available for snaps on classic [08:19] PR snapd#9831 closed: interfaces/builtin: fix unit test expecting snap-device-helper at /usr/lib/snapd [08:19] i can push a tweak there [08:20] mborzecki: but dbus-1 does not come from the host? [08:20] mborzecki: or am I missing something? [08:21] mvo: ahh right, i need my morning coffee clearly [08:21] mborzecki: does my reply in there make sense? [08:21] mborzecki: ok :) no worries! [08:22] morning [08:22] mvo: /etc/nsswitch is doubly problematic, it's a file in most systems, but a symlink on fedora ;) which we skip by default [08:22] let me check /etc/alternatives [08:24] mborzecki: alternatives are a debian thing, not sure if those ever were adopted someplace else [08:26] mvo: hm looks like only arch is missing it, which is ok i think? [08:31] mvo, I think suse has those as well [08:31] are we finally exploring untangling /etc [08:34] good morning [08:34] * zyga is trying to drop the coffee [08:39] mborzecki: +1 [08:39] mborzecki: I can update (unless you have this ready) [08:39] zyga: hey, can you take a quick look at https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/862869 with your morning coffee? [08:40] mborzecki, I stopped using coffee :) [08:40] but yeah, sure :) [08:40] mvo: the spread run is still in progress, if it's successful i'd rather merge it and do a follow up [08:40] mborzecki: sounds great [08:41] mborzecki: fwiw, samuele marked it as "needs-samuele-review" so we only only land after his +1 [08:41] mvo: right, in which case i may push a tweak for that test then :) [08:41] zyga: no untangling of etc yet :( not sure I will ever see this day [08:41] mborzecki: yeah [09:06] mborzecki: thanks for the review of validation-sets [09:07] pstolowski: yw [09:07] mborzecki: btw, snapd-generator fix is ready fo re-review ;) [09:24] mborzecki, is the system:snappy approval enough or do you need me to do some follow up steps? [09:25] zyga: no, having a 2nd pair of eyes glance at the spec is enough, thanks! [09:29] PR snapd#9513 closed: snapshotstate: detect duplicated snapshot imports [09:30] mvo, did anyone test the classic snap on UC20 (should we delist it finally ? or just make it print "please use lxd" ... or something like that) ... https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/uc-20-snapcraft-install-issue/22162/4 [09:30] ogra: great point, we should probably suggest using lxd at this point [09:30] mvo: ^ #9513, finally! \o/ [09:31] PR #9513: snapshotstate: detect duplicated snapshot imports [09:31] yeah [09:31] pstolowski: nice [09:31] any idea why tests/go.mod gets updated behind my back sometimes? [09:32] pstolowski: compiling go things inside tests [09:32] pstolowski: in a meeting [09:33] hmm, interesting, thanks [09:36] mvo: here's the output run against the snapd snap: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/m5RHWNs7jn/ -- there's obviously some false positives w.r.t. the NSS plugins, since they look like regular libraries [09:38] jamesh: thanks, still in a meeting but will get back to you [09:42] mvo: #9819 failed in the dirs-not-shared-with-host test, i'll push a tweak to use /etc/alternatives [09:42] PR #9819: snap-confine: make host /etc/ssl available for snaps on classic [10:01] mvo: hah, there's no /etc/alternatives in the core snap [10:01] mborzecki: oh, fun! [10:01] maybe it got removed at some point [10:02] mvo: i suppose we stay with apparmor.d for now, and just blacklist the systems where it's not on the host [10:04] mborzecki: do we need to blacklist? /etc/ssl is also not available and still works, no? [10:04] mborzecki: also in a meeting still [10:18] mvo: haha, more fun, /etc/os-release on debian has no ID_LIKE=debian ;) [10:23] mborzecki: woah! just woah! [10:23] mborzecki: well, I guess it makes sense [10:23] mborzecki: but :) [10:23] mvo: i'm looking into fixing that [10:24] mborzecki: ta [10:40] PR snapd#9838 opened: asserts: sort by revision with Sort interface [10:54] mborzecki: ^ [10:57] pstolowski: will look in a bit [10:57] mvo: pushed the changes to #9819 please take a look [10:57] PR #9819: snap-confine: make host /etc/ssl available for snaps on classic [10:58] ogra: have you already applied for BeagleV? [10:59] looks like the initial batch of those boards is going to be quite small [10:59] mborzecki: thank you, checking [11:15] mborzecki, only heard about it yesterday ... havent yet,m no ... but i plan to in a later batch [11:53] pstolowski: couple more comments https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9817 [11:53] PR #9817: cmd/snapd-generator: don't create mount overrides for snap-try snaps inside lxc [11:53] ty [12:38] pstolowski: mvo: can we merge https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9732 ? 2 +1, the error on xenial is unrelated [12:38] PR #9732: asserts: snapasserts method to validate installed snaps against validation sets [12:42] mborzecki: yes, totally, but may need manual merge again [12:45] PR snapd#9839 opened: tests: spread log analyzer that could be used for re execute failed tests [12:45] PR snapd#9840 opened: interfaces/builtin: Allow DBus property access on org.freedesktop.Notifications [13:01] pedronis: #8532 has +1 from me, with some tweaks [13:01] PR #8532: tests: install new snapd deb into preseed image [13:06] pstolowski: thx, I queued it but not sure when I'll get to it [13:06] pstolowski: I might have questions [13:28] morning folks [13:52] PR snapcraft#3404 closed: build(deps): bump lxml from 4.5.0 to 4.6.2 [13:52] PR snapcraft#3417 closed: Allow validation assertions to be revoked [13:59] pstolowski: I can merge 9732 if the current run is not green, just ping me [13:59] mvo: ty [14:01] PR snapd#9834 closed: tests: normalize test tools - part 1 [15:04] good morning ijohnson [15:04] hey zyga [15:04] ijohnson, how do you find focus to work in the last few days? [15:04] ha [15:04] memes, lots and lots of memes [15:04] is sergio around? [15:05] ijohnson, I think we all want to wake up in Feb [15:05] zyga: huh yeah Sergio was in SU, not sure why he's not on IRC [15:05] ah, no worries, I'll wait [15:06] zyga: yeah that's what everybody kept saying about after November "I can't wait for XXX to be over" :-P [15:06] PR snapd#9732 closed: asserts: snapasserts method to validate installed snaps against validation sets [15:06] ijohnson, yeah, I really hope it's one of those shows where the finale is just boring though [15:07] indeed, that's all our hopes really [15:07] ijohnson, not sure how it looks from your point of view but I was not expecting any of that to happen [15:07] * zyga waits for debootstrap to run [15:07] let me grab some water quickly [15:07] yeah it was really unexpected, I mean I was nervous something was gonna happen, but I never imagined that it would come to that [15:11] pstolowski: if you merged master into 9838 it will be a lot smaller now, yes? [15:13] mvo: yes, going to do in a sec [15:18] mborzecki: I added some comments to 9819. thanks a lot for updating it! [15:22] PR snapcraft#3418 closed: project: always set target arch even if not cross compiling [15:31] * cachio lunch [15:31] mvo: updated [15:38] ta [15:45] mborzecki: can you +1 #9838? [15:45] PR #9838: asserts: sort by revision with Sort interface [16:58] just saw interesting failure of uc20-create-partitions test: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/VCjQWKwP72/ [16:58] mvo: ^ [17:10] pstolowski: woah, "bad message" ?!? [17:11] mvo: that was on #9838, so nothing related to my branch [17:11] PR #9838: asserts: sort by revision with Sort interface [17:12] PR snapcraft#3410 closed: project: enable experimental target-arch support for core20 [17:12] pstolowski: right [18:01] mvo: that mount error message seems to be because the kernel is returning silly error messages for bad CRC detection: [18:01] > This is because kernel uses EBADMSG errno for "Bad CRC detected" situation. [18:01] from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496764 [18:31] ijohnson: thanks [18:54] jjohansen: hey, what is the status of the quiet profile flag? [18:59] jdstrand: currently scheduled for 3.1 but it could get pushed to 3.2 if higher priority items don't give me time to finish up the work on it [19:02] jjohansen: thanks! [19:28] hey jdstrand, what is the status of https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1868051? the mentioned pr was merged, so can I mark it as fixed ? [19:28] Bug #1868051: browser-support[allow-sandbox=true] should not grant access to /var/lib/snapd/desktop/applications [19:52] PR snapcraft#3350 closed: project loader, schema: add advanced grammar support for build-environment [19:57] PR snapd#9829 closed: tests: cleanup the run-checks script [20:04] * cachio afk [20:10] ijohnson: let me check [20:16] ijohnson: yep, fixed. I updated the bug [20:17] does anyone in here use the irccloud snap? if so would you mind testing the latest edge/candidate release before i promote it to stable? i just significantly rejigged our build process and bumped the main deps (including electron) several major versions and want to make sure i didn't mess anything up. thanks https://snapcraft.io/irccloud [20:28] jwheare, that's nice, I suggest talking about it on the forum as well [20:59] thanks jdstrand [21:00] jwheare: sure I can give it a spin [21:24] jwheare: seems to work fine for me, no problems that I can tell, I'm on revision 43 === ubott2 is now known as ubottu [21:32] ijohnson: amazing, thanks so much for checking [22:29] np [23:38] PR snapcraft#3336 closed: package repositories: introduce path property for exact paths [23:43] PR snapcraft#3416 closed: repo: default to target arch for stage package cache