[01:36] <vorlon> bryce: well, phpunit is bootstrapped now, but whee there are a lot of failing autopkgtests on the revdeps
[01:39] <bryce> vorlon, ah congrats.  And yeah I bet there's a lot to cleanup
[01:40] <bryce> php, the gift that keeps on giving
[01:42] <bryce> from php-parser...  autopkgtest-virt-ssh: WARNING: ssh connection failed. Retrying in 3 seconds...
[01:42] <bryce> that sounds like a weird error
[01:43] <bryce> php-codecoverage has... badpkg: rules extract failed with exit code 1
[01:43] <bryce> also weird
[01:44] <mwhudson> the first one is an infrastructure fail of some kind i think?
[01:44] <bryce> yeah what I'm thinking too
[01:48] <bryce> some of these failures (php-doctrine-common for example) are because they ran against the hirsute version rather than the hirsute-proposed version.  The errors sound like phpunit api version mismatches, so likely can be fixed with retriggering with the right version
[01:52] <bryce> php-twig same thing
[01:53] <bryce> composer is failing for some other reason, not sure what that is but looks more like a typical php test failure
[01:54] <bryce> anyway, good news is that the circular dependency is gone :-)
[02:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1037.40] (core, kernel)
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: callaudiod [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.5-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: callaudiod [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.5-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfilezilla [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.26.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfilezilla [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.26.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php-symfony-polyfill [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.22.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: callaudiod [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.5-1] (no packageset)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: callaudiod [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.5-1] (no packageset)
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfilezilla [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.26.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qmmp [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.4.3-1] (no packageset)
[05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qmmp [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.4.3-1] (no packageset)
[05:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfilezilla [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.26.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfilezilla [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.26.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qmmp [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.4.3-1] (no packageset)
[05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: callaudiod [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.5-1] (no packageset)
[05:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfilezilla [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.26.0-1] (no packageset)
[06:11] <cpaelzer> LocutusOfBorg: I see the former FTBFS on armhf https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dune-pdelab/2.7~20200605-2build1 was fixed by an upload of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dune-pdelab/2.7~20200605-2ubuntu1
[06:12] <cpaelzer> LocutusOfBorg: but that now seems to expose the same issue on armhf & ppc64el
[06:12] <cpaelzer> Is this just generally flaky or did you identify a real issue with the default parallel setting?
[06:12] <cpaelzer> might it make sense to just set it arch-inconditionally?
[06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qmmp [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.4.3-1] (no packageset)
[06:17] <cpaelzer> The entanglement fun just got an upload of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-workspace/4:5.20.5-2ubuntu1 to be part of the party and holding things up. For now it just seems to need time ...
[06:27] <cpaelzer> ubuntu-archive: is someone around to promote natsort 1903698 and libbpf 1910576 please. Both seem to be ready
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-133.137]
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-201.233]
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-133.137]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1035.37]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1037.40]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-63.71]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-63.71]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gkeop [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1009.10]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-63.71]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-63.71]
[07:56] <LocutusOfBorg> cpaelzer, might be  yes
[07:56] <LocutusOfBorg> generally the new version looks really less flaky in building
[08:00] <cpaelzer> LocutusOfBorg: I 've hit rebuild on the two failing ones in proposed, and at the same time started a PPA which does the change on all arch
[08:00] <cpaelzer> if the PPA is vastly superios to the other flaky builds I'll upload, but so far it doesn't seem to be much better
[08:43] <LocutusOfBorg> cpaelzer, for now i'm uploading armhf/ppc64el parallel reduction so it migrates. feel free o upload a new one after :)
[09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1018.19]
[09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-39.44]
[09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-39.44]
[09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-39.44]
[09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-39.44]
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wslu (groovy-proposed/main) [3.2.1-0ubuntu1 => 3.2.1-0ubuntu1.1] (core)
[10:34] <cpaelzer> LocutusOfBorg: the "all arch parallel=3" fails as well for me - just as much as the "all arch parallel=1" - I just think it isn't (much) related to parlellism at all
[10:34] <LocutusOfBorg> i susp gcc-9 works
[10:34] <cpaelzer> or "retry until happy" which will make the next one suffer :-/
[10:34] <Laney> bryce and mwhudson: That warning isn't the error, the error is that it can't get the source package for some reason
[10:35] <cpaelzer> and yes, of the toolchain issues I've worked on recenlty many got resolved by going back
[10:35] <Laney> I'd guess that it's because of FTBFS and all-proposed=1
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: acroread (precise-proposed/partner) [9.5.5-1precise1 => 9.5.5+empty-1precise1] (no packageset)
[11:13] <oSoMoN> I'm looking at gettext 0.21-3ubuntu1 that's FTBFS on i386 because one of its build-deps (dh-elpa) pulls in emacs, which isn't built on i386. How do we deal with those?
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gauche-c-wrapper [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.6.1-12] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gauche-c-wrapper [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.6.1-12] (no packageset)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gauche-c-wrapper [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.6.1-12] (no packageset)
[11:28] <Laney> oSoMoN: since it's only used for an arch-all package, you could move that build-dep to build-depends-indep maybe?
[11:28] <Laney> cpaelzer: done those two
[11:28] <Laney> (promotions)
[11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rpi-eeprom (focal-proposed/multiverse) [7.8-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 11.3-1ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rpi-eeprom (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [9.0-1ubuntu1 => 11.3-1ubuntu1~20.10.1] (no packageset)
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gauche-c-wrapper [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.6.1-12] (no packageset)
[11:30] <sil2100> tjaalton: hey! ;) If you have time, we have an HWE related SRU for groovy and focal for the raspberry pi that we'd like to get into -proposed as soon as possible
[11:30] <sil2100> tjaalton: the rpi-eeprom SRUs above ^
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gauche-c-wrapper [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.6.1-12] (no packageset)
[11:31] <tjaalton> sil2100: got it
[11:31] <sil2100> Those are straight backports from hirsute as well, this is a binary blob thingy
[11:31] <sil2100> Thank you!
[11:32] <oSoMoN> Laney, that sounds like a good idea, thanks for the tip!
[11:34] <Laney> oSoMoN: I think dh is smart enough to make the --with elpa in the rules deactivate in the non-indep case so it "should" only be a control change, but test that of course
[11:34] <oSoMoN> yeah, I'm testing in a PPA now
[11:34] <Laney> 👍
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gauche-c-wrapper [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.6.1-12] (no packageset)
[11:47] <oSoMoN> Laney, nope :/
[11:47] <oSoMoN> dh clean --with elpa --with maven-repo-helper
[11:47] <oSoMoN> dh: error: unable to load addon elpa: Can't locate Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/elpa.pm in @INC
[11:48] <Laney> maybe that only works with dh-sequence-foo BDs
[12:12] <oSoMoN> Laney, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/517347416/gettext_0.21-3ubuntu2~ppa1_0.21-3ubuntu2~ppa2.diff.gz seems to be doing the trick
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rpi-eeprom [source] (groovy-proposed) [11.3-1ubuntu1~20.10.1]
[12:31] <tjaalton> sil2100: should bug 1884748 be made a dupe of the new one?
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1016.18] (core)
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rpi-eeprom [source] (focal-proposed) [11.3-1ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[12:39] <tjaalton> sil2100: if you have time to ack pulseaudio for f/g then that would be great ;) (a regression fix, and status on hirsute clarified)
[12:39] <tjaalton> the current version in proposed is a month old
[12:40] <tjaalton> folks are getting impatient :)
[12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1016.18]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted acroread [source] (precise-proposed) [9.5.5+empty-1precise1]
[13:28] <Laney> oSoMoN: it's missing maven-repo-helper, does that matter? and I don't know if missing the other -indep targets matters either
[13:28] <Laney> I guess if the packages contain the right contents it's fine :>
[13:36] <oSoMoN> yeah, that's what I'll check carefully next, after I've had my coffee
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (bionic-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.3 => 0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.4] (core)
[14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libseqlib [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libseqlib [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-1.13 (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.13.8-1ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 1.13.8-1ubuntu1~16.04.2] (no packageset)
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-1.13 (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.13.8-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 1.13.8-1ubuntu1~18.04.2] (no packageset)
[14:28] <sil2100> tjaalton: thanks! Will do ;)
[14:28] <tjaalton> great, thanks ;)
[14:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (bionic-proposed/universe) [20190801-0ubuntu1~18.04.2 => 20201222.00-0ubuntu2~18.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[14:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20190801-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 => 20201222.00-0ubuntu2~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: google-guest-agent (xenial-proposed/primary) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-1.13 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.13.8-1ubuntu1~18.04.2]
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-1.13 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.13.8-1ubuntu1~16.04.2]
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: google-guest-agent (bionic-proposed/primary) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: google-osconfig-agent (bionic-proposed/primary) [20210112.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[14:48] <rbalint> sil2100, ^ this is the last one from me today, osconfig ftbfs on xenial, thanks for all the accepts!
[14:49] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, FYI slic3r-prusa built fine on ppc64el with the default parallelism, I dropped the delta...
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (groovy-proposed/main) [1:3.38.1-1ubuntu1 => 1:3.38.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:20] <sil2100> o/
[15:22] <LocutusOfBorg> please ubuntua-archive accept libfilezilla binaries
[15:23] <LocutusOfBorg> otherwise filezilla can't build...
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfilezilla [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.26.0-1]
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfilezilla [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.26.0-1]
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfilezilla [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.26.0-1]
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfilezilla [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.26.0-1]
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfilezilla [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.26.0-1]
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfilezilla [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.26.0-1]
[15:45] <LocutusOfBorg> ta
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-guest-agent [source] (bionic-proposed) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[16:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-guest-agent [source] (xenial-proposed) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-guest-agent [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (no packageset)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-guest-agent [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (no packageset)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-guest-agent [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (no packageset)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-guest-agent [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (no packageset)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-guest-agent [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (no packageset)
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-guest-agent [i386] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset)
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-guest-agent [s390x] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset)
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-guest-agent [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (no packageset)
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-guest-agent [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset)
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-guest-agent [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset)
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-guest-agent [arm64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset)
[16:30] <oSoMoN> sil2100, rbasak: can I please ask your opinion on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1895643/comments/29 ?
[16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-desktop3 (groovy-proposed/main) [3.38.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.38.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:51] <rbasak> Reading
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-guest-agent [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-guest-agent [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-guest-agent [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-guest-agent [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-guest-agent [i386] (xenial-proposed) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-guest-agent [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-guest-agent [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-guest-agent [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-guest-agent [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-guest-agent [i386] (bionic-proposed) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-guest-agent [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[16:56] <rbasak> oSoMoN, sil2100: IMHO, I think that breaking the other packages to bump Thunderbird is inevitable. Technically I don't think that's within the remit of the SRU team - it's a TB thing. I think we should figure out how to mitigate as much as possible, document and publicise the breakage as best as we can, then break it.
[16:56] <cjwatson> Can anyone promote acroread (in partner) from precise-proposed to precise?  I accepted it but I think it would be better if somebody who does more routine SRU stuff could look
[16:57] <cjwatson> SRU/partner/whatevs
[16:58] <rbasak> Since I think it's a TB thing, I'd prefer to check that a couple of other TB people concur, especially as I'm new
[16:59] <rbasak> We'll need to check if Breaks will do what we want by default - since I think "apt ugprade" probably won't remove the other packages in favour of a Thunderbird upgrade?
[16:59] <oSoMoN> I'll check that now
[16:59] <rbasak> Thanks
[17:01] <oSoMoN> rbasak, indeed "apt upgrade" won't remove the broken packages, and thus won't update thunderbird, as opposed to what "apt dist-upgrade" does
[17:03] <rbasak> oSoMoN: do you happen to know what the GUI software update thing does?
[17:04] <oSoMoN> rbasak, no, but I'll check
[17:04] <rbasak> I wonder if we should ship an SRU of the broken packages "beyond" the Breaks, making them empty, like was done with bitcoin and similar.
[17:05] <rbasak> With a notice explaining, or linking to an explanation.
[17:05] <rbasak> I've not thought this through. There are some routes to mitigation we could explore at least.
[17:06] <oSoMoN> Software Updater says "Not all updates can be installed"
[17:06] <oSoMoN> and offers running a partial upgrade
[17:06] <rbasak> Presumably that wouldn't include Thunderbird then
[17:08] <oSoMoN> oh in fact if I choose to proceed with the partial upgrade it does warn me that it's going to remove two packages (jsunit and tinyjsd), and upgrade 5 others (thunderbird*)
[17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tpm2-pkcs11 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-3] (no packageset)
[17:08] <rbasak> That's better, at least
[17:08] <oSoMoN> so the GUI experience is a bit scary, but it does what we expect
[17:09] <oSoMoN> maybe not scary, but at least unusual for most users
[17:14] <oSoMoN> rbasak, will you speak to other TB members, or do you want me to bring up the topic (if so what's the usual way, is there a dedicated ML)?
[17:16] <rbasak> oSoMoN: technical-board@lists.u.c please
[17:17] <rbasak> There's also a regular meeting and agenda but the ML is probably the best place to start.
[17:17] <oSoMoN> ack, I'll do that shortly
[17:17] <rbasak> Thanks!
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.10 => 2.664.11] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[17:19] <xnox> sil2100:  ^ that's livecd-rootfs backport of all the things for riscv64. I also uploaded it into my PPA, hopefully it will build and I will be able to rerun all livefs builds there to ensure the backport doesn't break anything.
[17:20] <xnox> but source code cherrypicks otherwise look legit.
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openscap (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.15-1ubuntu0.2 => 1.2.15-1ubuntu0.3] (no packageset)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openscap (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.17-0.1ubuntu1 => 1.2.17-0.1ubuntu1.1] (no packageset)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openscap (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.16-2ubuntu3.1 => 1.2.16-2ubuntu3.2] (no packageset)
[17:21] <xnox> horum, missed one.
[17:22] <cjwatson> vorlon: ^ maybe for acroread?
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openscap (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.2.8-1ubuntu0.2 => 1.2.8-1ubuntu0.3] (no packageset)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.10 => 2.664.12] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libseqlib [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librcsb-core-wrapper [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.005-9] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librcsb-core-wrapper [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.005-9] (no packageset)
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librcsb-core-wrapper [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.005-9] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-osconfig-agent [source] (bionic-proposed) [20210112.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libseqlib [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-osconfig-agent [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20210112.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (no packageset)
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-osconfig-agent [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20210112.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (no packageset)
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-osconfig-agent [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20210112.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (no packageset)
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: google-osconfig-agent [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20210112.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (no packageset)
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libseqlib [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-3~build1] (no packageset)
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libseqlib [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-3~build1] (no packageset)
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (bionic-proposed) [20201222.00-0ubuntu2~18.04.0]
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (bionic-proposed/universe) [20190801-0ubuntu1~18.04.2 => 20201222.00-0ubuntu2~18.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librcsb-core-wrapper [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.005-9] (no packageset)
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librcsb-core-wrapper [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.005-9] (no packageset)
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libseqlib [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-3~build1] (no packageset)
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libseqlib [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-3~build1] (no packageset)
[18:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (bionic-proposed/universe) [20190801-0ubuntu1~18.04.2 => 20201222.00-0ubuntu2~18.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (bionic-proposed) [20201222.00-0ubuntu2~18.04.0]
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (bionic-proposed) [20201222.00-0ubuntu2~18.04.0]
[18:12] <sil2100> rbalint: hey! Looking at gce-compute-image-packages for xenial now - one quick question just-in-case: is nvme-cli in xenial up-to-date for all uses of the package?
[18:12] <sil2100> Just asking as xenial seems to have a very old version of it compared to other series
[18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20201222.00-0ubuntu2~18.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20201222.00-0ubuntu2~16.04.0]
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libseqlib [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-3~build1] (no packageset)
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20201222.00-0ubuntu2~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-63.71~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-63.71~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:13.99.2-1ubuntu2.3]
[18:22] <sil2100> xnox: ACK
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (focal-proposed) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.10]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-133.137~16.04.1] (kernel)
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1032.33] (no packageset)
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-63.71~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1036.39] (core, kernel)
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1038.40] (core, kernel)
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-133.137~16.04.1] (kernel)
[18:26] <sil2100> xnox: uh, there's two livecd-rootfs uploads in the queue - both have the same changelog but different version numbers!
[18:27] <sil2100> xnox: I guess it was supposed to be 2.664.11, but why then 2.664.12 was uploaded?
[18:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-63.71~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:28] <sil2100> Any reason 2.664.12 was used? I don't see 2.664.11 being anywhere, so it feels like the correct versioning
[18:29] <sil2100> xnox: ok, since you might not be around and I'd like to EOD, I'll take 2.664.12 and re-version it as 2.664.11, then accept
[18:30] <sil2100> Ah, ok, I see
[18:31] <sil2100> It's due to the tag creation on the focal branch
[18:31] <sil2100> Nevermind that, let me review .12 then as is!
[18:33] <sil2100> grub2 I'll take a look at on Monday
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.11]
[18:39] <sil2100> xnox: ok, the backports seem safe but of course I have no way to quickly check if these are all the needed changes - but we can get it building and iterate on top of it if anything
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.12]
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [20201222.00-0ubuntu2~18.04.0]
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-osconfig-agent [i386] (bionic-proposed) [20210112.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-osconfig-agent [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [20210112.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-osconfig-agent [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [20210112.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted google-osconfig-agent [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [20210112.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [20201222.00-0ubuntu2~16.04.0]
[18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-133.137~16.04.1]
[18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-133.137~16.04.1]
[18:43] <sil2100> rbalint: google-guest-agent had a FTBFS on xenial armhf and powerpc - I re-ran the builds but please take a look if they fail again
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librcsb-core-wrapper [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.005-9] (no packageset)
[19:09] <rbalint> sil2100, i'll report the failures upstream, but in general those are not interesting arches for the package
[19:20] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, missing build on arm64: libdune-pdelab-dev (from 2.7~20200605-2ubuntu1)
[19:20] <LocutusOfBorg> missing build on armhf: libdune-pdelab-dev (from 2.7~20200605-2)
[19:20] <LocutusOfBorg> can you please kick them out?
[19:20] <LocutusOfBorg> the package is out from testing
[19:20] <LocutusOfBorg> ftbfs in sid: #976499
[19:21] <LocutusOfBorg> I prefer to keep some architectures instead if removing the package at all, but if you want to remove, even better
[19:21] <LocutusOfBorg> I think that pdelab will give troubles in the future anyway
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.005-9]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.005-9]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libseqlib [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-2]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.005-9]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.005-9]
[20:23] <vorlon> cjwatson: looking, thanks
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gauche-c-wrapper [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.6.1-12]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gauche-c-wrapper [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.6.1-12]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.005-9]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libseqlib [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-1]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tpm2-pkcs11 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.0-3]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gauche-c-wrapper [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.6.1-12]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libseqlib [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-1]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.005-9]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libseqlib [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-2]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted callaudiod [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.5-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gauche-c-wrapper [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.6.1-12]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gauche-c-wrapper [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.6.1-12]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qmmp [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.4.3-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qmmp [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.4.3-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted callaudiod [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.5-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qmmp [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.4.3-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gauche-c-wrapper [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.6.1-12]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qmmp [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.4.3-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted callaudiod [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.5-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted callaudiod [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.5-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kodi-pvr-vuplus [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [7.2.0+ds1-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-symfony-polyfill [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.22.0-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted callaudiod [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.5-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kodi-pvr-wmc [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [6.0.0-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gsequencer [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.7.25-1]
[20:25] <vorlon> chrisccoulson_, cjwatson: any particular reason we're handling acroread EOL with a dummy package vs straight removal and ignoring it?  partner never had a committment of security support or anything; if users currently have the package installed, why do we want to neuter it?
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kodi-pvr-vuplus [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [7.2.0+ds1-1]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lilypond [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.22.0-1]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kodi-pvr-wmc [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [6.0.0-1]
[20:26] <vorlon> not sure if anyone is looking at rails at all, but fwiw I kicked out a bunch of revdeps that had failing autopkgtests and have been removed from Debian testing; still some non-trivial blockers though
[20:28] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: libdune-pdelab-dev> ack, removing the binaries via the principle that if we were going to remove the source anyway it would come back on the next sync whether or not this bug was fixed, thereby resulting in the reduced architecture list making it into the release anyway
[20:28] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks, seems legit to me :)
[20:49] <cjwatson> vorlon: IDK, it's just the same as what we're doing with adobe-flashplugin and it didn't seem unreasonable enough for me to want to argue with it
[20:49] <vorlon> ah are we?
[20:51] <cjwatson> vorlon: see ~launchpad on MM for a thread about the current situation
[20:51] <vorlon> ok
[20:51] <cjwatson> (I don't really care much either way though)
[20:52] <kanashiro> vorlon, I want to take a look at rails situation, I just need to find some time do it :)
[20:55] <chrisccoulson_> vorlon, cjwatson, yeah, we probably could have done acroread/precise via a removal. And the same applies for adobe-flashplugin for precise and trusty
[20:56] <vorlon> kanashiro: ok cool
[20:56] <vorlon> chrisccoulson_: ah, I just replied to the MM thread - so are you ok with me just deleting acroread now instead?
[20:59] <chrisccoulson_> vorlon, yeah, I'm fine with that as long as nobody else objects
[20:59] <vorlon> who is in the set of nobody else that I should poll? :)
[20:59] <cjwatson> removing it doesn't preclude the option of introducing a dummy package later if we want to
[20:59] <cjwatson> similarly, introducing a dummy package doesn't preclude the option of removing it later
[21:00] <cjwatson> so I don't know that we need to be dreadfully cautious
[21:01] <cjwatson> the bit that's irreversible is the SQL surgery, but sounds like we have no alternative to that open to us
[21:01] <vorlon> right - in particular, removing it seems rather safe, since anybody who complains that it has disappeared and they can no longer install it is... not going to have satisfaction anyway
[21:02] <vorlon> so, I'm doing that now
[21:33] <bryce> vorlon, phpunit looks a lot happier today.  I see there's a dozen packages still with issues.  What can I best help with today?
[21:38] <vorlon> bryce: I'll bet a good number of them are still going to be tests that need to be retried with --all-proposed.  I've retried the tests that were blocking php-timer and php-codecoverage already, but haven't looked at the ones still blocking phpunit itself
[21:39] <bryce> vorlon, ok, yeah the couple I looked at sounded like just needing retriggered.   I can work on retriggers for stuff still blocking phpunit.