[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtracefs [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtracefs [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtracefs [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset)
[05:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: offlineimap3 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20210105.00d395b+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtracefs [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtracefs [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset)
[05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtracefs [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libseqlib [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-3~build1]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libseqlib [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-3~build1]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libseqlib [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-3~build1]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libseqlib [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-3~build1]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyvows [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [3.0.0-2]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libseqlib [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-3~build1]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtracefs [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtracefs [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtracefs [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted offlineimap3 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0~git20210105.00d395b+dfsg-1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtracefs [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtracefs [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtracefs [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zfs-linux [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.0.1-1ubuntu1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zfs-linux [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [2.0.1-1ubuntu1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zfs-linux [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.0.1-1ubuntu1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zfs-linux [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.0.1-1ubuntu1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zfs-linux [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [2.0.1-1ubuntu1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zfs-linux [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [2.0.1-1ubuntu1]
[11:22] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, hello, considering the huge amount of testing received and new bugs opened daily, I think we should release virtualbox asap
[11:22] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1901904
[11:22] <LocutusOfBorg> (I know its weekend, but maybe on monday?)
[11:22] <LocutusOfBorg> also borgbackup is ok please
[11:26] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: do we really need the ~buildN uploads? can't you just wait for the Debian sync, then we build a package only one time, and trigger autopkg tests only one time ...
[11:31] <LocutusOfBorg> I needed to test the fix on riscv64... :/
[11:31] <LocutusOfBorg> I tested on ppa for ppc64el and s390x, but riscv64 is a sad story
[11:32] <LocutusOfBorg> you know, symbols are different between debian and ubuntu...
[11:35] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. now I need to test libseqlib on s390x :/
[11:39] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, do you think we can make ndpi migrate?
 Opened #980216 in ftp.debian.org by Gianfranco Costamagna (locutusofborg) «RM: ndpi [i386 ppc64el s390x] -- RoQA; FTBFS». https://bugs.debian.org/980216
[11:39] <LocutusOfBorg> I did ask to remove some archs in debian too
[11:43] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, do you think we can do something for gdbm/i386? its bd-uninstallable but I don't understand if we have to whitelist some i386 binary or just hint
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: derpconf [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.8.3-2] (no packageset)
[20:02] <teward> Release Team and SRU team: the proposed changes here sync the dummy package from Unstable to hirsuite and other releases - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1911463 - while this makes *sense* because Flash is Dead, I still want this to get preapproved by SRU / Release Team / TB before we push this - for the sole reason that it's a force-sync.
[20:02] <teward> (and SRU team is not subbed)
[20:04] <teward> even though it makes logical sense, it's something that probably needs the approvals first
[20:59] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: gdbm seems built on i386, did someone else already whitelist the build-dependencies?
[21:00] <vorlon> I see the tests are failing (regressing) on i386
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mp3splt [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/none) [2.6.2+20170630-3.1] (no packageset)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mp3splt [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/none) [2.6.2+20170630-3.1] (no packageset)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mp3splt [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.6.2+20170630-3.1] (no packageset)