[18:25] <mdeslaur> tjaalton: hey, you removed the security update in focal's xorg-server when you backported the new upstream version
[19:06] <tjaalton> mdeslaur: hmm?
[19:06] <tjaalton> mdeslaur: if so, I'll check tomorrow and reupload
[19:07] <tjaalton> was supposed to be a backport of the groovy package, which should be uptodate?
[19:15] <tjaalton> mdeslaur: what's missing? the new upstream release should have what got dropped, no?
[19:15] <tjaalton> the patches that got dropped I mean
[19:18] <mdeslaur> tjaalton: no, the patches were required in groovy too for the same version: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/2:1.20.9-2ubuntu1.1
[19:19] <tjaalton> mdeslaur: but the focal backport is based on that
[19:19] <mdeslaur> looks like we have a 1.1 mismatch, not sure how that happened
[19:20] <tjaalton> hmm
[19:20] <tjaalton> huh
[19:23] <tjaalton> both uploaded the same day
[19:23] <tjaalton> and I can't see mine getting rejected
[19:23] <tjaalton> but apt-get source does pull the security updae
[19:23] <tjaalton> update
[19:23] <tjaalton> shit
[19:23] <mdeslaur> unfortunate timing
[19:24] <mdeslaur> so I guess groovy is missing whatever that sru was, and focal is missing the CVE fixes
[19:24] <tjaalton> I guess this needs to go via the security pocket?
[19:24] <mdeslaur> either -updates or -security is fine, since the issue is only in -updates
[19:25] <mdeslaur> I can push it to -security on monday if that's easier
[19:27] <tjaalton> either is fine by me, but someone would need to review my upload anyway
[19:27] <tjaalton> I can do that now
[19:27] <tjaalton> uploading the fix that is
[19:36] <mdeslaur> ok
[19:37] <tjaalton> do you have powers to review it from the sru queue?
[19:38] <mdeslaur> no, someone from sru would need to do that
[19:38] <mdeslaur> well wait, what exactly are you asking? if I would look at it, or approve it?
[19:40] <tjaalton> approve
[19:40] <mdeslaur> no, I can't do that
[19:44] <tjaalton> right
[19:58] <tjaalton> ok, I self-rejected my upload back then because it had the wrong buglink
[19:58] <tjaalton> but I can't figure out what the correct one would be
[19:59] <tjaalton> I'll look into this tomorrow..
[20:00] <tjaalton> mdeslaur: thanks for the heads-up, and sorry about the mess /o\
[21:57] <mdeslaur> tjaalton: no problem! :)