[12:55] <Laney> how come paths in cgit use \ for separator instead of /?
[12:55] <Laney> doesn't matter, just curious :-)
[13:08] <cjwatson> Laney: it was an upstream change, I dug it up a while back.  Let me see if I can find it
[13:12] <Laney> C:\
[13:13] <Laney> cjwatson: I'm just being nosy really, don't spend time looking unless it's right at hand
[13:13] <cjwatson> Laney: remind me where you see it exactly?
[13:13] <cjwatson> ah yes, in <title>
[13:14] <Laney> yeah, interestingly the path in the body still uses \
[13:15] <cjwatson> https://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/commit/?id=23f7dadaaba2817c92c42c0a642a3186aa8ef24d   not super-informative as to the reason
[13:16] <cjwatson> IIRC the reversing was to try to get more relevant things earlier in the title
[13:16] <cjwatson> so maybe the backslash is meant as a sort of indication that the path is reversed?  not sure
[13:17] <cjwatson> however https://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/commit/?id=e23f63461f17aeb770d47d9c3134414e549d1f0e changes it to « instead, so we'll get that eventually
[13:17] <cjwatson> when we redeploy on focal, I think
[13:18] <Laney> oh yes, heh, I didn't notice it was reversed
[13:19] <Laney> that makes some sense to me
[13:19] <cjwatson> it's a bit eccentric but I can kind of see the justification
[23:32] <JoBbZ> If I delete my PPA on launchpad, can I re-create it with the same name later?
[23:34] <cjwatson> JoBbZ: Yes, once it's finished deleting which might take up to an hour or so
[23:34] <JoBbZ> great, tyvm..
[23:35] <JoBbZ> I uploaded a bad .orig.tar.gz file, so builds would just constantly fail
[23:35] <JoBbZ> and no way to replace the orig.tar.gz :/
[23:35] <JoBbZ> (with the fixed one)
[23:35] <JoBbZ> that I could fine
[23:35] <JoBbZ> *find
[23:36] <cjwatson> JoBbZ: It's normally best to just bump the upstream part of the version, adding +repack1 or something
[23:38] <JoBbZ> be nice if there was a way to forcefully overwrite it
[23:39] <cjwatson> That's not planned, sorry, but bumping the version is pretty cheap and is what we normally advise
[23:40] <cjwatson> But you can delete and recreate the archive if you really prefer
[23:42] <JoBbZ> yeah, won't be a problem long term. I just didn't realize that the debian packagers actually deleted a number of files from the upstream source tarball, so it wasn't literally an original copy.  Now I know that, I won't hit the issue in the future. :)
[23:44] <JoBbZ> thanks for the help :)
[23:48] <cjwatson> No problem.  Yeah, that's sometimes done for DFSG-compliance reasons (though of course it may have been a mistake of some kind, I don't know)
[23:50] <JoBbZ> yeah, it's because it has RFC stuff in it
[23:51] <JoBbZ> I assume I'll be able to dput it again after a bit as well? (Right now, it says it was already uploaded to ppa.launchpad.net, even though the PPA disappeared from my site on the web page)
[23:52] <cjwatson> JoBbZ: That's a client-side check - dput -f overrides
[23:52] <cjwatson> JoBbZ: See "man dput"
[23:56] <JoBbZ> cjwatson: awesome tyvm :)