/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/01/22/#ubuntu-devel.txt

tjaaltonslyon: hi, if you have the s390x vm available for debugging 389, please check it's logs, there should be more than in the dogtag pkispawn error dump08:51
slyontjaalton: hey! Yes, that's a good point, checking the 389 logs. I need to re-run the LXD autopkgtest with "--shell-fail", to reproduce the logs08:55
tjaaltonslyon: the folks at #389 are eager to find out why it's failing09:17
tjaaltonthough they're mostly in the US09:17
slyontjaalton: I reproduced the logs.. there are two interesting files. Let me paste them somewhere09:18
tjaaltonokay09:18
slyontjaalton: here are all the logs from /var/log/dirsrv: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Q7xHNZYvkT/ https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/pjqj8NPzZj/ Are you in touch with the #389 folks?09:20
tjaaltonyes I asked about this yesterday, but they only test with x86 so it's not something they've hit09:21
slyonMost interesting part from the logs seems to be this "ERR - entry_get_rdn_mods - Fails to split RDN "o=pki-tomcat-CA" into components" Although, I do not know what it means.09:23
tjaaltonthey might have an idea09:23
slyonCool thanks! Maybe you can forward those logs and they can understand whats going on09:23
tjaaltonwe'll see09:23
tjaaltoncan you build 389 to test if reverting a commit helps?09:27
slyonYes. I guess we can setup a PPA and run the autopkgtest against that to see if it makes a change09:36
slyonwhat commit do you have in mind?09:38
tjaaltonthe one that added the error message in the log09:41
tjaaltonit's the topmost commit in that particular file, from last summer.. and it would roughly match the time when this started09:42
LaneyoSoMoN: nice one on dh-elpa/gettext, that seems to be the cleanest way to fix it to me10:36
oSoMoNLaney, credit goes to you for the initial hint, thanks!10:41
slyontjaalton: revertig https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/commit/2ccd0bed4e seems to work in manual testing! I triggered a full autopkgtest on the infrastructure against a PPA to see if it is working there as well. (https://launchpad.net/~slyon/+archive/ubuntu/testing/+packages)11:37
tjaaltonslyon: cool, I filed a bug upstream and will add this info too11:41
slyontjaalton: thanks! can you point me to that bug report? Also, I can confirm the test passes on autopkgtest.u.c with that one commit reverted: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute-slyon-testing/hirsute/s390x/d/dogtag-pki/20210122_114408_9ecb1@/log.gz13:47
tjaaltonslyon:13:48
tjaalton@tjaalton13:48
udevbotError: "tjaalton" is not a valid command.13:48
tjaaltonuh13:48
tjaaltonhttps://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/456313:48
slyonthx!13:48
Laneybdmurray: any idea what's up with apport autopkgtests?14:20
ygk_12345hi all14:21
Laneynot because you deleted apport from the PPA is it? 😏14:21
ygk_12345can someone tell me how to disable unattended security upgrades  through autoinstall for ubuntu 20.04 ?14:21
ygk_12345can someone help me with my query please14:24
ygk_12345how to disable unattended security upgrades  through autoinstall for ubuntu 20.04 ?14:27
dokobdmurray: please could you have a look at https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apport/20210122_112630_95059@/log.gz14:29
dokolooking at the log, I don't understand which failing issue is responsible for the error14:29
ygk_12345is anyone here familiar with subiquity installer ?14:35
Laneyygk_12345: I don't know, you might have more luck in #ubuntu-server14:38
oSoMoNxnox, would you mind confirming bug #1911236 ?14:46
ubottubug 1911236 in emacs (Ubuntu) "emacs FTBFS on s390x because of a failing unit test" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/191123614:46
oSoMoN(re- your upload that skips that test)14:46
xnoxoSoMoN:  i have no idea what you want? =)15:01
xnoxoSoMoN:  what do you mean "confirming bug"?15:01
oSoMoNxnox, set the status to confirmed15:01
xnoxand then what?15:01
oSoMoNthen nothing, I just don't like to confirm my own bugs15:01
xnoxoSoMoN:  the test is skipped; we are not going to work on this; so "fix released"?15:01
tdaitxLaney: I have commented back on bug 1903929, let me know if you need me to check anything else and/or (pointers on) how I can help to sort that out =)15:02
ubottubug 1903929 in britney "openjdk-8 uploads trigger swi-prolog, fdroidserver, and libreoffice autopkgtests unnecessarily" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190392915:02
oSoMoNxnox, in an ideal world we would come back to it later, to at least file an upstream bug15:02
oSoMoNand skipping a test is hardly fixing it, the problem is real, even if we don't care much about it15:02
oSoMoNand it's a regression15:03
tjaaltonslyon: still here? check the latest comment on the 389 bug, if you have that logfile15:46
slyonyes, currently doing meetings. But I think I pasted that logfile earlier. Will dig it out later15:46
tjaaltonoh right15:49
bdmurraydoko: I've found part of the problem.15:56
=== murphyslawbbs is now known as murphyslawbbs[aw

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!