tjaalton | slyon: hi, if you have the s390x vm available for debugging 389, please check it's logs, there should be more than in the dogtag pkispawn error dump | 08:51 |
---|---|---|
slyon | tjaalton: hey! Yes, that's a good point, checking the 389 logs. I need to re-run the LXD autopkgtest with "--shell-fail", to reproduce the logs | 08:55 |
tjaalton | slyon: the folks at #389 are eager to find out why it's failing | 09:17 |
tjaalton | though they're mostly in the US | 09:17 |
slyon | tjaalton: I reproduced the logs.. there are two interesting files. Let me paste them somewhere | 09:18 |
tjaalton | okay | 09:18 |
slyon | tjaalton: here are all the logs from /var/log/dirsrv: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Q7xHNZYvkT/ https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/pjqj8NPzZj/ Are you in touch with the #389 folks? | 09:20 |
tjaalton | yes I asked about this yesterday, but they only test with x86 so it's not something they've hit | 09:21 |
slyon | Most interesting part from the logs seems to be this "ERR - entry_get_rdn_mods - Fails to split RDN "o=pki-tomcat-CA" into components" Although, I do not know what it means. | 09:23 |
tjaalton | they might have an idea | 09:23 |
slyon | Cool thanks! Maybe you can forward those logs and they can understand whats going on | 09:23 |
tjaalton | we'll see | 09:23 |
tjaalton | can you build 389 to test if reverting a commit helps? | 09:27 |
slyon | Yes. I guess we can setup a PPA and run the autopkgtest against that to see if it makes a change | 09:36 |
slyon | what commit do you have in mind? | 09:38 |
tjaalton | the one that added the error message in the log | 09:41 |
tjaalton | it's the topmost commit in that particular file, from last summer.. and it would roughly match the time when this started | 09:42 |
Laney | oSoMoN: nice one on dh-elpa/gettext, that seems to be the cleanest way to fix it to me | 10:36 |
oSoMoN | Laney, credit goes to you for the initial hint, thanks! | 10:41 |
slyon | tjaalton: revertig https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/commit/2ccd0bed4e seems to work in manual testing! I triggered a full autopkgtest on the infrastructure against a PPA to see if it is working there as well. (https://launchpad.net/~slyon/+archive/ubuntu/testing/+packages) | 11:37 |
tjaalton | slyon: cool, I filed a bug upstream and will add this info too | 11:41 |
slyon | tjaalton: thanks! can you point me to that bug report? Also, I can confirm the test passes on autopkgtest.u.c with that one commit reverted: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute-slyon-testing/hirsute/s390x/d/dogtag-pki/20210122_114408_9ecb1@/log.gz | 13:47 |
tjaalton | slyon: | 13:48 |
tjaalton | @tjaalton | 13:48 |
udevbot | Error: "tjaalton" is not a valid command. | 13:48 |
tjaalton | uh | 13:48 |
tjaalton | https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/4563 | 13:48 |
slyon | thx! | 13:48 |
Laney | bdmurray: any idea what's up with apport autopkgtests? | 14:20 |
ygk_12345 | hi all | 14:21 |
Laney | not because you deleted apport from the PPA is it? 😏 | 14:21 |
ygk_12345 | can someone tell me how to disable unattended security upgrades through autoinstall for ubuntu 20.04 ? | 14:21 |
ygk_12345 | can someone help me with my query please | 14:24 |
ygk_12345 | how to disable unattended security upgrades through autoinstall for ubuntu 20.04 ? | 14:27 |
doko | bdmurray: please could you have a look at https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apport/20210122_112630_95059@/log.gz | 14:29 |
doko | looking at the log, I don't understand which failing issue is responsible for the error | 14:29 |
ygk_12345 | is anyone here familiar with subiquity installer ? | 14:35 |
Laney | ygk_12345: I don't know, you might have more luck in #ubuntu-server | 14:38 |
oSoMoN | xnox, would you mind confirming bug #1911236 ? | 14:46 |
ubottu | bug 1911236 in emacs (Ubuntu) "emacs FTBFS on s390x because of a failing unit test" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1911236 | 14:46 |
oSoMoN | (re- your upload that skips that test) | 14:46 |
xnox | oSoMoN: i have no idea what you want? =) | 15:01 |
xnox | oSoMoN: what do you mean "confirming bug"? | 15:01 |
oSoMoN | xnox, set the status to confirmed | 15:01 |
xnox | and then what? | 15:01 |
oSoMoN | then nothing, I just don't like to confirm my own bugs | 15:01 |
xnox | oSoMoN: the test is skipped; we are not going to work on this; so "fix released"? | 15:01 |
tdaitx | Laney: I have commented back on bug 1903929, let me know if you need me to check anything else and/or (pointers on) how I can help to sort that out =) | 15:02 |
ubottu | bug 1903929 in britney "openjdk-8 uploads trigger swi-prolog, fdroidserver, and libreoffice autopkgtests unnecessarily" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1903929 | 15:02 |
oSoMoN | xnox, in an ideal world we would come back to it later, to at least file an upstream bug | 15:02 |
oSoMoN | and skipping a test is hardly fixing it, the problem is real, even if we don't care much about it | 15:02 |
oSoMoN | and it's a regression | 15:03 |
tjaalton | slyon: still here? check the latest comment on the 389 bug, if you have that logfile | 15:46 |
slyon | yes, currently doing meetings. But I think I pasted that logfile earlier. Will dig it out later | 15:46 |
tjaalton | oh right | 15:49 |
bdmurray | doko: I've found part of the problem. | 15:56 |
=== murphyslawbbs is now known as murphyslawbbs[aw |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!