=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
=== jamespage_ is now known as jamespage
[16:25] <teward> ahayzen: #canonical-sysadmin
[16:25] <teward> ooops lag.
[16:25] <teward> (cjwatson already sent yo uthere yesterday, didn't read timestamps >.<)
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch
=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson
[19:35] <Simon-> could someone explain to me why https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1895757 got fixed but https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1891798 (which is older) is still being ignored?
[19:35] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1895757 in sudo (Ubuntu Bionic) "Terminal hangs running sudo when "use_pty" is set in /etc/sudoers" [High,Fix released]
[19:35] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1891798 in sudo (Ubuntu) "Update sudo to 1.8.22 to fix "stair-stepped output" bug" [Undecided,New]
[19:36] <Simon-> the last time I asked about a bug in here I think there are some "affects" options for Ubuntu that us normal people can't set, which means it gets no attention
[21:14] <rbasak> Simon-: this is a topic for #ubuntu-bugs really. Bugs are not necessarily ever addressed in reporting order. They're addressed by perceived importance, by developers scratching their own itches, by any volunteers who want to work on things at their priorities, etc.
[21:15] <rbasak> Simon-: please also see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates. We don't just update software in stable releases; you're presupposing the solution in your bug report there, rather than detailing the problem.
[22:17] <Simon-> no, I referenced the problem
[22:18] <Simon-> if someone wants to apply the bug fix commit instead they can do that
[23:36] <cjwatson> As rbasak said, I'm afraid it's not something for here.  We operate the infrastructure - we don't tell developers what order to fix bugs in.