=== alan_g_ is now known as alan_g [17:24] Fantu_: hi, about your patch. You wrote that b19f8d2 is applied in 4.6.0, so does that mean we should fix that part of the bug in focal? [17:24] (4.4.2) [17:41] laney I not understand exactly what you mean [17:41] Fantu_: You gave a patch for bionic, does the bug need to be fixed on focal too? [17:42] yes is an SRU for bionic, already written in old description and in latest comment [17:43] I taken the fixes from upstream already applied for long time [17:43] I know, but we need to have focal (20.04) fixed too, otherwise if someone upgrades they could get the bug again [17:43] just asking if focal does have the patches or if it is missing them [17:46] the missed in focal is only the second one minor, I upgraded to focal only recent one of my computer, about focal I'll check is there are other important fixes to be added in a SRU [17:48] ok, maybe I can just add the one patch to focal and upload that too [17:50] if you want already update focal with only the second patch can be ok, is very small and from fast look don't seems have things that can cause issue/unexpected cases [17:51] sounds good [17:51] I just think the SRU will be rejected if it's not all fixed in later versions of ubuntu [17:54] if there will be other important fixes for focal I'll check and test afterwards and I'll open a new SRU for them (if I'll found something) [17:55] sounds good [18:11] getting some fixes in ubuntu seems like a titanic undertaking^^' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/caribou/+bug/1912060 [18:11] Launchpad bug 1912060 in caribou (Ubuntu Groovy) "[SRU] caribou: Segfault (as regression of xorg CVE-2020-25712 fix) cause security issue for cinnamon" [Medium, In Progress] [18:15] for that one you can ask in #ubuntu-hardened once there's something ready to go [18:15] (that's the security channel) [18:45] there is already for focal ready and tested some days ago but only on latest comment told to ask to security instead after done with minimal patch :(