[01:08] <santa_> RikMills: algorithm to finally fix the thing
[01:09] <santa_> 1. wait until LocutusOfBorg or someone rebuilds libphonenumber
[01:10] <santa_> 2. reupload kitinerary -0ubuntu4 removing our workaround
[01:10] <santa_> strategy tested in the PPA:
[01:10] <santa_> https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/ubuntu/staging-kdeapplications/+packages
[01:11] <santa_> the -0ubuntu4 changes are prepared in the kubuntu_hirsute_staging branch
[01:12]  * santa_ disappears in the night
[02:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lammps [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20210122~gita77bb+ds1-2] (no packageset)
[09:01] <LocutusOfBorg> santa_, libphonenumber and ignition-msgs rebuilt done!
[09:03] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[09:45] <slyon> Hey! May I bring this 389-ds-base removal request to any ubuntu-archive team member's attention? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/389-ds-base/+bug/1913175 It should get quite a lot of things moving for plusone maintenance.
[09:46] <slyon> bad bot. bug #1913175 that is
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (focal-proposed/main) [11ubuntu5.2 => 11ubuntu5.3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[09:49] <Laney> slyon: is it part of a transition, so we need to rebuild the old version of it or something?
[09:52] <slyon> Laney: I'm not exactly sure.. AFAIK it is not part of any transition, only being hold back because of a regressing autopkgtest in the dogtag-pki reverse depends, for which we reported a bug upstream.
[09:52] <Laney> isn't it entangled with net-snmp because it needed rebuilding for a new soname
[09:52] <Laney> ?
[09:53] <slyon> Yes, you're right.. it is part of the auto-net-snmp transition
[09:54] <Laney> yeah, so I guess: remove, rebuild previous version
[09:55]  * Laney checks it builds ok
[10:01] <Laney> seems to, ok, let's do this!
[10:01] <slyon> thanks Laney!
[10:02] <Laney> then we can look into why the ubuntu isos failed to build ;-)
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.2]
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.14.0-1ubuntu1.1]
[10:07] <Laney> it is done
[10:10] <slyon> thank you!
[10:15] <LocutusOfBorg> santa_, I gave back kitinerary too
[10:19] <santa_> LocutusOfBorg: thanks a lot!
[10:19] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks to you!
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libunity [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [7.1.4+19.04.20190319-2build1]
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libunity [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [7.1.4+19.04.20190319-2build1]
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libunity [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [7.1.4+19.04.20190319-2build1]
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libunity [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [7.1.4+19.04.20190319-2build1]
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libunity [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [7.1.4+19.04.20190319-2build1]
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libunity [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [7.1.4+19.04.20190319-2build1]
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iproute2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-2ubuntu1.3]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxmlb [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.15-2ubuntu1~20.10.1]
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxmlb [source] (focal-proposed) [0.1.15-2ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[13:07] <Laney> sil2100: can I do a focal server daily-live build with proposed to verify LP: #1912496 ?
[13:09] <Laney> no wait, 20210126.1 was good enough
[13:09] <Laney> SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET
[13:11] <sil2100> \o/
[13:11] <sil2100> Yeah, I did one with PROPOSED=1 yesterday
[13:20] <Laney> need one for desktop to verify it the other way
[13:20]  * Laney does
[13:22] <Laney> lockfile: Forcing lock on "/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/etc/.lock-build-image-set-ubuntu-focal-daily-live"
[13:22] <Laney> oops
[13:22] <Laney> might have caused a collision there, hopefully it doesn't bork anything
[13:23] <Laney> argh
[13:23] <Laney> it's another stuck build I think https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/focal/ubuntu/+build/257509
[13:23] <Laney> I think we need to get to work on that germinate bug
[13:24] <Laney> there's https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/hirsute/ubuntukylin/+build/257468 too
[13:24] <Laney> and https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/hirsute/ubuntu/+build/257234
[13:25] <sil2100> :|
[13:27] <Laney> and https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/bionic/ubuntu-base/+build/257220 and https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/focal/cpc/+build/257224
[13:27] <Laney> ok that's bad
[13:27] <Laney> sil2100: I've got to run off, can you cancel all of those please? :/
[13:33] <sil2100> Darn, ok
[13:35] <sil2100> Cancelled, after quick lunch I'll check if there's any more that are stuck
[13:47]  * RikMills sheds a tear for infinity
[13:47] <RikMills> Condolences to those who knew him
[13:49]  * sil2100 hugs RikMills 
[14:38]  * rbalint misses infinity and sheds a tear, too
[14:40] <Maik> i never knew infinity but still this is sad news. :´(
[15:04] <RikMills> https://twitter.com/kubuntu/status/1354443269871185923
[15:14] <sil2100> tjaalton: hey! linux-firmware in focal - can you poke around to get that one verified?
[15:15] <rbalint> sil2100, bdmurray the glibc errors due to which glibc phasing is stopped are old thus imo it could continue phasing
[15:16] <Laney> thanks RikMills
[15:23] <tjaalton> sil2100: thanks, I've poked the folks to test it..
[15:24] <tjaalton> too bad it's not automatic :/
[15:26] <sil2100> tjaalton: thank you
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: lto-disabled-list (hirsute-proposed/primary) [1]
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted arduino-core-avr [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.8.3+dfsg1-1]
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lammps [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [20210122~gita77bb+ds1-2]
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lammps [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [20210122~gita77bb+ds1-1]
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lto-disabled-list [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1]
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted arduino-ctags [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8-arduino11-1]
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted arduino-ctags [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8-arduino11-1]
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted arduino-ctags [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8-arduino11-1]
[16:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted arduino-ctags [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8-arduino11-1]
[16:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted arduino-ctags [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8-arduino11-1]
[16:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted arduino-ctags [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8-arduino11-1]
[16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lto-disabled-list [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [1] (no packageset)
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lto-disabled-list [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1]
[17:09] <vorlon> sil2100: fyi landing lp:~xnox/debian-cd/focal-boot-next-fix for focal
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot-menu (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0.1 => 4.0.1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[17:22] <xnox> sil2100:  vorlon: ^ u-boot-menu sru is the last bit of UX missing from focal images (aka to ensure we say Ubuntu as the bootmenu name, instead of Debian)
[17:22] <xnox> and with this testflinger deployments of focal now succeed. It seems to rely on booting _without_ quiet; and with earlycon. At least for now.
[17:22] <xnox> and matches what is in hirsute.
[17:29] <xnox> fginther:  apw: v5.8 linux for riscv64 in focal looks good to me. works fine on unleashed & in qemu, please release to -updates?
[17:29] <xnox> sil2100:  vorlon: & ^
[17:32] <Laney> going to retry sbd regressions with all-proposed, it seems there's some less than stable ABI going on there and something didn't get a bumped dep when it should have, but upgrading everything together makes it work again
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ovn-octavia-provider (groovy-proposed/main) [0.3.0-0ubuntu1 => 0.3.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)
[18:06] <apw> xnox, will check on it in a bit
[18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nemo (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.5-1 => 3.6.5-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nemo (focal-proposed/universe) [4.4.2-2 => 4.4.2-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-budgie)
[21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (groovy-proposed/main) [2020f-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 => 2021a-0ubuntu1] (core)
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (groovy-proposed) [2021a-0ubuntu1]
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (groovy-proposed/main) [2020f-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 => 2021a-0ubuntu0.20.10] (core)
[21:40] <vorlon> xnox: u-boot-menu accepted
[21:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot-menu [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0.1ubuntu0.1]
[21:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-virtualenv (xenial-proposed/universe) [15.0.1+ds-3ubuntu1 => 15.0.1+ds-3ubuntu1.1] (no packageset)
[21:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (focal-proposed/main) [2020f-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 2021a-0ubuntu0.20.04] (core)
[21:41] <vorlon> xnox: you had this marked 'in progress' for groovy but not for focal, and there's no upload in the groovy queue?
[21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (bionic-proposed/main) [2020f-0ubuntu0.18.04 => 2021a-0ubuntu0.18.04] (core)
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (xenial-proposed/main) [2020f-0ubuntu0.16.04 => 2021a-0ubuntu0.16.04] (core)
[22:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnupg2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.2.4-1ubuntu1.3 => 2.2.4-1ubuntu1.4] (core)