| === philroche_ is now known as philroche | ||
| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linkchecker [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [10.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linkchecker [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [10.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linkchecker [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/none) [10.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linkchecker [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/none) [10.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linkchecker [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/none) [10.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linkchecker [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [10.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: barbican (focal-proposed/main) [1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 08:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (groovy-proposed) [2021a-0ubuntu0.20.10] | 09:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (focal-proposed) [2021a-0ubuntu0.20.04] | 09:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (bionic-proposed) [2021a-0ubuntu0.18.04] | 09:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (xenial-proposed) [2021a-0ubuntu0.16.04] | 10:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (focal-proposed) [11ubuntu5.3] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: friendly-recovery (groovy-proposed/main) [0.2.41 => 0.2.41ubuntu0.20.10.1] (core) | 10:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: friendly-recovery (focal-proposed/main) [0.2.41 => 0.2.41ubuntu0.20.04.1] (core) | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: friendly-recovery (bionic-proposed/main) [0.2.38ubuntu1.1 => 0.2.38ubuntu1.2] (core) | 10:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected binutils [source] (focal-proposed) [2.34-6ubuntu1.1] | 11:31 | |
| xnox | aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa | 11:47 |
|---|---|---|
| xnox | where is sil | 11:47 |
| xnox | Laney: https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/debian-cd/activate-focal-hwe-kernel/+merge/397085 we have started to build hwe things in livefs (via livecd-rootfs change) and new server subiquity images do have both generic & hwe kernels initrds etc. Now need to trigger generation of the boot menu entries. | 11:48 |
| xnox | could you please take a look? | 11:48 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 11:50 |
| sil2100 | Oh, ok, forgot about this step, might need to write it down somewhere | 11:51 |
| sil2100 | On it now | 11:51 |
| tjaalton | sil2100: fyi, linux-firmware is verified now | 11:52 |
| tjaalton | on focla | 11:52 |
| tjaalton | focal | 11:52 |
| sil2100 | tjaalton: thanks! :) | 11:52 |
| sil2100 | xnox: merged and deployed | 11:54 |
| Laney | woohoo work saved | 11:54 |
| xnox | sil2100: thank you! | 11:54 |
| xnox | Laney: =)))))) i think sil2100 felt disturbance in the force that somebody is trying to bypass him to touch debian-cd. | 11:55 |
| sil2100 | xnox: ...and modding the checklist to make sure I don't miss it during 22.04.2 :D | 11:55 |
| xnox | sil2100: well, for 22.04.2 and/or even now, i do wonder if I can somehow make it do the right right always. | 11:55 |
| Laney | that's good because I don't understand how that variable is used so I would have had to learn | 11:55 |
| sil2100 | Good thing there's xnox always with a watchful eye! | 11:55 |
| xnox | sil2100: since we now always have hwe metapackages. we could be always generating hwe menu entries in subquity. | 11:55 |
| Laney | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/7NvZwBrzfz/ | 11:56 |
| Laney | gibberish | 11:56 |
| xnox | Laney: let's pretend i understand how it works. looking at boot-amd64 it sort of looks like it would work right. but we shall see. | 11:56 |
| sil2100 | Laney: just the way we like it | 11:56 |
| xnox | Laney: i think that hunk is not used, because that's d-i image stuff ?! | 11:57 |
| Laney | who knows | 11:57 |
| * xnox was looking into tools/boot/focal/boot-amd64 script | 11:57 | |
| Laney | that bit is slightly more understandable | 11:57 |
| sil2100 | What I wouldn't want is for us to provide the boot entry all the time, even when the hwe meta package still points to the GA kernel - since that would be confusing to users | 11:59 |
| sil2100 | So we'd have to add some smarts to make sure it's pointing at the hwe kernel but ignoring it if hwe = ga | 12:00 |
| xnox | sil2100: as we now found out on the desktop, right?! =) | 12:00 |
| sil2100 | Yeah ;) | 12:00 |
| tjaalton | btw, the image has packages for both 5.6 & 5.10 oem kernels, and folks are now testing if 5.10 should replace 5.6 | 12:06 |
| tjaalton | on the image | 12:07 |
| tjaalton | then the metapackage to pull would be -oem-20.04b | 12:07 |
| tjaalton | 5.6 will be obsolete in a month | 12:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-202.234] (core, kernel) | 12:13 | |
| xnox | tjaalton: well, i thought it wasn't that straight forward. some 5.6-oem will move onto 5.8-hwe; and some will start off with 5.10-oem; and some will upgrade from 5.6-oem to 5.10-oem. | 12:15 |
| xnox | unless things have changed =) | 12:15 |
| xnox | tjaalton: do we have oem-metas that reference oem-20.04b on the iso itself? | 12:16 |
| tjaalton | that's correct, but the image probably has no need for 5.6 anyway. most of the migrations have happened already aiui | 12:17 |
| tjaalton | the image didn't seem to have 20.04b meta, so I'd say no? | 12:17 |
| tjaalton | anyway, they're testing 5.10 now and should have results before the end of the week | 12:18 |
| xnox | tjaalton: i'm just worried about image size of 3 x (kernel + lrm) stacks. | 12:24 |
| tjaalton | sure, I'm pretty confident 5.6 will get dropped | 12:25 |
| Laney | O_O | 12:26 |
| tjaalton | also, I'm forced to respin 5.10 but it should get in updates by tuesday | 12:28 |
| tjaalton | 5.6 has a security update respin | 12:29 |
| xnox | somehow i don't see meta, but linux-image-5.10.0-1011-oem is on the iso | 12:29 |
| tjaalton | yeah I'm not sure how it got there.. | 12:29 |
| xnox | i wonder if our globs for nvidia or some such pull that in. | 12:29 |
| xnox | tjaalton: yeap we pull in linux-modules-nvidia-460-oem-20.04 | 12:30 |
| xnox | wait | 12:30 |
| xnox | and this one too linux-modules-nvidia-460-oem-20.04b | 12:30 |
| tjaalton | ah | 12:31 |
| xnox | so 3x nvidia, with 2.5x of kernels =) | 12:31 |
| Laney | I thought 5.6 was meant to be dropped | 12:35 |
| tjaalton | aiui they want to test that 5.10 at least boots up | 12:36 |
| tjaalton | on the machines that now use 5.6 | 12:36 |
| tjaalton | hmm | 12:36 |
| tjaalton | though most should use hwe | 12:36 |
| tjaalton | anyway, rex knows more :) | 12:37 |
| Laney | right, machines go to hwe or new oem as required, then old oem goes away, that's what I thought the idea was | 12:37 |
| tjaalton | yes | 12:37 |
| tjaalton | but timing for the .2 image was challenging | 12:37 |
| sil2100 | xnox: hm, can we consider https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1905274 verified? | 12:46 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1905274 in u-boot (Ubuntu Groovy) "enable u-boot spl for riscv64" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 12:47 |
| xnox | sil2100: yes, commented. | 12:58 |
| xnox | sil2100: focal verified for realz. groovy is hand wave. | 12:58 |
| tseliot | hey sil2100 , can you approve LP: #1904583 for bionic too, please? (so that we can verify it) | 13:48 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1904583 in ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu Bionic) "SRU: Backport the latest developments on drivers detection and hybrid graphics" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1904583 | 13:48 |
| sil2100 | tseliot: adding it to my TODO o/ | 14:00 |
| sil2100 | xnox: thanks! | 14:00 |
| tseliot | sil2100, thanks a lot :) | 14:00 |
| sil2100 | slyon: hey! http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/netplan.io/focal/amd64 <- did you take a look at those? Since I was thinking about releasing glib2.0, but I see this one is happening all the time - it feels flaky as everytime a different test fails, so I guess it's nothing scary, right? | 14:01 |
| cking | hi there, zsys and zfsutils-linux for hirsute are stuck in proprosed migration, is it possible to add a hint skipping the implicit dependency (grubzfs-testsuite) and get it moving? | 14:04 |
| slyon | hey sil2100 ! Yes, I looked into them. looked like flaky timeouts which happen from time to time. But I'm not sure why it fails everytime... | 14:06 |
| slyon | It's not normal that they fail so often in a row | 14:06 |
| sil2100 | Ok | 14:07 |
| slyon | Let me quickly try if I can reporduce them in a local autopkgtest | 14:08 |
| xnox | cking: any uploader can retry tests with extra packages from proposed, or everything from proposed. you know that right? | 14:11 |
| xnox | and grub-zfstestsuite seems to need the same fixes as zsys. looking into that. | 14:12 |
| xnox | trying to upload grub-zfstestsuite that doesn't ftbfs | 14:15 |
| cking | xnox, ack, thanks | 14:34 |
| slyon | sil2100: the "bonds" test passed locally. So it seems to be flaky indeed. Flakyness seems to have become more intense as of glib2.0/2.64.6-1~ubuntu20.04.1, though. | 14:35 |
| slyon | But I think you should be fine releasing glib2.0 | 14:36 |
| xnox | cking: calling a pass. | 15:27 |
| xnox | # github.com/ubuntu/grubmenugen-zfs-tests_test [github.com/ubuntu/grubmenugen-zfs-tests.test] | 15:27 |
| xnox | ./disk_handler_test.go:248:38: not enough arguments in call to zfs.DatasetSnapshot | 15:27 |
| xnox | have (string, bool, map[zfs.Prop]zfs.Property) | 15:27 |
| xnox | want (string, bool, map[zfs.Prop]zfs.Property, map[string]string) | 15:28 |
| xnox | didrocks999: can you please fix grub-zfstestsuite too? | 15:28 |
| === alan_g_ is now known as alan_g | ||
| didrocks999 | xnox: not immediatly, this one depends on a grub with patched behavior. However, when we prepared both grub-zfstestsuite, an out of VCS upload was done by foundation, and so, we need to rebase our commits which is a nightmare (+redo all the work and testing). No time for this right now | 15:58 |
| didrocks999 | this is why I told cking that it’s ok to hint to skip grub-zfstestsuite behavior | 15:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpdk (focal-proposed/main) [19.11.3-0ubuntu0.2 => 19.11.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-server) | 16:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpdk (groovy-proposed/main) [19.11.5-1 => 19.11.6-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-server) | 16:00 | |
| xnox | i see | 16:01 |
| xnox | didrocks999: i wonder if i should help rebasing that. | 16:01 |
| xnox | cking: sigh | 16:01 |
| xnox | didrocks999: cking: sounds like we will need to ping ubuntu-release to allow things to migrate. | 16:01 |
| didrocks999 | yeah, that’s what I suggested cking, it’s only a testsuite anyway so it can stay in proposed | 16:03 |
| didrocks999 | xnox: if you want, there is a bunch of patches, but the most important part and time consuming is testing grub | 16:03 |
| cking | ugh, what a pain | 16:12 |
| didrocks999 | cking: really, as told by email, just ask for an hint on autopkgtests to skip the grub-zfstestsuite, there is no impact on this one anyway and this is on my list to spend again a full day on it redoing the work that was overridden by previous grub upload | 16:17 |
| vorlon | if anyone else is having trouble finding that package, it's apparently grubzfs-testsuite in the archive | 16:19 |
| cking | didrocks999, so I did ask a coupla hours ago in this channel, not sure what else I need to do | 16:19 |
| didrocks999 | sil2100: mind hinting zfs-linux and zsys to transition to the release pocket, skipping grubzfs-testsuite autopkgtests failure (as we will let it in -proposed) ^ | 16:22 |
| cking | +1 ^ | 16:22 |
| sil2100 | didrocks999: I can look at it after the meeting and after some SRU releases for .2! ;) | 16:24 |
| * cking suddenly realizes he didn't ask clearly enough, doh | 16:25 | |
| didrocks999 | thanks sil2100! | 16:25 |
| sil2100 | cking: in the meantime, could you take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1894329 verification for focal? Since I guess it would be good to get that for .2? | 16:57 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1894329 in coreutils (Ubuntu) "ZFS revert from grub menu not working." [High,Incomplete] | 16:57 |
| xnox | vorlon: oooh, components missmatches in maas seed in focal and needs promotion => pxelinux (deb) from the syslinux source | 16:57 |
| xnox | (and they try to do testing/building with main only) | 16:58 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: if you could verify at least groovy and focal tzdata, that would be awesome | 16:58 |
| vorlon | ubuntu-archive: we have a migration prepared for moving ubuntu-archive-tools from bzr to git (https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/ubuntu-archive-tools/bzr-to-git/+merge/384436). Is there a good/bad time to do this migration? | 16:58 |
| vorlon | (the git branch is a bit behind so I'll need to ask rbalint for a reimport) | 16:59 |
| sil2100 | hm, not sure how many tools from there are used by the publisher and such | 16:59 |
| vorlon | xnox: in *focal*? | 17:00 |
| sil2100 | So you're probably more familiar with what risk that could introduce - I just know that for image build and publishing we have a local copy on ancientminister and that won't break anything | 17:00 |
| vorlon | sil2100: I would handle migrating the snakefruit and anonster checkouts, it's more about coordinating with the archive team to update their local checkouts and retarget any in-progress MPs | 17:01 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: okay | 17:01 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: I've one MP outstanding for ubuntu-archive-tools | 17:01 |
| xnox | vorlon: and in hirsute too pxelinux syslinux-common | 17:01 |
| vorlon | bryce: ack | 17:01 |
| xnox | vorlon: they got dropped when we moved off them, but maas still uses them. | 17:01 |
| vorlon | xnox: how did it end up as a c-m in focal? | 17:01 |
| xnox | vorlon: by getting seeded into maas-supported seed by me. | 17:02 |
| xnox | (sponsoring merge proposal from maas team) | 17:02 |
| xnox | vorlon: it's stuff inside the maas snap / boot-resources maas stream. | 17:02 |
| vorlon | mm | 17:03 |
| xnox | pxelinux syslinux-common => both should be in main in focal & hirsute. | 17:03 |
| xnox | vorlon: unless you disagree with how to pxeboot? | 17:03 |
| vorlon | xnox: I generally disagree with changing seeds in stable releases :) | 17:03 |
| xnox | vorlon: i can ask for clarifications. | 17:04 |
| vorlon | I suppose it's a special case where there was an untracked dependency that was only detected post-release | 17:04 |
| xnox | yeah, that. | 17:05 |
| Laney | I would actively enjoy it if ubuntu-archive-tools were to be migrated | 17:06 |
| vorlon | Laney: any concerns about timing? | 17:07 |
| vorlon | we do have rather a few outstanding MPs which I think is why this didn't get done sooner; I'll try to garden those before pulling the trigger | 17:07 |
| Laney | not for my own checkout | 17:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-202.234] | 17:08 | |
| Laney | Only if there's a problem for the point release which needs a fix there and it doesn't get deployed because some server's copy didn't get switched over yet | 17:09 |
| Laney | probably low likelihood | 17:09 |
| vorlon | xnox: syslinux source is in main in focal, promoting the binaries requires republishing focal-updates, I'm inclined to punt | 17:10 |
| xnox | vorlon: after pooint release? we publish focal-updates all the time..... | 17:11 |
| rbalint | vorlon, please ping me when everything is ready and i'll do the reimport | 17:11 |
| vorlon | rbalint: thanks | 17:11 |
| vorlon | xnox: not even then. I don't want to do a re-publish of a package to -updates for no other reason than a binary c-m fix when the source is already in main and it is therefore already tracked for security support | 17:12 |
| xnox | vorlon: ack! | 17:12 |
| xnox | gotcha. | 17:12 |
| vorlon | tseliot: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 source is in hirsute with no binaries; should it be removed? (noticed because it's currently in the i386 whitelist, but is no longer after a refresh) | 17:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:0.8.6.3~0.18.04.1] | 17:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-prime [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.15.3~0.18.04.1] | 17:26 | |
| bdmurray | sil2100: tzdata verified for F and G | 17:37 |
| xnox | vorlon: lp:maas-images are moving from using bionic bootloaders to using focal ones; since we are not choosing to republish syslinux into main unchanged, it means ltrager will have to change lp:maas-images to enable universe to pull pxelinux. | 17:40 |
| xnox | but otherwise ~foundations-bugs are still on the hook to maintain it. | 17:41 |
| * cjwatson has no concerns about u-a-t if somebody else is dealing with the migration and chasing down things like clones on snakefruit :) | 17:41 | |
| cjwatson | we've been pointing people at tools like copy-package there for some time, so it's probably worth doing a wiki search (including {help,dev}.launchpad.net) and actively notifying people like IS who might be heavy users | 17:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libcroco from i386-whitelist in hirsute | 17:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 from i386-whitelist in hirsute | 17:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed uthash from i386-whitelist in hirsute | 17:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libbpf to i386-whitelist in hirsute | 17:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libfile-dirlist-perl to i386-whitelist in hirsute | 17:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libfile-touch-perl to i386-whitelist in hirsute | 17:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server to i386-whitelist in hirsute | 17:43 | |
| vorlon | xnox: ok; I don't really want maas-images pulling arbitrarily from universe, but OTOH if we're not going to have a feedback loop that enforces main-ness before release I'm not sure whether there's much value | 17:51 |
| === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch | ||
| vorlon | cjwatson: good points - though in the worst case users will update their checkouts and get a README pointing them elsewhere so I'm not too fussed if we miss a spot | 17:55 |
| xnox | vorlon: the target so far is to move maas-images to next lts around/after .1 release. | 17:56 |
| xnox | vorlon: should we do something of the same effect earlier? | 17:56 |
| vorlon | xnox: which is not the point at which we should be getting feedback from the MAAS team that packages need to be promoted to main for the release | 17:57 |
| xnox | or like have ~ubuntu-cdimage owned pipeline that builds maas-images ? | 17:57 |
| xnox | or even building out of devel? | 17:57 |
| cjwatson | vorlon: yeah | 17:57 |
| vorlon | xnox: they ought to have a CI pipeline for devel, independent of what release they use for production | 17:57 |
| xnox | vorlon: i wonder if we should have per-series boot-resources builds anyway. | 17:57 |
| xnox | vorlon: ack. | 17:57 |
| vorlon | xnox: I'm fine not having per-series boot resources, I just want them checking this stuff against trunk :) | 17:58 |
| vorlon | xnox: and where are you having this conversation w/ Lee given that he's not in this channeL? | 17:58 |
| xnox | vorlon: ~secureboot-maas | 17:59 |
| xnox | vorlon: my special place where i have maas team on demand =) | 17:59 |
| vorlon | >_< | 18:00 |
| xnox | vorlon: i'll open maas-images project bug report about that. | 18:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (groovy-proposed/main) [2:17.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 2:17.0.1-0ubuntu2] (openstack) | 18:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (bionic-proposed/main) [2:12.0.10-0ubuntu1 => 2:12.0.10-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 18:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.2.1-0ubuntu1 => 2:16.2.1-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 18:10 | |
| bdmurray | sil2100: I'm looking at the tzdata autopkgtest failures now | 18:12 |
| tseliot | vorlon, it can be removed, since I think we have transitional packages for it | 18:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pip (focal-proposed/universe) [20.0.2-5ubuntu1.1 => 20.0.2-5ubuntu1.2] (no packageset) | 18:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-virtualenv (focal-proposed/universe) [20.0.17-1 => 20.0.17-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 18:39 | |
| kanashiro | ubuntu-archive: I need some removals from hirsute to unblock ruby-faraday{,-middleware} migration. You can find all the details in LP #1913596 and LP #1913598 | 18:44 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1913596 in ruby-puppet-forge (Ubuntu) "autopkgtest failure is blocking ruby-faraday{,-middleware} in hirsute-proposed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1913596 | 18:44 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1913598 in ruby-faraday-middleware (Ubuntu) "[RM] autopkgtest failure is blocking ruby-faraday{,-middleware} in hirsute-proposed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1913598 | 18:44 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: thanks! | 18:44 |
| kanashiro | we would be following what debian already did | 18:45 |
| kanashiro | it will also unblock many ruby libraries that are stuck in proposed at the moment | 19:03 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: tzdata is all SRU'ed and autopkgtests have passed. | 19:51 |
| bdmurray | SRU verified | 19:51 |
| vorlon | xnox: why does boost1.74 not build libboost-iostreams1.74-dev on i386? (thin-provisioning-tools wants it) | 19:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libesmtp from i386-whitelist in hirsute | 19:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libnet from i386-whitelist in hirsute | 19:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libudfread to i386-whitelist in hirsute | 19:58 | |
| === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson | ||
| vorlon | xnox: I guess the answer is you pruned everything not known to be needed; straightforward enough. I'm readding now | 20:11 |
| * enyc meows | 20:14 | |
| vorlon | sil2100: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/u/ubuntu-image/hirsute/s390x this is crazypants... why are tests consistently failing on s390x due to failure to start the grub-common.service, only with the new python3-defaults, and passing otherwise? | 20:16 |
| vorlon | also why is there a grub-common service on s390x :P | 20:16 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: thanks! | 20:35 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: uh, I'd have to take a look, but that sounds weird! And it seems to be happening only for the qa tests, and that depends on @buildeps@ and uh, git | 20:37 |
| sil2100 | So wtf | 20:37 |
| sil2100 | Oh, wait, one time it was unittests.sh that also failed, uh | 20:37 |
| sil2100 | So it's not reliably failing the same thing! | 20:38 |
| vorlon | sil2100: yeah :/ | 21:01 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: speaking of things not to phase - language-pack-* ? | 21:07 |
| xnox | vorlon: i don't know why we build grub-common deb on s390x. | 21:32 |
| vorlon | xnox: well if we didn't then ubuntu-image would currently be uninstallable | 21:36 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: sounds right to me | 21:36 |
| bdmurray | so sil2100 you might want to fully phase those | 21:37 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: yeah, will do | 21:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (groovy-proposed/main) [1:20.10.2 => 1:20.10.3] (core) | 22:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.10.3 => 1:20.04.10.4] (core) | 22:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:20.10.3] | 22:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.10.4] | 22:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.15.5 => 20.04.15.6] (core) | 22:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adios [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.13.1-27] (no packageset) | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adios [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.13.1-27] (no packageset) | 23:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adios [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.13.1-27] (no packageset) | 23:32 | |
| === fabiomirmar_ is now known as fabiomirmar | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adios [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.13.1-27] (no packageset) | 23:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adios [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.13.1-27] (no packageset) | 23:55 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!