[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ots [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-6] (no packageset)
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: crashtest [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: graftcp [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.3.1+ds1-1] (no packageset)
[05:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plotsauce [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0~0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-limits [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.5.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcomps [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.1.15-4] (no packageset)
[05:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyfuse3 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [3.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sphinx-prompt [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.3.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbrz [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.23.2+bzr1633-1] (no packageset)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcomps [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.15-4] (no packageset)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-sass [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcomps [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.15-4] (no packageset)
[05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcomps [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.15-4] (no packageset)
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plotsauce [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0~0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plotsauce [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0~0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyfuse3 [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plotsauce [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0~0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-sass [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyfuse3 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcomps [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.15-4] (no packageset)
[05:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plotsauce [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0~0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plotsauce [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0~0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-sass [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyfuse3 [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-sass [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-sass [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcomps [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.15-4] (no packageset)
[05:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyfuse3 [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[06:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-sass [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcomps [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.15-4]
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcomps [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.15-4]
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcomps [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.15-4]
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcomps [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.15-4]
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcomps [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.15-4]
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcomps [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.15-4]
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyfuse3 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.2.0-1]
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyfuse3 [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [3.2.0-1]
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyfuse3 [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [3.2.0-1]
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyfuse3 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.2.0-1]
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyfuse3 [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.2.0-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted crashtest [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-limits [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-sass [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-sass [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-sass [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sphinx-prompt [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.3.0-2]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted graftcp [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.3.1+ds1-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-sass [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-sass [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qbrz [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.23.2+bzr1633-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-sass [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ots [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.0-6]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ots [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.0-6]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ots [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.0-6]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plotsauce [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0~0.1-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plotsauce [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0~0.1-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plotsauce [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0~0.1-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ots [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.0-6]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ots [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.0-6]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plotsauce [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0~0.1-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ots [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.0-6]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plotsauce [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0~0.1-1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plotsauce [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0~0.1-1]
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdap [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.20.7-3]
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdap [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [3.20.7-3]
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdap [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.20.7-3]
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdap [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.20.7-3]
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdap [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [3.20.7-3]
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdap [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [3.20.7-3]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed discount from i386-whitelist in hirsute
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libproc-processtable-perl from i386-whitelist in hirsute
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libtext-markdown-discount-perl from i386-whitelist in hirsute
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added llvm-toolchain-12 to i386-whitelist in hirsute
[09:09] <sil2100> handsome_feng: hey! I saw LP: #1914367 reported in kylin for .2 - it feels rather serious, is it something that happens on every install?
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1046.50]
[10:08] <paride> xnox, hi! did you try to reproduce  https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1914285 ?
[10:08] <paride> I need a sanity check :)
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.messaging (bionic-proposed/main) [5.35.0-0ubuntu2 => 5.35.0-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[10:20] <paride> now that the HWE kernel is included in the subiquity images we need to bump the max image size
[10:20] <paride> here: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/ubuntu-cdimage/mainline/view/head:/lib/cdimage/tree.py#L1878
[10:21] <paride> but this ^^ is buggy because "xenial" >= "bionic", but Ubuntu Xenial < Bionic
[10:22] <rbasak> HWE kernel is included in the subiquity images> that's new!
[10:22] <cjwatson> paride: No, config["DIST"] is a magic object
[10:22] <rbasak> Is that documented anywhere please?
[10:23] <cjwatson> paride: See cdimage.config.Series
[10:23] <paride> cjwatson, interesting, looking. thanks for the pointer!
[10:27] <paride> rbasak, we definitely need to mention it in the release notes. It isn't at the moment.
[10:27] <paride> rbasak, the default kernel is still the non-HWE one
[10:34] <rbasak> Ah, so booting the HWE kernel is an option now?
[10:38] <paride> rbasak, yes
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-203.235]
[10:46] <paride> cjwatson, https://code.launchpad.net/~paride/ubuntu-cdimage/ubuntu-cdimage/+merge/397422
[10:50] <cjwatson> Yep, looks plausible to me but I'm not really doing cdimage stuff any more so probably better if somebody more active reviews it
[10:51] <sil2100> Looking
[10:51] <paride> bzr log points at sil2100
[10:51] <paride> there :)
[10:53] <sil2100> paride: hm, ok, I think it makes sense - of course we only have the HWE kernels for focal, not in groovy or hirsute, so it's not really >= focal - but that being said, I think a size bump of this magnitude is okay anyway
[10:53] <sil2100> Let me merge this
[10:54] <sil2100> paride: as for the subiquity reboot bug - how frequently does that happen? You think it's a blocker?
[10:54] <sil2100> I'll add it to bugs to watch for now
[10:59] <paride> sil2100, I couldn't reproduce it in a fully manual install, but I am a bit worried about it. Past week the bug was not there, then we had the problem with the image building scripts caused by the removal of the legacy image stuff, and that you fixed
[10:59] <paride> I don't think that's related, but the issue caused a hole of a few days in the automated testing
[10:59] <paride> then this monday I started seeing the intermittent failures the bug I filed is about
[11:00] <paride> I struggled to reproduce it locally, but in the end I managed to, so it's not something strictly related to the test harness
[11:01] <paride> let me see if I can eliminate another variable
[11:01]  * paride does a few more installs
[11:03] <paride> rbasak, and of course if you boot the installed with the hwe kernel then the installed system uses linux-generic-hwe-20.04 as its kernel
[11:04] <rbasak> That sounds really useful.
[11:04] <paride> so the hwe kernel has been added to both /casper (for the installer) and /pool, with all its .debs
[11:04] <rbasak> We should document that as a headline feature!
[11:09] <paride> sil2100, should the .OVERSIZED files be manually removed from https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/focal/daily-live/pending/ now?
[11:09] <paride> they cause a big warning in the iso tracker
[11:14] <sil2100> paride: yeah, +1 on that
[12:09] <xnox> sil2100:  issue with riscv64 image......
[12:10] <xnox> sil2100:  on http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/420/builds/226356/testcases I cannot report that Unleashed & Qemu pass without bugs =)
[12:10] <xnox> sil2100:  cause qemu & unleashed board test cases are not there.
[12:24] <sil2100> We have no test cases!
[12:24] <sil2100> :)
[12:25] <sil2100> xnox: should I add some generic ones? Or do we actually ahve some riscv test cases present?
[12:25] <sil2100> xnox: anyway, it's still good to hear that the issue here is that there is no issue ;)
[12:28] <xnox> sil2100:  well it needs qemu boot; unleashed board boot => at least. not sure if there are any generic ones to use, given it is preinstalled image.
[12:29] <xnox> let me check what we have for pi
[12:30] <xnox> sil2100:  ubuntu-base riscv64 product is missing too
[12:31] <sil2100> Oh, ok, that one I forgot completely
[12:31] <sil2100> Let me add it
[12:33] <Laney> It'll need to be in etc/qa-products too if it's not already
[12:33] <Laney> looks like it is!
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Focal 20.04.2] (20210201.1) has been added
[12:41] <sil2100> Ok, all added o/
[13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-snapshot [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1:13~++20210129063721+010b176cdefb-1~exp1] (no packageset)
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1051.53] (kernel)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1:13~++20210129063721+010b176cdefb-1~exp1]
[13:44] <sil2100> Ok, bad news, certification reported a blanket issue with one of the hardware: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1914374
[13:46] <sil2100> hm, guess we need a bit more info about that one
[13:46] <sil2100> jibel, Laney: JFYI ^
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvirt [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/main) [7.0.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvirt [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [7.0.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvirt [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/main) [7.0.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvirt [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [7.0.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvirt [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/main) [7.0.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[14:10] <Laney> come now, people need to use the proper tools to report bugs
[14:12] <sil2100> +1 on that
[14:19] <sil2100> hm, ok, we have some logs, weird
[14:19] <sil2100> Feels like what we fixed earlier?
[14:20] <Laney> it's claiming the desktop isn't launching, that would be something else
[14:22] <Laney> or is it the installed system?
[14:22] <Laney> in that case, no installer syslog
[14:25] <sil2100> Well, they attached some installer logs
[14:26] <sil2100> And there seemed to be some removals performed, looking at the logs now
[14:26] <Laney> ah
[14:26] <Laney> dang, just now
[14:26] <Laney> thanks 'hide' button!
[14:28] <icey> Hey, can an admin please reject the python-oslo.messaging from the bionic unapproved queue?
[14:28] <Laney> sil2100:
[14:28] <Laney> Feb  1 14:07:38 ubuntu apt-setup: This disc is called:
[14:28] <Laney> Feb  1 14:07:38 ubuntu apt-setup: 'Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS _Focal Fossa_ - Release amd64 (20210201.1)'
[14:29] <handsome_feng> sil2100: Hi, I can't reproduce the bug here, and she (who is the member of our test team) can't reproduced it either, so I set the bug to Incomplete for more test, I think it won't block the 20.04.2 release
[14:32] <Laney> ah no, what, maybe I opened the wrong file, it is the right iso
[14:34] <sil2100> Laney: hm, still looking at it, but is there some problem and confusion because it installs linux-oem-5.6 and then removes the hwe kernel + bits? Maybe too much is removed?
[14:34] <rbasak> icey: done
[14:35] <icey> thanks rbasak - there will be a new upload shortly that we'll hopefully get through quickly (partial revert of previously accepted SRU)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-oslo.messaging [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.35.0-0ubuntu3]
[14:36] <sil2100> handsome_feng: ok, might be something specific to the given hardware
[14:36] <sil2100> handsome_feng: thanks for checking!
[14:37] <handsome_feng> sil2100:  nop :)
[14:39] <rbasak> icey: could you create a separate bug for the regresion please, tag it regression-updates, and close that bug from the changelog entry of your revert upload please, so that we can track it properly?
[14:39] <icey> rbasak: yes
[14:40] <rbasak> Thanks!
[14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1051.53]
[14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-snapshot [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1:13~++20210129063721+010b176cdefb-1~exp1] (no packageset)
[14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvirt [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [7.0.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvirt [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [7.0.0-1ubuntu1]
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvirt [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [7.0.0-1ubuntu1]
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvirt [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [7.0.0-1ubuntu1]
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1:13~++20210129063721+010b176cdefb-1~exp1]
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvirt [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [7.0.0-1ubuntu1]
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvirt [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [7.0.0-1ubuntu1]
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvirt [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [7.0.0-1ubuntu1]
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-snapshot [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1:13~++20210129063721+010b176cdefb-1~exp1] (no packageset)
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1:13~++20210129063721+010b176cdefb-1~exp1]
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnupg2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.4-1ubuntu1.4]
[15:24] <xnox> sil2100:  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1914374 commented that the kernel removal highlighted is the expected one.
[15:24] <xnox> sil2100:  and asked if the oem v5.6 kernel is busted on that sku; if it should be using v5.6 oem kernel or the hwe v5.8 one.
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpdk (focal-proposed/main) [19.11.3-0ubuntu0.2 => 19.11.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-server)
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected dpdk [source] (focal-proposed) [19.11.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[16:01] <xnox> Laney:  is it intentional that we have -server nvidia graphics on the desktop iso available?
[16:05] <Laney> Dunno
[16:05] <Laney> Probably not
[16:06] <Laney> Is there some situation where you'd want that?
[16:09] <sil2100> How are those pulled in?
[16:13] <xnox> sil2100:  ship-live pattern.
[17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.messaging (bionic-proposed/main) [5.35.0-0ubuntu2 => 5.35.0-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[17:10] <coreycb> rbasak, hello I've just uploaded python-oslo.messaging to the bionic unapproved queue and it deals with the regerssion-updates that icey mentioned earlier
[17:13] <paride> xnox, sil2100, I ran out of idea on https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1914285
[17:13] <paride> I tried a lot today to identify what's triggering it, but it's elusive
[17:14] <bdmurray> coreycb: If you don't have from Robie let me know and I can have a look.
[17:15] <bdmurray> s/have/hear/
[17:16] <rbasak> sil2100: can I accept dpdk into focal-proposed? AFAICT, it's seeded in supported-misc-servers only, though I'm confused by seeded-in-ubuntu listing it as "supported" by various flavours. I don't think it ends up on any ISO though?
[17:21] <rbasak> coreycb, icey: you're not reverting the first patch then? Are you hoping to land this in into -updates in a hurry, or can it wait the usual ageing period?
[17:22] <coreycb> rbasak: we're keeping the first patch. I'm going to ask seyeong, who tested the original SRU, if he can also test this version.
[17:23] <coreycb> I would like to get it out fast though, once tested
[17:24] <rbasak> coreycb: a straight revert of the entire SRU would minimise regression risk the most. Are we sure that the first patch won't interact in an unexpected way?
[17:24] <rbasak> I'm less sure about doing a partial revert in a hurry
[17:25] <rbasak> bdmurray: second opinion please?
[17:26] <coreycb> rbasak: pretty certain we're good with just having the first patch. the upstream approach was to only land the first patch in N-1 release and then add the 2nd/3rd patch in N release to minimize disruptiveness and we didn't follow that pattern in the first SRU in distro unfortunately. I've tested partial unattended-upgrades with this new bionic version from a PPA and it's not disruptive.
[17:28] <rbasak> coreycb: any special interaction for users already on 5.35.0-0ubuntu2 getting the revert?
[17:28] <coreycb> rbasak: the reason I want seyeong to test this new version is that the understanding is the first patch alone will fix the original bug.
[17:28] <bdmurray> rbasak: I'm in a metting at the moment, will look when it wraps up.
[17:29] <coreycb> rbasak: the easiest thing to do is to downgrade to 5.35.0-0ubuntu1 and restart neutron* services
[17:30] <coreycb> if they've already upgraded the entire cloud to 5.35.0-0ubuntu2 then the disruption goes away. it only is disruptive if parts of the cloud are at 5.35.0-0ubuntu1 and parts are at 5.35.0-0ubuntu2
[17:30] <rbasak> coreycb: my concern is just that in a hurry to fix a regression, further oversights can compound the problem, and so usually I'd prefer to see the whole thing reverted (usually that's lowest risk) and then to go around again with the full ageing period and normal level of QA/caution, rather than rush through an attempted further fix of the broken fix, IYSWIM.
[17:30] <rbasak> Let's see what Brian says.
[17:30] <rbasak> Apart from that point, your upload looks good.
[17:31] <coreycb> rbasak: ok thanks. I can revert everything too if it will help, and we can then put the single patch through more vigorous testing as a 3rd SRU.
[17:31] <rbasak> coreycb: wil it be disruptive if parts of the cloud are on 5.35.0-0ubuntu2 and parts on 5.35.0-0ubuntu3?
[17:32] <coreycb> rbasak: It shouldn't be a problem but that should be something we also test
[17:32] <coreycb> rbasak: for now, let me update the test case section with what needs testing before we'd release this
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librepo [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.12.1-4] (no packageset)
[17:38] <sil2100> rbasak: I think it should be ok for -proposed, but just be sure to not move it to -updates for now
[17:39] <bdmurray> coreycb: So given that some parts are on 5.35.0-0ubuntu1 how would that interact with 5.35.0-0ubuntu3?
[17:39] <coreycb> bdmurray: rbasak: I think I'll just revert all the patches and re-upload. There's no reason to rush the fix for the first sru, but there is reason to run the revert.
[17:39] <coreycb> s/run/rush/
[17:40] <bdmurray> Alirghty
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librepo [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.12.1-4] (no packageset)
[17:47] <rbasak> sil2100: OK, thanks!
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpdk [source] (groovy-proposed) [19.11.6-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpdk [source] (focal-proposed) [19.11.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.messaging (bionic-proposed/main) [5.35.0-0ubuntu2 => 5.35.0-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librepo [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.12.1-4] (no packageset)
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-oslo.messaging [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.35.0-0ubuntu3]
[17:54] <rbasak> coreycb: thanks, and accepted. Please check for unexpected interactions with ubuntu2 before we release.
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.messaging [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.35.0-0ubuntu3]
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librepo [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.12.1-4] (no packageset)
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (groovy-proposed/main) [0.99.3 => 0.99.3.1] (core)
[18:04] <coreycb> rbasak: will do, thank you
[18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librepo [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.12.1-4] (no packageset)
[18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librepo [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.12.1-4] (no packageset)
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (focal-proposed/main) [0.98.9.3 => 0.98.9.4] (core)
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (focal-proposed/main) [1:0.8.6.4~0.20.04.1 => 1:0.8.6.5~0.20.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[18:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnupg2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.2.4-1ubuntu1.3 => 2.2.4-1ubuntu1.4] (core)
[19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (focal-proposed) [1:0.8.6.5~0.20.04.1]
[20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.15.6 => 20.04.15.7] (core)
[20:51] <sil2100> bdmurray: hey! Can you review the ubiquity upload ^? It's the real fix for the OEM bug ^
[20:52] <bdmurray> sil2100: Yes, how many people have worked on it?
[20:52] <sil2100> 3
[20:53] <bdmurray> That sounds rubber stampable then
[20:53] <bdmurray> ;-)
[20:53] <sil2100> hah, well, I could have still done some mistake when prepping the upload!
[20:53] <sil2100> So better if you take a look anyway
[20:53] <bdmurray> I am!
[20:54] <bdmurray> What are apt_installed and all_removed?
[20:55] <sil2100> hm, sadly I think we won't have the time to do *all* the testing of that in -proposed, so after a sanity test I'll just push it through to -updates and let the OEM guys check the RC images
[20:56] <sil2100> bdmurray: so apt_removed is the list of packages marked for removal during the installation - and there's actually two lists of that, apt_removed and apt_removed_recursive (packages that have been marked for recursive removal)
[20:56] <sil2100> So when excluding those from the list of apt_installed we want to get all packages from both those sets
[20:57] <bdmurray> Okay, and then the log line will have a large list in %s?
[20:57] <sil2100> Might, but most of the time it's either empty (so no message at all) or 1-2 packages
[20:58] <sil2100> In the case of the OEM bug it was basically one package
[21:07] <bdmurray> sil2100: Was it generated with -v?
[21:07] <sil2100> bdmurray: actually, wait! I see a problem
[21:07] <bdmurray> sil2100: oh, the old one is in -proposed and -updates
[21:07] <sil2100> bdmurray: please wait, I'll re-upload
[21:08] <bdmurray> sil2100: okay, standing by
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.15.7]
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.15.6 => 20.04.15.7] (core)
[21:14] <sil2100> bdmurray: ok, new upload pushed
[21:15] <sil2100> bdmurray: should be good now - previously the line was too long and I didn't see it as I was not running the clean-tests
[21:22] <sil2100> bdmurray: does it look okayish to you?
[21:23] <bdmurray> sil2100: ish
[21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.15.7]
[21:24] <sil2100> Thank you! Now for it to build, doing a quick sanity test and then off to -updates with it
[21:24] <sil2100> In the meantime I'll go a bit AFK
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1021.22] (core, kernel)
[22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1021.22]
[22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.10 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.10.0-1014.15] (no packageset)
[22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.99.3.1]
[23:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (focal-proposed) [0.98.9.4]
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1017.19] (core)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1017.19]
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted grub2.04-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.143]
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: grub2.04-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.143] (no packageset)
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: grub2.04-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.143] (no packageset)
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted grub2.04-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.143]
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted grub2.04-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.143]