| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T187: Lubuntu 20.04.2] kc2bez (Dan Simmons) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T187#4218 | 00:19 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/378/ | 00:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/622/ | 00:49 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/541/ | 01:07 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/200/ | 01:08 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/126/ | 01:08 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/551/ | 01:08 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pcmanfm-qt just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pcmanfm-qt/367/ | 01:24 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-about just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-about/337/ | 01:26 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/203/ | 01:28 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-notificationd just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-notificationd/328/ | 01:28 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/589/ | 01:28 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/105/ | 01:28 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/351/ | 01:28 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-archiver/354/ | 01:28 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/585/ | 01:29 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/622/ | 01:38 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/126/ | 01:38 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/378/ | 01:38 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/201/ | 01:58 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/590/ | 01:59 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/106/ | 01:59 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/352/ | 01:59 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/542/ | 01:59 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/586/ | 02:10 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/622/ | 02:10 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/126/ | 02:10 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/378/ | 02:10 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/552/ | 02:12 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/204/ | 02:14 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-archiver just became unstable after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-archiver/355/ | 02:25 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_liblxqt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_liblxqt/713/ | 06:28 | |
| RyuKurisu[m] | <wxl "we could always do kwin"> My main 'issue' would be all the dependencies it has. How about KWinFT? | 08:04 |
|---|---|---|
| lubot | [telegram] <alifnuxer> Bro....can I know startxfce for lubuntu??? because I used vnc server but if I connect with vnc viewer is blank screen | 08:48 |
| lubot | [telegram] <kc2bez> 1 We aren't all "bros" in the channel. 2 This sounds like a support issue, you are in the development channel. (re @alifnuxer: Bro....can I know startxfce for lubuntu??? because I used vnc server but if I connect with vnc viewer is blank screen) | 09:05 |
| kc2bez | ! support | 09:05 |
| ubot93 | For Lubuntu support, please join the #lubuntu channel on IRC or https://telegram.lubuntu.me/support for Telegram. Also, at https://forum.lubuntu.me you can find our Discourse forum. | 09:05 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/543/ | 10:15 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/543/ | 10:26 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/201/ | 10:26 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-about just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-about/337/ | 10:40 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/202/ | 10:56 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libsysstat just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libsysstat/98/ | 11:17 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/553/ | 11:32 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-archiver UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-archiver/355/ | 11:33 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/205/ | 11:43 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rLIBLXQTPACKAGINGfcbd433029ad: Merge branch 'ubuntu/hirsute' into ci/stable] kc2bez (Dan Simmons) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rLIBLXQTPACKAGINGfcbd433029ad | 11:44 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-archiver UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-archiver/356/ | 11:59 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/205/ | 12:03 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/553/ | 12:14 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_calamares just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_calamares/648/ | 12:24 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools/529/ | 12:28 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-build-tools/306/ | 12:35 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T185: deal with merges] The_LoudSpeaker (Raman Sarda) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T185#4221 | 12:44 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T185: deal with merges] kc2bez (Dan Simmons) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T185#4223 | 12:50 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools/529/ | 12:54 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-build-tools/93/ | 13:05 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-build-tools/93/ | 13:05 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools/530/ | 13:19 | |
| The_LoudSpeaker | wxl: so we doing debuild -S -sa by default now? | 13:26 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | also, I am getting this: https://lintian.debian.org/tags/possible-new-upstream-release-without-new-version.html | 13:30 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | even when the version number is correct. | 13:30 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-build-tools/307/ | 13:35 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rLIBFMQTPACKAGING1215d360d800: New upstream version] The_LoudSpeaker (Raman Sarda) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rLIBFMQTPACKAGING1215d360d800 | 13:36 | |
| The_LoudSpeaker | it should show up on launchpad in some time right? | 13:37 |
| -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- New binary: libfm-qt [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu) | 13:39 | |
| The_LoudSpeaker | ughh!! | 13:39 |
| kc2bez[m] | <The_LoudSpeaker "it should show up on launchpad i"> We are missing some context. Which package and version? | 13:39 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | s390x build failed. | 13:39 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfm-qt/0.16.0-3ubuntu1/+build/20987501 | 13:39 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | kc2bez[m]: libfm-qt 0.16.0-3ubuntu1 | 13:40 |
| lubot | [telegram] <RikMills> Why don't you test in a PPA 1st? | 13:40 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | don't have one set up yet. | 13:41 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/521468661/buildlog_ubuntu-hirsute-s390x.libfm-qt_0.16.0-3ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz here are the log | 13:41 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | *logs | 13:41 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | dpkg-gensymbols gave me errors. | 13:42 |
| kc2bez[m] | <The_LoudSpeaker "https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+so"> Looks like many symbols issues. | 13:42 |
| lubot | [telegram] <RikMills> That lintian warning is correct | 13:42 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | @RikMills as far as I understand from that warning, I need to correct the version number. But isn't it correct? 0.16.0-3ubuntu1 ? | 13:43 |
| -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- New binary: libfm-qt [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu) | 13:43 | |
| The_LoudSpeaker | kc2bez[m]: yes. how do I check what went wrong? | 13:43 |
| lubot | [telegram] <RikMills> You put "New upstream release.", which is not true on this merge | 13:43 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | @RikMills: 0.15.1 to 0.16.0 is a new upstream release only right? | 13:44 |
| lubot | [telegram] <RikMills> Not compared to the debian revision you are merging from (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <The_LoudSpeaker> @RikMills: 0.15.1 to 0.16.0 is a new upstream release only right?) | 13:45 |
| lubot | [telegram] <RikMills> i.e. the previous entry in your merged debian/changelog | 13:45 |
| theloudspeaker | ohh. now I get it. | 13:45 |
| theloudspeaker | I should just modify the changelog entry. use better words there. | 13:46 |
| theloudspeaker | and about the symbol errors, what do I do about it? | 13:46 |
| lubot | [telegram] <RikMills> fix them | 13:46 |
| kc2bez[m] | then bump the Ubuntu version | 13:47 |
| theloudspeaker | <lubot "[telegram] <RikMills> fix them"> where to find what to exactly to fix? | 13:47 |
| kc2bez[m] | In the build log | 13:48 |
| theloudspeaker | <kc2bez[m] "then bump the Ubuntu version"> yeah, after symbols are fixed version would be 3ubuntu2 right? | 13:48 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/586/ | 13:50 | |
| -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- New binary: libfm-qt [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu) | 13:50 | |
| -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- New binary: libfm-qt [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu) | 13:51 | |
| kc2bez[m] | Yes, I would wait until it finishes building on all the architectures so you only have to make one (hopefully) change to the symbols | 13:52 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | okay. digging into the symbols file for that architecture | 13:55 |
| * The_LoudSpeaker doesn't understand symbols files. | 14:04 | |
| The_LoudSpeaker | wxl: you faced something simillar on the last package na? how to fix this senpai? | 14:05 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | ohh. you had only one error and you removed that symbol from main symbols file. why might I ask? | 14:18 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | I have series of such errors in my build. not just one line. | 14:18 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/587/ | 14:22 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/587/ | 14:26 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T185: deal with merges] The_LoudSpeaker (Raman Sarda) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T185#4224 | 14:26 | |
| The_LoudSpeaker | riscv64 also failed. :( same thing, symbols. | 14:28 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-policykit just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-policykit/572/ | 14:37 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-policykit just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-policykit/572/ | 14:37 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-panel just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-panel/353/ | 14:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-panel just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-panel/353/ | 15:13 | |
| lubot | [telegram] <RikMills> https://matterbridge.lubuntu.me/09fa9023/giphy.mp4 | 15:33 |
| lubot | [telegram] <teward001> the symbols are evil :P | 15:33 |
| lubot | [telegram] <teward001> :P | 15:33 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/591/ | 16:50 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/107/ | 16:51 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/353/ | 17:40 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/591/ | 18:31 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/591/ | 18:32 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/107/ | 18:37 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/353/ | 18:47 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/878/ | 19:43 | |
| wxl | @The_LoudSpeaker: are you all figured out? | 19:57 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/419/ | 19:57 | |
| lubot | [telegram] <The_LoudSpeaker> Not yet. | 19:57 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/622/ | 19:58 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/126/ | 19:58 | |
| wxl | i would *presume* you just apply what i did across all of the missing symbols | 19:58 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/378/ | 19:58 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/878/ | 19:58 | |
| wxl | `(!arch=s390x)` can be appended to any symbol. if there's another tag (in parens) you separate them with a pipe (`|`) | 19:59 |
| wxl | i'd suggest sticking it in a ppa to check the build before pushing it all upstream | 19:59 |
| wxl | regarding the lintian warning did you figure that out? | 20:01 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | For that i just have to rephrase my 1st line from the dch. | 20:02 |
| wxl | anyways -sa is required when the upstream tarball doesn't already exist in launchpad. in the event of a new upstream release, that is to be expected. there's no real problem in adding -sa to force the source tar ball to be included, so why not | 20:02 |
| wxl | the issue is you did "new upstream release" meaning "new debian release" rather than an actual "new upstream release" XD | 20:02 |
| wxl | anything else you need help with? | 20:03 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/419/ | 20:03 | |
| The_LoudSpeaker | that's lintian's fault. It doesn't understand that new debian release are also new upstream releases for us. | 20:03 |
| wxl | well yeah kind of sort of | 20:04 |
| wxl | it's ultimately seeing "new upstream release" and comparing your version number with the previous one. since the upstream portion is unchanged, it makes no sense | 20:04 |
| wxl | BTW look at that previous changelog entry | 20:04 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | nothing else. I will just boot the containers now and try fixing the symbols. | 20:04 |
| wxl | it's a symbols update | 20:04 |
| wxl | so that's weird | 20:05 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | yeah I did include those symbols in my new build. check the commit, you will new symbols files for all architectures. | 20:05 |
| RikMills | looks like this package has a seperate symbols file for each arch! :S | 20:05 |
| wxl | that kind of makes it a bit more managable in this cae | 20:08 |
| wxl | se | 20:08 |
| wxl | ugh you know | 20:08 |
| wxl | i would have done the same thing with liblxqt but it was only one symbol so that didn't seem to justify it | 20:08 |
| wxl | please ping me if you need me. i'm kind of head down right now. | 20:12 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | wxl: can you explain what we are doing here with symbols files ? | 20:19 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | and like what exactly are these symbols files? | 20:19 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | why do we need them and why are they breaking stuff? | 20:19 |
| wxl | ok so first off, contrary to popular belief, i'm not the expert on symbols XD | 20:20 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | but you are senpai here. Go read up and then explain. XD | 20:21 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/623/ | 20:29 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/379/ | 20:33 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm just failed after being unstable: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/127/ | 20:34 | |
| The_LoudSpeaker | Also, wxl since we have separate symbols files for each architecture, i think instead of adding that (!arch=s390x) just deleting that line from the file would do? | 20:42 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | that (!arch=s390x) is basically saying don't use that symbol or something? | 20:43 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | Also, we don't have a version of 0.16 of libfm-qt building in our CI ? | 20:44 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | wxl: wxl wxl say some thing. | 20:47 |
| wxl | sorry phone | 20:47 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | oh. take your time then. | 20:47 |
| wxl | done now | 20:48 |
| wxl | here's the docs https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html | 20:49 |
| wxl | tl;dr symbols are shared libraries | 20:49 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | okay | 20:56 |
| wxl | and just to be sure you're clear on that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_(computing)#Shared_libraries | 20:58 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/206/ | 20:59 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/554/ | 20:59 | |
| wxl | in any case i think it's safe to say that all shared libraries are not guaranteed to work across all the architectures we use | 21:00 |
| wxl | in reality not including a failing symbol on an arch means that THAT library won't work so it could result in other software depending on it not working | 21:00 |
| wxl | but again, who is running LXQt on s390x? | 21:00 |
| wxl | this may be helpful too https://qt-kde-team.pages.debian.net/symbolfiles.html | 21:02 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | okay so we have an option to either break that library or fix it (by rewriting the symbols file) and we choose to break it for s390x | 21:02 |
| wxl | they're all one in the same essentially | 21:02 |
| wxl | the right solution is that upstream makes everything compatible with s390x but again that may not be anywhere in their scope or intention | 21:03 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | why are we even supporting s390x again? | 21:06 |
| wxl | ask ubuntu | 21:08 |
| wxl | or for that matter, debian, since they do too https://wiki.debian.org/SupportedArchitectures | 21:09 |
| wxl | along with lots of thinsg we don't | 21:09 |
| wxl | although their riscv64 is unsupported and ours is ugh | 21:09 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | riscv64 me also we have simillar problem. I will need some time to read up and understand how to fix this. | 21:13 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | til then it's okay to have it fail on these right? or I have to do it today itself? | 21:15 |
| kc2bez[m] | Sorry missed most of this. Working for a living is fun. | 21:15 |
| kc2bez[m] | We do have these packages in ci and they are building. | 21:15 |
| kc2bez[m] | ci.lubuntu.me | 21:15 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | can we not use symbols files from the CI then? | 21:16 |
| kc2bez[m] | sure, look at the ci/unstable and ci/stable branches | 21:16 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | will save us time and resources on trying to fix stuff in debian's symbols files. | 21:16 |
| The_LoudSpeaker | yup. looking in them now | 21:17 |
| kc2bez[m] | well maybe yes and maybe no but more often than not it will help. | 21:17 |
| kc2bez[m] | Make sure it is building in ci first | 21:18 |
| theloudspeaker | kc2bez: i see 0.15.1 only there. | 21:22 |
| * theloudspeaker uploaded an image: image.png (92KiB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/ofCLhDEprljDNQURQFKzdeLL/image.png > | 21:22 | |
| kc2bez[m] | yes, +gitDATESTAMP | 21:22 |
| kc2bez[m] | ci/unstable is from the tip of master | 21:23 |
| kc2bez[m] | ci/stable follows the version number | 21:24 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libsysstat just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libsysstat/99/ | 21:24 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/592/ | 21:24 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/108/ | 21:24 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/354/ | 21:25 | |
| theloudspeaker | ci unstable was successful. ci_stable was unsuccessful (last builds) | 21:25 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_calamares just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_calamares/649/ | 21:25 | |
| kc2bez[m] | yeah, looking at the buildlog for stable there were all sorts of symbols issues there too. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/521447413/buildlog_ubuntu-hirsute-amd64.libfm-qt_0.15.1+git202102050440~hirsute-0ubuntu1~ppa1_BUILDING.txt.gz | 21:29 |
| theloudspeaker | i see only a libfm-qt_0.15.1+git202102050400~hirsute-0ubuntu1~ppa1.debian.tar.xz and not a ubuntu.src.tar.xz like we get form merge-o-matic | 21:30 |
| theloudspeaker | I will download and check the source tar. | 21:30 |
| kc2bez[m] | ? | 21:30 |
| theloudspeaker | <kc2bez[m] "yeah, looking at the buildlog fo"> this is for ci stable or unstable? | 21:31 |
| kc2bez[m] | that is ci stable | 21:31 |
| theloudspeaker | <kc2bez[m] "?"> I went to https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-ci/+archive/ubuntu/unstable-ci-proposed/+packages/ and checked if it was building for all architectures. | 21:32 |
| theloudspeaker | apparently it is. | 21:32 |
| kc2bez[m] | yes, it simulates the archive | 21:32 |
| wxl | someone else can deal with this aug7744 person on discourse. i'm tired of all of their weird-o edge case situations coupled with a relatively poor grasp of english. sigh | 21:32 |
| theloudspeaker | that tar.xz is from that page only. downloading and checking it it now. | 21:32 |
| kc2bez[m] | I can look at it tonight wxl | 21:33 |
| theloudspeaker | <wxl "someone else can deal with this "> just seenzone them then. ;) | 21:33 |
| kc2bez[m] | Ok well it is in phab already theloudspeaker | 21:33 |
| kc2bez[m] | it is in the ci/stable branch of the package you have | 21:34 |
| wxl | looks like ci doesn't build on riscv64 | 21:34 |
| kc2bez[m] | maybe not | 21:34 |
| kc2bez[m] | It takes forever anyway | 21:34 |
| wxl | what's weird is no arch is specified so i don't get that | 21:35 |
| kc2bez[m] | I think ci would probably always fail on it because it only checks for something like 3 or 4 hours for a package | 21:35 |
| theloudspeaker | kc2bez: I see qt7 only in that branch. | 21:35 |
| * theloudspeaker uploaded an image: image.png (54KiB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/VyabUPNXgPxYAcQUNjpAgTaf/image.png > | 21:35 | |
| kc2bez[m] | right, that is the one that is failing anyway. | 21:36 |
| kc2bez[m] | standby | 21:36 |
| kc2bez[m] | https://phab.lubuntu.me/source/libfm-qt/history/ci%252Funstable/ | 21:37 |
| kc2bez[m] | You can see apt-ghetto has been updating the symbols ^ | 21:37 |
| kc2bez[m] | for ci/unstable | 21:38 |
| * theloudspeaker uploaded an image: image.png (62KiB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/NTEgRxIePaIDvymOtflGwOUe/image.png > | 21:38 | |
| theloudspeaker | even in the tar I downloaded from ci unstable rigth now, which has 0.15.1+gitdate, qt7 is only there. no qt8 stuff. | 21:38 |
| kc2bez[m] | I get that. but the symbols themselves are valid | 21:38 |
| kc2bez[m] | Or else it wouldn't build | 21:39 |
| theloudspeaker | but in qt8 I don't have that monolithic single symbols file for all architectures. | 21:39 |
| kc2bez[m] | hmm must be Debian broke it out then | 21:39 |
| theloudspeaker | if you look at upstream (debian_ source, we have different symbols for each architecture. | 21:39 |
| theloudspeaker | can we do this: keep a single symbols file for qt8 on our ubuntu side? | 21:40 |
| theloudspeaker | using the one from ci? | 21:40 |
| kc2bez[m] | I wouldn't | 21:40 |
| kc2bez[m] | Ii guess the ci won't help here | 21:40 |
| wxl | either is valid | 21:40 |
| wxl | but if there are vast differences between archs (remember mine was a oneliner), it would be best to have them separate | 21:41 |
| wxl | otherwise you're going to have a heavily tagged single file | 21:41 |
| wxl | and that's kind of ugly | 21:41 |
| kc2bez[m] | It is better to keep the Ubuntu delta down so it might be best to follow Debian | 21:41 |
| theloudspeaker | if i am to apply what wxl you applied for liblxqt, I will have multiple lines of those hacks in symbols files of s390x and riscv64. would that be okay instead of having a single symbols file which works? | 21:43 |
| wxl | so let's say you have some line x that works in amd64 but not in s390x | 21:44 |
| wxl | you could tag the single .symbols file with (!arch=s390x) | 21:44 |
| wxl | or you could have an .amd64 file that includes x and a .390x file that does not | 21:44 |
| theloudspeaker | yeah thats understandable. separate ones are better. | 21:45 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-policykit just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-policykit/573/ | 21:45 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/878/ | 21:45 | |
| RyuKurisu[m] | wxl I haven't checked myself physically, but I noticed that Garuda Linux doesn't use a swap file but a swap partition with Btrfs and Calamares | 21:45 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-panel just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-panel/354/ | 21:45 | |
| theloudspeaker | so what I am going to do now is delete the parts from s390x symbols file which give me errors. | 21:45 |
| wxl | i note that apt-ghetto[m] was using the (optional) tag. i wonder if that's an alternative | 21:47 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/623/ | 21:47 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm just failed after being unstable: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/127/ | 21:48 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/379/ | 21:48 | |
| kc2bez[m] | FWIW libfm-qt might be the hardest one to deal with. | 21:49 |
| wxl | yes | 21:49 |
| theloudspeaker | good to know. | 21:55 |
| theloudspeaker | I will continue this in the morning. have only 3 lectures tomorrow. | 21:56 |
| theloudspeaker | gtg now. | 21:56 |
| wxl | thx! | 21:59 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/544/ | 22:00 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/203/ | 22:01 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/419/ | 22:03 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/879/ | 22:06 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/593/ | 22:15 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/109/ | 22:15 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/355/ | 22:15 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/207/ | 22:16 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/420/ | 22:16 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/555/ | 22:18 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/623/ | 22:18 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/127/ | 22:19 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/379/ | 22:19 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/879/ | 22:31 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm just became unstable after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/128/ | 22:32 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/545/ | 22:45 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/204/ | 22:46 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/420/ | 22:47 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/880/ | 22:57 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
