[00:19] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T187: Lubuntu 20.04.2] kc2bez (Dan Simmons) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T187#4218 [00:48] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/378/ [00:49] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/622/ [01:07] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/541/ [01:08] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/200/ [01:08] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/126/ [01:08] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/551/ [01:24] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pcmanfm-qt just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pcmanfm-qt/367/ [01:26] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-about just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-about/337/ [01:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/203/ [01:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-notificationd just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-notificationd/328/ [01:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/589/ [01:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/105/ [01:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/351/ [01:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-archiver/354/ [01:29] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/585/ [01:38] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/622/ [01:38] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/126/ [01:38] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/378/ [01:58] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/201/ [01:59] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/590/ [01:59] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/106/ [01:59] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/352/ [01:59] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/542/ [02:10] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/586/ [02:10] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/622/ [02:10] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/126/ [02:10] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/378/ [02:12] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/552/ [02:14] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/204/ [02:25] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-archiver just became unstable after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-archiver/355/ [06:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_liblxqt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_liblxqt/713/ [08:04] My main 'issue' would be all the dependencies it has. How about KWinFT? [08:48] [telegram] Bro....can I know startxfce for lubuntu??? because I used vnc server but if I connect with vnc viewer is blank screen [09:05] [telegram] 1 We aren't all "bros" in the channel. 2 This sounds like a support issue, you are in the development channel. (re @alifnuxer: Bro....can I know startxfce for lubuntu??? because I used vnc server but if I connect with vnc viewer is blank screen) [09:05] ! support [09:05] For Lubuntu support, please join the #lubuntu channel on IRC or https://telegram.lubuntu.me/support for Telegram. Also, at https://forum.lubuntu.me you can find our Discourse forum. [10:15] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/543/ [10:26] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/543/ [10:26] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/201/ [10:40] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-about just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-about/337/ [10:56] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/202/ [11:17] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libsysstat just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libsysstat/98/ [11:32] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/553/ [11:33] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-archiver UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-archiver/355/ [11:43] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/205/ [11:44] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rLIBLXQTPACKAGINGfcbd433029ad: Merge branch 'ubuntu/hirsute' into ci/stable] kc2bez (Dan Simmons) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rLIBLXQTPACKAGINGfcbd433029ad [11:59] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-archiver UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-archiver/356/ [12:03] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/205/ [12:14] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/553/ [12:24] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_calamares just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_calamares/648/ [12:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools/529/ [12:35] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-build-tools/306/ [12:44] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T185: deal with merges] The_LoudSpeaker (Raman Sarda) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T185#4221 [12:50] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T185: deal with merges] kc2bez (Dan Simmons) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T185#4223 [12:54] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools/529/ [13:05] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-build-tools/93/ [13:05] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-build-tools/93/ [13:19] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools/530/ [13:26] wxl: so we doing debuild -S -sa by default now? [13:30] also, I am getting this: https://lintian.debian.org/tags/possible-new-upstream-release-without-new-version.html [13:30] even when the version number is correct. [13:35] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-build-tools/307/ [13:36] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rLIBFMQTPACKAGING1215d360d800: New upstream version] The_LoudSpeaker (Raman Sarda) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rLIBFMQTPACKAGING1215d360d800 [13:37] it should show up on launchpad in some time right? [13:39] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- New binary: libfm-qt [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu) [13:39] ughh!! [13:39] We are missing some context. Which package and version? [13:39] s390x build failed. [13:39] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfm-qt/0.16.0-3ubuntu1/+build/20987501 [13:40] kc2bez[m]: libfm-qt 0.16.0-3ubuntu1 [13:40] [telegram] Why don't you test in a PPA 1st? [13:41] don't have one set up yet. [13:41] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/521468661/buildlog_ubuntu-hirsute-s390x.libfm-qt_0.16.0-3ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz here are the log [13:41] *logs [13:42] dpkg-gensymbols gave me errors. [13:42] Looks like many symbols issues. [13:42] [telegram] That lintian warning is correct [13:43] @RikMills as far as I understand from that warning, I need to correct the version number. But isn't it correct? 0.16.0-3ubuntu1 ? [13:43] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- New binary: libfm-qt [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu) [13:43] kc2bez[m]: yes. how do I check what went wrong? [13:43] [telegram] You put "New upstream release.", which is not true on this merge [13:44] @RikMills: 0.15.1 to 0.16.0 is a new upstream release only right? [13:45] [telegram] Not compared to the debian revision you are merging from (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) @RikMills: 0.15.1 to 0.16.0 is a new upstream release only right?) [13:45] [telegram] i.e. the previous entry in your merged debian/changelog [13:45] ohh. now I get it. [13:46] I should just modify the changelog entry. use better words there. [13:46] and about the symbol errors, what do I do about it? [13:46] [telegram] fix them [13:47] then bump the Ubuntu version [13:47] fix them"> where to find what to exactly to fix? [13:48] In the build log [13:48] yeah, after symbols are fixed version would be 3ubuntu2 right? [13:50] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/586/ [13:50] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- New binary: libfm-qt [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu) [13:51] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- New binary: libfm-qt [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu) [13:52] Yes, I would wait until it finishes building on all the architectures so you only have to make one (hopefully) change to the symbols [13:55] okay. digging into the symbols file for that architecture [14:04] * The_LoudSpeaker doesn't understand symbols files. [14:05] wxl: you faced something simillar on the last package na? how to fix this senpai? [14:18] ohh. you had only one error and you removed that symbol from main symbols file. why might I ask? [14:18] I have series of such errors in my build. not just one line. [14:22] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/587/ [14:26] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/587/ [14:26] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T185: deal with merges] The_LoudSpeaker (Raman Sarda) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T185#4224 [14:28] riscv64 also failed. :( same thing, symbols. [14:37] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-policykit just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-policykit/572/ [14:37] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-policykit just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-policykit/572/ [14:48] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-panel just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-panel/353/ [15:13] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-panel just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-panel/353/ [15:33] [telegram] https://matterbridge.lubuntu.me/09fa9023/giphy.mp4 [15:33] [telegram] the symbols are evil :P [15:33] [telegram] :P [16:50] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/591/ [16:51] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/107/ [17:40] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/353/ [18:31] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/591/ [18:32] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/591/ [18:37] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/107/ [18:47] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/353/ [19:43] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/878/ [19:57] @The_LoudSpeaker: are you all figured out? [19:57] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/419/ [19:57] [telegram] Not yet. [19:58] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/622/ [19:58] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/126/ [19:58] i would *presume* you just apply what i did across all of the missing symbols [19:58] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/378/ [19:58] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/878/ [19:59] `(!arch=s390x)` can be appended to any symbol. if there's another tag (in parens) you separate them with a pipe (`|`) [19:59] i'd suggest sticking it in a ppa to check the build before pushing it all upstream [20:01] regarding the lintian warning did you figure that out? [20:02] For that i just have to rephrase my 1st line from the dch. [20:02] anyways -sa is required when the upstream tarball doesn't already exist in launchpad. in the event of a new upstream release, that is to be expected. there's no real problem in adding -sa to force the source tar ball to be included, so why not [20:02] the issue is you did "new upstream release" meaning "new debian release" rather than an actual "new upstream release" XD [20:03] anything else you need help with? [20:03] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/419/ [20:03] that's lintian's fault. It doesn't understand that new debian release are also new upstream releases for us. [20:04] well yeah kind of sort of [20:04] it's ultimately seeing "new upstream release" and comparing your version number with the previous one. since the upstream portion is unchanged, it makes no sense [20:04] BTW look at that previous changelog entry [20:04] nothing else. I will just boot the containers now and try fixing the symbols. [20:04] it's a symbols update [20:05] so that's weird [20:05] yeah I did include those symbols in my new build. check the commit, you will new symbols files for all architectures. [20:05] looks like this package has a seperate symbols file for each arch! :S [20:08] that kind of makes it a bit more managable in this cae [20:08] se [20:08] ugh you know [20:08] i would have done the same thing with liblxqt but it was only one symbol so that didn't seem to justify it [20:12] please ping me if you need me. i'm kind of head down right now. [20:19] wxl: can you explain what we are doing here with symbols files ? [20:19] and like what exactly are these symbols files? [20:19] why do we need them and why are they breaking stuff? [20:20] ok so first off, contrary to popular belief, i'm not the expert on symbols XD [20:21] but you are senpai here. Go read up and then explain. XD [20:29] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/623/ [20:33] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/379/ [20:34] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm just failed after being unstable: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/127/ [20:42] Also, wxl since we have separate symbols files for each architecture, i think instead of adding that (!arch=s390x) just deleting that line from the file would do? [20:43] that (!arch=s390x) is basically saying don't use that symbol or something? [20:44] Also, we don't have a version of 0.16 of libfm-qt building in our CI ? [20:47] wxl: wxl wxl say some thing. [20:47] sorry phone [20:47] oh. take your time then. [20:48] done now [20:49] here's the docs https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html [20:49] tl;dr symbols are shared libraries [20:56] okay [20:58] and just to be sure you're clear on that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_(computing)#Shared_libraries [20:59] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/206/ [20:59] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/554/ [21:00] in any case i think it's safe to say that all shared libraries are not guaranteed to work across all the architectures we use [21:00] in reality not including a failing symbol on an arch means that THAT library won't work so it could result in other software depending on it not working [21:00] but again, who is running LXQt on s390x? [21:02] this may be helpful too https://qt-kde-team.pages.debian.net/symbolfiles.html [21:02] okay so we have an option to either break that library or fix it (by rewriting the symbols file) and we choose to break it for s390x [21:02] they're all one in the same essentially [21:03] the right solution is that upstream makes everything compatible with s390x but again that may not be anywhere in their scope or intention [21:06] why are we even supporting s390x again? [21:08] ask ubuntu [21:09] or for that matter, debian, since they do too https://wiki.debian.org/SupportedArchitectures [21:09] along with lots of thinsg we don't [21:09] although their riscv64 is unsupported and ours is ugh [21:13] riscv64 me also we have simillar problem. I will need some time to read up and understand how to fix this. [21:15] til then it's okay to have it fail on these right? or I have to do it today itself? [21:15] Sorry missed most of this. Working for a living is fun. [21:15] We do have these packages in ci and they are building. [21:15] ci.lubuntu.me [21:16] can we not use symbols files from the CI then? [21:16] sure, look at the ci/unstable and ci/stable branches [21:16] will save us time and resources on trying to fix stuff in debian's symbols files. [21:17] yup. looking in them now [21:17] well maybe yes and maybe no but more often than not it will help. [21:18] Make sure it is building in ci first [21:22] kc2bez: i see 0.15.1 only there. [21:22] * theloudspeaker uploaded an image: image.png (92KiB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/ofCLhDEprljDNQURQFKzdeLL/image.png > [21:22] yes, +gitDATESTAMP [21:23] ci/unstable is from the tip of master [21:24] ci/stable follows the version number [21:24] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libsysstat just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libsysstat/99/ [21:24] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/592/ [21:24] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/108/ [21:25] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/354/ [21:25] ci unstable was successful. ci_stable was unsuccessful (last builds) [21:25] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_calamares just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_calamares/649/ [21:29] yeah, looking at the buildlog for stable there were all sorts of symbols issues there too. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/521447413/buildlog_ubuntu-hirsute-amd64.libfm-qt_0.15.1+git202102050440~hirsute-0ubuntu1~ppa1_BUILDING.txt.gz [21:30] i see only a libfm-qt_0.15.1+git202102050400~hirsute-0ubuntu1~ppa1.debian.tar.xz and not a ubuntu.src.tar.xz like we get form merge-o-matic [21:30] I will download and check the source tar. [21:30] ? [21:31] this is for ci stable or unstable? [21:31] that is ci stable [21:32] I went to https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-ci/+archive/ubuntu/unstable-ci-proposed/+packages/ and checked if it was building for all architectures. [21:32] apparently it is. [21:32] yes, it simulates the archive [21:32] someone else can deal with this aug7744 person on discourse. i'm tired of all of their weird-o edge case situations coupled with a relatively poor grasp of english. sigh [21:32] that tar.xz is from that page only. downloading and checking it it now. [21:33] I can look at it tonight wxl [21:33] just seenzone them then. ;) [21:33] Ok well it is in phab already theloudspeaker [21:34] it is in the ci/stable branch of the package you have [21:34] looks like ci doesn't build on riscv64 [21:34] maybe not [21:34] It takes forever anyway [21:35] what's weird is no arch is specified so i don't get that [21:35] I think ci would probably always fail on it because it only checks for something like 3 or 4 hours for a package [21:35] kc2bez: I see qt7 only in that branch. [21:35] * theloudspeaker uploaded an image: image.png (54KiB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/VyabUPNXgPxYAcQUNjpAgTaf/image.png > [21:36] right, that is the one that is failing anyway. [21:36] standby [21:37] https://phab.lubuntu.me/source/libfm-qt/history/ci%252Funstable/ [21:37] You can see apt-ghetto has been updating the symbols ^ [21:38] for ci/unstable [21:38] * theloudspeaker uploaded an image: image.png (62KiB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/NTEgRxIePaIDvymOtflGwOUe/image.png > [21:38] even in the tar I downloaded from ci unstable rigth now, which has 0.15.1+gitdate, qt7 is only there. no qt8 stuff. [21:38] I get that. but the symbols themselves are valid [21:39] Or else it wouldn't build [21:39] but in qt8 I don't have that monolithic single symbols file for all architectures. [21:39] hmm must be Debian broke it out then [21:39] if you look at upstream (debian_ source, we have different symbols for each architecture. [21:40] can we do this: keep a single symbols file for qt8 on our ubuntu side? [21:40] using the one from ci? [21:40] I wouldn't [21:40] Ii guess the ci won't help here [21:40] either is valid [21:41] but if there are vast differences between archs (remember mine was a oneliner), it would be best to have them separate [21:41] otherwise you're going to have a heavily tagged single file [21:41] and that's kind of ugly [21:41] It is better to keep the Ubuntu delta down so it might be best to follow Debian [21:43] if i am to apply what wxl you applied for liblxqt, I will have multiple lines of those hacks in symbols files of s390x and riscv64. would that be okay instead of having a single symbols file which works? [21:44] so let's say you have some line x that works in amd64 but not in s390x [21:44] you could tag the single .symbols file with (!arch=s390x) [21:44] or you could have an .amd64 file that includes x and a .390x file that does not [21:45] yeah thats understandable. separate ones are better. [21:45] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-policykit just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-policykit/573/ [21:45] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/878/ [21:45] wxl I haven't checked myself physically, but I noticed that Garuda Linux doesn't use a swap file but a swap partition with Btrfs and Calamares [21:45] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-panel just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-panel/354/ [21:45] so what I am going to do now is delete the parts from s390x symbols file which give me errors. [21:47] i note that apt-ghetto[m] was using the (optional) tag. i wonder if that's an alternative [21:47] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/623/ [21:48] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm just failed after being unstable: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/127/ [21:48] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/379/ [21:49] FWIW libfm-qt might be the hardest one to deal with. [21:49] yes [21:55] good to know. [21:56] I will continue this in the morning. have only 3 lectures tomorrow. [21:56] gtg now. [21:59] thx! [22:00] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/544/ [22:01] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/203/ [22:03] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/419/ [22:06] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/879/ [22:15] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/593/ [22:15] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/109/ [22:15] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/355/ [22:16] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/207/ [22:16] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/420/ [22:18] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/555/ [22:18] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/623/ [22:19] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/127/ [22:19] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/379/ [22:31] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/879/ [22:32] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm just became unstable after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/128/ [22:45] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/545/ [22:46] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/204/ [22:47] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/420/ [22:57] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/880/