[00:19] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T187: Lubuntu 20.04.2] kc2bez (Dan Simmons) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T187#4218
[00:48] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/378/
[00:49] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/622/
[01:07] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/541/
[01:08] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/200/
[01:08] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/126/
[01:08] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/551/
[01:24] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pcmanfm-qt just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pcmanfm-qt/367/
[01:26] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-about just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-about/337/
[01:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/203/
[01:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-notificationd just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-notificationd/328/
[01:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/589/
[01:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/105/
[01:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/351/
[01:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-archiver/354/
[01:29] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/585/
[01:38] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/622/
[01:38] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/126/
[01:38] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/378/
[01:58] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/201/
[01:59] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/590/
[01:59] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/106/
[01:59] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/352/
[01:59] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/542/
[02:10] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/586/
[02:10] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/622/
[02:10] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/126/
[02:10] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/378/
[02:12] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/552/
[02:14] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/204/
[02:25] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-archiver just became unstable after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-archiver/355/
[06:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] merger_liblxqt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/merger_liblxqt/713/
[08:04] <RyuKurisu[m]> <wxl "we could always do kwin"> My main 'issue' would be all the dependencies it has.  How about KWinFT? 
 Bro....can I know startxfce for lubuntu??? because I used vnc server but if I connect with vnc viewer is blank screen
 1 We aren't all "bros" in the channel. 2 This sounds like a support issue, you are in the development channel. (re @alifnuxer: Bro....can I know startxfce for lubuntu??? because I used vnc server but if I connect with vnc viewer is blank screen)
[09:05] <kc2bez> ! support
[10:15] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/543/
[10:26] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/543/
[10:26] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/201/
[10:40] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-about just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-about/337/
[10:56] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/202/
[11:17] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libsysstat just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libsysstat/98/
[11:32] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/553/
[11:33] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-archiver UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-archiver/355/
[11:43] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/205/
[11:44] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rLIBLXQTPACKAGINGfcbd433029ad: Merge branch 'ubuntu/hirsute' into ci/stable] kc2bez (Dan Simmons) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rLIBLXQTPACKAGINGfcbd433029ad
[11:59] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-archiver UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-archiver/356/
[12:03] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/205/
[12:14] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/553/
[12:24] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_calamares just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_calamares/648/
[12:28] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools/529/
[12:35] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-build-tools/306/
[12:44] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T185: deal with merges] The_LoudSpeaker (Raman Sarda) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T185#4221
[12:50] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T185: deal with merges] kc2bez (Dan Simmons) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T185#4223
[12:54] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools/529/
[13:05] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-build-tools/93/
[13:05] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-build-tools/93/
[13:19] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-build-tools/530/
[13:26] <The_LoudSpeaker> wxl: so we doing debuild -S -sa by default now?
[13:30] <The_LoudSpeaker> also, I am getting this: https://lintian.debian.org/tags/possible-new-upstream-release-without-new-version.html
[13:30] <The_LoudSpeaker> even when the version number is correct.
[13:35] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-build-tools UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-build-tools/307/
[13:36] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rLIBFMQTPACKAGING1215d360d800: New upstream version] The_LoudSpeaker (Raman Sarda) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rLIBFMQTPACKAGING1215d360d800
[13:37] <The_LoudSpeaker> it should show up on launchpad in some time right? 
[13:39] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- New binary: libfm-qt [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu)
[13:39] <The_LoudSpeaker> ughh!!
[13:39] <kc2bez[m]> <The_LoudSpeaker "it should show up on launchpad i"> We are missing some context. Which package and version?
[13:39] <The_LoudSpeaker> s390x build failed.
[13:39] <The_LoudSpeaker> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfm-qt/0.16.0-3ubuntu1/+build/20987501
[13:40] <The_LoudSpeaker> kc2bez[m]: libfm-qt 0.16.0-3ubuntu1
 Why don't you test in a PPA 1st?
[13:41] <The_LoudSpeaker> don't have one set up yet.
[13:41] <The_LoudSpeaker> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/521468661/buildlog_ubuntu-hirsute-s390x.libfm-qt_0.16.0-3ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz here are the log
[13:41] <The_LoudSpeaker> *logs
[13:42] <The_LoudSpeaker> dpkg-gensymbols gave me errors. 
[13:42] <kc2bez[m]> <The_LoudSpeaker "https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+so"> Looks like many symbols issues.
 That lintian warning is correct
[13:43] <The_LoudSpeaker> @RikMills as far as I understand from that warning, I need to correct the version number. But isn't it correct? 0.16.0-3ubuntu1 ?
[13:43] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- New binary: libfm-qt [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu)
[13:43] <The_LoudSpeaker> kc2bez[m]: yes. how do I check what went wrong?
 You put "New upstream release.", which is not true on this merge
[13:44] <The_LoudSpeaker> @RikMills: 0.15.1 to 0.16.0 is a new upstream release only right?
 Not compared to the debian revision you are merging from (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <The_LoudSpeaker> @RikMills: 0.15.1 to 0.16.0 is a new upstream release only right?)
 i.e. the previous entry in your merged debian/changelog
[13:45] <theloudspeaker> ohh. now I get it.
[13:46] <theloudspeaker> I should just modify the changelog entry. use better words there.
[13:46] <theloudspeaker> and about the symbol errors, what do I do about it?
 fix them
[13:47] <kc2bez[m]> then bump the Ubuntu version
[13:47] <theloudspeaker> <lubot "[telegram] <RikMills> fix them"> where to find what to exactly to fix?
[13:48] <kc2bez[m]> In the build log
[13:48] <theloudspeaker> <kc2bez[m] "then bump the Ubuntu version"> yeah, after symbols are fixed version would be 3ubuntu2 right?
[13:50] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/586/
[13:50] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- New binary: libfm-qt [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu)
[13:51] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- New binary: libfm-qt [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu)
[13:52] <kc2bez[m]> Yes, I would wait until it finishes building on all the architectures so you only have to make one (hopefully) change to the symbols 
[13:55] <The_LoudSpeaker> okay. digging into the symbols file for that architecture
[14:04]  * The_LoudSpeaker doesn't understand symbols files.
[14:05] <The_LoudSpeaker> wxl: you faced something simillar on the last package na? how to fix this senpai?
[14:18] <The_LoudSpeaker> ohh. you had only one error and you removed that symbol from main symbols file. why might I ask?
[14:18] <The_LoudSpeaker> I have series of such errors in my build. not just one line.
[14:22] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/587/
[14:26] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-powermanagement/587/
[14:26] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T185: deal with merges] The_LoudSpeaker (Raman Sarda) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T185#4224
[14:28] <The_LoudSpeaker> riscv64 also failed. :( same thing, symbols.
[14:37] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-policykit just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-policykit/572/
[14:37] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-policykit just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-policykit/572/
[14:48] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-panel just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-panel/353/
[15:13] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-panel just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-panel/353/
 https://matterbridge.lubuntu.me/09fa9023/giphy.mp4
 the symbols are evil :P
 :P
[16:50] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/591/
[16:51] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/107/
[17:40] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/353/
[18:31] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/591/
[18:32] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/591/
[18:37] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/107/
[18:47] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/353/
[19:43] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/878/
[19:57] <wxl> @The_LoudSpeaker: are you all figured out?
[19:57] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/419/
 Not yet.
[19:58] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/622/
[19:58] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/126/
[19:58] <wxl> i would *presume* you just apply what i did across all of the missing symbols
[19:58] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/378/
[19:58] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/878/
[19:59] <wxl> `(!arch=s390x)` can be appended to any symbol. if there's another tag (in parens) you separate them with a pipe (`|`)
[19:59] <wxl> i'd suggest sticking it in a ppa to check the build before pushing it all upstream
[20:01] <wxl> regarding the lintian warning did you figure that out?
[20:02] <The_LoudSpeaker> For that i just have to rephrase my 1st line from the dch.
[20:02] <wxl> anyways -sa is required when the upstream tarball doesn't already exist in launchpad. in the event of a new upstream release, that is to be expected. there's no real problem in adding -sa to force the source tar ball to be included, so why not
[20:02] <wxl> the issue is you did "new upstream release" meaning "new debian release" rather than an actual "new upstream release" XD
[20:03] <wxl> anything else you need help with?
[20:03] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/419/
[20:03] <The_LoudSpeaker> that's lintian's fault. It doesn't understand that new debian release are also new upstream releases for us.
[20:04] <wxl> well yeah kind of sort of
[20:04] <wxl> it's ultimately seeing "new upstream release" and comparing your version number with the previous one. since the upstream portion is unchanged, it makes no sense
[20:04] <wxl> BTW look at that previous changelog entry
[20:04] <The_LoudSpeaker> nothing else. I will just boot the containers now and try fixing the symbols.
[20:04] <wxl> it's a symbols update
[20:05] <wxl> so that's weird
[20:05] <The_LoudSpeaker> yeah I did include those symbols in my new build. check the commit, you will new symbols files for all architectures.
[20:05] <RikMills> looks like this package has a seperate symbols file for each arch! :S
[20:08] <wxl> that kind of makes it a bit more managable in this cae
[20:08] <wxl> se
[20:08] <wxl> ugh you know
[20:08] <wxl> i would have done the same thing with liblxqt but it was only one symbol so that didn't seem to justify it
[20:12] <wxl> please ping me if you need me. i'm kind of head down right now.
[20:19] <The_LoudSpeaker> wxl: can you explain what we are doing here with symbols files ?
[20:19] <The_LoudSpeaker> and like what exactly are these symbols files?
[20:19] <The_LoudSpeaker> why do we need them and why are they breaking stuff?
[20:20] <wxl> ok so first off, contrary to popular belief, i'm not the expert on symbols XD
[20:21] <The_LoudSpeaker> but you are senpai here. Go read up and then explain. XD
[20:29] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/623/
[20:33] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/379/
[20:34] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm just failed after being unstable: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/127/
[20:42] <The_LoudSpeaker> Also, wxl since we have separate symbols files for each architecture, i think instead of adding that (!arch=s390x) just deleting that line from the file would do?
[20:43] <The_LoudSpeaker> that (!arch=s390x) is basically saying don't use that symbol or something?
[20:44] <The_LoudSpeaker> Also, we don't have a version of 0.16 of libfm-qt building in our CI ?
[20:47] <The_LoudSpeaker> wxl: wxl wxl say some thing.
[20:47] <wxl> sorry phone
[20:47] <The_LoudSpeaker> oh. take your time then. 
[20:48] <wxl> done now
[20:49] <wxl> here's the docs https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html
[20:49] <wxl> tl;dr symbols are shared libraries
[20:56] <The_LoudSpeaker> okay
[20:58] <wxl> and just to be sure you're clear on that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_(computing)#Shared_libraries
[20:59] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/206/
[20:59] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/554/
[21:00] <wxl> in any case i think it's safe to say that all shared libraries are not guaranteed to work across all the architectures we use
[21:00] <wxl> in reality not including a failing symbol on an arch means that THAT library won't work so it could result in other software depending on it not working
[21:00] <wxl> but again, who is running LXQt on s390x?
[21:02] <wxl> this may be helpful too https://qt-kde-team.pages.debian.net/symbolfiles.html
[21:02] <The_LoudSpeaker> okay so we have an option to either break that library or fix it (by rewriting the symbols file) and we choose to break it for s390x
[21:02] <wxl> they're all one in the same essentially
[21:03] <wxl> the right solution is that upstream makes everything compatible with s390x but again that may not be anywhere in their scope or intention
[21:06] <The_LoudSpeaker> why are we even supporting s390x again?
[21:08] <wxl> ask ubuntu
[21:09] <wxl> or for that matter, debian, since they do too https://wiki.debian.org/SupportedArchitectures
[21:09] <wxl> along with lots of thinsg we don't
[21:09] <wxl> although their riscv64 is unsupported and ours is ugh
[21:13] <The_LoudSpeaker> riscv64 me also we have simillar problem. I will need some time to read up and understand how to fix this.
[21:15] <The_LoudSpeaker> til then it's okay to have it fail on these right? or I have to do it today itself?
[21:15] <kc2bez[m]> Sorry missed most of this. Working for a living is fun.
[21:15] <kc2bez[m]> We do have these packages in ci and they are building.
[21:15] <kc2bez[m]> ci.lubuntu.me
[21:16] <The_LoudSpeaker> can we not use symbols files from the CI then?
[21:16] <kc2bez[m]> sure, look at the ci/unstable and ci/stable branches 
[21:16] <The_LoudSpeaker> will save us time and resources on trying to fix stuff in debian's symbols files.
[21:17] <The_LoudSpeaker> yup. looking in them now
[21:17] <kc2bez[m]> well maybe yes and maybe no but more often than not it will help.
[21:18] <kc2bez[m]> Make sure it is building in ci first
[21:22] <theloudspeaker> kc2bez:  i see 0.15.1 only there.
[21:22]  * theloudspeaker uploaded an image: image.png (92KiB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/ofCLhDEprljDNQURQFKzdeLL/image.png >
[21:22] <kc2bez[m]> yes, +gitDATESTAMP
[21:23] <kc2bez[m]> ci/unstable is from the tip of master
[21:24] <kc2bez[m]> ci/stable follows the version number
[21:24] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libsysstat just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libsysstat/99/
[21:24] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/592/
[21:24] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/108/
[21:25] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/354/
[21:25] <theloudspeaker> ci unstable was successful. ci_stable was unsuccessful (last builds)
[21:25] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_calamares just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_calamares/649/
[21:29] <kc2bez[m]> yeah, looking at the buildlog for stable there were all sorts of symbols issues there too. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/521447413/buildlog_ubuntu-hirsute-amd64.libfm-qt_0.15.1+git202102050440~hirsute-0ubuntu1~ppa1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[21:30] <theloudspeaker> i see only a libfm-qt_0.15.1+git202102050400~hirsute-0ubuntu1~ppa1.debian.tar.xz and not a ubuntu.src.tar.xz like we get form merge-o-matic
[21:30] <theloudspeaker> I will download and check the source tar.
[21:30] <kc2bez[m]> ?
[21:31] <theloudspeaker> <kc2bez[m] "yeah, looking at the buildlog fo"> this is for ci stable or unstable?
[21:31] <kc2bez[m]> that is ci stable
[21:32] <theloudspeaker> <kc2bez[m] "?"> I went to https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-ci/+archive/ubuntu/unstable-ci-proposed/+packages/ and checked if it was building for all architectures.
[21:32] <theloudspeaker> apparently it is. 
[21:32] <kc2bez[m]> yes, it simulates the archive
[21:32] <wxl> someone else can deal with this aug7744 person on discourse. i'm tired of all of their weird-o edge case situations coupled with a relatively poor grasp of english. sigh
[21:32] <theloudspeaker> that tar.xz is from that page only. downloading and checking it it now.
[21:33] <kc2bez[m]> I can look at it tonight wxl
[21:33] <theloudspeaker> <wxl "someone else can deal with this "> just seenzone them then. ;)
[21:33] <kc2bez[m]> Ok well it is in phab already theloudspeaker 
[21:34] <kc2bez[m]> it is in the ci/stable branch of the package you have
[21:34] <wxl> looks like ci doesn't build on riscv64
[21:34] <kc2bez[m]> maybe not
[21:34] <kc2bez[m]> It takes forever anyway
[21:35] <wxl> what's weird is no arch is specified so i don't get that
[21:35] <kc2bez[m]> I think ci would probably always fail on it because it only checks for something like 3 or 4 hours for a package
[21:35] <theloudspeaker> kc2bez:  I see qt7 only in that branch. 
[21:35]  * theloudspeaker uploaded an image: image.png (54KiB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/VyabUPNXgPxYAcQUNjpAgTaf/image.png >
[21:36] <kc2bez[m]> right, that is the one that is failing anyway.
[21:36] <kc2bez[m]> standby
[21:37] <kc2bez[m]> https://phab.lubuntu.me/source/libfm-qt/history/ci%252Funstable/
[21:37] <kc2bez[m]> You can see apt-ghetto has been updating the symbols ^
[21:38] <kc2bez[m]> for ci/unstable
[21:38]  * theloudspeaker uploaded an image: image.png (62KiB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/NTEgRxIePaIDvymOtflGwOUe/image.png >
[21:38] <theloudspeaker> even in the tar I downloaded from ci unstable rigth now, which has 0.15.1+gitdate, qt7 is only there. no qt8 stuff. 
[21:38] <kc2bez[m]> I get that. but the symbols themselves are valid
[21:39] <kc2bez[m]> Or else it wouldn't build
[21:39] <theloudspeaker> but in qt8 I don't have that monolithic single symbols file for all architectures.
[21:39] <kc2bez[m]> hmm must be Debian broke it out then
[21:39] <theloudspeaker> if you look at upstream (debian_ source, we have different symbols for each architecture.
[21:40] <theloudspeaker> can we do this: keep a single symbols file for qt8 on our ubuntu side?
[21:40] <theloudspeaker> using the one from ci?
[21:40] <kc2bez[m]> I wouldn't
[21:40] <kc2bez[m]> Ii guess the ci won't help here 
[21:40] <wxl> either is valid
[21:41] <wxl> but if there are vast differences between archs (remember mine was a oneliner), it would be best to have them separate
[21:41] <wxl> otherwise you're going to have a heavily tagged single file
[21:41] <wxl> and that's kind of ugly
[21:41] <kc2bez[m]> It is better to keep the Ubuntu delta down so it might be best to follow Debian
[21:43] <theloudspeaker> if i am to apply what wxl you applied for liblxqt, I will have multiple lines of those hacks in symbols files of s390x and riscv64. would that be okay instead of having a single symbols file which works?
[21:44] <wxl> so let's say you have some line x that works in amd64 but not in s390x
[21:44] <wxl> you could tag the single .symbols file with (!arch=s390x)
[21:44] <wxl> or you could have an .amd64 file that includes x and a .390x file that does not
[21:45] <theloudspeaker> yeah thats understandable. separate ones are better.
[21:45] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_lxqt-policykit just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_lxqt-policykit/573/
[21:45] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/878/
[21:45] <RyuKurisu[m]> wxl I haven't checked myself physically, but I noticed that Garuda Linux doesn't use a swap file but a swap partition with Btrfs and Calamares 
[21:45] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-panel just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-panel/354/
[21:45] <theloudspeaker> so what I am going to do now is delete the parts from s390x symbols file which give me errors.
[21:47] <wxl> i note that apt-ghetto[m] was using the (optional) tag. i wonder if that's an alternative
[21:47] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/623/
[21:48] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm just failed after being unstable: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/127/
[21:48] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/379/
[21:49] <kc2bez[m]> FWIW libfm-qt might be the hardest one to deal with.
[21:49] <wxl> yes
[21:55] <theloudspeaker> good to know.
[21:56] <theloudspeaker> I will continue this in the morning. have only 3 lectures tomorrow. 
[21:56] <theloudspeaker> gtg now.
[21:59] <wxl> thx!
[22:00] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/544/
[22:01] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/203/
[22:03] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/419/
[22:06] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/879/
[22:15] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_pavucontrol-qt/593/
[22:15] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_pavucontrol-qt/109/
[22:15] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_pavucontrol-qt/355/
[22:16] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_lxqt-archiver/207/
[22:16] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/420/
[22:18] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_lxqt-archiver/555/
[22:18] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_sddm/623/
[22:19] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/127/
[22:19] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_sddm UNSTABLE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_sddm/379/
[22:31] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/879/
[22:32] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_sddm just became unstable after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_sddm/128/
[22:45] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_libfm-qt/545/
[22:46] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] hirsute_stable_libfm-qt FAILURE: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/hirsute_stable_libfm-qt/204/
[22:47] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] groovy_stable_qterminal just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/groovy_stable_qterminal/420/
[22:57] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] focal_stable_qterminal just succeeded after failing: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/focal_stable_qterminal/880/