| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (groovy-proposed/main) [2.694.1 => 2.694.3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 00:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.15 => 2.664.17] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 00:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.49 => 2.525.51] (desktop-core) | 01:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.65 => 2.408.66] (desktop-core) | 01:20 | |
| xnox | vorlon: thanks! | 01:26 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (groovy-proposed/main) [3.38.2-1ubuntu1~20.10.1 => 3.38.3-2ubuntu0.20.10.1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra) | 04:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (groovy-proposed/main) [3.38.2-1ubuntu1~20.10.1 => 3.38.3-2ubuntu0.20.10.1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) | 04:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (groovy-proposed/main) [1:5.0-5ubuntu9.4 => 1:5.0-5ubuntu9.5] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 06:17 | |
| === didrocks999 is now known as didrocks | ||
| === juergh_ is now known as juergh | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdump-tools [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [1:1.6.8.2] | 08:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmd [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.3-3] | 08:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmd [i386] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.3-3] | 08:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmd [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.3-3] | 08:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uncalled [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.2+ds-1] | 08:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uncalled [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [2.2+ds-1] | 08:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmd [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.3-3] | 08:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmd [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.3-3] | 08:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uncalled [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [2.2+ds-1] | 08:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmd [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.3-3] | 08:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uncalled [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.2+ds-1] | 08:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmd [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.3-3] | 08:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.694.2] | 09:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.694.3] | 09:18 | |
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.16] | 09:52 | |
| Laney | xnox: sil2100: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1915114 | 09:56 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1915114 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubiquity: No vmlinuz* after install. 20.04.2" [Undecided,New] | 09:56 |
| Laney | it's an oem machine, apparently they ended up with no kernel ... | 09:56 |
| Laney | it hits: Feb 7 21:19:24 ubuntu /plugininstall.py: Refusing to install {'linux-oem-20.04'}: marked to be removed later on, so this would be redundant. | 09:57 |
| * Laney squeaks | 09:58 | |
| mwhudson | i'm sure i read at least three focal-changes emails about that today :( | 10:03 |
| sil2100 | Laney: *sighs* | 10:11 |
| sil2100 | This whole mark-for-removal is utterly confusing - if it was marked to be removed later on anyway, wouldn't that mean that even without our last-minute change it would be potentially broken? | 10:14 |
| Laney | I dunno | 10:14 |
| sil2100 | I don't feel strongly in all the oem installation story, who wrote the original ubiquity parts of it? | 10:15 |
| Laney | me and xnox, xnox more the kernel selection stuff | 10:16 |
| sil2100 | Could you spare some cycles to get to the bottom of this? You're our only hope! | 10:25 |
| sil2100 | *dramatic superhero music in the background* | 10:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted whoopsie [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.2.72.2] | 10:25 | |
| Laney | well I can reproduce it I think, that's something | 10:30 |
| Laney | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/kS9Rqz3qkh/ https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/B3cxzDrNwc/ | 10:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted whoopsie [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.2.69ubuntu0.3] | 10:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.17] | 11:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.50] | 11:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.2-3ubuntu6.12 => 1:4.2-3ubuntu6.13] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 11:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.51] | 11:04 | |
| xnox | Laney: they are using oem image right, the one that defaults to oem kernel? | 11:19 |
| xnox | Laney: or stock one? | 11:20 |
| Laney | normal image | 11:20 |
| Laney | oem sku | 11:20 |
| Laney | give me a second, I will have a commit | 11:20 |
| xnox | Laney: read your paste, amd i'm like O_o | 11:20 |
| * xnox wants to go cry in the corner a bit. | 11:21 | |
| sil2100 | As we all | 11:21 |
| xnox | sil2100: separately, my fixes for UEFI images are all good and dandy. But i did not copy them for the buildd images. | 11:21 |
| xnox | sil2100: i think i will verify this batch, and redo them for buildd images later. | 11:21 |
| Laney | xnox: the problem is basically this https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/6dgZVB7M2X/ | 11:22 |
| Laney | what is arch_check_usable_kernel trying to do? | 11:25 |
| Laney | because it is this which rejects oem | 11:25 |
| sil2100 | xnox: yeah, +1, since it's livecd-rootfs we also don't have to wait the aging period anyway | 11:27 |
| Laney | I guess because this is supposed to be selected by the "if wants_oem_kernel" branch or what? | 11:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.66] | 11:27 | |
| === msalvatore_ is now known as msalvatore | ||
| xnox | Laney: thing to install should be compatible. | 11:30 |
| xnox | Laney: i guess before excluding things to remove from to install..... things worked fine. because removal of -5.6.0-1042-oem was ok. | 11:31 |
| xnox | and a noop. | 11:31 |
| xnox | Laney: now, we must not mark for removal the abi of the kernel to install. | 11:31 |
| xnox | and only ever remove the generic one, or well the kernel that is preinstalled only. | 11:32 |
| xnox | Laney: you reproduced this with just the oem-qemu-meta? | 11:32 |
| Laney | no but it probably would do | 11:32 |
| Laney | I was using sutton.newell-adam like the reporter | 11:33 |
| xnox | how did it work on release day.... nvidia kept the kernel installed? | 11:33 |
| xnox | and this is without nvidia? | 11:33 |
| Laney | something like that | 11:33 |
| xnox | so, in incompatible ones, we need to iterate over them with dpkg to see if they are installed, and only add them to incompatible, if they are installed. | 11:34 |
| Laney | I guess we don't consider the oem kernel "usable" because it should only ever be explicitly selected | 11:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1040.42~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 11:39 | |
| Laney | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Jskmtws8Bh/ | 11:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1020.21+21.04.1] (core, kernel) | 11:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8.0-1020.21+21.04.1] | 11:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pip [source] (focal-proposed) [20.0.2-5ubuntu1.2] | 11:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1022.23+21.04.2] (core, kernel) | 11:48 | |
| sil2100 | This change makes me feel uneasy deep inside, but I really don | 11:59 |
| sil2100 | *don't know these parts | 11:59 |
| sil2100 | Like, why is it marked as incompatible in the first place? | 11:59 |
| Laney | because it's not "usable", that's why we have this escape hatch for oem kernels (I think) | 12:00 |
| xnox | sil2100: we want to prevent people able to preseed oem kernel choice..... when they are not on certified / known to work platform. | 12:06 |
| Laney | so we say in that codepath, everything you thought was good is now bad | 12:06 |
| Laney | but we don't say | 12:06 |
| Laney | some of the things you thought were bad, actually they are ok | 12:07 |
| Laney | (oem things) | 12:07 |
| Laney | that's what I was thinking when making the change like that | 12:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8.0-1022.23+21.04.2] | 12:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1040.42~18.04.1] | 12:10 | |
| sil2100 | tumbleweed: hey! I had a question regarding the python-virtualenv SRU for focal, left it in the bug comment o/ | 12:16 |
| xnox | apw: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2021-February/117224.html => skipping udebs by default patches with test builds of unstable kernel for comparison. | 12:24 |
| apw | xnox, as we don't build them when disable_di=false why would we strip them? | 12:52 |
| apw | them being in debian/control but not built (and therefore added to debian/files) is key to them not ending up in the binary upload | 12:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-11-cross-ports [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 13:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1022.24+21.04.1] (core, kernel) | 13:12 | |
| xnox | apw: dak in debian would reject that! | 13:20 |
| xnox | i would have thought. | 13:21 |
| xnox | apw: but if that works, it would make things simplier. | 13:21 |
| apw | xnox, yep, it would ... but we are doing that _allllll_ the time | 13:21 |
| xnox | apw: i was also thinking to have udebs that are in the top level control.stub to be in a separate file, to never emit them. | 13:21 |
| xnox | apw: hence no need to strip them either. | 13:21 |
| apw | xnox, as in generate control.stub (from control.stub.in), and control.stub.di (from kernel-wedge) and then include control.stub.di in the concatenation to debian/control only when enabled. | 13:23 |
| apw | xnox, if so ... that would suck a lot less | 13:23 |
| icey | Hey, any chance this sru to Focal that's been verified for over a week could get looked at today? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1906271 | 13:23 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1906271 in nova (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] November Stable Point Updates" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 13:23 |
| xnox | apw: yeah all that. | 13:26 |
| xnox | apw: cause i hate that you mention some udebs in the .dsc, but not all; and also mention them when not building it. | 13:26 |
| xnox | gives me the creeps =) | 13:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8.0-1022.24+21.04.1] | 13:52 | |
| xnox | Laney: sil2100: it looks god. | 13:54 |
| xnox | that too, but "good" as well =) | 13:54 |
| Laney | xnox: what does? | 14:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.15.7 => 20.04.15.10] (core) | 14:10 | |
| xnox | please review/approve ^ | 14:11 |
| coreycb | RAOF: hello, if you have cycles, please could we get a review of cinder and ovn-octavia-provider? they start in the groovy unapproved queue. | 14:30 |
| === didrocks999 is now known as didrocks | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.15.8] | 14:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.15.10] | 14:40 | |
| icey | RAOF: not to pile on, but the nova SRU that's been verified for Focal for a while now would be great to progress :) | 14:58 |
| sil2100 | icey: well, not all bugs from the nova SRU have been verified yet! https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1893263 is still pending | 15:39 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1893263 in nova (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] Cannot create instance with multiqueue image and vif_type=tap (calico)" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 15:39 |
| sil2100 | So the SRU team cannot release it without all the bits verified | 15:39 |
| sil2100 | Anyway, please do not release any SRUs to focal-updates for now, thanks o/ | 15:42 |
| xnox | apw: is it intended that src:linux-meta in hirsute for 5.10 on arm64 does not produce linux-generic-64k like linux-meta in hirsute-release does the v5.8 one? | 16:57 |
| xnox | apw: never mind pinged ~kernel people to fix it. | 17:26 |
| tumbleweed | sil2100: ah, I think I made a typo in that SRU | 17:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.2.0] (20210209.1) has been added | 19:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-11-cross-ports [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 19:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.2.0] (20210209.1) has been added | 19:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.2.0] (20210209.1) has been added | 19:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.2.0] (20210209.1) has been added | 19:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.2.0] (20210209) has been added | 19:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-virtualenv (focal-proposed/universe) [20.0.17-1 => 20.0.17-1ubuntu0.2] (no packageset) | 19:30 | |
| tumbleweed | sil2100: ^^ | 19:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (groovy-proposed) [2:17.0.0-0ubuntu3] | 20:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.2.0-0ubuntu3] | 20:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ovn-octavia-provider [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.3.0-0ubuntu2] | 20:35 | |
| doko | vorlon, Laney: now that glibc is blocking everything, I think it would be better to priotize the armhf tests triggered by glibc, instead of priotizing test for packages with a small number of autopkg tests | 20:43 |
| doko | also a mass retry of all tests triggered by perl would help | 20:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-httplib2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.2+dfsg-1ubuntu0.3] | 21:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1018.20+21.04.1] (core) | 22:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8.0-1018.20+21.04.1] | 22:08 | |
| sil2100 | tumbleweed: thanks! | 23:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!