[03:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mkdepend [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0~svn45-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: macromoleculebuilder [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.2+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: macromoleculebuilder [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.2+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: macromoleculebuilder [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.2+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fiat [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2019.2.0~git20210116.0439689-2] (no packageset)
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.6 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.7] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (groovy-proposed/main) [6.6.0-1ubuntu3.2 => 6.6.0-1ubuntu3.3] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[07:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-11-cross-ports [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fiat [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2019.2.0~git20210116.0439689-2]
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-11-cross-ports [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1ubuntu1]
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mkdepend [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0~svn45-2ubuntu1]
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-11-cross-ports [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1ubuntu1]
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-11-cross-ports [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1ubuntu1]
[08:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted macromoleculebuilder [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.2+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[08:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted macromoleculebuilder [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [3.2+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[08:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted macromoleculebuilder [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.2+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added autoconf2.69 to i386-whitelist in hirsute
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gcc-11-cross-ports to i386-whitelist in hirsute
[09:41] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, hello, lowdown is a replacement for pandoc, only depending on libbsd and something else, already on i386... would it be possible to whitelist it?
[09:41] <LocutusOfBorg> https://github.com/maxmind/libmaxminddb/pull/251
[09:41] <LocutusOfBorg> debian and upstream is pushing to change libmaxminddb to use it
[09:41] <LocutusOfBorg> so we go in sync again
[10:31]  * enyc meows
[10:54] <seb128> could someone let network-manager migrate by skipping the systemd regression? it's not a n-m issue but systemd and lxc not being friends (bug #1914062 has some of the details)
[11:26] <Laney> seb128: it'll mean we don't have coverage of systemd in hirsute any more, is that a good idea?
[11:26] <Laney> did you get any indication from rbalin_t on the fix?
[11:29] <seb128> Laney, what do you mean coverage of systemd in hirsute?
[11:29] <seb128> he said he was working on it but I don't have specifics
[11:30] <Laney> It will start failing
[11:30] <Laney> So we will no longer be able to tell if it gets worse for another reason
[11:30] <seb128> ah, you mean in the release pocket
[11:31] <Laney> right
[11:31] <Laney> an interim option might be to turn that one off, then you get to keep all the rest of the tests
[11:31] <seb128> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/systemd/hirsute/amd64 seems it's already quite unhappy
[11:32] <Laney> it is, I'm trying running on a large instance now as requested by r_balint yesterday to see if that helps
[11:32] <seb128> k, I guess no forcing then
[11:32] <Laney> I dunno, I was asking really
[11:32] <seb128> I might end up just 'breaking' network-manager again and going back to force udev off
[11:32] <seb128> that's probably the less diruptive option
[11:33] <seb128> you have a point about making systemd fail in release if n-m migrates as it is
[11:34] <seb128> rbalint, any idea when we might see a fix for the systemd vs lxc issue? if not soon could you maybe disable the n-m-online test in the next systemd upload?
[11:34] <Laney> is this the real reason that autopilot started breakig btw?
[11:34] <seb128> ah, could well be indeed
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.2.0] (20210210.1) has been added
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunderbird (focal-proposed/main) [1:78.5.0+build3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 1:78.7.1+build1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected thunderbird [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:78.7.0+build2-0ubuntu0.20.04.4]
[12:45] <rbalint> seb128, Laney ETA is today or tomorro
[12:45] <rbalint> w
[12:45] <seb128> rbalint, great, thanks
[12:49] <Laney> sil2100: do you know what the proper resolution of https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915252 is?
[13:04] <rbasak> sil2100: OK to publish qemu into focal-proposed?
[13:04] <rbasak> Or will that interfere?
[13:04] <rbasak> It is seeded - in server-ship at least.
[13:04] <rbasak> But I don't see it interfering with testing
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.66 => 2.408.67] (desktop-core)
[13:10] <xnox> sil2100:  ^ one change in xenial's livecd-rootfs is not possible to ship; as grub in xenial doesn't support the flags we want and thus we can't have nice things. So i reverted the bit we can't ship. and drop the bug number, and uploaded again with -v. All other stuff we can ship just fine.
[13:10] <xnox> sil2100:  please accept that, such that xenial's livecd-rootfs can go out with the other ones.
[13:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-44.50] (core, kernel)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-44.50] (core, kernel)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-44.50] (core, kernel)
[13:22] <sil2100> rbasak: hey, should be fine if it's to -proposed
[13:22] <sil2100> We only were re-spinning desktops, but the least -updates movement the better
[13:22] <rbasak> OK. Thanks!
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-44.50] (core, kernel)
[13:24] <rbasak> FWIW, there's also Supported-Installer-Desktiop -> livecd-rootfs -> qemu-utils
[13:24] <rbasak> But I trust that's still OK
[13:24] <rbasak> (for proposed only)
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-44.50]
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-44.50]
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-44.50]
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-44.50]
[13:54] <LocutusOfBorg> sorry for opening a blocking bug for glibc :/ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1915275
[14:06] <icey> sil2100: regarding your comment yesterday: "please do not release any SRUs to focal-updates for no"; is that a general request or just for the requested update?
[14:08] <sil2100> icey: we're re-spinning some 20.04.2 images so I need the -updates pocket frozen for now, at least for seeded packages
[14:08] <juliank> oh ubuntu-archive we should still get to  work on setting phased-update-percentage for stuff in hirsute-proposed to make sure things work correctly with the new apt
[14:08] <icey> ok, just wanted to confirm! thanks sil2100
[14:08] <juliank> #gottaDoSomeTesting
[14:08] <juliank> just a fixed 10 or 50 will do fine, I suppose
[14:10] <sil2100> xnox: looking o/
[14:11] <juliank> for a period of the rest of this month I guess then we can turn it off again I suppose
[14:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:5.0-5ubuntu9.5]
[14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.2-3ubuntu6.13]
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.67]
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-virtualenv [source] (focal-proposed) [20.0.17-1ubuntu0.1]
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-virtualenv [source] (focal-proposed) [20.0.17-1ubuntu0.2]
[15:16] <sigv> sergiodj: Good Wednesday morning! Any movement on LP: #1908065 ?
[15:17] <sergiodj> sigv: hello there!  thanks for pinging :).  I will look into it this afternoon
[15:17] <sigv> Saw the previous Focal SRU you had got pushed to -updates
[15:17] <sergiodj> yes
[15:17] <sigv> Thank you!
[15:17] <sergiodj> there's one more SRU for sssd that I need to upload
[15:18] <sergiodj> so I'll see about including yours there
[15:23] <sigv> sergiodj: Sounds good to me! By the way, will you be interested in me doing verification? Or will you check up on those?
[15:24] <sergiodj> sigv: if you can do the verification, I'd really appreciate :)
[15:25] <sigv> sergiodj: Yeah, I can do them for all four versions. I'm just new to the Ubuntu sponsorship process and was wondering about the preferred workflow for such a core project.
[15:26] <sergiodj> sigv: the verification is prefereable done by the bug reporter, but unfortunately that doesn't always happen, so the person who uploads the package ends up having to also verify the package
[15:28] <sigv> sergiodj: Got it! In that case I'll do the verification there for sure.
[15:29] <sergiodj> thanks, much appreciated :)
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected enigmail [sync] (focal-proposed) [2:2.2.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal 20.04.2.0] (20210210) has been added
[16:11] <Laney> juliank: can you upload something and block it, then we set the PUP on that?
[16:21] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: lowdown would be whitelisted on i386 iff something else on i386 needs it
[16:22] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: so when the libmaxminddb change lands, happy to pull it in
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1023.24] (core, kernel)
[16:30] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: (and this is basically the policy - the set of packages we enable for i386 are precisely those needed to support the interesting runtime libraries; so unless getting the package to build on i386 is a problem, the answer is always yes)
[16:32] <vorlon> xnox: merged your bambam hint, but I see imagemagick is also blocked by a sagetex/arm64 autopkgtest failure currently
[16:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1019.21] (core)
[16:47] <juliank> Laney: I'd say we want this more broadly than a targeted test uploaf
[16:50] <Laney> ok, what's the idea?
[16:50] <Laney> If it's tell people to turn on hirsute-proposed, sounds bad
[16:57] <xnox> vorlon:  which was retried earlier in the day, and is green in the autopkgtest infra.
[16:57] <xnox> so it should be fine in the next run.
[17:45] <juliank> Laney: broad buildds and autopkgtest testing
[19:03] <vorlon> xnox: ok
[20:50] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks vorlon