RikMills | santa_: sort of | 11:59 |
---|---|---|
santa_ | RikMills: ugh, I'm a bit busy right now | 12:07 |
santa_ | in any case: | 12:08 |
santa_ | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1915250 | 12:08 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1915250 in fakeroot (Ubuntu) "buildd file owner/group for shared libraries " [High,Confirmed] | 12:08 |
RikMills | santa_: thanks. subbed to that | 12:09 |
santa_ | ↑ the important owner problem, I've forwarded the thing to doko so he is taking care of that | 12:09 |
santa_ | atm I'm doing a test rebuild against the latest binutils he uploaded (built against the old libc) to see if it fixes the problem | 12:09 |
santa_ | another important thing | 12:09 |
santa_ | the packages we have in the staging PPA are built with the first defective round of tarballs | 12:10 |
santa_ | I haven't rebuild all with "a" versions except for kconfig | 12:10 |
RikMills | yeah, I figured that | 12:11 |
santa_ | however I have built them in my server and I see no problem (keep in mind they are just a couple of translations missing) | 12:11 |
santa_ | so my idea is: just keep them mostly as they are, and whenever you upload to bileto/archive it will be automatically fixed | 12:12 |
santa_ | that being said, I plan to do a few fixes more for fw: | 12:12 |
RikMills | that sounds fair, as the ppa packages will go away | 12:12 |
santa_ | - lintian overrides for long descriptions (I see no way to shorten them) | 12:13 |
santa_ | - mark one package of kconfig as Multi-Arch: foreign to get rid of the lintian warning | 12:13 |
santa_ | - maybe re-enable the acc test of kconfig and fix it if it's broken | 12:14 |
RikMills | ack | 12:14 |
santa_ | and this way we will have everything mostly green | 12:15 |
santa_ | at least better than the previous version | 12:15 |
santa_ | also, I have fixed a small glitch in kubuntu-retry-builds in master | 12:16 |
santa_ | and that's it for now, I also have a bunch of misc news about my build machines, but let's leave that for the weekend | 12:16 |
santa_ | if you have any comments, please shoot :) | 12:17 |
RikMills | don't think so. having fun with copyright :/ | 12:19 |
santa_ | alright, 10000000000000 thanks for your work | 12:20 |
santa_ | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5jzkz_ZsRo | 12:20 |
santa_ | the best or nothing XD | 12:20 |
RikMills | https://github.com/rlancaste/stellarsolver/issues/76 | 12:20 |
BluesKaj | Howdy folks | 13:03 |
-queuebot:#kubuntu-devel- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.2.0] has been marked as ready | 18:16 | |
santa_ | hi everyone | 21:15 |
santa_ | RikMills: plasma-firewall and kpmcore are out of sync in git | 21:16 |
santa_ | also I'm happy to say the libc6/binutils problem mitigation by doko is working so far | 21:16 |
guiverc | https://kubuntu.org/getkubuntu/ links download 20.04.2 (not 20.04.2.0 - needs to be updated?) | 21:57 |
mparillo | I think the links on Kubuntu.org are correct. It is the image at the top of https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/20.04.2/release/kubuntu-20.04.2-desktop-amd64.iso that shows 20.04.2.0, correct? | 22:50 |
mparillo | And then the links lower down. I think there was a re-spin where some users running non-free drivers were without a kernel or something like that. | 22:51 |
guiverc | mparillo, the 64-bit download points to 20.04.2 and not later 20.04.2.0 (with OEM fixes included as I understood it) | 22:52 |
mparillo | Can you refresh? | 22:56 |
guiverc | :) refreshed & all as I'd expect. thanks mparillo | 22:56 |
mparillo | My pleasure. I may create a bug just for tracking. | 22:57 |
mparillo | https://bugs.launchpad.net/kubuntu-website/+bug/1915467 | 23:02 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1915467 in Kubuntu Website "Download does not point to re-spun20.04.2.0 ISO" [High,Fix released] | 23:02 |
=== adam_ is now known as adam_sal |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!