[00:58] <RikMills> vorlon: I'm not sure. Pino is a DD, but has not reported it yet on their BTS. I may look to do so tomorrow if it is still not done
[05:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: manpages-l10n [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [4.9.1-3] (no packageset)
[07:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postgresql-10 (bionic-proposed/main) [10.15-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 10.16-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (core)
[07:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postgresql-9.5 (xenial-proposed/main) [9.5.24-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 9.5.25-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core)
[09:08] <RikMills> this may simply be a 'NO' (given the state), but are there expectations on when glibc will be migrated?
[09:11] <doko> it's the first work-day with all autopkg tests run ...
[09:19] <RikMills> obviously
[09:24] <RikMills> I was just asking for a feel on it really. There is and will be things blocked that I would very much like to get on the Kubuntu ISO later in the week, but hey, reality may disagree
[09:40] <doko> Laney: I see you're also looking at netatalk. any idea about the autopkg tst status?
[09:41] <Laney> doko: it's working now afaik
[09:45] <doko> neutral
[09:45] <Laney> yes
[09:45] <Laney> not a problem is it?
[09:49] <doko> just wondering why it was "ok" before
[09:51] <Laney> I think it gained Restrictions: superficial in one of the Debian revisions
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ansible-base [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.10.5+dfsg-1]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hash-slinger [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.1-1]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hash-slinger [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [3.1-1]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hash-slinger [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.1-1]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted manpages-l10n [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [4.9.1-2]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted olm [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.2.1~dfsg-7ubuntu1]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyqt-builder [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.8.0+dfsg-1]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted budgie-wallpapers [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [21.04]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hash-slinger [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [3.1-1]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted manpages-l10n [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [4.9.1-3]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hash-slinger [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.1-1]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-phpseclib3 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.0.5-1]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hash-slinger [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [3.1-1]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu39]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu40]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu39]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu40]
[10:12] <doko> Laney, juliank: please could you have a look at the armhf autopkg tests triggered by policykit-1 and dconf? all "in progress" since 10 days
[10:13] <juliank> hzh
[10:13] <juliank> huh
[10:14] <juliank> seems like quite a bit of them got lost
[10:16] <juliank> Feb 15 06:37:04 juju-prod-ues-proposed-migration-machine-12 /home/ubuntu/autopkgtest-cloud/worker/worker[12520]: INFO: Waiting for and processing AMQP requests
[10:16] <juliank> Feb 15 06:37:05 juju-prod-ues-proposed-migration-machine-12 /home/ubuntu/autopkgtest-cloud/worker/worker[29907]: INFO: autopkgtest exited with code 0
[10:16] <doko> there may be more, but these seem to be very obvious
[10:16] <juliank> Feb 15 06:37:05 juju-prod-ues-proposed-migration-machine-12 /home/ubuntu/autopkgtest-cloud/worker/worker[29907]: INFO: Putting results into swift autopkgtest-hirsute hirsute/armhf/r/ruby-rspec-parameterized/202102
[10:16] <juliank> I see tests passing in 1s
[10:16] <juliank> ah me bad at reading
[10:16] <juliank> But the queue size has been 0 ever since it finished up
[10:17] <juliank> which seems dubious
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnupg2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.4-1ubuntu1.4]
[10:20] <Laney> I would initially look at rabbitmq, there's no evidence that the worker received the jobs
[10:20] <Laney> will retry them, feel free to poke further if you want
[10:23] <Laney> HA rmq sure would be nice
[10:23] <doko> same with openjdk-16 python3.9 guile-3.0 ...
[10:24] <doko> qtxmlpatterns-opensource-src
[10:24] <Laney> don't list them
[10:24] <Laney> it's fine
[10:24] <doko> ok
[10:26] <Laney> I dunno what but there seems to have been some kind of incident 9-10 days ago
[10:32] <Laney> [Thu Feb  4 07:12:20 2021] Out of memory: Kill process 16647 (beam) score 638 or sacrifice child
[10:32] <Laney> [Thu Feb  4 07:12:20 2021] Killed process 16647 (beam) total-vm:1940040kB, anon-rss:1304320kB, file-rss:0kB
[10:32] <Laney> ?
[10:32] <Laney> beam ~= rabbitmq here
[10:34] <Laney> all requeued now
[10:37] <juliank> Laney: eww
[10:38] <Laney> yeah, but also
[10:38] <Laney> I thought we had fixed everywhere to set the persistent flag when submitting stuff
[10:38] <Laney> which I thought meant please write this to disk
[10:38] <Laney> to stop this kind of thing being so terrible
[10:39] <Laney> at one point they were basically in memory which meant any crash or restart would wipe the queue, that sucked
[10:39] <Laney> so not 100% convinced by that being the explanation
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.0-44.50~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.0-44.50~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1108.120~16.04.1] (kernel)
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.0-44.50~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.0-44.50~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: runit [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.1.2-39.1] (no packageset)
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted runit [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.1.2-39.1]
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-44.50~20.04.1]
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-44.50~20.04.1]
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-44.50~20.04.1]
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-44.50~20.04.1]
[13:00] <sil2100> xnox: hey, so looking at the grub2 upload - the revert there will basically re-introduce amost all the bugs fixed by https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/2.04-1ubuntu35.2 ?
[13:04] <sil2100> Though I guess the main change from that one introduced the MAAS issue
[13:06] <xnox> sil2100:  not quite.
[13:07] <xnox> sil2100:  i am reverting bullet points 3 & 4 only.
[13:07] <xnox> sil2100:  and yes it means that faster tcp & non-ethernet cards support is dropped.
[13:08] <xnox> sil2100:  but in LP: #1911439 it was mostly guesswork as to what we need. And hence revert. We never had a clear reproducer as to what is needed in ps5 & maas.
[13:08] <xnox> sil2100:  what might happen next is that we figure out why these patches break things in edk2 / ovmf / linux bridges / qemu and reintroduce them if we can fix edk2/qemu/lxd/kernels
[13:10] <xnox> sil2100:  i would keep 1911439 as closed / fixreleased.
[13:10] <xnox> sil2100:  or do you want me to reopen as affecting all series?
[13:10] <xnox> either or is fine.
[13:15] <sil2100> hm, I don't have preferences related to 1911439, since that one's tricky - but the faster tcp & non-ethernet cards support bugs I'd like switched to Triaged
[13:16] <xnox> sil2100:  failure to parse.
[13:17] <xnox> sil2100:  1911439 was "make everything faster", into which "tcp & non-ethernet cards support" got bundled into. among with tsc calibration
[13:17] <xnox> (tsc calibration is staying)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:20.10.5]
[13:18] <xnox> sil2100:  i can open a new bug report about "lack of faster tcp & non-ethernet cards support"
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (groovy-proposed/main) [1:20.10.4 => 1:20.10.5] (core)
[13:20] <sil2100> Ah, right, it was one bug "Netboot improvements backport from hirsute", hm hm
[13:21] <sil2100> Ok, maybe let's just mention on the bug that parts of it got reverted and that should be enough then
[13:23] <sil2100> git-dpm is okay but the diff it generates for SRUs, brrr
[13:35] <cpaelzer> thank you sil2100 for releasing DPDK SRUs
[13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu35.4]
[13:41] <sil2100> xnox: uh oh, I guess it's not a problem per-se so I'll accept it as is, but the grub2-signed dep is for 2.04-1ubuntu35.3 instead of 2.04-1ubuntu35.4 - but I guess since both .3 and .4 are bundled together, it will anyway work as expected ;)
[13:42] <sil2100> It'll dep wait for the right one anyway
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.155.3]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pollinate (focal-proposed/main) [4.33-3ubuntu1 => 4.33-3ubuntu1.20.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[13:43] <xnox> sil2100:  yes cause it is >=
[13:43] <xnox> i hope >_<
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:20.10.5]
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pollinate (bionic-proposed/main) [4.33-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 4.33-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pollinate (groovy-proposed/main) [4.33-3ubuntu1 => 4.33-3ubuntu1.20.10.1] (ubuntu-server)
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.9]
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu35.2 => 2.04-1ubuntu35.4] (core)
[13:51] <cpaelzer> doko: I've uploaded a fixed chrony to un-break glibc 2.33 with it
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.11]
[13:52] <cpaelzer> doko: it soon should be complete in proposed and we will need to retrigger the armhf chrony test then
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu35.4]
[13:52] <cpaelzer> doko: I wanted to ask if you want me to do that or if you will do (4.0-5ubuntu2 is the fixed version)
[13:53] <cpaelzer> actually, due to the way how dependencies work out it might even test against the new glibc by default
[13:53] <cpaelzer> but if tomorrow that still is blocked you might consider retriggering it
[13:53] <cpaelzer> and if you wonder what I'm talking about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1915006/comments/9
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.9 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.9] (core)
[14:02] <doko> cpaelzer: please coordinate with rbalint. he's steering glibc, I only did the quick fix for ldd, and some testing stuff in the VCS
[14:03] <cpaelzer> ok, rbalint ^^ FYI
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu35.4 => 2.04-1ubuntu35.4] (core)
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (focal-proposed) [3.192.30.6]
[14:40] <icey> hey sil2100, I'm wondering if we can discuss https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1893263 , the Calico project doesn't actually support Focal which makes Focal validation somewhat impossible. In addition, the Nova package in proposed no longer has any bits specifically patching that bug as the fix has been included in the upstream Nova point release that's been uploaded as a part of https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1906271
[14:45] <sil2100> hm
[14:46] <sil2100> Ah, ok, so this is something interesting then
[14:46] <sil2100> Ok, I see in the bug comments about focal being missing
[14:47] <icey> the current upload has, compared to the last released version, something like: Add patch for bug 1, remove patch for bug 1, Upstream point release
[14:47] <sil2100> Alright, let me write something on the bug and then check validation of the rest and release it as is
[14:47] <icey> heh always fun to accidentally reference that
[14:47] <sil2100> hah ;)
[14:47] <icey> thanks sil2100 - for reference, I did actually hack around in the calico packaging enough to build it for focal, but it seems that the upstream really does need to do some more work to make it support focal :-/
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.9 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.9] (core)
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gamemode [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.6-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gamemode [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.6-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libraw [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [0.20.2-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libraw [i386] (hirsute-proposed/main) [0.20.2-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libraw [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/main) [0.20.2-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gamemode [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.6-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gamemode [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.6-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gamemode [i386] (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.6-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gamemode [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.6-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:14] <xnox> sil2100: signed bits are ready for you, whenever you are ready =) https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=grub2 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/groovy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=grub2
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libraw [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [0.20.2-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libraw [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/main) [0.20.2-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.13.2]
[15:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu35.4]
[15:21] <sil2100> Suar!
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.9]
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.9]
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libvirt [source] (groovy-proposed) [6.6.0-1ubuntu3.3]
[15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libvirt [source] (focal-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.7]
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gamemode [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.6-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libraw [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [0.20.2-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1108.120~16.04.1]
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gamemode [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6-1]
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gamemode [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6-1]
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gamemode [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6-1]
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gamemode [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6-1]
[16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gamemode [i386] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6-1]
[16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gamemode [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6-1]
[16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gamemode [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6-1]
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (groovy-proposed/main) [6.6.0-1ubuntu3.2 => 6.6.0-1ubuntu3.3] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.6 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.7] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[16:31] <cpaelzer> sil2100: ^^ these are the uploads that include both changelog stanzas as you requested
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libraw [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.20.2-1]
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libraw [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.20.2-1]
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libraw [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.20.2-1]
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlroots [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.12.0-2]
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlroots [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.12.0-2]
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlroots [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.12.0-2]
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libraw [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.20.2-1]
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libraw [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.20.2-1]
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlroots [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.12.0-2]
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libraw [i386] (hirsute-proposed) [0.20.2-1]
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlroots [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.12.0-2]
[16:37] <doko> tjaalton: could you have a look at the opentk merge?
[16:39] <Eickmeyer> Hi sil2100! Looks like you've been busy, but I wanted to bug you about LP: #1915534. It's having an effect on the OEM I work for.
[16:40] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: hello! o/
[16:40] <sil2100> Ah, saw an upload of this package in the queue indeed, will try to get to it shortly
[16:40] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: No worries. Wasn't sure if you saw it (or if anybody did). :)
[16:57] <Trevinho> sil2100: I've updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1880405 not sure I missed others :P
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinnamon [source] (groovy-proposed) [4.6.7-1ubuntu1.1]
[17:04] <rbalint> cpaelzer, thanks!
[17:06] <tjaalton> doko: there are no new changes in debian besides the package revision?
[17:07] <tjaalton> should probably NMU the rest
[17:07] <tjaalton> of our diff
[17:21] <rbasak> sil2100: o/ I'll review pollinate from the queue. I peer reviewed it earlier for a teammate, so it should be trivial for me.
[17:23] <rbasak> FWIW, I'm doing this for me team on a regular basis now, since we have a peer review policy already. If it's an SRU, then I often take the peer review and double it up as an SRU review. Meets the requirements and saves a third person from having to look.
[17:23] <rbasak> It does mean that I +1 an SRU before it's uploaded, and then when it appears in the queue I just have to verify it's identical to what I reviewed (which git-ubuntu makes easy). But then there's risk of colliding with another SRU team member as we have no mechanism to "take a lock" on queue items.
[17:23] <rbasak> Not sure what to do about that.
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pollinate [source] (groovy-proposed) [4.33-3ubuntu1.20.10.1]
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pollinate [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.33-0ubuntu1~18.04.2]
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.10.5 => 1:20.04.10.6] (core)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pollinate [source] (focal-proposed) [4.33-3ubuntu1.20.04.1]
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinnamon [source] (focal-proposed) [4.4.8-4ubuntu0.2]
[21:21] <wxl> sigh i failed to pay attention to the fact that somehow some translation files disappeared while making a very minor change to lubuntu-default-settings. can someone just drop 21.04.1ubuntu1 altogether?
[21:27] <wxl> maybe i can just `dput --force` an upload with the same version
[22:03] <teward> wxl: might just want to put a version higher to supersede
[22:03] <teward> since you burned the version
[22:05] <wxl> i figured it out :)