| santa_ | hi there | 00:31 |
|---|---|---|
| santa_ | RikMills: do you mind if I build frameworks 5.79 on the ninjas PPA to add it to the experimental PPA | 00:32 |
| santa_ | mostly because we will end up having fw 5.79 + plasma 5.21 and fw is going to take a while to be actually available | 00:32 |
| RikMills | santa_: that sounds ok. obviously please make sure you change the settings so not building against proposed. and test the 2 ppas together, before copying them together into one | 00:36 |
| santa_ | sure, that's the idead | 00:37 |
| santa_ | in fact I'm testing with VMs, but the staging packages depend on -proposed things | 00:37 |
| santa_ | I'm rebuilding everything of fw/plasma/apps in tritemio btw | 00:38 |
| santa_ | http://tritemio-groomlake.duckdns.org/build-status/buildstatus_ubuntu-exp/ | 00:38 |
| santa_ | ↑ doing fw atm | 00:38 |
| RikMills | [16:29]<xn0x> discuss unfreezing the archive tomorrow. | 00:39 |
| RikMills | [16:29]<xn0x> figure out if we can allow glibc to migrate. | 00:39 |
| RikMills | that from #u-release sounds hopeful | 00:39 |
| RikMills | but must assume glibc will be stuck for a while just in case | 00:40 |
| santa_ | yes, I have been reading the channel, before the upload queue "spam" XD | 00:45 |
| RikMills | I am probably being over hopeful :/ | 00:45 |
| RikMills | as long as there are no more issues, I will probably put 5.21.0 into the hirsute queue in the morning | 00:48 |
| RikMills | as do the syntaxhighlighting hotfix | 00:49 |
| RikMills | *and do | 00:49 |
| IrcsomeBot | <DarinMiller> btw, no issues so far with ppa:kubuntu-ppa/experimental. But I have only run it for few minutes.... | 01:31 |
| mparillo | But did it look nearly as good as the youtube video? | 01:47 |
| RikMills | santa_: why are you building amd64 only on the wrong ppa? | 02:23 |
| RikMills | ppa:kubuntu-ninjas/frameworks only has 2GB as well | 02:23 |
| RikMills | would be better IMO in ppa:kubuntu-ninjas/plasma even though it is frameworks? | 02:24 |
| RikMills | especially as you plan to copy to a ppa which has all arches enabled | 02:24 |
| RikMills | hmmm I guess no huge deal | 02:28 |
| RikMills | I would have just tried to match the eventual target ppa | 02:31 |
| RikMills | syntax-highlighting and kdnssd 5.79.1 hotfixes staged | 02:44 |
| BluesKaj | Howdy folks | 12:22 |
| santa_ | hi everyone | 15:14 |
| RikMills | afternoon | 15:14 |
| santa_ | RikMills: yes, I realized after uploading, but not a big deal imho, since this is just a temporary thing for testing | 15:15 |
| RikMills | ok | 15:15 |
| santa_ | also the reason why we have all archs activated in staging is mostly to update the symbols files, which we already did | 15:15 |
| santa_ | so yeah, if someone is testing plasma in an IBM mainframe, he/she won't have the new fw, only plasma 5.21 | 15:16 |
| RikMills | lol | 15:16 |
| * RikMills puts his mainframe away in disappointment | 15:18 | |
| santa_ | needless to say if I were rich I would have a mansion with a small cpd one machine per ubuntu/debian arch to build and test | 15:18 |
| santa_ | and an assitant named Alfred | 15:18 |
| RikMills | hopefully the 'fun-with-fakeroot' is almost over | 15:20 |
| santa_ | yeah, I have seen the bug report, my test rebuilds in the night were fine btw | 15:21 |
| santa_ | anyway, I have to leave you know. I will have time again in the night to finish fw, TODO: | 15:21 |
| RikMills | yeah, today has just been, 'why is riscv64 now borked?' | 15:21 |
| santa_ | - provide that hotfixes you do | 15:21 |
| santa_ | - test | 15:21 |
| santa_ | - copy packages to experimental PPA | 15:22 |
| santa_ | feel free to do those if you have time before I do | 15:22 |
| santa_ | see you later, 100000000000000 thanks for your work :) | 15:22 |
| RikMills | thank you as well! | 15:22 |
| RikMills | santa_: there was a reason I dropped kconfig acc test :/ | 17:37 |
| RikMills | test deps are not satisfiable on i386 | 17:37 |
| RikMills | so FAIL | 17:37 |
| RikMills | I forgot | 17:37 |
| RikMills | I am just going to nuke them again. There is no way to skip | 17:40 |
| santa_ | RikMills: ack, and I'm find with the workaround. just FYI I think we could still void them just for i386 | 21:15 |
| santa_ | in debian/tests/control: | 21:16 |
| santa_ | set dh-acc depends as "dh-acc [!i386]" | 21:16 |
| santa_ | in debian/tests/acc: | 21:17 |
| santa_ | add an if to detected if the arch is i386; if so, exit 0 | 21:17 |
| santa_ | I think that could work | 21:17 |
| RikMills | oh, for some reason I thought that wouldn't work in tests/control | 21:18 |
| santa_ | FTR: https://people.debian.org/~mpitt/autopkgtest/README.package-tests.html | 21:18 |
| santa_ | RikMills: have you disabled other tests for the same reason? if the strategy above works maybe we could re-enable them | 21:18 |
| RikMills | no, I think that was the only one | 21:19 |
| santa_ | another possibility would be disabling them like you were attempting to do some time ago; the strategy would be: | 21:20 |
| santa_ | rename debian/tests/control -> debian/tests/control.disable | 21:20 |
| santa_ | I would add support in gbp-tritemio to undo the rename on the fly without touching the git local clone | 21:21 |
| santa_ | this way we would get them built with acc tests in tritemio, no acc tests in the archive, saving some cycles for the ubuntu infra | 21:22 |
| RikMills | let me ponder on that. I am not messing with the version I put in the upload queue for now | 21:22 |
| RikMills | in principle that sounds useful though | 21:22 |
| santa_ | sure, of course, just think about it and we could assess it better one of these weekends | 21:23 |
| santa_ | btw I think I'm going to have time today to finish the fw 5.79 + plasma 5.21 case if possibru | 21:24 |
| santa_ | but I need to do some personal stuff before that | 21:25 |
| RikMills | cool. I got distracted | 21:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!