[00:31] <santa_> hi there
[00:32] <santa_> RikMills: do you mind if I build frameworks 5.79 on the ninjas PPA to add it to the experimental PPA
[00:32] <santa_> mostly because we will end up having fw 5.79 + plasma 5.21 and fw is going to take a while to be actually available
[00:36] <RikMills> santa_: that sounds ok. obviously please make sure you change the settings so not building against proposed. and test the 2 ppas together, before copying them together into one
[00:37] <santa_> sure, that's the idead
[00:37] <santa_> in fact I'm testing with VMs, but the staging packages depend on -proposed things
[00:38] <santa_> I'm rebuilding everything of fw/plasma/apps in tritemio btw
[00:38] <santa_> http://tritemio-groomlake.duckdns.org/build-status/buildstatus_ubuntu-exp/
[00:38] <santa_> ↑ doing fw atm
[00:39] <RikMills> [16:29]<xn0x> discuss unfreezing the archive tomorrow.
[00:39] <RikMills> [16:29]<xn0x> figure out if we can allow glibc to migrate.
[00:39] <RikMills> that from #u-release sounds hopeful
[00:40] <RikMills> but must assume glibc will be stuck for a while just in case
[00:45] <santa_> yes, I have been reading the channel, before the upload queue "spam" XD
[00:45] <RikMills> I am probably being over hopeful :/
[00:48] <RikMills> as long as there are no more issues, I will probably put 5.21.0 into the hirsute queue in the morning
[00:49] <RikMills> as do the syntaxhighlighting hotfix
[00:49] <RikMills> *and do
 btw, no issues so far with ppa:kubuntu-ppa/experimental. But I have only run it for few minutes....
[01:47] <mparillo> But did it look nearly as good as the youtube video?
[02:23] <RikMills> santa_: why are you building amd64 only on the wrong ppa?
[02:23] <RikMills> ppa:kubuntu-ninjas/frameworks only has 2GB as well
[02:24] <RikMills> would be better IMO in ppa:kubuntu-ninjas/plasma even though it is frameworks?
[02:24] <RikMills> especially as you plan to copy to a ppa which has all arches enabled
[02:28] <RikMills> hmmm I guess no huge deal
[02:31] <RikMills> I would have just tried to match the eventual target ppa
[02:44] <RikMills> syntax-highlighting and kdnssd 5.79.1 hotfixes staged
[12:22] <BluesKaj> Howdy folks
[15:14] <santa_> hi everyone
[15:14] <RikMills> afternoon
[15:15] <santa_> RikMills: yes, I realized after uploading, but not a big deal imho, since this is just a temporary thing for testing
[15:15] <RikMills> ok
[15:15] <santa_> also the reason why we have all archs activated in staging is mostly to update the symbols files, which we already did
[15:16] <santa_> so yeah, if someone is testing plasma in an IBM mainframe, he/she won't have the new fw, only plasma 5.21
[15:16] <RikMills> lol
[15:18]  * RikMills puts his mainframe away in disappointment
[15:18] <santa_> needless to say if I were rich I would have a mansion with a small cpd one machine per ubuntu/debian arch to build and test
[15:18] <santa_> and an assitant named Alfred
[15:20] <RikMills> hopefully the 'fun-with-fakeroot' is almost over
[15:21] <santa_> yeah, I have seen the bug report, my test rebuilds in the night were fine btw
[15:21] <santa_> anyway, I have to leave you know. I will have time again in the night to finish fw, TODO:
[15:21] <RikMills> yeah, today has just been, 'why is riscv64 now borked?'
[15:21] <santa_> - provide that hotfixes you do
[15:21] <santa_> - test
[15:22] <santa_> - copy packages to experimental PPA
[15:22] <santa_> feel free to do those if you have time before I do
[15:22] <santa_> see you later, 100000000000000 thanks for your work :)
[15:22] <RikMills> thank you as well!
[17:37] <RikMills> santa_: there was a reason I dropped kconfig acc test :/
[17:37] <RikMills> test deps are not satisfiable on i386
[17:37] <RikMills> so FAIL
[17:37] <RikMills> I forgot
[17:40] <RikMills> I am just going to nuke them again. There is no way to skip
[21:15] <santa_> RikMills: ack, and I'm find with the workaround. just FYI I think we could still void them just for i386
[21:16] <santa_> in debian/tests/control:
[21:16] <santa_> set dh-acc depends as "dh-acc [!i386]"
[21:17] <santa_> in debian/tests/acc:
[21:17] <santa_> add an if to detected if the arch is i386; if so, exit 0
[21:17] <santa_> I think that could work
[21:18] <RikMills> oh, for some reason I thought that wouldn't work in tests/control 
[21:18] <santa_> FTR: https://people.debian.org/~mpitt/autopkgtest/README.package-tests.html
[21:18] <santa_> RikMills: have you disabled other tests for the same reason? if the strategy above works maybe we could re-enable them
[21:19] <RikMills> no, I think that was the only one
[21:20] <santa_> another possibility would be disabling them like you were attempting to do some time ago; the strategy would be:
[21:20] <santa_> rename debian/tests/control -> debian/tests/control.disable
[21:21] <santa_> I would add support in gbp-tritemio to undo the rename on the fly without touching the git local clone
[21:22] <santa_> this way we would get them built with acc tests in tritemio, no acc tests in the archive, saving some cycles for the ubuntu infra
[21:22] <RikMills> let me ponder on that. I am not messing with the version I put in the upload queue for now
[21:22] <RikMills> in principle that sounds useful though
[21:23] <santa_> sure, of course, just think about it and we could assess it better one of these weekends
[21:24] <santa_> btw I think I'm going to have time today to finish the fw 5.79 + plasma 5.21 case if possibru
[21:25] <santa_> but I need to do some personal stuff before that
[21:25] <RikMills> cool. I got distracted