[19:43] You'll never take me alive, copper! [19:51] Might anyone have any idea why, in the key bindings GUI (the `Global Actions Manager`), I can set ANY combo of keys for a command *EXCEPT* for `Win + E`? [19:51] yes [19:52] https://manual.lubuntu.me/stable/F/keyboard_shortcuts.html [19:53] > if the W(indows) key opens the LXQT application menu (equivilant of the windows start menu) in Global-keys, Openbox commands like window resizing (W + arrow keys) will not work correctly. [19:53] Huh. [19:54] But other `Win` combos work just fine. D: And I think I had `Win + E` set up before, but now I can't set it again. I guess "not work correctly" must mean "work sporadically". [19:54] * > if the W(indows) key opens the LXQT application menu (equivilant of the windows start menu) in Global-keys, Openbox commands like window resizing (W + arrow keys) will not work correctly. [19:54] Huh. [19:54] (`Win`, by itself, does indeed open the application launcher.) [19:55] in that case, nope. [19:55] what version are you on? [19:55] Ubuntu 20.04 focal, 5.8.0-43-generic [19:56] What did you bind `Win + E` to? [19:56] Before, I bound it to `dolphin`, a file manager. Then I unbound it. Now, I can't bind anything to `Win + E`. [19:57] `Win + Q` works just fine. [19:57] * krotera[m] uploaded an image: image.png (27KiB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/UKOhcPJdsCJLmQcMkFDtzneZ/image.png > [19:57] I guess I should call it `Meta` instead of `Win`. But `Meta + E`, in particular, will not register at all in the red-boxed element. xD [19:58] * I guess I should call it `Meta` instead of `Win`. But `Meta + E`, in particular, will not appear at all in the red-boxed element when I press it. xD [19:59] * I guess I should call it `Meta` instead of `Win`. But `Meta + E`, in particular, will not appear at all in the red-boxed element when I press it. xD [19:59] `Q`, `W`, `R`, `T`, `A`, `S`, `D`, all work. Just not `E`. [20:01] try removing that entry and creating a new one [20:01] * I guess I should call it `Meta` instead of `Win`. But `Meta + E`, in particular, **will not appear at all** in the red-boxed element when I press it. xD [20:01] `Q`, `W`, `R`, `T`, `A`, `S`, `D`, all work. Just not `E`. [20:02] i certainly can't reproduce THAT behavior, though (where it won't take the keystroke) [20:03] Did. The countdown in the red-boxed element just keeps going on `Meta + E`, as if I'm not pressing it. [20:03] [telegram] is Meta+E mapped already elsewhere? [20:03] is Meta+E"> No [20:04] Is there some way to open the Global Actions Manager with command line output, to spot any errors? : o [20:04] of course [20:06] `xprop | grep WM_CLASS` reveals the Global Actions Manager GUI to be `lxqt-config-globalkeyshortcuts`, and that works. : D [20:07] But sadly no errors print out when it's not accepting `Meta + E`. xD [20:07] * `xprop | grep WM_CLASS` and clicking the Global Actions Manager GUI reveals its command to be `lxqt-config-globalkeyshortcuts`, and that works. : D [20:08] * `xprop | grep WM_CLASS` and clicking the Global Actions Manager GUI reveals its command to be `lxqt-config-globalkeyshortcuts`, and launching it that way works. : D [20:08] you may want to try to run the actual daemon: /usr/bin/lxqt-globalkeysd [20:08] (which means you'll have to kill it first) [20:11] * krotera[m] sent a long message: < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/cTdaffmeyWoMQgGpGThYawUW/message.txt > [20:11] * krotera[m] sent a long message: < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/wXaNGlsIElDBRTBeJyGWHmZN/message.txt > [20:12] clearly not [20:12] I only know how to interface with daemons via `systemctl`. D: [20:13] um [20:14] killall globalkeysd && globalkeysd [20:14] * krotera[m] sent a long message: < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/ymzAGxSJiUSdkWcYlgAOxnGz/message.txt > [20:15] kill $(pgrep globalkeysd) [20:15] and if that still produces nothing, it's not running and that may well be your problem right there. you can further confirm with e.g. `ps aux | grep globalkeysd` [20:18] `$(pgrep globalkeysd)` produces nothing, but `ps aux` did reveal `/usr/bin/lxqt-globalkeysd` running with a PID which I killed. [20:18] There's also a `--color=auto globalkeysd` running which rotates its PID on every `ps aux` command. xD [20:18] * krotera[m] sent a long message: < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/RjyQoKkPOiSbxWVEhtJDsSAz/message.txt > [20:19] * `$(pgrep globalkeysd)` produces nothing, but `ps aux` did reveal `/usr/bin/lxqt-globalkeysd` running with a PID which I killed. [20:19] There's also a `--color=auto globalkeysd` running which changes its PID on every `ps aux` command. xD [20:19] UGH i meant lxqt-globalkeysd [20:20] * krotera[m] sent a long message: < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/iOIOhsRxxBFpTBiOEYNztPys/message.txt > [20:20] : D [20:20] I guess the daemon's restarted, but the Global Actions Manager has the same problem. Still accepts everything else except for `Meta + E`. [20:21] can't reproduce so [20:21] of course you have dolphin so what other quirks does your system have relative to stock lubuntu? [20:25] A few, I guess. :v I have many things installed, like Dropbox, Chrome, yakuake, etc. Modified my `~/.bashrc`. That's a hard question to answer comprehensively. [20:26] well, something there must be causing the conflict [20:26] I also replaced `xscreensaver` with `xautolock` since `xscreensaver` was locking all except for one of my monitors. 😂 [20:27] oh i'd file a bug against that. as a general rule, `xscreensaver` is the one and only solution for locking that actually works [20:27] which is why we are pretty adamant about not using anything else [20:27] Apparently not. :v [20:27] you miss my point [20:28] there have been a ton of security bugs against other lockers [20:31] * krotera[m] uploaded an image: locker.png (1708KiB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/tXnPAewSlidZaiHGYYiPocNs/locker.png > [20:31] There's a picture I took of it. xD [20:31] like i said, file a bug [20:32] I filed a bug on Launchpad, but they told me to file it upstream. Do I do that https://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/bugs.html ? [20:32] where's this launchpad bug? [20:33] Well, it's private since it's security-related. [20:33] and? [20:33] 1. share the url and no one without privledges will be able to see it [20:33] * Well, it's private since it's security-related. [20:33] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1916003 [20:33] Error: launchpad bug 1916003 not found [20:34] 2. is there even any info on there that should be private? [20:34] yeah that bug doesn't even exist [20:36] guiverc: ^ didn't you see something like this with e.g. bug 1814490 ? [20:36] bug 1814490 in xscreensaver (Ubuntu) "lubuntu 19.04/19.10 xscreensaver runs on single display, other display continues normally" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1814490 [20:36] anyways, yep, that's upstream [20:36] * krotera[m] uploaded an image: image.png (75KiB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/JyDKeEtdZabKQDdqTJdJlpgd/image.png > [20:36] Same URL I posted : o [20:37] very strange. i should have access to all of the private bugs but oh well [20:38] if it's not already resolved (5.45 is out upstream), then reporting it upstream would be the way to go [20:39] there were a bunch of bug fixes in 5.44 and 5.45 [20:40] Cool. ¦ p [20:42] LXQt feels a little rough around the edges. It's incredibly smooth, graphically, though. 🤩 On no other DE do windows drag around as smoothly as they do on Windows (and you drag them a lot since ostensibly Openbox doesn't support window snapping/tiling). [20:43] xscreensaver has nothing to do with LXQt [20:43] and your problem with Meta-E is yours alone [20:43] but if you've got some other reason to say that… [20:43] (also Openbox has nothing to do with LXQt, either) [20:44] That's true. xD I guess I should say Lubuntu, as a whole. [20:44] well you can always contribute and help make it better [20:47] I would like that, but I probably need to be a little smarter first. : p [20:47] Anyway, I appreciate the help. [20:47] i think you're selling yourself a little short [20:47] there's ALWAYS places people can help [21:51] wxl, sorry didn't see the bug you mentioned, but 1814490 occurs when screens are positioned relative to one another in specific locations (with attached.clicked). I expect that'll go with 0.16 (I don't look for it anymore, just slightly alter screen positions when it occurs) [21:53] guiverc: well tl;dr the issue was xscreensaver not locking on all screens [21:54] not sure about positioning and the person made a private bug report and promptly ran away sooooooo [21:55] sorry I'm very distracted.. yep that occurs and I hope it'll be gone with 0.16, but I'm convinced it occurs with screens relatively positioned to one another.. I've got ~4 like bugs that all occur together (the screensaver can occur on it's own.. so it's a little different, but change screen position & it stops occurring too) [21:56] i wonder if it's something that occurs on other destop environments [22:07] not that I've experienced.. it occurs on multiple boxes for me (most folks don't have one screen above another; but I've six screens on desk (2 high x 3) & use 2x per box so vertical seemed easier === neo is now known as Guest90598