[18:45] <Eickmeyer> tomreyn, krytarik: Just looking at the logs, I saw about 2-3 different violations by Hash. Basically being disruptive and disrespectful, which I'd consider a CoC violation, and repeatedly going off-topic.
[18:46] <teward> Eickmeyer: mind sharing with me?
[18:46] <teward> because i'm curious
[18:46] <tomreyn> they've shown a rough edge in the past
[18:46] <Eickmeyer> teward: Sure, my logs were local, but I'll get you something.
[18:46] <teward> Eickmeyer: find the same logs on the irc logs page, problem solved.
[18:46] <teward> :P
[18:47] <Eickmeyer> teward: Exactly, but ERR:TakesAMoment
[18:47] <tomreyn> normally you can just do https://ubuntu.com/search?q=hash but this is a difficult nickname
[18:48] <tomreyn> works well for this repeat offender https://ubuntu.com/search?q=tomreyn
[18:48] <Eickmeyer> teward: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/02/21/%23ubuntu.html search for Hash as a nick.
[18:49] <Eickmeyer> That's only yesterday.
[18:49] <Eickmeyer> Basically, if it were me, one more violation by this person and that's grounds for a ban.
[18:49] <Eickmeyer> Especially since they've been warned multiple times.
[18:54] <teward> my 2 cents
[18:54] <teward> yes they should be smacked for the violations of CoC
[18:54] <teward> but at the same time they WERE attempting to help
[18:54] <teward> so I'd say a quiet not a ban
[18:54] <teward> if only because bans are... well, more 'final'
[18:54] <teward> this IS, however, an IRCC / IRC Moderator level decision ;)
[18:54] <teward> (not CC)
[18:55] <teward> (just making a point of WHY we have delegated permissions :)_
[18:57] <el> have they been talked to about it yet?
[18:57] <Eickmeyer> el: In channel.
[18:57] <Eickmeyer> teward: I agree, I was just making friendly suggestions. :)
[18:57] <el> hrm istr hash being someone specific too
[18:58] <el> let me look a bit
[18:58]  * Eickmeyer has his friendly IRC OP hat on, not his CC hat, to be clear
[19:00] <el> oh. right. it's Stoned
[19:00] <Eickmeyer> el: Oh! Isn't that an evasion then?
[19:00] <el> idk are they curently in the ban list?
[19:00] <Eickmeyer> idk...
[19:01] <Eickmeyer> Stoned has definitely been warned several times in several different channels.
[19:01] <Eickmeyer> iirc
[19:01] <el> doesn't seem they have an account ban in #ubuntu unless there's an interim nick i forgot about
[19:02] <Eickmeyer> Well, if it's Stoned and they changed their nick, then they definitely either a) know better, or b) have been told.
[19:02] <el> he is banned from -ot though
[19:02] <Eickmeyer> ^ That
[19:02] <Eickmeyer> 's right.
[19:02] <el> so yeah he's not goign to change. i'd just go for removal the next time they dumb
[19:02] <Eickmeyer> Exactly what I was suggesting.
[19:03] <Eickmeyer> I knew that MO looked familiar.
[19:04] <el> previously chown and chmod in #ubuntu-offtopic
[19:05] <Eickmeyer> Pattern of poor behavior.
[20:23] <hggdh> for the record, I have quieted Apachez (but ubottu did not ask me for reasons)
[20:23] <hggdh> ugh. Incomplete record -- they were quieted in #u