[06:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tgt [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1:1.0.80-1ubuntu1]
[06:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tgt [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1:1.0.80-1ubuntu1]
[06:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tgt [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1:1.0.80-1ubuntu1]
[06:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tgt [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1:1.0.80-1ubuntu1]
[06:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tgt [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1:1.0.80-1ubuntu1]
[06:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tgt [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1:1.0.80-1ubuntu1]
[07:38] <cpaelzer> hi ubuntu-archive people, the last dependency that was holding tgt in main was dropped and it now (as expected) shows as movement to universe in https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.html
[07:39] <cpaelzer> we have already uploaded a new tgt which will add (back) universe dependencies to tgt
[07:39] <cpaelzer> to have this migrate I wanted to ask if someone could do the tgt main->universe move please?
[08:13] <seb128> cpaelzer, hey, demoted now
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adsys [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1]
[08:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-204.236]
[08:28] <LocutusOfBorg> ta
[08:36] <cpaelzer> thank you seb128
[08:36] <seb128> cpaelzer, np!
[08:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adsys [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1] (no packageset)
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adsys [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1ppa1] (no packageset)
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adsys [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1ppa1] (no packageset)
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1034.35] (no packageset)
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1024.26] (core, kernel)
[11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1013.17] (no packageset)
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-137.141~16.04.1] (kernel)
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-137.141~16.04.1] (kernel)
[11:40] <LocutusOfBorg> bind9-libs is not migrating because of "libdns-export1110-udeb/amd64 has unsatisfiable dependency"
[11:40] <LocutusOfBorg> what should I do?
[11:42] <doko> let me check ...
[11:54] <cpaelzer> seb128: this morning you were so kind that you moved tgt to universe
[11:54] <cpaelzer> seb128: could it be that you only moved the one in hirsute-release but not the one in hirsute-proposed
[11:54] <cpaelzer> if one has to move them individually at all
[11:55] <cpaelzer> I'm seeing tgt-glusterfs/amd64 in main cannot depend on libgfapi0 in universe in excuses as of now
[11:55] <cpaelzer> but since tgt-* should be in universe now that should not be an issue
[11:56] <seb128> cpaelzer, indeed, sorry I just responded to the ping and didn't check that there was a version in proposed to demote as well, done now
[11:56] <cpaelzer> awesome
[11:56] <cpaelzer> thanks!
[11:56] <seb128> np! sorry for not getting it right the first time
[12:04] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: I think it should be removed (isc-dhcp should b-d on bind9-dev, or be removed as well).  the alternative is to build bind9-libs without udebs
[12:05] <LocutusOfBorg> can you please do it?
[12:06] <LocutusOfBorg> there are 3-4 udebs I think to remove
[12:06] <doko> maybe better to build isc-dhcp from bind9-dev?
[12:10] <doko> cpaelzer: we could remove bind9-libs, if we build isc-dhcp using bind9-dev. currently we have both bind9 and bind9-libs sources in the archive
[12:11] <doko> hmm, but bind9 builds any of the shared libs
[12:54] <xnox> doko:  i thought something that we use somewhere got dropped upstream, hence the split packaging.
[12:55] <doko> I suppose a minimal isc-dhcp for cloud-init
[12:57] <xnox> doko: no, not that. libbind-export-dev got dropped in new upstream releases of src:bind9, which isc-dhcp-client still needs, which we use in the initrd. cloud-init uses it too, but it could use other things too.
[12:58] <xnox> doko:  i hoped to bring netplan/systemd-networkd into the initrd, but alas those are too heavy can't work without dbus yet.
[13:12] <xnox> doko:  https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hirsute/amd64/grub-emu any idea why this package got promoted to main? it used to always be in universe.
[13:12] <xnox> it is uninstallable in main, pulls in universe library.
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1109.121] (no packageset)
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1066.74] (kernel)
[13:21] <lucasmoura> hi @sil2100 we have an SRU for unattended-upgrades for Xenial
[13:21] <lucasmoura> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1915547
[13:21] <lucasmoura> Can we start the process of uploading it the proposed queue ?
[13:21] <lucasmoura> Also, if you need any additional information on that SRU, please let me know and I will provide it
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1109.121]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1066.74]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1013.17]
[13:33] <cpaelzer> doko: usually ahasenack was looking into bind9
[13:34] <cpaelzer> I'm not sure about the history and would need to do the same archeological digging that you likely already started
[13:36] <kanashiro> Laney, could you please take a look at this MP? https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/398707
[13:36] <kanashiro> puma tests are timing out on arm64 and s390x after re-triggering them multiple times
[13:37] <cpaelzer> btw I forgot to ask before lucasmoura have you tried on cnaonistack if they would not e.g. indefinetly hang?
[13:37] <cpaelzer> maybe that confirmation would further help to get this merged?
[13:37] <xnox> sil2100:  can you accept s390-tools signed in hirsute please? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hirsute/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=s390-tools
[13:39] <lucasmoura> sorry @cpaelzer I think I am not getting your question here ? you mean that I can upload the package into cnaonistack ?
[13:40] <cpaelzer> lucasmoura: sorry it is kanashiro that makes me ka*tab here and lu* tab there :-/
[13:40] <lucasmoura> Oh okay, no problem :)
[13:40] <cpaelzer> I guess whenever I ping you and it makes no sense consider that as the reason :-/ Count them and per 10 false-pings you get one beer on the next sprint
[13:41] <lucasmoura> hahaha got it
[13:41] <kanashiro> cpaelzer, heh sorry for the inconsistent nicknames :)
[13:41] <cpaelzer> np, you are the one paying those beers ^^ :-P
[13:41] <kanashiro> I did not try canonistack, I can do it
[13:47] <sil2100> xnox: done!
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [2.16.0-0ubuntu1]
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python2.7 (xenial-security/main) [2.7.12-1ubuntu0~16.04.14 => 2.7.12-1ubuntu0~16.04.13] (core) (sync)
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.7-1]
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.7-2]
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.7-2]
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.7-1]
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python2.7 [sync] (xenial-security) [2.7.12-1ubuntu0~16.04.13]
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.7-2]
[14:09] <cjwatson> FYI I've been reverting python2.7 security updates to xenial and bionic at leosilva's request
[15:05] <Laney> kanashiro: yeah, I would be happer if we knew it was going to help and not hold up a builder for even longer if it is actually a hang
[15:06] <Laney> timing out on s390x and not other arches is surprising
[15:06] <Laney> we're talking about it going from passing in 00:02:22 to 05:38:07 and timeout
[15:06] <Laney> with a new upstream version
[15:06] <Laney> to me, that is suspicious ;-)
[15:07] <Laney> there's one of these on http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/puma/hirsute/amd64 as well
[15:07] <Laney> to be honest I think you're looking at a race condition / hang
[15:07] <Laney> cpaelzer: ^-
[15:10] <kanashiro> Laney, I am creating a s390x VM to test it
[15:14] <Laney> nice one
[15:15] <cpaelzer> Laney: yeah we agree, hence I suggested to test on canoonistack already
[15:16] <cpaelzer> Laney: the MP was to 50% to show kanashiro where it would be changed
[15:22] <Laney> okey, let's mark it as WIP then
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-137.141~16.04.1]
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-137.141~16.04.1]
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1024.26]
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1034.35]
[15:48] <Laney> vorlon: sil2100: I saw the action item from the TB meeting about the LTS status of flavours. My question was a bit different to the one answered though, although that one is also good. Since flavours have to apply to the TB to release as an LTS, really the release team should make sure that they've done that when confirming LTS status. I was after that approval being documented somewhere.
[16:00] <sil2100> Ah, you mean like the fact that this approval needs to be performed by the TB? Like, documenting the process?
[16:01] <Laney> Like, we say hey flavours, which of you wants to be LTS?
[16:01] <Laney> but we need to also check that the TB has approved them before
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [460.39-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 460.56-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 (groovy-proposed/restricted) [460.39-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 => 460.56-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (i386-whitelist)
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 (focal-proposed/restricted) [460.39-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 460.56-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server (groovy-proposed/restricted) [460.32.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 => 460.32.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.2] (no packageset)
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server (bionic-proposed/restricted) [460.32.03-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 460.32.03-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (no packageset)
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [460.32.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 460.32.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (no packageset)
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 450.102.04-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (no packageset)
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (groovy-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 => 450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.10.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (focal-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (i386-whitelist)
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (bionic-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 450.102.04-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (no packageset)
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (groovy-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 => 450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.10.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (i386-whitelist)
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [390.141-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 390.141-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (groovy-proposed/restricted) [390.141-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 => 390.141-0ubuntu0.20.10.2] (core, i386-whitelist, kernel-dkms)
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (focal-proposed/restricted) [390.141-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 390.141-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (core, i386-whitelist, kernel-dkms)
[16:20] <vorlon> kanashiro: looks like now we're only waiting on puma?
[16:21] <vorlon> (for rails)
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [418.181.07-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 418.181.07-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (kernel-dkms)
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (groovy-proposed/restricted) [418.181.07-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 => 418.181.07-0ubuntu0.20.10.2] (core, kernel-dkms)
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (focal-proposed/multiverse) [418.181.07-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 418.181.07-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (kernel-dkms)
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: evolution-data-server [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/main) [3.39.2-0build1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: evolution-data-server [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/main) [3.39.2-0build1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: evolution-data-server [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [3.39.2-0build1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: evolution-data-server [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/main) [3.39.2-0build1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:44] <juliank> Laney: Lots of novaclient.exceptions.Forbidden: Maximum number of ports exceeded (HTTP 403) (Request-ID: req-aafef3ab-a97a-40b8-a4a4-3854cbbedfc3)
[16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: evolution-data-server [i386] (hirsute-proposed/main) [3.39.2-0build1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:47] <Laney> sec
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: evolution-data-server [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [3.39.2-0build1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:58] <Laney> juliank: there's a script in shell history (heh) to delete excess ports, let me run it and see if things wake up then
[17:06] <Laney> dunno, not sure that did much
[17:27] <Laney> i can't start a few of them because of secgroups that I don't seem to be able to delete
[17:27] <Laney> not sure why
[17:39] <juliank> Laney: oh yeah that too
[17:45] <vorlon> Laney: well, I think there should be one place to document the LTS status, so we can use wherever is best for the release team :)
[17:54] <Laney> vorlon: I think it's two things though - the permission as granted by applying to the TB, and the participation in a given LTS as indicated to the release team. The release notes is fine for the latter, but we don't have a place to look for the former apart from grubbing in ML archives.
[18:10] <kanashiro> vorlon, yes, just puma is blocking rails. The test is hanging on a s390x VM. I'll be debugging this issue.
[18:10] <vorlon> kanashiro: ok thanks.  I just commented on cpaelzer's MP asking for this to be a long test, which seems very wrong
[18:12] <kanashiro> vorlon, I was talking to him and mentioned that if it was marked as a long test could work, but now I confirmed it will not. So my bad :)
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: evolution-data-server [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [3.39.2-0build1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adsys [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1]
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adsys [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1ppa1]
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted evolution-data-server [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.39.2-0build1]
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted evolution-data-server [i386] (hirsute-proposed) [3.39.2-0build1]
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted evolution-data-server [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.39.2-0build1]
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adsys [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1ppa1]
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted evolution-data-server [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [3.39.2-0build1]
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted evolution-data-server [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [3.39.2-0build1]
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted evolution-data-server [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.39.2-0build1]
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted evolution-data-server [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [3.39.2-0build1]
[21:01] <Laney> we have had our last auto-sync of hirsute!
[21:10] <mwhudson> <dramatic music>
[21:12]  * RikMills watches the portcullis with big spikes lower and lock in place
[21:13] <tumbleweed> and now we try to get all the crap to that synced to migrate...
[21:14] <RikMills> lol
[22:43] <xnox> doko:  please clean up NBS in proposed for udebs old binaries left on s390x: s390-tools-udeb, s390-tools-zkey-udeb (from 2.15.1-1ubuntu3)
[22:46] <mwhudson> tumbleweed: trash compactor scene where one wall is labelled 'release' and the other wall is labelled 'britney'
[22:48] <tumbleweed> and a bunch of engineers with pitchforks in the middle
[22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[22:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)