-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 02:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 04:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 05:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 05:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 05:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 05:58 | |
doko | xnox: done | 06:05 |
---|---|---|
doko | rbalint: util-linux still builds util-linux-udeb, and won't migrate | 06:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 06:10 | |
ricotz | hello, could someone please retry https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.1.1~rc2-0ubuntu1/+build/21083933 | 06:13 |
seb128 | ricotz, hey, retried now | 06:56 |
ricotz | seb128, thank you | 07:11 |
seb128 | np! | 07:11 |
doko | rbalint: util-linux fixed | 07:21 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gcc-8 to i386-whitelist in hirsute | 07:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gnome-icon-theme to i386-whitelist in hirsute | 07:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libprelude to i386-whitelist in hirsute | 07:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added p7zip to i386-whitelist in hirsute | 07:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added rpm to i386-whitelist in hirsute | 07:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added xcftools to i386-whitelist in hirsute | 07:28 | |
=== icey_ is now known as icey | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 08:31 | |
ricotz | I am wondering if these builds are stuck or still working hard in the background? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.1.1~rc2-0ubuntu1/+build/21083931 -- https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.1.1~rc2-0ubuntu1/+build/21083932 | 08:31 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] | 08:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] | 08:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] | 08:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] | 08:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] | 08:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] | 08:51 | |
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks | ||
Laney | why do I have a bazillion livefs/cdimage failures?! | 09:21 |
Laney | ricotz: I think it's probably still grinding away | 09:21 |
Laney | oh they're all old | 09:29 |
Laney | someone cancelled all the hung builds I guess ... | 09:33 |
RikMills | seb128: would you consider hinting flatpak on s390x? debian maintainer has not and cannot maintain the tests on that apparently | 09:37 |
seb128 | RikMills, don't ask me, I'm not in the release team so I can't hint things, also I've no clue about flatpak nor interest | 09:38 |
RikMills | seb128: oh, I thought you were release team as well as AA. apologies | 09:38 |
seb128 | RikMills, no worry :-) | 09:40 |
RikMills | I think I need a post-it-note on my monitor with who is RT and who is AA. the mismatch between the 2 often catches me out! | 09:42 |
RikMills | so same question to any RT members lurking ;) | 09:44 |
Laney | cjwatson: that ^- is reminding me... could you put https://code.launchpad.net/~laney/germinate/+git/germinate/+merge/397151 on your queue please? | 09:49 |
Laney | RikMills: I'll look, a patch to upstream (Debian) to skip on arches they don't care about would be welcome | 09:50 |
RikMills | Laney: understood. | 09:51 |
RikMills | I have to forward the one I already have applied anyway | 09:52 |
Laney | yes please! | 09:54 |
cjwatson | Laney: Oh right, will do | 09:54 |
cjwatson | Laney: Which host is germinate hanging on here? | 09:54 |
Laney | cjwatson: It's germinate as called from livecd-rootfs, so inside a buildd and I guess germinate from the archive | 09:56 |
Laney | which implies SRUing I suppoes | 09:56 |
Laney | suppose | 09:56 |
cjwatson | Laney: ugh, well I'm happy for somebody else to do that once it's in hirsute | 10:02 |
cjwatson | Laney: some comments for you | 10:02 |
Laney | thanks | 10:02 |
Laney | I'll look again soon | 10:02 |
seb128 | Laney, didn't you say we were ignoring netplan.io/ppc64el failing tests now? | 10:03 |
seb128 | network-manager (1.26.2-1ubuntu1 to 1.30.0-1ubuntu1) in proposed for 0 days | 10:03 |
seb128 | Regressions | 10:03 |
seb128 | netplan.io/0.101-4ubuntu2: ppc64el (log, history) | 10:03 |
Laney | did I? | 10:04 |
seb128 | I guess I misunderstood the 'seb128: slyon: I will add a hint for netplan.io now, but I would appreciate it if this regression could still be investigated, it might be finding a bug (at least a test bug) on ppc64el' | 10:05 |
RikMills | I see a hint for ubuntu1 but proposed has ubuntu2 | 10:07 |
RikMills | s/proposed/release | 10:09 |
Laney | ah I see, that version has a pass | 10:11 |
RikMills | so does ubuntu2 against itself, so I guess a reset against that would not work either? | 10:15 |
Laney | I just need to bump it | 10:15 |
Laney | done | 10:16 |
RikMills | I find this reset thing mildly confusing | 10:17 |
Laney | which part? | 10:18 |
seb128 | thx | 10:19 |
RikMills | ubuntu2 has a pass, so if 'that' is the new baseline, and ubuntu2 has a fail against something else, then how is that still not a regression against the new baseline | 10:20 |
Laney | The baseline state for that version is a failure, so that will become the new baseline | 10:23 |
RikMills | so it takes more recent results. fair enough | 10:24 |
Laney | It basically starts again from any higher versions, that's an easier way to think about it | 10:25 |
RikMills | thanks | 10:25 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-8 [i386] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [8.4.0-7ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist) | 11:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-8 [i386] (hirsute-proposed) [8.4.0-7ubuntu2] | 11:08 | |
doko | xnox: ^^^ | 11:09 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 12:16 | |
paride | hi! it seems that the casper/filesystem.squashfs in the s390x images can't be unsquashed: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Kp652SDKwf/ | 13:23 |
paride | this on the Focal images and happening since ~2021-02-21 | 13:24 |
paride | did anything change in the way it's generated? | 13:24 |
paride | sil2100 ^ | 13:25 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1094.107] (no packageset) | 13:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gkeop [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1011.12] (no packageset) | 13:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1041.43] (core, kernel) | 13:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1022.23] (core, kernel) | 13:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1049.53] (no packageset) | 13:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1066.74~16.04.1] (kernel) | 13:48 | |
paride | can reproduce locally on hirsute by loop-mounting the s390x image and trying unsquashfs on installer.squashfs | 13:50 |
paride | mwhudson, ^^ this is likely the cause of the ubuntu-focal-live-server-s390x-smoke-edge failures | 13:51 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1094.107] | 14:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1041.43] | 14:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1049.53] | 14:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gkeop [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1011.12] | 14:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 15:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] | 15:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] | 15:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] | 15:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] | 15:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] | 15:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] | 15:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] | 15:45 | |
=== Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Groovy 20.10, Focal 20.04.2.0, Bionic 18.04.5 | Archive: Feature Freeze, Debian Import Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Hirsute Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis | infinity, you will be missed | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1066.74~16.04.1] | 16:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1022.23] | 16:44 | |
* RikMills thanks L@ney as flatpak migrated and the thing it blocked | 16:54 | |
RikMills | FYI, I have no clue on the flatpak test failures against new glib2.0 :P | 16:55 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.17 => 2.664.18] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 16:59 | |
=== hellswor1 is now known as hellsworth | ||
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch | ||
lucasmoura | tjaalton, sil2100 Sorry to bother with this again, but do we have an update on the SRU for unattended-upgrades on Xenial ? | 19:22 |
lucasmoura | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1915547 | 19:22 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1915547 in unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial) " sru unattended-upgrades ( 1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.6 update to 1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.7 ) Xenial" [High,Triaged] | 19:22 |
lucasmoura | If not, no problem at all. I just want to make sure that everyhing is in order with that proposal | 19:23 |
lucasmoura | ps: I realized I posted this on the wrong channel (ubuntu-devel), so that's why I am posting it here now | 19:23 |
=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1109.121~16.04.1] (kernel) | 20:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!