[02:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[04:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[05:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:05] <doko> xnox: done
[06:08] <doko> rbalint: util-linux still builds util-linux-udeb, and won't migrate
[06:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:13] <ricotz> hello, could someone please retry https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.1.1~rc2-0ubuntu1/+build/21083933
[06:56] <seb128> ricotz, hey, retried now
[07:11] <ricotz> seb128, thank you
[07:11] <seb128> np!
[07:21] <doko> rbalint: util-linux fixed
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gcc-8 to i386-whitelist in hirsute
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gnome-icon-theme to i386-whitelist in hirsute
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libprelude to i386-whitelist in hirsute
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added p7zip to i386-whitelist in hirsute
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added rpm to i386-whitelist in hirsute
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added xcftools to i386-whitelist in hirsute
=== icey_ is now known as icey
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[08:31] <ricotz> I am wondering if these builds are stuck or still working hard in the background? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.1.1~rc2-0ubuntu1/+build/21083931 -- https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.1.1~rc2-0ubuntu1/+build/21083932
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu1]
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks
[09:21] <Laney> why do I have a bazillion livefs/cdimage failures?!
[09:21] <Laney> ricotz: I think it's probably still grinding away
[09:29] <Laney> oh they're all old
[09:33] <Laney> someone cancelled all the hung builds I guess ...
[09:37] <RikMills> seb128: would you consider hinting flatpak on s390x? debian maintainer has not and cannot maintain the tests on that apparently
[09:38] <seb128> RikMills, don't ask me, I'm not in the release team so I can't hint things, also I've no clue about flatpak nor interest
[09:38] <RikMills> seb128: oh, I thought you were release team as well as AA. apologies
[09:40] <seb128> RikMills, no worry :-)
[09:42] <RikMills> I think I need a post-it-note on my monitor with who is RT and who is AA. the mismatch between the 2 often catches me out!
[09:44] <RikMills> so same question to any RT members lurking ;)
[09:49] <Laney> cjwatson: that ^- is reminding me... could you put https://code.launchpad.net/~laney/germinate/+git/germinate/+merge/397151 on your queue please?
[09:50] <Laney> RikMills: I'll look, a patch to upstream (Debian) to skip on arches they don't care about would be welcome
[09:51] <RikMills> Laney: understood.
[09:52] <RikMills> I have to forward the one I already have applied anyway
[09:54] <Laney> yes please!
[09:54] <cjwatson> Laney: Oh right, will do
[09:54] <cjwatson> Laney: Which host is germinate hanging on here?
[09:56] <Laney> cjwatson: It's germinate as called from livecd-rootfs, so inside a buildd and I guess germinate from the archive
[09:56] <Laney> which implies SRUing I suppoes
[09:56] <Laney> suppose
[10:02] <cjwatson> Laney: ugh, well I'm happy for somebody else to do that once it's in hirsute
[10:02] <cjwatson> Laney: some comments for you
[10:02] <Laney> thanks
[10:02] <Laney> I'll look again soon
[10:03] <seb128> Laney, didn't you say we were ignoring netplan.io/ppc64el failing tests now?
[10:03] <seb128>  network-manager (1.26.2-1ubuntu1 to 1.30.0-1ubuntu1) in proposed for 0 days
[10:03] <seb128> Regressions
[10:03] <seb128>     netplan.io/0.101-4ubuntu2: ppc64el (log, history)
[10:04] <Laney> did I?
[10:05] <seb128> I guess I misunderstood the '	seb128: slyon: I will add a hint for netplan.io now, but I would appreciate it if this regression could still be investigated, it might be finding a bug (at least a test bug) on ppc64el'
[10:07] <RikMills> I see a hint for ubuntu1 but proposed has ubuntu2
[10:09] <RikMills> s/proposed/release
[10:11] <Laney> ah I see, that version has a pass
[10:15] <RikMills> so does ubuntu2 against itself, so I guess a reset against that would not work either?
[10:15] <Laney> I just need to bump it
[10:16] <Laney> done
[10:17] <RikMills> I find this reset thing mildly confusing
[10:18] <Laney> which part?
[10:19] <seb128> thx
[10:20] <RikMills> ubuntu2 has a pass, so if 'that' is the new baseline, and ubuntu2 has a fail against something else, then how is that still not a regression against the new baseline
[10:23] <Laney> The baseline state for that version is a failure, so that will become the new baseline
[10:24] <RikMills> so it takes more recent results. fair enough
[10:25] <Laney> It basically starts again from any higher versions, that's an easier way to think about it
[10:25] <RikMills> thanks
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-8 [i386] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [8.4.0-7ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist)
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-8 [i386] (hirsute-proposed) [8.4.0-7ubuntu2]
[11:09] <doko> xnox: ^^^
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[13:23] <paride> hi! it seems that the casper/filesystem.squashfs in the s390x images can't be unsquashed: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Kp652SDKwf/
[13:24] <paride> this on the Focal images and happening since ~2021-02-21
[13:24] <paride> did anything change in the way it's generated?
[13:25] <paride> sil2100 ^
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1094.107] (no packageset)
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gkeop [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1011.12] (no packageset)
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1041.43] (core, kernel)
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1022.23] (core, kernel)
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1049.53] (no packageset)
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1066.74~16.04.1] (kernel)
[13:50] <paride> can reproduce locally on hirsute by loop-mounting the s390x image and trying unsquashfs on installer.squashfs
[13:51] <paride> mwhudson, ^^ this is likely the cause of the ubuntu-focal-live-server-s390x-smoke-edge failures
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1094.107]
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1041.43]
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1049.53]
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gkeop [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1011.12]
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1]
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1]
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1]
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1]
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1]
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1]
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1]
=== Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Groovy 20.10, Focal 20.04.2.0, Bionic 18.04.5 | Archive: Feature Freeze, Debian Import Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Hirsute Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis | infinity, you will be missed
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1066.74~16.04.1]
[16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1022.23]
[16:54]  * RikMills thanks L@ney as flatpak migrated and the thing it blocked
[16:55] <RikMills> FYI, I have no clue on the flatpak test failures against new glib2.0 :P
[16:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.17 => 2.664.18] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
=== hellswor1 is now known as hellsworth
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch
[19:22] <lucasmoura> tjaalton, sil2100  Sorry to bother with this again, but do we have an update on the SRU for unattended-upgrades on Xenial ?
[19:22] <lucasmoura> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1915547
[19:22] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1915547 in unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial) " sru unattended-upgrades ( 1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.6 update to 1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.7 ) Xenial" [High,Triaged]
[19:23] <lucasmoura> If not, no problem at all. I just want to make sure that everyhing is in order with that proposal
[19:23] <lucasmoura> ps: I realized I posted this on the wrong channel (ubuntu-devel), so that's why I am posting it here now
=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson
[20:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1109.121~16.04.1] (kernel)