mwhudsonparide: huh!00:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1041.43~18.04.1] (no packageset)06:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1037.39~18.04.1] (no packageset)06:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1022.23+21.04.1] (core, kernel)06:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1038.41~18.04.1] (no packageset)06:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1038.41] (core, kernel)06:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.10 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.10.0-1015.16] (no packageset)06:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1094.107~16.04.1] (kernel)06:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1024.25+21.04.1] (core, kernel)06:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1038.41]06:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8.0-1024.25+21.04.1]06:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.10 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.10.0-1015.16]06:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8.0-1022.23+21.04.1]06:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1041.43~18.04.1]06:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1037.39~18.04.1]06:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1038.41~18.04.1]06:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1094.107~16.04.1]06:53
paridemwhudson, the error changed a bit with the daily images generated in the last few days, now it's just:08:03
paride+ unsquashfs -d new_installer old_iso/casper/installer.squashfs08:03
parideCan't find a SQUASHFS superblock on old_iso/casper/installer.squashfs08:03
parideold_iso is just the loop-mounted ubuntu-focal-live-server-s390x.iso08:03
paridethe surprising part is that the image itself tests fine!08:04
parideso either the squashfs is not that broken, or unsquashfs is broken, or who knows08:04
parideI had a look at ubuntu-cdimage but couldn't spot an obvious recent change that could be to blame08:05
paridebut I always get a bit lost with all the moving parts of the iso image generation08:06
mwhudsonparide: did you try downloading the installer.squashfs directly from https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/hirsute/ubuntu-server-live/+build/263162 ?08:30
mwhudsonparide: i'm doing that now but for some reason the wet piece of string connecting me to the librarian is particularly slow today08:30
paridemwhudson, I didn't, trying now. But note that the failure happens with the focal images, not hirsute08:31
mwhudsonparide: oh!08:31
mwhudsonthat's even more bizarre then08:32
mwhudsonhuh downloading two squashfses in parallel and they are both going as fast as the first one was on its own08:32
paridemwhudson, they seems to unsquash fine...08:40
mwhudsonparide: hmm hmm08:40
* paride tries again with the iso image doing everything locally08:41
mwhudsonparide: can you match the iso to a livefs build via the build logs and see if the squashfses sha1s match?08:41
mwhudsonbecause ttbomk they are just dumped onto the iso08:41
paridemwhudson, doing so08:42
mwhudsonoh... i wonder if the date of the change in behaviour is when inject-subiquity-snap switched from mounting the squashfs to unpacking it08:42
mwhudsonthat was jan 6, probably too long ago?08:43
mwhudsonparide: yeah the squashfs from https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/focal/ubuntu-server-live/+build/263230 seems to unsquash ok for me (on focal)08:46
mwhudsonok i can download from cdimage 10+ x faster than the librarian08:48
paridemwhudson, and *locally* I can unsquash even from the iso, but I could reproduce the issue on the s390x machine08:50
parideI'll follow the thread again...08:50
mwhudsonah hah08:50
mwhudsonparide: which distro is the script being run on? bionic?08:53
paridemwhudson, yes08:53
mwhudsonit seems a bit unlikely that an endianness bug in unsquashfs on bionic has suddenly appeared doesn't it08:54
paridemwhudson, I don't know if I should be happy or not, but it seems to be working with today's daily09:03
mwhudsonparide: shall we try being happy for a few days?09:04
paridemwhudson, yes :)09:04
mwhudsonparide: ok, i'll give it a go :)09:04
LocutusOfBorgricotz, hello, do you have any idea for the libreoffice autopkgtest sadness?10:02
LocutusOfBorgits now the only poppler blocker for migration10:02
LocutusOfBorg /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unopkg.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libjvmaccesslo.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory10:03
LocutusOfBorgnot sure what this does mean...10:03
ricotzLocutusOfBorg, yes, and I have a fix for it, I briefly discussed it seb128 earlier on how to proceed10:05
seb128LocutusOfBorg, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/1917301 btw10:05
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1917301 in poppler (Ubuntu) "New poppler transition is ongoing" [Undecided,New]10:05
seb128LocutusOfBorg, it's not the only blocker, gdal/s390x needs to be sorted out which I just reported to Debian (and the maintainer was prompt to upload a candidate fix now that I will sync over once it's published)10:06
ricotzbasically this libreoffice autopkgtest problem doesn't affect the desktop build which would be fine to transition10:06
ginggswould someone please review https://code.launchpad.net/~ginggs/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/398846 ?10:10
LocutusOfBorgseb128, ^^ this fixes gdal/s390x10:11
LocutusOfBorgthis is why I was asking about libreoffice10:11
LocutusOfBorgseb128, the "maintainer candidate fix" can't work"10:11
LocutusOfBorgthanks for working on it I go back in my cave then :D10:12
seb128LocutusOfBorg, why can't it work? and please write that to the debian bug10:13
seb128ginggs, ^10:13
LocutusOfBorgsomething like "we can't apt install stuff somewhere inside the test" and the "fix" is to hint the failure so if the package comes back on such architecture it becomes green again10:13
LocutusOfBorgNBS-cleanups should be converted into "test-reset" hints otherwise you loose your big endian test platform10:14
seb128LocutusOfBorg, https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-sf/-/commit/0134ec6c10:14
ginggsseb128: i prefer to wait for the test to fail so i have some evidence to re-open the bug10:14
seb128ginggs, why would it fail?10:15
ginggsseb128: apt-get install needs root10:16
ginggssee also debian bug #98374810:16
ubot5Debian bug 983748 in src:dh-r "dh-r: pkg-r-autopkgtest breaks autopkgtests" [Serious,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/98374810:16
seb128k, well let's see, we are not in a hurry10:17
seb128libreoffice is going to take a few days unless we decide to hint over that one as well10:18
ginggswell, i'd like to see r-cran-lwgeom migrate10:19
seb128right, I'm not in ubuntu-release so I can't merge that hint myself10:19
ginggsseb128: ack10:22
ginggsi just hope some trigger-happy sync-er doesn't sync r-cran-sf10:23
rbalintdoko, retried systemd tests, they all failed together when retrying with all-proposed10:54
rbalintvorlon, (& all) please don't trigger with all-proposed=1 often, it is an example of LP: #189731710:57
ubot5Launchpad bug 1897317 in Auto Package Testing "Extra triggers invalidate passing test results and also may cause test failures" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189731710:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.49.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)10:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.49.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)11:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1037.39] (no packageset)12:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1039.42] (core, kernel)12:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 [source] (groovy-proposed) [460.56-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]12:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server [source] (groovy-proposed) [460.32.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.2]12:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.49.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)12:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [source] (groovy-proposed) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.10.2]12:42
LocutusOfBorgginggs, are you going to update #983749?13:07
ginggsLocutusOfBorg: i prefer to wait for the test to fail so i have some evidence to re-open the bug13:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server [source] (groovy-proposed) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.10.2]13:17
LocutusOfBorgbtw ginggs I don't think syncing it will make the hint any worse, right? I mean, the hint tracks the first "bad version" so it doesn't require changes if the version increases...13:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [source] (groovy-proposed) [390.141-0ubuntu0.20.10.2]13:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [source] (groovy-proposed) [418.181.07-0ubuntu0.20.10.2]14:48
sil2100tumbleweed: hey! Are you around? I wanted to review python-pip for focal and I'd need it to be re-uploaded with teh source created with -v to also incldue the previous changelog entry in .changes14:51
sil2100I'll re-upload it and then accept14:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pip (focal-proposed/universe) [20.0.2-5ubuntu1.2 => 20.0.2-5ubuntu1.3] (no packageset)15:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-pip [source] (focal-proposed) [20.0.2-5ubuntu1.3]15:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pip [source] (focal-proposed) [20.0.2-5ubuntu1.3]15:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.49.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-virtualenv [source] (focal-proposed) [20.0.17-1ubuntu0.3]15:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1037.39]16:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1039.42]16:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 [source] (focal-proposed) [460.56-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]16:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: google-osconfig-agent (xenial-proposed/primary) [20210219.00-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]17:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-osconfig-agent (bionic-proposed/universe) [20210112.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0 => 20210219.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (no packageset)17:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-osconfig-agent (focal-proposed/universe) [20210112.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.0 => 20210219.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.0] (no packageset)17:41
tumbleweedsil2100: around17:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-osconfig-agent (groovy-proposed/universe) [20210112.00-0ubuntu1~20.10.0 => 20210219.00-0ubuntu1~20.10.0] (no packageset)17:41
tumbleweedsil2100: ah, sure17:42
tumbleweedsil2100: err, looks like you accepted them after all?17:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server [source] (focal-proposed) [460.32.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.2]18:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [source] (focal-proposed) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.2]18:16
ginggsthank you, mystery merger18:22
ginggsoh, it was tumbleweed :)18:24
tumbleweedyesterday, too18:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server [source] (focal-proposed) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.2]18:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [source] (focal-proposed) [418.181.07-0ubuntu0.20.04.2]18:29
sil2100tumbleweed: as said, I re-uploaded and accepted ;)18:29
tumbleweedah, I misread18:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [source] (focal-proposed) [390.141-0ubuntu0.20.04.2]18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.49.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)18:37
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch
wxllubuntu has grub2-signed in ship-live but it seems what's available in the current daily is an old version from several days ago. can anyone tell me why?19:19
wxlalso has something happened with the md5 checks? they seem to have disappeared19:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-pan [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.3]19:32
vorlonrbalint: all-proposed> unfortunately trying to selectively trigger with a subset of proposed is tediously inefficient; I don't like using all-proposed but it's better than the alternative20:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (bionic-proposed/main) [2:12.1.1-0ubuntu3 => 2:12.1.1-0ubuntu4] (openstack, ubuntu-server)20:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnutls28 (groovy-proposed/main) [3.6.15-4ubuntu2 => 3.6.15-4ubuntu2.1] (core, i386-whitelist)20:24
seb128vorlon, hey, thanks for the build-essential tip on libinih the other day ... now about upstreaming to Debian, do you think I should try to get the hack there or is it likely that you do the autopkgtest setup fix before next cycle?20:27
=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson
tewardanyone know why the seeds for the ISOs might not be up to date for the ISO builds?  Lubuntu's seeing some ISO chaos with a mismatch of the grub version that's on the ISO from https://phab.lubuntu.me/source/seed/browse/hirsute/ship-live where the Lubuntu ship-live data is stored.  Seeing -1ubuntu37 not -1ubuntu40 on the latest ISOs, and it's causing UEFI install errors because of apt deps on grub not being installed/working.20:38
tewardcc wxl kc2bez20:38
teward(related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1917292)20:40
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1917292 in calamares (Ubuntu) "Lubuntu Hirsute daily install failed due to grub packaging errors" [Critical,Confirmed]20:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: manila (focal-proposed/universe) [1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (openstack)20:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xsane (focal-proposed/universe) [0.999-8ubuntu2 => 0.999-8ubuntu2.1] (no packageset)20:56
vorlonseb128: I ought to do the fix to autopkgtest before then21:01
seb128vorlon, thanks22:09
kanashirodoes anyone know what is the value of 'ulimit -n' in our autopkgtest testbeds? An upstream maintainer wants to know it to see if it meets their expectation22:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnutls28 (focal-proposed/main) [3.6.13-2ubuntu1.3 => 3.6.13-2ubuntu1.4] (core, i386-whitelist)22:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.49.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)23:09
vorlonkanashiro: should be the default for Ubuntu, which is 1024 soft limit and 1048576 hard limit AFAIR23:52
vorlonkanashiro: btw you uploaded puma and its autopkgtests still fail, what are next steps there?23:54
wxlvorlon: since you are awake, i'll bug you. lubuntu seems to have old packages versions seeded in ship-live for which i can't explain. the packages last changed days ago.23:58
vorlonwxl: what packages specifically, and what do you expect to see instead?23:59
wxlvorlon: in particular, grub-efi-amd64-signed is stuck on -1ubuntu37 though we're on -1ubuntu40 as of the 25th. last iso was built earlier this morning.23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!