[00:07] <mup> Bug #1917377 opened: maas 2.9.2 proxmox machine violates unique constraint "maasserver_bmc_power_type_parameters_idx" <db> <index> <proxmox> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1917377>
[09:36] <Nafallo> hi! :-)
[09:37] <Nafallo> I'm not getting the dhcp.conf files written on my rackd. any pointers in the right direction as to why would be helpful.
[09:42] <Nafallo> hmm. I think I'll delete and re-add the rack controller actually.
[10:05] <Nafallo> reinstalling the rackd worked :-P
[11:05] <mup> Bug #1917441 opened: Deployment of an Ubuntu Core 20 image fails <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1917441>
[11:11] <mup> Bug #1917441 changed: Deployment of an Ubuntu Core 20 image fails <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1917441>
[11:17] <mup> Bug #1917441 opened: Deployment of an Ubuntu Core 20 image fails <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1917441>
[14:37] <Be-El> is there any documentation on available variables for tempita templates?
[15:20] <mup> Bug #1917480 opened: [2.9] dmesg has a lot of apparmor denials when machines with AMT power type are used <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1917480>
[15:29] <mup> Bug #1917480 changed: [2.9] dmesg has a lot of apparmor denials when machines with AMT power type are used <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1917480>
[15:32] <mup> Bug #1917480 opened: [2.9] dmesg has a lot of apparmor denials when machines with AMT power type are used <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1917480>
[18:55] <mup> Bug #1917510 opened: Back to machine details directs to legacy <ui> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1917510>
[18:58] <mup> Bug #1917510 changed: Back to machine details directs to legacy <ui> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1917510>
[19:07] <mup> Bug #1917510 opened: Back to machine details directs to legacy <ui> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1917510>
[22:25] <mwhudson> ltrager: did maas drop support for installing centos 6? it seems images are no longer published
[22:47] <classicsnail> it's past end of maintenance, or maybe that's the reason?
[22:47] <classicsnail> so maybe, even