| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directx-headers [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] | 00:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directx-headers [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 00:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directx-headers [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 00:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directx-headers [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 00:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directx-headers [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 00:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directx-headers [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 00:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directx-headers [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 00:54 | |
| xnox | vorlon: well I guess I want this grub to migrate in hirsute before uploading armhf fixes, packaging fixes, ppc64el patches.... | 01:30 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected neutron [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:12.1.1-0ubuntu4] | 01:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected neutron [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:12.1.1-0ubuntu4] | 01:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted west-chamber [source] (focal-proposed) [20100405+svn20111107.r124-12ubuntu0.2~20.04.1] | 02:10 | |
| tjaalton | RAOF: thanks! looks like it got accepted to debian too, that was quick ;) | 04:20 |
| RAOF | tjaalton: you might want to change the licence to “Expat” (because it's that flavour of MIT) but that wasn't blocking 😀 | 04:22 |
| tjaalton | ah ok, committed to git :) | 04:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directx-headers [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 04:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directx-headers [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 04:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directx-headers [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 04:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directx-headers [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 04:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directx-headers [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 04:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: directx-headers [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 05:07 | |
| === didrocks2 is now known as didrocks | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8.0-1024.26+21.04.1] | 09:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directx-headers [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directx-headers [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directx-headers [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directx-headers [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directx-headers [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directx-headers [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directx-headers [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directx-headers [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directx-headers [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directx-headers [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directx-headers [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted directx-headers [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.2-1] | 10:09 | |
| xnox | Laney: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output.txt grub2 & grub2-signed migrated in hirsute, without grub2-unsigned causing havoc. | 11:13 |
| xnox | and i don't understand how or why britney do that, as that is very broken. | 11:14 |
| juliank | Britney also says Depends: grub2 grub2-unsigned in update_excuses | 11:14 |
| Laney | what should have prevented it in your opinion? | 11:14 |
| juliank | grub2 depends on grub2-unsigned | 11:16 |
| rbalint | vorlon, see LP: #1867338 | 11:16 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1867338 in kerneloops (Ubuntu) "Is kerneloops still useful on Ubuntu?" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1867338 | 11:16 |
| juliank | or did I read that wrong way around? | 11:16 |
| juliank | certainly causes me to switch from grub-efi-* to grub-pc | 11:16 |
| Laney | secondly | 11:17 |
| Laney | that update_output.txt says that grub2-unsigned was taken with the set | 11:17 |
| xnox | juliank: Laney: i think just bad timing? | 11:18 |
| xnox | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/hirsute/2021-03-03/06:22:51.log | 11:18 |
| Laney | Copying: grub2/2.04-1ubuntu42 | 11:18 |
| Laney | Copying: grub2-signed/1.164 | 11:18 |
| xnox | has | 11:18 |
| Laney | Copying: grub2-unsigned/2.04-1ubuntu42 | 11:18 |
| xnox | yeap that | 11:18 |
| Laney | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-unsigned/+publishinghistory | 11:19 |
| Laney | deleted but not published in release | 11:19 |
| Laney | what | 11:19 |
| xnox | but i see no pending there | 11:19 |
| xnox | Laney: please use AA powers to copy into release suite | 11:19 |
| juliank | launchpad had a hickup? :D | 11:19 |
| Laney | thanks I will, you're like one step behind me | 11:19 |
| Laney | this is a matter for #launchpad to look into | 11:19 |
| cjwatson | Probably a copy failure. We should fix this by making the promotion arrangements use the newish "move" facility rather than copy-then-delete | 11:20 |
| cjwatson | [2021-03-03 08:53:53,220: DEBUG/ForkPoolWorker-1] Rejected: | 11:21 |
| cjwatson | [2021-03-03 08:53:53,220: DEBUG/ForkPoolWorker-1] grub2-unsigned 2.04-1ubuntu42 in hirsute (binaries conflicting with the existing ones) | 11:21 |
| Laney | cjwatson: is that more immune to failures or would we still have had a partial set, just without the deletion from proposed? | 11:21 |
| cjwatson | It means that if it fails the result will still be published in -proposed rather than just vanishing | 11:22 |
| juliank | kind of needs an atomic move of multiple thingies | 11:22 |
| cjwatson | You aren't going to get that though | 11:22 |
| juliank | move all or nothing :) | 11:22 |
| cjwatson | The copier is already awful | 11:22 |
| cjwatson | But you *can* have an atomic move of one thing | 11:23 |
| juliank | not enough acid for me | 11:23 |
| cjwatson | So how about not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good | 11:23 |
| * Laney makes a sad face | 11:23 | |
| Laney | I was just wondering if it would have avoided the breakage hirsute users are seeing, we should still use it of course | 11:23 |
| xnox | i think it would have been okish if britney requested things in reverse order. | 11:24 |
| cjwatson | I'm not sure what's going on with this one. Binary conflicts maybe due to something about i386? | 11:24 |
| xnox | i.e. it knows that grub2 has depends on grub2-unsigned and implicit on grub2-signed. it could have copied grub2-unsigned, grub2-signed, then grub2. | 11:24 |
| cjwatson | Might need a wgrant consult | 11:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: grub2-unsigned (hirsute-release/primary) [2.04-1ubuntu42] | 11:24 | |
| xnox | cjwatson: the same source and binaries got copied down to bionic, built i386 record there, and copied further down to xenial (trusty-esm). So yes the source has i386 build record that is not to be published in hirsute. | 11:25 |
| cjwatson | xnox: Even with move=True, the move would still be asynchronous so the copyPackage caller doesn't necessarily get an error | 11:25 |
| Laney | is that a good thing to accept? | 11:25 |
| xnox | ah | 11:25 |
| cjwatson | So I don't think reverse order helps | 11:25 |
| xnox | naive xnox | 11:26 |
| cjwatson | I suspect that is going to fail again once approved, but we'll see | 11:27 |
| xnox | maybe i should have kept building grub-efi-amd64:i386 out of src:grub2 on bionic down. =/ | 11:27 |
| xnox | then src:grub2-unsigned would not have had i386 build | 11:27 |
| xnox | i guess the copy needs to be done with arches specified explicitely, i.e. we only want amd64 & arm64 in hirsute-release. | 11:28 |
| * xnox has no idea if that makes sense | 11:28 | |
| cjwatson | It doesn't | 11:28 |
| cjwatson | I have not had enough coffee (ever) to be confident about working out this particular bit of copier behaviour | 11:29 |
| Laney | Yeah looks like that accept disappeared | 11:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected grub2-unsigned [sync] (hirsute-release) [2.04-1ubuntu42] | 11:29 | |
| Laney | lies | 11:29 |
| cjwatson | Same error | 11:30 |
| cjwatson | You may need a separate build for now | 11:31 |
| xnox | cjwatson: Laney: can you please back out grub2 & grub2-signed out of release, back into proposed? and put the old one in (ubuntu40 based) | 11:32 |
| * cjwatson is not going to do that FWIW | 11:32 | |
| cjwatson | (not because I object, but because you can either have me working out copier bugs or doing archive surgery but not both) | 11:33 |
| cjwatson | I wonder if the issuperset check in the copier needs to be adjusted a bit to take the target series's architecture set into account | 11:33 |
| xnox | separate build means building three source packages. And this time i will drop building grub-efi-amd64:i386 so will take time. | 11:33 |
| cjwatson | Even if I can figure out the copier bug that would still be faster than me fixing it :)( | 11:34 |
| cjwatson | :) | 11:34 |
| xnox | Laney: can you please demote-to-proposed grub2 & grub2-signed? | 11:35 |
| xnox | i will prepare new i386-less builds | 11:36 |
| Laney | yes, you don't need to repeatedly ask :-) | 11:38 |
| Laney | and you definitely don't mean demote-to-proposed, that means remove from release :p | 11:38 |
| Laney | can you file a block-proposed bug or something so they don't accidentally get copied back again? | 11:38 |
| xnox | tags added on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1915536 | 11:41 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1915536 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu Groovy) "one grub" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 11:41 |
| Laney | xnox: done, can you check the publishing history please to see if it looks ok? | 11:45 |
| Laney | I didn't copy back to proposed fwiw | 11:45 |
| cjwatson | Could somebody file a Launchpad bug about the copy issue please? I *think* the copier needs to be extended to take architecture filters into account - if createMissingBuilds isn't going to create builds for an architecture, then the check for whether conflicting builds would be created should also exclude that architecture | 11:47 |
| xnox | Laney: you are amazing, it looks beautiful. | 11:48 |
| xnox | cjwatson: i will file the bug report. | 11:49 |
| Laney | I wonder if we could arrange for ubuntu-archive-robot's mail to go somewhere | 11:50 |
| Laney | we would have been at least theoretically able to see the reject then | 11:51 |
| cjwatson | get IS to create a non-janky email address for it and I'd be happy to reconfigure it | 11:51 |
| Laney | ah | 11:51 |
| Laney | https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive-robot I see the destination now :-) | 11:51 |
| cjwatson | it was easy at the time ... | 11:51 |
| cjwatson | xnox: ta | 11:52 |
| xnox | cjwatson: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1917614 | 11:54 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1917614 in Launchpad itself "one grub broke copypackage -proposed => release in hirsute with i386 build in bionic" [Undecided,New] | 11:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serial-test [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-1] (no packageset) | 11:55 | |
| Laney | should I ask for a mailing list or just for it to forward to a list of people? | 11:55 |
| Laney | ubuntu-archive ^- opinions on where to send ~ubuntu-archive-robot's Launchpad mail? | 11:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serial-test [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-1] (no packageset) | 11:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serial-test [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-1] (no packageset) | 11:56 | |
| apw | Laney, i don't think we have a list if that helps; likely it should go to those who can access its host | 11:56 |
| seb128 | Laney, what sort of emails is the robot getting? | 11:56 |
| apw | (copy failures I assume) | 11:56 |
| Laney | not sure, but at least the output of copying packages to the release pocket | 11:56 |
| xnox | there are buildd mailing lists but i think that's full of spam. | 11:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serial-test [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-1] (no packageset) | 11:57 | |
| xnox | sorry i mean ftbfs | 11:57 |
| apw | but likely a bunch of positive copies too | 11:57 |
| Laney | I'm guessing most of you won't want to see most of it | 11:57 |
| doko | I'm subscribed to all fbfs mails ;p | 11:57 |
| Laney | I would probably /dev/null anything that's not a reject | 11:57 |
| Laney | unless it turns out there's something else interesting in there | 11:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serial-test [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-1] (no packageset) | 11:58 | |
| Laney | basically wondering if you want to be able to opt in via a list orrrrr opt in via an RT ticket | 11:58 |
| Laney | not sure there's anything particularly secret in there but if there is the list archives could be private | 11:58 |
| Laney | that feels easiest to me | 11:58 |
| apw | feel free to throw me on the list | 11:59 |
| apw | i am used to a firehose of lauchpad emails, and having to sort them for useful things | 12:00 |
| Laney | I guess there's already https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/ | 12:00 |
| cjwatson | Having it just be an alias for ubuntu-archive@lists doesn't seem awful | 12:03 |
| Laney | Nothing sensitive in the output in your experience? | 12:03 |
| Laney | if not, let's do that then | 12:03 |
| cjwatson | Hm | 12:04 |
| cjwatson | Two problems that maybe interact badly: ubuntu-archive@lists is moderated and ~ubuntu-archive-robot gets a lot of mail; and it would be bad practice to allow ~ubuntu-archive-robot's email to go to a public list without moderation because there are probably ways that could be used to do bad things to the account | 12:04 |
| cjwatson | How about a new internal-only mailing list maybe? | 12:05 |
| Laney | Alright | 12:05 |
| cjwatson | Reading /home/cjwatson/mail/ubuntu/archive-robot... 24408/397994 (6%) | 12:06 |
| cjwatson | Not sure I've ever archived anything from that :) | 12:06 |
| cjwatson | (if it's a new mailing list, though, it needs to be configured to allow mails from LP without moderation. I can probably provide headers if need be) | 12:07 |
| cjwatson | Looking at this, I think just adding archive@ubuntu.com and noreply@launchpad.net to the permitted senders list would work fine | 12:09 |
| * Laney nods | 12:11 | |
| Laney | ok, request sent | 12:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serial-test [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-1] (no packageset) | 12:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1020.22+21.04.1] (core) | 12:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serial-test [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.1-1] | 12:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serial-test [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.1-1] | 12:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serial-test [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.1-1] | 12:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serial-test [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.1-1] | 12:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serial-test [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.1-1] | 12:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serial-test [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.1-1] | 12:27 | |
| xnox | Laney: can you please remove i386 binaries of src:grub2-unsigned in bionic-proposed xenial-proposed trusty-proposed? the grub-efi-amd64:i386 grub-efi-amd64-bin:i386 grub-efi-amd64-dbg:i386 ? as those will have to go back to 2.02 based versions from src:grub2 | 12:56 |
| Laney | xnox: I'm going to lunch now but I'd prefer you work with vorlon or someone who knows this better than I do if you don't mind. I don't feel super comfortable given that I'm coming to this kind of cold | 13:03 |
| xnox | ok | 13:33 |
| xnox | i will have all that staged in a ppa, to ensure all the things are right, and will upload into the archive. | 13:34 |
| xnox | and then will ask for vorlon to accept. | 13:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xsane [source] (focal-proposed) [0.999-8ubuntu2.1] | 14:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8.0-1020.22+21.04.1] | 14:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (bionic-proposed/main) [2:12.1.1-0ubuntu3 => 2:12.1.1-0ubuntu4] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 14:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.23 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.24] (core) | 14:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.31 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.32] (core) | 14:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (trusty-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.17 => 2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.23] (core) | 14:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: grub2-unsigned (hirsute-proposed/primary) [2.04-1ubuntu43] | 14:46 | |
| xnox | vorlon: ^^^^ | 14:47 |
| xnox | i guess trusty is not needed in primary, so please reject that one. | 14:47 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.23] | 14:53 | |
| apw | xnox, ^ | 14:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mmm a proposed-migration log is now 45MB... | 15:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/hirsute/2021-03-03/ | 15:02 |
| xnox | apw: tah. | 15:05 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvpn (groovy-proposed/main) [2.4.9-3ubuntu1 => 2.5.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 15:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-osconfig-agent [source] (groovy-proposed) [20210219.00-0ubuntu1~20.10.0] | 16:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted grub2-unsigned [source] (hirsute-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu43] | 16:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openvpn [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.5.1-1ubuntu1] | 16:13 | |
| vorlon | rbalint: ah, so a MoM bug that a package removed from Debian still shows up in the merge list. So you want me to remove kerneloops from Ubuntu as well? ubuntu-archive wasn't subscribed to that bug | 16:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-osconfig-agent [source] (focal-proposed) [20210219.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.0] | 16:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-osconfig-agent [source] (bionic-proposed) [20210219.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] | 16:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (groovy-proposed/main) [246.6-1ubuntu1.1 => 246.6-1ubuntu1.2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 16:23 | |
| vorlon | xnox: why would we move grub-efi-amd64-bin:i386 back to src:grub2 instead of adding grub2-unsigned to the i386 build whitelist? | 16:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (focal-proposed/main) [245.4-4ubuntu3.4 => 245.4-4ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist) | 16:26 | |
| rbalint | vorlon, ideally i'd like to hear kernel team's opinion | 16:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.44 => 237-3ubuntu10.45] (core) | 16:29 | |
| rbalint | apw, should kerneloops be dropped? | 16:29 |
| vorlon | thanks | 16:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (hirsute-proposed/none) [none => 2.04-1ubuntu43] (no packageset) | 16:31 | |
| vorlon | I realize now this has shown up in the process-removals list and I've been ignoring it for a while because of the Ubuntu delta :) | 16:31 |
| rbalint | vorlon, definitely not merge material :-) | 16:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cargo-outdated [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.9.9-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 16:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cargo-outdated [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.9.9-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 16:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cargo-outdated [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.9.9-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 16:44 | |
| xnox | vorlon: i can try that, please stand by. | 16:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cargo-outdated [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.9.9-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 16:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cargo-outdated [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.9.9-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 16:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu43 => 2.04-1ubuntu43] (no packageset) | 16:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cpp-macros [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cpp-macros [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cpp-macros [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cpp-macros [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cpp-macros [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:07 | |
| vorlon | xnox: expedited adding grub2-unsigned to the whitelist so that the next hirsute upload will build on i386 without any further futzing | 17:15 |
| vorlon | xnox: will I need to add grub2 to the whitelist as well? if I don't will we have i386 binaries from grub2-unsigned with unsatisfiable deps that will make britney sad? | 17:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cpp-macros [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added grub2-unsigned to i386-whitelist in hirsute | 17:43 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, | 17:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | autopkgtest for rust-glib/0.8.2-1: amd64: Regression ♻ , arm64: Regression ♻ , armhf: Regression ♻ , ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Regression ♻ | 17:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | autopkgtest for rust-onig/blacklisted: amd64: Not a regression, arm64: Not a regression, armhf: Regression ♻ , ppc64el: Not a regression, s390x: Not a regression | 17:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | is it possible to hint them two? rust-onig is already blacklisted, I don't get why it complains on armhf | 17:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and rust-glib fails also in Debian... | 17:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | also please kick rust-sha-1 out from release pocket, its buggy in Debian too and holding back rust migration | 17:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I think with 2 hints and one demotion to proposed we can see ~40 packages migrate | 17:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-cargo-outdated [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.9.9-1ubuntu1] | 18:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-cargo-outdated [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.9.9-1ubuntu1] | 18:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-cargo-outdated [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.9.9-1ubuntu1] | 18:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-cpp-macros [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.6-1ubuntu1] | 18:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-cpp-macros [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.6-1ubuntu1] | 18:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-cpp-macros [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.6-1ubuntu1] | 18:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-cargo-outdated [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.9.9-1ubuntu1] | 18:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-cpp-macros [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.6-1ubuntu1] | 18:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-cpp-macros [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.6-1ubuntu1] | 18:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-cargo-outdated [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.9.9-1ubuntu1] | 18:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-cargo-outdated [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.9.9-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 18:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-cpp-macros [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.6-1ubuntu1] | 18:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-cargo-outdated [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.9.9-1ubuntu1] | 18:32 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | slyon, will you post patches to the respective debian bugs ^^ ? | 18:48 |
| === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch | ||
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: why did Debian allow rust-glib autopkgtests to regress in testing? | 19:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | who knows... its... rust | 19:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | maybe transitions and uninstallabilities makes tracking it hard | 19:11 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: rust-onig, had a successful test run on armhf of 6.1.0-1 previously and is now blacklisted. Does it need to be blacklisted there? | 19:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | force-test-reset on armhf maybe? | 19:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | if the test is blacklisted should it be reset anyway? | 19:12 |
| vorlon | ok Laney blacklisted it for sensible reasons that apply to armhf on lxd also even if they don't necessarily cause rust-onig's own tests to fail | 19:12 |
| vorlon | (they would just make *other* tests fail on the same lxd host by consuming all the shared disk :P) | 19:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ok but how can an blacklisted test ever run successfully? | 19:13 |
| vorlon | oh but also https://bugs.debian.org/973657 is fixed | 19:13 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 973657 in src:rust-onig "src:rust-onig: autopkgtest uses enormous amount (> 25 GB) of disk space" [Important,Fixed] | 19:13 |
| vorlon | a blacklisted test can't run successfully, it ran successfully before the blacklist was added | 19:13 |
| vorlon | anyway we should just remove the blacklist for this one now | 19:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, this doesn't explain what I see on excuses | 19:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | autopkgtest for rust-onig/blacklisted: amd64: Not a regression, arm64: Not a regression, armhf: Regression ♻ , ppc64el: Not a regression, s390x: Not a regression | 19:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | on armhf its shown as regressed | 19:16 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: it does explain. It's regressed because the test previously *succeeded* on armhf due to the lxd host having enough disk space to accommodate; and then it was blacklisted; so all subsequent test requests from britney for this package get returned with version 'blacklisted', as a failure, with the test never run | 19:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ok but if a package is blacklisted, shouldn't previous passes just be discarded? | 19:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | anyway if you unblacklist even better | 19:17 |
| vorlon | that's not how it's implemented | 19:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ack :) | 19:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | maybe can you please do also something for rust-sha-1? | 19:19 |
| vorlon | still working through the others | 19:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks, I admit I can't understand if the blacklist/hint/sha-1 are the only blockers | 19:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I need some britney run before figuring out if something else is missing :) | 19:22 |
| vorlon | rust-onig unblacklisted, tests retriggered | 19:25 |
| slyon | LocutusOfBorg: yes, I'll submittodebian tomorrow | 19:27 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 19:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added grub2 to i386-whitelist in hirsute | 19:28 | |
| slyon | I have some more of those in the pipeline | 19:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | slyon, if you need somebody to NMU them let me know | 19:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | you sumbit, we wait 10 days, we NMU, we sync, we profit | 19:29 |
| slyon | Sounds like a plan! | 19:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | :) | 19:31 |
| === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qiskit-aer [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1build1] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu43] | 23:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu43] | 23:35 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!