/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/03/05/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: visp [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)01:28
mwhudsonvorlon: what's the process for getting a package (libgit2) built on i386?03:05
xnoxhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/i386 => there is modifying dependencies & transitioning abis03:35
xnoxmwhudson:  i guess this is modifying dependencies? hence you need to add source package to i386 seed in git, and ask AA to rerun update?03:35
xnoxmwhudson:  rmfile, truncate file, setup loopdevice, mkfs -L scratch loopdevice => filesystem with label scratch present, would you like to continue?05:53
xnoxmwhudson:  i love that on a brand new file, one has to clean it first =)))))05:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.7 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.8] (ubuntu-server, virt)07:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (groovy-proposed/main) [6.6.0-1ubuntu3.3 => 6.6.0-1ubuntu3.4] (ubuntu-server, virt)07:57
=== acheronuk is now known as RikMills
dokoLaney: update-motd now fails consistently on all archs. is that file permission error for debian/tests? make the package a v3 package and change the permissions in the source?08:40
Laneydoko: I'll look, I was trying to get results in bileto but it never ran there so I gave up and copied it to get runs in the archive09:01
dokoLocutusOfBorg: visp ftbfs09:04
Laneyyeah I guess it lost the +x when uploading because of 1.009:06
LaneyI ran it from the source directory rather than the .dsc when testing locally I guess, that's why it worked09:06
Laneywonder if it should be native or quilt09:08
sigvif that's a direct question of the difference: native when debian/ is in source respository/tarball directly. quilt when debian/ is added from a diff/patch on top of source tarball.09:09
sigvwithout going into further details, that's a way to summarize the high level.09:10
sigvimpacts expectations about how updates to source versions are interpreted, and so on, but at its core it's about whether a package is built directly from original source (native) or packaging is external (quilt).09:11
sigvfeels like you should know that however. :/09:11
Laneyhaha09:11
Laneythanks sigv, no I was more asking which one would be right to use here09:12
sigvwell, the core point then still stands: does debian/ live in the source directly and packages get built from the tarballs without patching, or are custom diffs applied?09:12
sigvbecause you don't expect debian/patches in a `native`. that is the main development workflow difference that guides that decision...09:14
LaneyThe other one is that native packages always have their entire source uploaded; that's why ubuntu-wallpapers isn't one for example09:15
sigvbinary/large blobs can be a pain there, makes sense.09:15
LocutusOfBorgdoko, yes I saw it09:16
LocutusOfBorgwill have a lokk09:16
LaneyBut tools these days can handle generating orig tarballs anyway, excluding the debian/ directory, so they can live together just fine in non native packages09:16
sigvif you have a native, then you are expecting all patches to be applied on the project directly as well, and can't just plonk in a debian/patches without going through upstream.09:18
LaneyIt does have some random changes in the diff outside of Debian patches09:19
LaneyI'm going to pick native :-)09:19
Laneythanks for the discussion09:19
sigvnative is a good choice, if you can push the debian/ to the source repo and maintain patches inside that source repo, yeah.09:19
* sigv wishes luck09:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (bionic-proposed/main) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.18 => 4.0.0-1ubuntu8.19] (ubuntu-server, virt)10:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (xenial-proposed/main) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.30 => 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.31] (ubuntu-server, virt)10:09
xnoxLaney:  removing tag off grub2, and it should migrate fine this time, because it is built with i386 in hirsute now.11:10
Laneybest of luck little grubs11:11
Laneycjwatson: I think ubuntu-archive-robot's email address should be updatable when you've got a moment to do that. Looks like the list works11:13
parideo/11:33
paridethe last two hirsute-live-server-amd64 ISOs install unbootable systems when installing in UEFI mode11:34
xnoxparide:  perfect.11:35
xnoxparide:  cd-boot-images using the new grub with lots of security patches landed two days ago.11:36
cjwatsonLaney: are you able to accept my list subscription?11:36
xnoxparide:  but not yet grub. So iso boots, but the installed system doesn't?11:36
paridexnox, yes exactly11:36
xnoxlovely11:36
Laneycjwatson: hmm no, I thought IS were going to subscribe everyone in that Launchpad team11:38
LaneyI asked for the admins to be list mods, which includes you IIRC11:38
Laney(I'm subscribed; I got a welcome message, and vorlon replied to my test mail to the list)11:39
paridexnox, not really informative but this is what happens then the installed system tries to boot: https://people.ubuntu.com/~paride/misc/Screenshot.png11:39
cjwatsonLaney: Sounds lovely but AFAICS I'm not11:39
Laneyif you didn't see that mail, then I guess no indeed11:40
cjwatsone.g. hyperkitty just tells me "you must be subscribed to view the archives"11:40
LaneyI guess I'll ping IS and ask them to double check, please stand by11:40
cjwatsonta11:40
cjwatson(huh, I'm apparently on ubuntu-archive-robot-owner@lists ...)11:41
=== popey8 is now known as popey
Laneythere's a link I could click to confirm the change11:58
xnoxparide:  ah, nah, that's fine, that's just broken lvm package.12:06
xnoxparide:  will be fixed once https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/2.03.11-2ubuntu3 migrates.12:06
Laneywe should revert lvm in release shouldn't we12:06
xnoxseb128: slyon: looks like our installer tests did catch lvm2 bug as per paride above.12:06
xnoxLaney:  probs. cause this lvm2 rebuild looks like stuck behind autopkgtests.12:07
Laneyi'll do it12:07
paridexnox, does it make sense that bios installs work?12:07
Laneysomeone else can wrangle those tests12:07
xnoxparide: with lvm?12:08
* xnox is puzzled12:08
xnoxyeah, some go thing fails to build.12:08
slyonxnox: that's good. But an lvm2 autopkgtest would probably be even better, to catch it earlier12:08
paridexnox, let me double check12:08
Laneyit is done12:10
xnoxLaney:  thank you12:18
paridexnox, bios install is also broken, not sure why it passes on the platform-qa jenkins12:20
paridebut fails locally12:20
xnoxparide:  good.12:22
Laneyicey: hey could you look into cinder/armhf autopkgtest failure please? looks more likely to be container related than armhf related to me13:01
iceylooking13:03
Laneythink I'll add a badtest hint, so it'll need to be fixed for the next version13:05
iceyLaney: in essence, it looks like it's from the new addition of python3-rtslib-fb, and that failing with a modprobe error13:06
Laneyyup13:06
Laneyif cinder is supposed to work inside a container, that is something to fix13:07
Laneyotherwise Restrictions: isolation-machine is available to you :-)13:07
iceywell, cinder doesn't require python3-rtslib-fb to work in all cases13:07
Laneyor a ConditionVirtualization on the unit in question or something13:07
iceyLaney: any idea how this was handled with tgt previously?13:08
Laneymostly for someone who knows the software to decide on :>13:08
Laneysorry afraid not13:08
iceyah no worries13:08
iceyLaney: thanks for the poke, I have a thought on fixing it13:10
Laneygreat, thanks!13:10
Laneyok so lvm2 should go in next time as far as I can see13:11
Laneycjwatson: IS says the subscriptions should be fixed. I tried clicking the links myself but they don't work for me - guess you have to be logged in as the account being manipulated13:24
* Laney vanishes for Mandatory Daily Walk13:24
rbasaksil2100: o/ looking at unattended-upgrades in the Xenial queue (carried over from yesterday)13:27
cjwatsonLaney: Yeah, they're not13:28
cjwatsonSomething is weird13:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected unattended-upgrades [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.7]13:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.7]13:32
iceyhey Laney: do you know if there's a packaging thing that would allow installing a dependency if not in a container?13:43
sil2100rbasak: hey! o/ Ok! Though since it's Friday, it's Timo's SRU day o/ tjaalton ^14:23
tjaaltonyup14:23
rbasakOh, right. Sorry, I forgot what day it was.14:26
rbasakAnyway, it's done and accepted :)14:26
tjaaltonthat's fine :)14:30
Laneyicey: nope, I think you need to make the thing itself deal with that using something like ConditionVirtualization if that's appropriate14:47
iceyLaney: as it turns out, there's already a bug for this that I'm now working on: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-rtslib-fb/+bug/1865037:-D14:47
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1865037 in python-rtslib-fb (Ubuntu) "make the service fail gracefully if unable to load modules" [High,Triaged]14:47
Laneynothing gets past cpaelzer!14:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (focal-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.8]14:58
cjwatsonLaney: OK, fixed the mailman confusion and I've switched ubuntu-archive-robot's email address over now15:00
cjwatsonSo in theory there should start to be much email there15:00
Laneycjwatson: cheers. Looking forward to it.15:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (groovy-proposed) [6.6.0-1ubuntu3.4]15:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [390.141-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 390.141-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-desktop)15:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.31]15:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opencryptoki [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.14.0+dfsg-0ubuntu3.1]15:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opencryptoki [source] (focal-proposed) [3.13.0+dfsg-0ubuntu5.1]15:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opencryptoki [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.9.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1.4]15:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opencryptoki [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.4.1+dfsg-1ubuntu4.1]15:25
Laneyah there we go16:22
cjwatsonindeed, spammity spam16:30
cjwatsonerr, shall I see if I can turn off the [ubuntu-archive-robot] prefix?16:31
cjwatsoneveryone is surely going to be filtering this by list-id or something anyway16:32
cjwatsondone, will see if people complain16:33
Laneysure16:33
LaneyI already heard from seb128 and didrocks that they unsubbed :-)16:33
cjwatsonI'd suggest that people disable delivery rather than unsubbing - that way they still have access to look in the archives if they need to debug something16:34
cjwatsonthat being the point of this16:35
=== _hc[m] is now known as _hc
RikMillsI would quite like to get the new flameshot (screenshot) tool into hirsute. Since that missed feature freeze by just 2 days, and is not seeded anywhere, is there a chance I could get that in without FFe paperwork?16:51
RikMillshttps://github.com/flameshot-org/flameshot/releases16:52
RikMills"Improved Wayland support on Gnome" is interesting16:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [0.136ubuntu6.4]17:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.173.20]17:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-settings [source] (bionic-proposed) [460.39-0ubuntu0.18.04.2]17:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [source] (bionic-proposed) [390.141-0ubuntu0.18.04.2]17:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (groovy-proposed/main) [2.1.10ubuntu0.2 => 2.1.10ubuntu0.3] (core, i386-whitelist)18:53
juliank^ launchpad generated the diff against 2.1.11 instead of 2.1.10ubuntu0.2, sorry for that19:02
juliankI don't know why I didn't go for 2.1.11ubuntu0.1 last update19:02
juliankthat would fix the issue19:03
juliank2.1.11 was a subset of the changes in 2.1.10ubuntu0.219:03
juliankBut it got overthrown by 2.1.10ubuntu0.1 security update, so I went on from there19:03
julianknow all the diffs are off19:04
juliankBut at least it will be over in a few months :D19:04
juliank(suggest to use git-ubuntu for this SRU review)19:04
vorlonmwhudson: built on i386 is "ask an AA to build it and explain why it's wanted"19:50
vorlonmwhudson: is this needed for debcargo?19:59
tewardcjwatson: vorlon: can you take a stab and check the iso builders to see if your syncs froze up again?  Lubuntu version mismatches after a forced rebuild21:02
tewardunless the sync system hasn't run yet for the daily run21:02
tewardcc wxl21:02
cjwatsonBleh21:05
cjwatsonThis is fundamentally about Laney's germinate timeout thing that I need to get round to finishing reviewing21:05
cjwatsonIn the meantime let me cancel some livefs builds and that should unstick things eventually21:05
cjwatson(livefs builds are getting stuck, so sets of image builds are never finishing, so the lock stays held)21:07
wxlsigh i guess i should have looked at the list. it's obvious it is still stuck on 1ubuntu4021:12
wxli had hoped the issue was that the new grub had come almost right when we got our new iso so i was thinking maybe one package had migrated but not the other but i guess that's not the case21:13
cjwatsonIt's finishing up some slightly out-of-order image builds now but is getting there21:13
cjwatsonI'll run new Lubuntu builds once the logjam has cleared21:14
wxlthanks cjwatson21:14
cjwatsonmerged that germinate fix (for bug 1912495) and uploaded to Debian; I'll sync it once it works its way through various pipelines.  somebody will still need to sort out SRUs, but that should at least start helping to lower the failure probability21:37
ubot5bug 1912495 in germinate (Ubuntu) "Can hang forever in downloading" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/191249521:37
cjwatsonteward,wxl: 20210305.2 is on its way out and looks better21:58
wxlthanks cjwatson22:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: visp [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)22:02
vorlonapw_: lotsa kernel packages listed as reverse-build-deps of dh-systemd on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html, can you update them to drop this build-dep? (since you already build-dep on debhelper-compat 10, and dh-systemd became a transitional package with debhelper 9.20160709, the B-D can just be dropped from bionic and later)22:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: visp [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)22:08
vorlonapw_: (actually even the xenial version is newer)22:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: visp [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)22:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: visp [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)22:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: visp [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)22:41

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!