| tomreyn | i promise, i didn't drink and ops | 00:05 |
|---|---|---|
| tomreyn | it's just late ;-) | 00:05 |
| krytarik | Haha.. XD | 00:05 |
| krytarik | What client you using again? | 00:05 |
| tomreyn | hexchat | 00:06 |
| tomreyn | i know there are scripts but i'm not a real fan of those | 00:06 |
| krytarik | Ah ok, then not. >_< | 00:06 |
| tomreyn | thanks, though | 00:06 |
| sarnold | heh I've been meaning to read through unit193's script for ages to figure out how it works, but whenever a miscreant shows up doesn't feel like the time to do it, and when there's no one around to make trouble, there's no need :) | 00:07 |
| krytarik | They do make things like account and IP bans easier though.. | 00:07 |
| leftyfb | tomreyn: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/NTsw7TvHBk/ there ya go | 00:24 |
| leftyfb | tomreyn: I'm just giving you a heads. They haven't done anything to warrant a boot yet, but that's their game. They teeter on the edge | 00:25 |
| tomreyn | thanks leftyfb, can i quote what you wrote in -discuss here? | 00:26 |
| leftyfb | sure | 00:26 |
| tomreyn | <leftyfb> tomreyn: ptah is a troll ... that was probably their alt that you banned | 00:27 |
| tomreyn | <leftyfb> I've got some stuff from 2016 along the same lines ... they're part of the "efnet news" troll group. They've been trolling channels on Efnet for years | 00:27 |
| tomreyn | <leftyfb> coming up with arcane questions is part of their game ... they half make it seem like they're legitimate questions | 00:27 |
| tomreyn | <leftyfb> this particular one was pinging me earlier asking me if I was the same one who wouldn't play their game on EFnet earlier today. | 00:27 |
| tomreyn | <leftyfb> and CTCP'ing random people | 00:27 |
| tomreyn | i just looked through my channel logs and i can see that others have previously reported that this nickname on this same address was ctcp spamming | 00:28 |
| tomreyn | right now it's calm, but this is good to know. | 00:29 |
| HackerII | https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=ted%20gunderson&kind=video | 00:29 |
| tomreyn | krytarik: i may have hit some wasp nest there | 00:30 |
| leftyfb | tomreyn: some more logs from efnet ... they are very passive in thieir trolling: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/ZpMBtYG484/ | 00:30 |
| krytarik | tomreyn: Nah, we'll be fine! XD | 00:30 |
| krytarik | tomreyn: It's more like the wasp net hit you.. >_< | 00:32 |
| tomreyn | yes, i guess | 00:32 |
| tomreyn | and i forgot this channel is logged. | 00:32 |
| sarnold | I've invited sigyn to a handful of channels, but I don't have ops everywhere | 00:45 |
| Unit193 | Do not allow it in -meeting. | 01:00 |
| sarnold | no? | 01:07 |
| sarnold | (it's acedemic, I tried, I don't have ops there :) | 01:08 |
| Unit193 | I mean, it'd be pretty funny next desktop meeting when half the people are klined, but maybe not ideal. :> | 01:09 |
| sarnold | is it *that* aggressive? | 01:11 |
| teward | yes it can be | 01:13 |
| teward | there was one time it klined *me* by accident, and caught me in the crossfire while hitting others. It did not go well for Freenode that day when they had to deal with an angry teward :P | 01:13 |
| teward | sarnold: ^ | 01:14 |
| teward | as for not having ops in -meeting that's cause you have no cloak that lets you have +o. TECHNICALLY even my ubuntu member cloak lets me +o if I have to in -meeting to fix things or help chair a meeting when people get stuck. :P | 01:14 |
| sarnold | man if we could harness the energy of an angry teward we could turn off the last of our coal-fired power plants :) | 01:18 |
| teward | well if you want to mess around with antimatter-levels of insane energy, then go ahead, but :P | 01:18 |
| teward | sigyn can be evil when it's cracking down on people | 01:18 |
| teward | and it's *very* sensitive about flooding and rapid message repetition | 01:19 |
| tomreyn | it does warn users before it klines them, i think. i got warned a couple times but that was probably an earlier version. | 01:20 |
| Unit193 | sarnold: No, they spam lines and lines of text there. They do things weird. | 01:25 |
| sarnold | 'tis a silly place, lets not go there | 01:25 |
| Unit193 | tomreyn: No, it warns. teward just likes to ignore warnings. :> | 01:26 |
| teward | lol i just never am on IRC anymore xD | 01:26 |
| teward | unless I have to be :) | 01:26 |
| tomreyn | hehe, poor guy | 01:27 |
| teward | is someone from the IRCC here and can they do me a favor and initiate bannination of *!*Radio*@45.86.203.* in #lubuntu-offtopic as I just did in #lubuntu? It's that spammer guy with those links... | 01:31 |
| teward | I'd do it but apparently I forgot to ask +o in the lubuntu channels the last time I went through :) | 01:31 |
| teward | unless I can dredge up one of the other ops | 01:31 |
| krytarik | Somehow I think that's what the namespace ban list was intended for.. :3 | 01:42 |
| krytarik | Cause that's just the HackerII pal going around and causing trouble everywhere they can think of and get in.. | 01:44 |
| teward | perhaps. i don't have access to add a namespace ban though. has one been implemented yet? | 01:45 |
| sarnold | heh yeah I was thinking it'd be keen if we could just pop a mask into a bot and have it apply the ban for us in the dozens of channels we've got | 01:47 |
| teward | that'd be the namespace bans i think | 01:47 |
| tomreyn | https://freenode.net/kb/answer/extbans | 01:48 |
| tomreyn | ah i got you wrong | 01:48 |
| sarnold | oh the $j thing could do the trick | 01:49 |
| teward | i think that's what krytarik meant | 01:49 |
| teward | there ARE $j bans in places, but I don't know who can put into those lists. | 01:49 |
| krytarik | We've got '$j:#ubuntu-namespace-bans' on the ban list of all channels that are under the supervision of the Ubuntu IRC team, and as it turns out since 2016. | 01:51 |
| sarnold | Sat 06 01:51:03 [freenode] -!- Cannot join to channel #ubuntu-namespace-bans (You must be invited) | 01:52 |
| sarnold | hehe | 01:52 |
| tomreyn | probably need to /msg chanserv invite #ubuntu-namespace-bans | 01:52 |
| tomreyn | unless -ChanServ- You are not authorized to perform this operation. | 01:53 |
| krytarik | That's being handled solely by the IRCC though. | 01:53 |
| krytarik | And the idea of temporarily adding bans to it has been brought up previously, but never really hammered out yet. So it continued to be rather static and useless. | 01:56 |
| Unit193 | Well not useless, just not designed for this usecase. | 02:33 |
| Unit193 | I'm here now but I suspect it no longer matters. | 02:34 |
| sarnold | I suspect we're not done with him yet | 02:37 |
| krytarik | I did say "rather useless"! :P | 02:37 |
| krytarik | And yeah, I guess we'll see about their persistency.. | 02:38 |
| === j is now known as jess | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!