[00:18] utkarsh2102: i can't get these network-manager tests to pass even with isc-dhcp from the release pocket :/ === jamesh_ is now known as jamesh [07:30] araragh the rustc in release on s390x is too broken to bootstrap itself :( [07:33] mwhudson: hiya, oh really? :/ [07:33] well, I am not sure who to ask for help [07:33] should ubuntu-devel@l.u.c be a good place to start? [07:33] utkarsh2102: i'm like 90% sure that building with gcc-9 will make it pass [07:34] we could just upload that [07:34] oh you mean that same diff like in groovy? [07:34] or we could do the "test against a ppa" thing but that's pretty tedious [07:35] yeah, I could do that, that's not a problem [07:35] well, I have to request someone to trigger a test :P [07:35] happy to click links :) [07:35] although it's my evening now and i'm not going to be around much longer [07:36] but before I do that, my inital test would be to install a fixed isc-dhcp package on a VM and run those network-manager tests there to see if the issue is indeed fixed. [07:36] thank you and no problem, I am sure anyone could do that from the server team, I guess [07:36] yeah [07:37] btw, what did you try yesterday? [07:37] two things that I see to try are: "and something like the rules change from http://launchpadlibrarian.net/516062485/w1retap_1.4.4-4ubuntu1_1.4.4-4ubuntu2.diff.gz" [07:38] utkarsh2102: i ran autopkgtest -B . --- null on a canonistack ppc64el vm [07:38] and "trying this diff on the package: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/493173027/isc-dhcp_4.4.1-2.1ubuntu8_4.4.1-2.1ubuntu9.diff.gz?" [07:38] with various isc-dhcp-client packages installed: from release, built from proposed source, proposed source built with gcc-9 [07:38] and they all failed for reasons that made my head hurt [07:40] aw, thanks for doing that! [07:40] let me see if I get any lead on this. I am inclined towards reaching out to xnox (I wonder if they're around here?) [10:30] mwhudson: hey, look what I got: [10:30] Ran 9 tests in 95.362s [10:30] OK (expected failures=2) [10:30] all passing now! \o/ [10:33] thanks to your 90% certainity about compilation w/ gcc-9. it did indeed fix that! === mfo_ is now known as mfo === dasm_ is now known as dasm [14:52] waveform, ricotz: there was a scheduling error on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/Agenda. When are you expecting the meeting today? [14:53] rbasak, I planned 15 UTC but I saw earlier it is 19 utc [14:54] ah, and now it is 15 UTC again? [14:54] Yes the wiki page was accidentally changed incorrectly to say 19 UTC [14:55] Are you OK with 15 UTC, or would you prefer to postpone? [14:55] I am fine with 15 UTC [14:55] Thanks! [14:55] rbasak, was discussing this with sil2100 - I'm happy with either but have to finish by 19:30UTC if it's the later option [14:56] Let's all do 15 UTC then. [14:56] I think that works for everyone, and it's also the correct time, so hopefully will mean the other DMB members show up :) === Guest95017 is now known as _hc [17:09] seb128: did you stop doing rdep rebuilds for the libzip transition for any particular reason? [17:14] I'm opting out okular from that transition in the very short term, as I care more about the pdf support fixes in the new upstream okular than having support via libzip for MS chm files [19:25] RikMills, no, just hit end of week / +1 rotation and had to go back to other things I had left pending for longer that I should have, help finishing would be welcome [19:26] I expect most package should build without change but I just didn't have the free machine cycle and hours to confirm and upload [20:13] utkarsh2102: good! did you try the -O2/-O3 switch too? [20:13] utkarsh2102: building with gcc-9 is fine for hirsute i guess but not a truly long term solution [20:13] utkarsh2102: how much do you enjoy chasing toolchain bugs? :)