[00:18] <mwhudson> utkarsh2102: i can't get these network-manager tests to pass even with isc-dhcp from the release pocket :/
[07:30] <mwhudson> araragh the rustc in release on s390x is too broken to bootstrap itself :(
[07:33] <utkarsh2102> mwhudson: hiya, oh really? :/
[07:33] <utkarsh2102> well, I am not sure who to ask for help
[07:33] <utkarsh2102> should ubuntu-devel@l.u.c be a good place to start?
[07:33] <mwhudson> utkarsh2102: i'm like 90% sure that building with gcc-9 will make it pass
[07:34] <mwhudson> we could just upload that
[07:34] <utkarsh2102> oh you mean that same diff like in groovy?
[07:34] <mwhudson> or we could do the "test against a ppa" thing but that's pretty tedious
[07:35] <utkarsh2102> yeah, I could do that, that's not a problem
[07:35] <utkarsh2102> well, I have to request someone to trigger a test :P
[07:35] <mwhudson> happy to click links :)
[07:35] <mwhudson> although it's my evening now and i'm not going to be around much longer
[07:36] <utkarsh2102> but before I do that, my inital test would be to install a fixed isc-dhcp package on a VM and run those network-manager tests there to see if the issue is indeed fixed.
[07:36] <utkarsh2102> thank you and no problem, I am sure anyone could do that from the server team, I guess
[07:36] <mwhudson> yeah
[07:37] <utkarsh2102> btw, what did you try yesterday?
[07:37] <utkarsh2102> two things that I see to try are: "and something like the rules change from http://launchpadlibrarian.net/516062485/w1retap_1.4.4-4ubuntu1_1.4.4-4ubuntu2.diff.gz"
[07:38] <mwhudson> utkarsh2102: i ran autopkgtest -B . --- null on a canonistack ppc64el vm
[07:38] <utkarsh2102> and "trying this diff on the package: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/493173027/isc-dhcp_4.4.1-2.1ubuntu8_4.4.1-2.1ubuntu9.diff.gz?"
[07:38] <mwhudson> with various isc-dhcp-client packages installed: from release, built from proposed source, proposed source built with gcc-9
[07:38] <mwhudson> and they all failed for reasons that made my head hurt
[07:40] <utkarsh2102> aw, thanks for doing that!
[07:40] <utkarsh2102> let me see if I get any lead on this. I am inclined towards reaching out to xnox (I wonder if they're around here?)
[10:30] <utkarsh2102> mwhudson: hey, look what I got:
[10:30] <utkarsh2102> Ran 9 tests in 95.362s
[10:30] <utkarsh2102> OK (expected failures=2)
[10:30] <utkarsh2102> all passing now! \o/
[10:33] <utkarsh2102> thanks to your 90% certainity about compilation w/ gcc-9. it did indeed fix that!
[14:52] <rbasak> waveform, ricotz: there was a scheduling error on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/Agenda. When are you expecting the meeting today?
[14:53] <ricotz> rbasak, I planned 15 UTC but I saw earlier it is 19 utc
[14:54] <ricotz> ah, and now it is 15 UTC again?
[14:54] <rbasak> Yes the wiki page was accidentally changed incorrectly to say 19 UTC
[14:55] <rbasak> Are you OK with 15 UTC, or would you prefer to postpone?
[14:55] <ricotz> I am fine with 15 UTC
[14:55] <rbasak> Thanks!
[14:55] <waveform> rbasak, was discussing this with sil2100 - I'm happy with either but have to finish by 19:30UTC if it's the later option
[14:56] <rbasak> Let's all do 15 UTC then.
[14:56] <rbasak> I think that works for everyone, and it's also the correct time, so hopefully will mean the other DMB members show up :)
[17:09] <RikMills> seb128: did you stop doing rdep rebuilds for the libzip transition for any particular reason?
[17:14] <RikMills> I'm opting out okular from that transition in the very short term, as I care more about the pdf support fixes in the new upstream okular than having support via libzip for MS chm files
[19:25] <seb128> RikMills, no, just hit end of week / +1 rotation and had to go back to other things I had left pending for longer that I should have, help finishing would be welcome
[19:26] <seb128> I expect most package should build without change but I just didn't have the free machine cycle and hours to confirm and upload
[20:13] <mwhudson> utkarsh2102: good! did you try the -O2/-O3 switch too?
[20:13] <mwhudson> utkarsh2102: building with gcc-9 is fine for hirsute i guess but not a truly long term solution
[20:13] <mwhudson> utkarsh2102: how much do you enjoy chasing toolchain bugs? :)