[01:43] <ua_> the whole canonical betting on dart/flutter thing makes me think canonical is going to be google's bitch in near future just like mozilla, what do you guys think?
[02:57] <lotuspsychje> good morning
[07:23] <ducasse> good morning
[08:05] <marcoagpinto> Morning!
[08:14] <imrjd> hello folks
[08:15] <imrjd> good morning folks
[18:08] <lotuspsychje> !info mutter
[18:09] <lotuspsychje> bug #1690719 fixes in mutter
[21:13] <Bashing-om> UWN: Issue 673 is on the streets: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue673 :D
[22:18] <Nomenclatura> Somebody explain to me please how is that chrome-sandbox with 4755 in many snaps is not a humongous security hole
[22:24] <oerheks> what is chrome-sandbox?
[22:26] <Nomenclatura> https://github.com/electron/electron/issues/17972
[22:27] <Nomenclatura> Some snaps use it for "setting permissions". But I cannot understand why we need to trust a 3rd party binary with 4755 at all under NO circumstance at all.
[22:28] <Nomenclatura> If these need 'elevated permissions' to setup the container, I'd rather have a native helper to be called to create the container rather than a 3rd party binary doing it itself.
[22:29] <Nomenclatura> It is a security hole the size of Texas.
[22:30] <oerheks> good thing google chrome is not included
[22:30] <oerheks> and electron stuff, welll, some have an opinion about those
[22:34] <Nomenclatura> If an 'app' needs priviledges, they could call a trusted helper to do that instead.
[22:35] <Nomenclatura> I mean, of they need to set a container or something