[14:19] coreycb: do you know where we are with bug 1789177? I see an upload in the Bionic queue, but based on the bug comments it's not clear to me if you still want the upload to land or not, since the upload predates the comments. [14:19] bug 1789177 in python-oslo.messaging (Ubuntu Xenial) "RabbitMQ fails to synchronize exchanges under high load" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1789177 [14:28] rbasak: we'd still like that to get into bionic, but I've just asked seyeongkim if he can comment on the bug with his (dis)agreement [14:45] Hi, is pkgstripfiles running optipng on all PNGs something that is different between Ubuntu/Debian? [14:45] I've found a case where the build time run of optipng on some test-data files breaks these autopkgtests [14:46] but optipng is at the same version in Debian, and would break it there as well (manually tested) [14:46] so I wonder why this runs for us but not in the Debian build, but since this is an area I never touched I wanted to ask for some experience or guidance where to look at [14:48] cpaelzer: pkgstripfiles existing at all is different between Debian/Ubuntu [14:49] ok cjwatson that was an easy yet obvious answer then - thanks [14:49] np [14:49] I have already found NO_PNG_PKG_MANGLE which likely is my way out for now [14:49] yep [14:56] cpaelzer, yes [14:56] some perl applications had this issue when optimizing images === rharper_ is now known as rharper === Savicq is now known as Saviq === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson [18:41] thanks to whoever did the syncing/fixing of nix! [18:58] whoever keeps retrying php7.4 on riscv stop doing so, mysql seems to just be borked there and that needs fixing [18:59] that's bug #1915275 it seems [18:59] bug 1915275 in glibc (Ubuntu) "mysql-8.0 regressed on riscv64 due to new glibc" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1915275 [18:59] which is the remaining item for the libzip transition [19:01] cpaelzer, ^ unsure what 'server-next' means exactly as a tag but it would be nice to bump the priority now if possible === not_phunyguy is now known as phunyguy [21:25] Does anybody know how much RAM is alloted to systems running autopkgtests at ci.debian.net? [21:56] bdmurray: i found a thing which suggests 8G https://ci.debian.net/munin/ci-worker01/ci-worker01/memory.html [21:58] mwhudson: hmmm, m1.large also has 8G [22:01] Ah, I wasn't looking at s390x results for Debian. It fails there too. === popey3 is now known as popey [22:18] bdmurray: perhaps not a coincidence! === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand [23:30] bdmurray: confirmed that it's 8G for a debian runner [23:30] (in #debci on oftc) [23:35] mwhudson: thanks! [23:38] (in #debci on oftc) [23:38] pp[s [23:38] oops