[01:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-11 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [11-20210310-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[03:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: isc-dhcp (focal-proposed/main) [4.4.1-2.1ubuntu5 => 4.4.1-2.1ubuntu5.20.04.1] (core)
[03:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: isc-dhcp (bionic-proposed/main) [4.3.5-3ubuntu7.1 => 4.3.5-3ubuntu7.2] (core)
[06:26] <cpaelzer> doko: I've submited the dh-systemd B-D removal, but it already is an debhelper | dh-systemd so it isn't as bad as it might seem from the NBS report
=== _hc[m] is now known as _hc
[07:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-11 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [11-20210310-1ubuntu1]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected kdump-tools [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:1.6.8.2ubuntu1]
[08:28] <doko> dannf, apw_, sforshee: kdump-tools's source wants to promote to main, it's just a split-out, but needs a bug subscriber ...
[08:58] <apw_> doko, added
[08:59] <doko> and promoted
[10:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceilometer (focal-proposed/main) [1:14.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 1:14.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[10:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceilometer (groovy-proposed/main) [1:15.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:15.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)
[10:24] <Laney> I'm making big/long/never run handling live in its own git repo
[10:24] <Laney> should be auto deployed from the branch, means any release team member can change those
[10:25] <apw_> akin to a hints branch, sounds wonderful
=== apw_ is now known as apw
[10:25] <Laney> yeah like that
[10:25] <Laney> really the last thing I wanted to do before pushing the 'new' autopkgtest
[10:26] <Laney> so hopefully I'll be on track with doing that today (albeit unused)
[10:35] <Laney> https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs?h=main
[10:35]  * Laney makes the wip branch use that
[11:24] <tjaalton> I've filed a couple of FFE's, for mesa and xwayland, would appreciate if someone had a look
[12:39] <sil2100> coreycb: hey! Could you provide a test case for LP: #1896734 ?
[12:39] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1896734 in neutron (Ubuntu Groovy) "A privsep daemon spawned by neutron-openvswitch-agent hangs when debug logging is enabled (large number of registered NICs) - an RPC response is too large for msgpack" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1896734
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (groovy-proposed) [2:17.1.0-0ubuntu3]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.3.0-0ubuntu3]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted isc-dhcp [source] (groovy-proposed) [4.4.1-2.1ubuntu10]
[13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted isc-dhcp [source] (focal-proposed) [4.4.1-2.1ubuntu5.20.04.1]
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted isc-dhcp [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.3.5-3ubuntu7.2]
[13:29] <coreycb> dosaboy_: can you fill in the SRU template details for those neutron bugs?
[13:30] <coreycb> sil2100: thanks for taking a look. checking on that. ^
=== mfo is now known as Guest88258
[14:54] <juliank> Laney: Is it safe for me to do a manual run in the cloud to validate if https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/399088 passes with long_tests?
[14:55] <juliank> Not sure if you're playing with anything that would be disruptive to that effort :D
[14:55] <Laney> If you want
[14:55] <Laney> No
[14:55] <Laney> I would have thought Canonistack would be OK enough for that though, i.e. it would not require an admin
[14:55] <Laney> (Unless it's to do with proxies)
[14:55] <juliank> well I'd have thought that too, but oh well
[14:57] <Laney> It's up to you, but I would prefer people to self serve if they have the facilities available to them
[14:57] <Laney> so yeah, go for it
[14:58]  * Laney clones wip/mojo-juju-2 into the new env
[14:58] <Laney> time to try it
[15:04] <juliank> woooohooo
[15:24] <Laney> forgot I have to set all the secrets up
[15:24] <Laney> boring
[15:57] <juliank> Laney: Am I missing something I need to change to run the test manually in https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/cSQWRWFbWJ/? Every test I run failed with ssh timeouts :(
[15:58] <Laney> that locale thing messes it up I think
[15:58] <Laney> look for unset/export in the history
[16:01] <juliank> Laney: trying that, thanks
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: west-chamber (groovy-proposed/universe) [20100405+svn20111107.r124-12ubuntu0.2 => 20100405+svn20111107.r124-12ubuntu0.3] (kernel-dkms)
[16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: west-chamber (focal-proposed/universe) [20100405+svn20111107.r124-12ubuntu0.2~20.04.1 => 20100405+svn20111107.r124-12ubuntu0.3~20.04.1] (kernel-dkms)
=== powersj_ is now known as powersj
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.10 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.10.0-1017.18] (no packageset)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.10 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.10.0-1017.18]
=== theloudspeaker_ is now known as The_LoudSpeaker
[20:18] <LocutusOfBorg> Logan, should we sync 0ad from experimental?
[20:26] <Logan> LocutusOfBorg please see LP: #1918179
[20:26] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1918179 in 0ad (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync 0ad 0.0.24b-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1918179
[20:27] <Logan> I made the mistake of syncing 0ad-data before making sure 0ad was also safe to sync (which it doesn't appear to be) :/
[20:29] <LocutusOfBorg> ack thanks
[20:29] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/21147378
[20:29] <LocutusOfBorg> I syncd on my ppa, lets see how the build goes
[20:31] <LocutusOfBorg> oh new cargo... damn
[21:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-11-cross [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)