| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| seb128 | libzip migrate \o/ thanks cpaelzer ! | 13:22 |
|---|---|---|
| cpaelzer | yw seb128 | 13:43 |
| cpaelzer | let us hope it really does migrate and not hit any last minute issues | 13:44 |
| cpaelzer | or did it complete by now | 13:44 |
| cpaelzer | oh yeah it did \o/ | 13:44 |
| cpaelzer | seb128: maybe I can trade that fro some AA need I have? | 13:46 |
| cpaelzer | seb128: I was pinging doko this morning, but he seems busy | 13:46 |
| cpaelzer | seb128: another +1 think I found was spyder https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#spyder | 13:46 |
| cpaelzer | it had a bunch of issues, with all but one resolved by now | 13:46 |
| cpaelzer | the one that is left is that spyder-reports is incompatible | 13:46 |
| cpaelzer | I'd like to ask that we go the same way as Debian did on that which is remov spyder-reports and let the rest migrate | 13:47 |
| cpaelzer | https://tracker.debian.org/news/1235339/spyder-reports-removed-from-testing/ | 13:47 |
| cpaelzer | seb128: if you'd agreee could you do that removal for me so this can migrate as well? | 13:48 |
| seb128 | cpaelzer, k, let me check that one | 13:56 |
| seb128 | cpaelzer, removed | 14:31 |
| cpaelzer | thank you seb128 | 14:31 |
| seb128 | np! | 14:31 |
| === ebarretto_ is now known as ebarretto | ||
| === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch | ||
| JawnSmith | Is any core dev available to restart the failed python3-pynvim autopkgtests that are blocking python3-defaults? I believe the new version of python-msgpack resolves the issue. | 17:43 |
| ginggs | JawnSmith: . | 17:50 |
| JawnSmith | Thanks again ginggs! | 17:50 |
| ginggs | yw! | 17:51 |
| === mfo_ is now known as mfo | ||
| teward | doko: you TIL for `rar`, is that synced to Multiverse from debian, or is that handled by Ubuntu? Asking because it looks odd that `rar` only is on i386 and amd64, and not the ports (RPi, etc.) while `unrar` is fully available on the arm archs. | 21:38 |
| teward | was wondering if you knew anything about that | 21:38 |
| teward | (was digging into an Lubuntu issue when I discovered this) | 21:38 |
| cjwatson | teward: easy to check, compare with https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rar | 21:46 |
| cjwatson | teward: https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/r/rar/control-2%3A5.5.0-1 has the arch limitation too | 21:46 |
| cjwatson | looks just not super well-maintained | 21:46 |
| teward | hmm makes sense. seems like there's something going awry there though, with it not being maintained. I'm assuming it's closed source proprietary if it's in Multiverse.) | 21:47 |
| cjwatson | teward: however from the "source code" it's clear enough why it's only available on a couple of arches: https://sources.debian.org/src/rar/2:5.5.0-1/ | 21:47 |
| teward | pfft | 21:47 |
| teward | figures it ships the prebuilts | 21:48 |
| teward | this explains a lot | 21:48 |
| teward | *makes notes on this limitation for things* | 21:48 |
| teward | if i had any knowledge of the internals on creating RAR files I'd consider creating some other `rar` tool but I don't have the knowledge, and ERR:TOOBUSY | 21:48 |
| cjwatson | there's no sign that source exists publicly here. | 21:49 |
| teward | yeah the license files explain it too | 21:50 |
| teward | TL;DR it's WinRAR's rar but built for linux. | 21:50 |
| cjwatson | and I don't know how much to believe https://peazip.github.io/free-rar-create.html (which was just the first hit on some search terms) but it suggests that no free reimplementation can legally exist | 21:50 |
| teward | at least, if i'm understanding the license on there right. | 21:50 |
| cjwatson | which I think means nobody should morally support this format. | 21:51 |
| teward | *rolls eyes* I don't disagree | 21:51 |
| teward | ... there's no way we can `rm -rf` the `rar` non-free utility from Ubuntu without everyone being supremely mad at us is there? (since 'unrar' is made under a similar license on the 'no reverse engineering') | 21:52 |
| teward | (i can see keeping unrar, but i'd love to take the proverbial nuke to the `rar` binaries themselves. | 21:52 |
| cjwatson | I don't know. it's probably no worse than a bunch of other stuff in multiverse. | 21:53 |
| teward | well when amd64 eventually dies in a decade or more, RAR will die anyways :P | 21:54 |
| teward | *shrugs* | 21:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!