[00:40] weird, my browser give a warning with the developer website https://snapcraft.io/phaktionz >>https://www.mkproj.com/Phaktionz/ [00:41] "This server could not prove that it is www.mkproj.com; its security certificate is from www.github.com. This may be caused by a misconfiguration or an attacker intercepting your connection." === benfrancis0 is now known as benfrancis [07:10] morning [07:34] heh, started seeing the unit tests fail frequently when opensuse packages are automatically rebuilt on obs, probably the build hosts are less beefy now [07:55] mborzecki: interessting, any patterns? [07:55] mborzecki: fwiw, we see this too in LP on the slower arches and sometimes on i386 but it's all a bit random [07:56] mvo: client timtout exceeded or even hits an i/o timeout, and one other test with retry counts is failing [07:56] mvo: i suppose the hosts are really vms and very slow at that too [07:57] yeah, i/o timeout indicates soething really slow :/ [08:12] mvo: a trivial PR to look at https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10041 [08:12] PR #10041: interfaces/builtin: update unit tests to use proper distro's libexecdir [08:15] PR snapd#10041 closed: interfaces/builtin: update unit tests to use proper distro's libexecdir [09:05] PR snapd#10043 opened: o/servicestate: detect and forbid attempts to control user daemons [10:31] heh, i cannot install lxd on arch: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/3gkk3XSWTx/ [14:17] hey amurray, can i please get a resolution on https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/request-for-auto-connection-of-jami-network-manager/22833/4 ? it's been a blocker for us for nearly a month now [14:23] mwhudson, yo ... i'm trying to build a page that links to the sources of each and every released core/18/20 snap ... looking at dpkg.list of the most recent core18 there is a "console-conf 0.0.29👍8.04.2" but launchpad does not know that version anywhere, neither in the main archive, nor in the snappy-dev image PPA ... any idea where that version comes from ? (bionic itself only has 0.0.29 without suffix it seems) [14:27] sil2100, ^^^ any idea ? do we use any other PPAs for core18 builds beyond snappy-dev/image ? [14:32] argh ... okay .,, seems i found https://launchpad.net/~canonical-foundations/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-image [14:32] what a pain === alan_g_ is now known as alan_g [16:46] * cachio__ lunch [19:03] doko: sorry for not getting back to you earlier. I looked at removing dh-systemd from the build-depends but it's a bit tricky, we use the same debian/control from 16.04+ so if at all possilbe I would like to keep it this way. any suggestions for me? [19:15] mvo,doko: I think something like `Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9.20160709~) | dh-systemd` ought to be backport-friendly [19:30] cjwatson: awesome, thank you so much ! [19:42] PR snapd#10044 opened: packaging: drop dh-systemd from build-depends on ubuntu-16.04+ [20:45] * cachio__ afk [20:51] What's the best way to contact people responsible for the Snap Brand Store ? [20:54] om26er: you can reach out to sales@canonical.com [20:54] ijohnson I sent a query from the Ubuntu website, I guess it goes to that email as well ? [21:32] om26er: I don't know for sure, but yes both that email and the ubuntu website will end up at the same set of people who will get back to you [21:32] om26er: if you don't hear back from anyone in a day or so, feel free to let us know here and I can go poke people manually to get in touch with you, but they are always very responsive, just many of them are in EU right now :-) [21:52] PR snapd#10045 opened: cmd/snap/pack: unhide the compression option [22:49] bandali: I see there was some discussion on this earlier that this may not be strictly required - can you confirm via the forum if this is definitely necessary for jami to function? [22:52] amurray, i think i had done that in an earlier reply of mine (where i also showed output from jami); but i can double check over the coming days to be sure [22:53] thanks [22:53] cheers [23:07] ogra: yeah some special fun there