=== pieq_ is now known as pieq | ||
=== sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie | ||
_hc | hello all, I'm a DD and I'm checking in on the status of my packages in Ubuntu/hirsute. This update seems to be stuck in "proposed" even though it made it into Debian/testing/bullseye a while ago: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/androguard | 08:20 |
---|---|---|
_hc | is there something I can do to get it unstuck? | 08:20 |
Unit193 | First stop would be to https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/hirsute/update_excuses.html#androguard where you can see autopkgtest regressions. | 08:28 |
Unit193 | (See also: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#pkg-androguard - http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/androguard) | 08:35 |
_hc | could someone retrigger those failed runs? it seems like something killed the tests | 08:37 |
_hc | I tried but I don't have permissions | 08:37 |
_hc | it is passing on all arches in Debian/bullseye https://ci.debian.net/packages/a/androguard/ | 08:38 |
_hc | all supported arches | 08:38 |
Unit193 | Yeah, I did so when you first asked. | 08:41 |
_hc | thanks | 08:41 |
ginggs | _hc: out of memory. Killed in the log and passing on armhf are reliable indicators of that | 11:30 |
seb128 | so, I triggered ['chromium-browser/89.0.4389.82-0ubuntu0.18.04.1'] for bionic/amd64 earlier | 11:31 |
_hc | do ubuntu's runners have less RAM than Debian's? Is there something I should do? | 11:31 |
seb128 | but there is no result showing on https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/chromium-browser/bionic/amd64 and it's not in the running page | 11:32 |
seb128 | how can I tell what happened there? is that pending a webpage refresh? | 11:32 |
seb128 | did it silently fail for some reason and if so how do I tell that's the case? | 11:32 |
ginggs | _hc: much less. androguard needs to be added to the big_packages list so the test will run on a bigger cloud instance. i've been meaning open a MR for some other packages, i'll add yours to the list | 11:37 |
_hc | thanks! | 11:38 |
Laney | seb128: it seems to be there, I'm guessing you were just waiting for it to be fetched by the website | 11:48 |
seb128 | Laney, ah, I should have waited a bit more, thanks :) | 12:13 |
seb128 | oSoMoN, so yeah, it's also failing, not specific to the ppa | 12:13 |
oSoMoN | seb128, ack, thanks for confirming this | 12:48 |
seb128 | np! | 12:49 |
=== mfo_ is now known as mfo | ||
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks | ||
=== alan_g_ is now known as alan_g | ||
cjwatson | rbalint: Sorry for the long delay! I'm getting copious coffee and working on a reply now ... | 16:25 |
rbalint | rbasak, ^ , guess :-) | 16:26 |
cjwatson | Ugh, sorry | 16:26 |
cjwatson | Quite right | 16:26 |
rbasak | Thanks! | 16:39 |
=== dosaboy_ is now known as dosaboy | ||
=== balloons8 is now known as balloons | ||
coreycb | Hello release team, I would like to sync python-dogpile.cache from debian experimental as it's needed by a new version of python-oslo.cache for OpenStack. | 20:02 |
rbasak | Trevinho: do we need to revert the sssd SRU? | 23:54 |
Trevinho | rbasak: It's not clear to me what are the affected cases, as that comment looks more a warning, or what? | 23:56 |
rbasak | AFAICT, the reporter is giving us a use case that breaks auth when your SRU is applied? | 23:58 |
Trevinho | rbasak: yeah, not sure there's an actual case though? | 23:58 |
Trevinho | rbasak: I mean I hope so, so indeed would be better to proceed with safer upgrade if there's such risk | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!