| rbasak | ^ done, thanks | 00:35 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openbox [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.1-7ubuntu0.2] | 00:35 | |
| === pieq_ is now known as pieq | ||
| cpaelzer | LocutusOfBorg: yes I'll look after freecad | 05:58 |
| cpaelzer | it worked with the fix on a cannistack based build and in Debian, I wondere what it is now, loooking ... | 05:58 |
| cpaelzer | I see that you already did a rebuld which worked (on build) | 05:59 |
| cpaelzer | thanks | 05:59 |
| cpaelzer | And the original problem resolved as well with the autopkgtest on 0.19.1+dfsg1-2~build1 being good now | 06:00 |
| cpaelzer | at least on s390x, checking other arches now ... | 06:00 |
| RAOF | ddstreet: I'm actually off this week (and next), but it's because I've got childcare duties so I'll see if I can fit it in. | 06:52 |
| RAOF | ddstreet: bug #1853613 and bug #1864822 are missing the necessary SRU information; bdmurray asked for that on the 10th, and there doesn't appear to have been any activity since then? | 07:00 |
| ubot5 | bug 1853613 in neutron (Ubuntu) "VMs don't get ip from dhcp after compute restart" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1853613 | 07:00 |
| ubot5 | bug 1864822 in neutron (Ubuntu) "Openvswitch Agent - Connexion openvswitch DB Broken" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1864822 | 07:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes cpaelzer :D | 08:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks for looking at the armhf too | 08:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | what about ignoring the failure since it has been there since the begin, and its a problem in Debian too? | 08:37 |
| apw | xnox, i suspect as that doesn't get bound up with nvidia we can just let it die on the vine and replace it with the upcoming 5.11. ^ sforshee | 08:51 |
| Laney | The initial seeding of autopkgtest-cloud's database which is running in the new environment currently ... | 09:14 |
| Laney | it's been happening for 2 days now | 09:14 |
| Laney | means redeploys will be painful things, hmm | 09:15 |
| Laney | maybe we should look into backing that up and being able to seed a deployment with a pre-existing copy of the db | 09:16 |
| cpaelzer | LocutusOfBorg: this is my +1 time, which means looking after cases that usually are ignored :-) | 09:21 |
| cpaelzer | I'm looking for an ubuntu-archive member to consider https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iperf/+bug/1919432 please - anyone around? | 09:21 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1919432 in iperf (Ubuntu) "[REMOVE] please remove iperf 2.0.14a+dfsg1 fom hirsute-proposed" [Undecided,New] | 09:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | cpaelzer, I can do it then :D | 09:26 |
| tintou | Hi there, I get frequent crashes with the bamf daemon and would appreciate this to be available in focal 🙂 https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/4442 | 09:36 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, you are archive admin now? | 09:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | lol seb128 | 09:44 |
| seb128 | ? | 09:44 |
| seb128 | sorry I don't understand the joke if that's one | 09:44 |
| seb128 | should I handle that request or are you dealing with it? | 09:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | no cpaelzer was answering me something related to netgen/armhf build failure | 09:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but the context has been probably lost in messages sent days ago :) | 09:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this is why it looks funny now with the other messages written after | 09:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm not archive admin sorry! | 09:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | we were discussing about freecad (fixed now) and netgen on armhf that is the last blocker for migration | 09:46 |
| * LocutusOfBorg thinks that irc should gain a feature to answer to a specific message, otherwise different conversations are entangled and misunderstanding becomes common... discord has it | 09:46 | |
| cpaelzer | seb128: TL;DR yes please look after the iperf removal if you have the time for it atm | 09:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | opencascade should go in in ~10h cpaelzer :) | 10:03 |
| seb128 | cpaelzer, removed | 10:03 |
| cpaelzer | thanks seb128 | 10:03 |
| seb128 | np! | 10:03 |
| cpaelzer | LocutusOfBorg: how so, did you manage to further track down the sigbus on netgen? | 10:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | cpaelzer, I uploaded a patch to dh_auto_test || true on armhf | 10:16 |
| cpaelzer | ok, thanks | 10:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | since the archive won't regress (the sigbus has been there since lots of time) | 10:16 |
| cpaelzer | yes that also was my summary | 10:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes so the hammer looks ok wrt "archive sanity" | 10:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (btw armhf is built now!) | 10:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | cpaelzer, btw the debian issue is really the same, but unfortunately the link I provided changes when stuff is rebuilt, so it doesn't point anymore to the right failure | 10:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (wrt what you wrote on upstream issue) | 10:20 |
| cpaelzer | I expected that when not seeing an issue | 10:20 |
| cpaelzer | but I didn't know for sure that this was the case | 10:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yeah bad me | 10:21 |
| cpaelzer | np | 10:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I opened that bug after checking if debian was affected too | 10:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | btw, do you know that back in the days, we used to fix some armhf unaligned access by using -O0 there? | 10:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | let me try on ppa | 10:21 |
| cpaelzer | I happened to see a few -O0 and froce-gcc-9 fixes, but not for armhf unaligned access | 10:26 |
| ginggs | there's also a -mno-unaligned-access flag | 10:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | testing it now... | 10:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | didn't fix :/ | 11:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/528368416/buildlog_ubuntu-hirsute-armhf.netgen_6.2.2006+really6.2.1905+dfsg-2ubuntu3_BUILDING.txt.gz | 11:12 |
| ddstreet | RAOF ah sorry about that, i was requesting for a teammate and didn't notice they were missing sru data - i'll get them to fix that asap. thanks any enjoy your time off! | 11:23 |
| cpaelzer | the log does not show the || true | 11:24 |
| cpaelzer | so it seems it didn't enter that path at all | 11:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1110.122] (no packageset) | 11:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-206.238] (core, kernel) | 11:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1095.108] (no packageset) | 11:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-139.143] (core, kernel) | 11:32 | |
| ddstreet | rbasak on your sru shift today, if you have a chance can you review the neutron upload in the bionic queue | 11:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-139.143] (core, kernel) | 11:49 | |
| tjaalton | src:xwayland is stuck on the new queue for hirsute | 12:04 |
| sforshee | xnox, apw: I don't care much either way whether that linux-riscv migrates, we will be doing a 5.11 upload this week | 12:08 |
| apw | sforshee, but you do want to make sure that that upload doesn't have the pointeless udeb which is causing issues | 12:08 |
| sforshee | apw: of course. Our 5.11 tree has the noudeb profile support so I don't think it should, but we'll confirm before uploading | 12:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-206.238] | 12:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1110.122] | 12:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-139.143] | 12:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1095.108] | 12:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-139.143] | 12:12 | |
| xnox | sforshee: apw: horay =) doing 360s now. New riscv kernel would be nice, cause then we would be able to cron daily unmatched images. | 12:46 |
| === mfo_ is now known as mfo | ||
| === didrocks999 is now known as didrocks | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1110.122~16.04.1] (kernel) | 14:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1095.108~16.04.1] (kernel) | 14:50 | |
| doko | tjaalton: is this entirely new code, or split out from something? | 15:10 |
| === alan_g_ is now known as alan_g | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1110.122~16.04.1] | 15:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1095.108~16.04.1] | 15:17 | |
| vorlon | doko: hmm for some reason there are a number of udeb binaries left behind on s390x and riscv64 only https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/hirsute_outdate.txt I'm working on cleaning them up | 15:27 |
| doko | vorlon: could be the left-over that was built with the dpkg introducing noudeb removed from proposed and not yet avail in release | 15:29 |
| vorlon | they're all out-of-date udebs | 15:30 |
| doko | ahh, and we still need to remove the source packages that *only* build udebs, and block-list them | 15:30 |
| doko | like hw-detect | 15:30 |
| vorlon | so the newer source did build on these archs, dropping the udebs, but the binaries were left behind on s390x and riscv64 | 15:30 |
| vorlon | and I spot-checked and the binaries seem to have been manually removed by you on the other archs | 15:30 |
| doko | vorlon: will you remove these, or should I? | 15:33 |
| doko | tjaalton: so xwayland is a copy of xorg-xserver ... accepting that | 15:33 |
| vorlon | doko: I'm taking care of them | 15:34 |
| vorlon | just wanted to let you know something seemed to have gone wrong | 15:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xwayland [source] (hirsute-proposed) [2:21.0.99.902-0ubuntu1] | 15:34 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | jamespage, hello, is python-ceilometerclient syncable? | 16:34 |
| dosaboy_ | bdmurray: hi sorry i missed your msg, i caught it in https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1853613 | 17:16 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1853613 in neutron (Ubuntu) "VMs don't get ip from dhcp after compute restart" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 17:16 |
| === dosaboy_ is now known as dosaboy | ||
| dosaboy | bdmurray: so basically that SRU contains 7 patches that all form part of the same fix for which the test is the same | 17:17 |
| dosaboy | so i tried to simplify it by putting the template in one bug and referencing it from the others | 17:17 |
| dosaboy | since the verification need only happen once i.e. in one LP | 17:18 |
| dosaboy | bdmurray: if there is anything else i can do to make that make more sense please let me know | 17:18 |
| dosaboy | rbasak: sorry i think i meant to ping you since brian is out | 17:23 |
| tjaalton | doko: yes, it's a stripped version that only builds xwayland deb.. thanks! | 17:52 |
| xnox | vorlon: i think it was just timing & the fact that we did process all the amd64 ones and then wanted to wait for them to rattle out. Then i uploaded drops for all other arches, but didn't think of out of date binaries, nor did i ping anybody about them. | 18:19 |
| xnox | so i don't think there was active effort to spot them & remove them. I thought everything was fine. | 18:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | cpaelzer, opencascade should go in on next round | 18:34 |
| cpaelzer | \o/ | 18:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (groovy-proposed/main) [1.0.0~rc10-0ubuntu2 => 1.0.0~rc93-0ubuntu1~20.10.1] (ubuntu-server) | 18:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.0~rc10-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.0~rc93-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 18:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0~rc10-0ubuntu1~18.04.2 => 1.0.0~rc93-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 18:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (groovy-proposed/main) [1.3.7-0ubuntu3.3 => 1.4.4-0ubuntu1~20.10.1] (ubuntu-server) | 19:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.3-0ubuntu2.3 => 1.4.4-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 19:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.4 => 1.4.4-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 19:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (groovy-proposed/universe) [19.03.13-0ubuntu3.1 => 20.10.2-0ubuntu1~20.10.1] (no packageset) | 19:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (focal-proposed/universe) [19.03.8-0ubuntu1.20.04.2 => 20.10.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 19:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (bionic-proposed/universe) [19.03.6-0ubuntu1~18.04.3 => 20.10.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 19:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nfs-utils (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3.3 => 1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3.4] (core) | 19:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nfs-utils (groovy-proposed/main) [1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu6 => 1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu6.1] (core) | 19:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nfs-utils (bionic-proposed/main) [1:1.3.4-2.1ubuntu5.3 => 1:1.3.4-2.1ubuntu5.4] (core) | 19:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (groovy-proposed/main) [246.6-1ubuntu1.2 => 246.6-1ubuntu1.3] (core, i386-whitelist) | 21:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (focal-proposed/main) [245.4-4ubuntu3.5 => 245.4-4ubuntu3.6] (core, i386-whitelist) | 21:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.45 => 237-3ubuntu10.46] (core) | 21:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (xenial-proposed/main) [229-4ubuntu21.29 => 229-4ubuntu21.30] (core) | 21:43 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!