[00:32] <corrinado[m]> <Kraus "It is, just not an "official" on"> I'm just here to specifically refute the idea that Mint has anything to do with Ubuntu directly. Other than sitting on the repos, it is a *completely different distribution that gets zero support from Canonical. So may I be the 2nd to suggest that there is nothing 'Official' regarding Mint.
[00:33] <Kraus> If I respond, he'll ban me.
[00:33] <Kraus> Sorry.
[00:34] <guiverc> there are no runtime adjustments in any Ubuntu flavor.   (code is modified & new packages built when required; adjustments are a insecure hack needed only to avoid building your own packages)
[01:01] <Eickmeyer> Kraus: I never said I'd ban you, but you might be given a time-out for a few days.
[01:01] <Eickmeyer> Of course, that's if you still cannot abide by the IRC guidelines and staying on-topic.
[01:01] <Kraus> I don't pet dogs that already bit me.
[01:01] <Eickmeyer> Either way, this discussion does need to end.
[01:02] <Eickmeyer> Kraus: If you can't be friendly and let it go, then yes, I will be banning you because that is failure to abide by the Ubuntu Code of Conducty.
[01:02] <Eickmeyer> *conduct
[01:03] <Kraus> Surely you can agree that in the world of FOSS, things are endlessly labyrinthing, and that when it comes down to semantics like "flavors" versus "derivatives" versus "forks," it can be understandable that someone new to Linux will sometimes step on traps, especially those created through sociopolitical differences, through no fault of their own.
[01:06] <Eickmeyer> Again, that's not up for discussion. You've been muted for 3 days.
[01:12] <kveremitz> oof
[01:12] <kveremitz> some people
[10:20] <rgh> woot
[10:20] <rgh> another day, another drama \o/