| === ahayzen_ is now known as ahayzen | ||
| === juergh` is now known as juergh | ||
| === rastos2 is now known as rastos | ||
| rastos | Hi. My server recently got automatic update which brought in "openjdk-lts (11.0.10+9-0ubuntu1~18.04)" (date 20 Jan 2021) and my java client application suddenly failed to connect and it seems to be because "openjdk-lts (11.0.10+9-0ubuntu1~18.04)" on server does not include https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8256030 (from 2020-11-08 ). How can I check if JDK-8256030 is included in "openjdk-lts (11.0.10+9-0ubuntu1~18.04)" fr | 07:26 |
|---|---|---|
| rastos | * ... from 20 Jan 2021? | 07:27 |
| === rastos2 is now known as rastos | ||
| === lag_ is now known as lag | ||
| xnox | rastos: it should be in. I think. | 12:30 |
| xnox | doko: ^^^ | 12:44 |
| popey | https://askubuntu.com/questions/1324662/is-there-a-canonical-no-pun-intended-source-for-ubuntu-version-badges | 13:10 |
| popey | have we considered making a badges dot ubuntu dot com? Seems straightforward | 13:10 |
| xnox | popey: we have that in snapstore | 13:22 |
| xnox | popey: not sure we do for classic ubuntu | 13:22 |
| popey | i know we have it for snaps, I'm asking just for the archive | 13:22 |
| xnox | popey: hm.... that website has support for like suse & ubuntu too. | 13:25 |
| xnox | i don't like the insecure implementation of it though =) | 13:25 |
| xnox | popey: i wonder if we can just contribute more things to that very same website. | 13:26 |
| xnox | popey: also not sure what would be a nice badge => the one pointing at latest package version in $devel? or in $lts? | 13:33 |
| popey | xnox that's a good point. I suspect lts | 13:44 |
| xnox | popey: which will never look nice next to "unstable badge" | 13:58 |
| xnox | i'd rather have a badge that links to packages.ubuntu.com or pad.lv/u/$pkg without version numbers | 13:58 |
| xnox | possibly with just the highest version number only listed. | 13:59 |
| popey | well, the code is open source. so it could be arranged to do that :D | 14:09 |
| popey | I wish we still had apps. ubuntu . com :( | 14:09 |
| doko | rastos, xnox: just download the source, and have a look. and yes, it's included | 14:53 |
| ogra | sil2100, hmm, so i cant really use copy-package for the PPA copy ... not sure why but copy-package always tells me the PPA doesnt exist ... i must be missing something 😞 | 15:30 |
| ogra | oh, silly me ... i was missing an "/ubuntu" in th ppa url ... | 15:42 |
| ogra | sil2100, everything copied to the hirsute-propsed queue ... happy reviewing 😉 | 15:53 |
| === juergh is now known as Guest9645 | ||
| === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch | ||
| === juergh is now known as Guest21961 | ||
| === Guest21961 is now known as Guest1 | ||
| === Guest1 is now known as juergh | ||
| === adehnrsw is now known as andrewsh | ||
| === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson | ||
| Odd_Bloke | We're writing a cloud-init postinst stanza to fix up some log file permissions and want to set the group to `adm`: can we safely assume that `adm` will exist when postinst runs? | 21:07 |
| === falcojr4 is now known as falcojr | ||
| xnox | Odd_Bloke: grep adm base-passwd-3.5.49/group.master | 22:27 |
| xnox | adm:*:4: | 22:27 |
| xnox | Odd_Bloke: yes adm group is reserved one, statically allocated in base-passwd and required to be there by debian policy i think. | 22:27 |
| xnox | Odd_Bloke: if adm is not there, fallback to root i guess. | 22:28 |
| cjwatson | xnox,Odd_Bloke: Yes, it's required to be there. You shouldn't need a fallback. | 22:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!