[07:26] <rastos> Hi. My server recently got automatic update which brought in "openjdk-lts (11.0.10+9-0ubuntu1~18.04)" (date  20 Jan 2021) and my java client application suddenly failed to connect and it seems to be because "openjdk-lts (11.0.10+9-0ubuntu1~18.04)"  on server does not include https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8256030 (from 2020-11-08 ). How can I check if JDK-8256030 is included in  "openjdk-lts (11.0.10+9-0ubuntu1~18.04)" fr
[07:27] <rastos> * ... from  20 Jan 2021?
[12:30] <xnox> rastos:  it should be in. I think.
[12:44] <xnox> doko:  ^^^
[13:10] <popey> https://askubuntu.com/questions/1324662/is-there-a-canonical-no-pun-intended-source-for-ubuntu-version-badges
[13:10] <popey> have we considered making a badges dot ubuntu dot com? Seems straightforward
[13:22] <xnox> popey:  we have that in snapstore
[13:22] <xnox> popey:  not sure we do for classic ubuntu
[13:22] <popey> i know we have it for snaps, I'm asking just for the archive
[13:25] <xnox> popey:  hm.... that website has support for like suse & ubuntu too.
[13:25] <xnox> i don't like the insecure implementation of it though =)
[13:26] <xnox> popey:  i wonder if we can just contribute more things to that very same website.
[13:33] <xnox> popey:  also not sure what would be a nice badge => the one pointing at latest package version in $devel? or in $lts?
[13:44] <popey> xnox that's a good point. I suspect lts
[13:58] <xnox> popey:  which will never look nice next to "unstable badge"
[13:58] <xnox> i'd rather have a badge that links to packages.ubuntu.com or pad.lv/u/$pkg without version numbers
[13:59] <xnox> possibly with just the highest version number only listed.
[14:09] <popey> well, the code is open source. so it could be arranged to do that :D
[14:09] <popey> I wish we still had apps. ubuntu . com :(
[14:53] <doko> rastos, xnox: just download the source, and have a look. and yes, it's included
[15:30] <ogra> sil2100, hmm, so i cant really use copy-package for the PPA copy ... not sure why but copy-package always tells me the PPA doesnt exist ... i must be missing something 😞
[15:42] <ogra> oh, silly me ... i was missing an "/ubuntu" in th ppa url ...
[15:53] <ogra> sil2100, everything copied to the hirsute-propsed queue ... happy reviewing 😉
[21:07] <Odd_Bloke> We're writing a cloud-init postinst stanza to fix up some log file permissions and want to set the group to `adm`: can we safely assume that `adm` will exist when postinst runs?
[22:27] <xnox> Odd_Bloke:  grep adm base-passwd-3.5.49/group.master
[22:27] <xnox> adm:*:4:
[22:27] <xnox> Odd_Bloke:  yes adm group is reserved one, statically allocated in base-passwd and required to be there by debian policy i think.
[22:28] <xnox> Odd_Bloke:  if adm is not there, fallback to root i guess.
[22:49] <cjwatson> xnox,Odd_Bloke: Yes, it's required to be there.  You shouldn't need a fallback.